Looking inside the black box of comprehensive geriatric assessment: a classification system for problems, recommendations, and implementation strategies

Geriatric Assessment in the Era of Targeted and Immunotherapy

Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults and because of the aging of the population, the number of older adults diagnosed with cancer will increase significantly around the world. With increasing age, more older adults are living with frailty, and this may impact the tolerability of cancer treatments. International guidelines, such as the American Society for Clinical Oncology geriatric oncology guideline, recommend a geriatric assessment and management for all older adults with cancer to support the treatment decision-making process as well as develop a plan for supportive care interventions to support the older adults during cancer treatments. While there is clinical trial evidence to support a geriatric assessment and management for older adults receiving chemotherapy, there is less evidence to support a geriatric assessment for older adults starting immunotherapy. There are increasing numbers of new immunotherapies and targeted therapies available for older adults with cancer but often few older adults have been included in the clinical trials, leaving less evidence for clinicians to guide treatment decisions. In this current opinion, we review the current evidence on the use of a geriatric assessment and management in the context of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We review how a geriatric assessment could support older adults making treatment decisions for immunotherapy, review how geriatric assessment parameters are linked with outcomes and provide guidance on how geriatric assessment can guide the supportive care plan during immunotherapy treatment.

Executive dysfunction and effectiveness of physical program in older adults: which association?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the association between executive function and the magnitude of improvement from personalised exercise interventions on gait performance among older-old adults.

AIM

We examined whether the effectiveness of personalised intervention on gait performance is dependent on the patient's baseline dysexecutive syndrome, as assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery.

METHODS

A total of 175 older community-dwellers (83.57 ± 5.2 years; 70.2% female) were recruited from the day centre for after-care and rehabilitation in the Nantes Ambulatory Centre of the Clinical Gerontology (France), and were followed during a pre-post-intervention, single-arm retrospective design. The intervention consisted of an individual personalised rehabilitation program over a period of 7 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions (45 min each). Gait speed in four conditions (preferred, fast, and under two dual-task conditions), Timed Up and Go test, and handgrip strength test were assessed.

RESULTS

Using a pre-post analysis of covariance, a significant increase in dual-task gait speed while counting (+ 0.10 m/s; + 15%) and in dual-fluency gait speed (+ 0.06 m/s; + 10%), and in Timed Up and Go performance (- 2.9 s; + 17.8%) was observed after the rehabilitation program, regardless the baseline executive status.

DISCUSSION

An individual personalized intervention is effective to improve mobility performance and the dual-task gait speed in older-old adults. The magnitude of those effects is independent of the patient's baseline characteristics including the executive function status.

CONCLUSIONS

Even the most deficient baseline characteristics of patients should not be viewed as clinical barrier for implementing a beneficial individual intervention in high-risk older adults.

Practical management of older adults with cancer: geriatric oncology in Japan

Japan has the highest proportion of older adults globally, and the average life expectancy of the Japanese population has increased in recent decades. Given that the incidence of cancer increases with age, it is a major health concern for older adults. However, geriatric oncology is a relatively new field and collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians in Japan is limited. Hence, oncologists and other healthcare professionals engaged in cancer care have not been able to adequately understand geriatric care, and information and experience are insufficient for this specific population. Thus, they may struggle with the assessment and management of older adults with cancer. Recently, several Japanese academic societies for cancer have developed practical guidelines and research policy with regard to geriatric research in older adults with cancer, in addition to organizing symposia and workshops focusing especially on geriatric oncology. Furthermore, because the Japan Geriatrics Society established a discipline committee on cancer, close collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians has grown steadily. Geriatric oncology is currently recognized as an important field of cancer care in Japan. The integration of oncology and geriatric care is anticipated in the near future. However, understanding the aspects of geriatric care and meanings of technical jargons used in geriatric oncology is difficult. Accordingly, this article provides an overview of the current knowledge and recent advancements in geriatric oncology. In addition, it outlines the current status and problems of geriatric oncology in Japan.

The Development of Geriatric Assessment and Intervention Guidelines for an Online Geriatric Assessment Tool: A Canadian Modified Delphi Panel Study

BACKGROUND

There are no guidelines available for what assessment tools to use in a patient's self-completed online geriatric assessment (GA) with management recommendations. Therefore, we used a modified Delphi approach with Canadian expert clinicians to develop a consensus online GA plus recommendations tool.

METHODS

The panel consisted of experts in geriatrics, oncology, nursing, and pharmacy. Experts were asked to rate the importance and feasibility of assessments and interventions to be included in an online GA for patients. The items included in the first round were based on guidelines for in-person GA and literature review. The first two rounds were conducted using an online survey. A virtual 2 h meeting was held to discuss the items where no consensus was reached and then voted on in the final round.

RESULTS

34 experts were invited, and 32 agreed to participate. In round 1, there were 85 items; in round 2, 50 items; and in round 3, 25 items. The final tool consists of fall history, assistive device use, weight loss, medication review, need help taking medication, social supports, depressive symptoms, self-reported vision and hearing, and current smoking status and alcohol use.

CONCLUSION

This first multidisciplinary consensus on online GA will benefit research and clinical care for older adults with cancer.

Self-management interventions for issues identified in a geriatric assessment: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

With the development of electronic geriatric assessment (GA), recommendations for self-management can be provided to patients without the presence of health care providers. Our research question was to identify what self-management interventions can be used by patients to address issues identified in GA and to determine their effect on patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life, health, mood, cognition, and functional status.

METHODS

Searches were conducted on July 13, 2021, by a health sciences librarian in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library. A combination of database-specific subject headings and text word searches was used such as self-management, a key word for each of the geriatric assessment domains and older adults. Two independent reviewers reviewed abstracts and full texts for inclusion and abstracted data. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings.

RESULTS

Among 28,520 abstracts reviewed, 34 randomized controlled trials were included. The most frequently studied geriatric domains were mood (n = 13 studies), mobility/falls (n = 12), quality of life (n = 11), and functional status (n = 7). The majority of studies demonstrated positive effects on mobility/falls (9 of 12), pain (3 of 5), comorbidity (4 of 4), and medication management (4 of 4). Most studies were of low to moderate quality. All geriatric domains were targeted in at least one study.

CONCLUSIONS

Low- to moderate-quality studies show a variety of effective self-efficacy-targeted interventions exist for older adults to improve several important geriatric domains and related outcomes. However, long-term effects, validation, and scalability of these interventions remain largely unknown.

Quality of care of consultations from the geriatric oncology clinic: "Are we addressing the needs of patients?"

INTRODUCTION

A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended for older adults with cancer in the pre-treatment setting to optimize care. A CGA systematically evaluates multiple domains to develop a holistic view of the patient's health and facilitate timely interventions to ameliorate patient outcomes. For a CGA to be most effective, optimization of each abnormal domain should occur. However, there is limited literature exploring this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consultations of patients seen in a Geriatric Oncology clinic from June 2015 to June 2018 were reviewed. The percentage of "no recommendations made" in the consultation letter following the identification of impairment in each of eight geriatric domains was calculated. Trends over time were examined by stratifying the data into three periods ("Year 1", "Year 2", and "Year 3") and conducting a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 365 consultation notes were reviewed. The patients were predominately older (mean age 79.9 years), male (66.9%), with genitourinary (38.6%) or gastrointestinal (23.3%) cancers. The most common stage was metastatic (40.6%). The most common treatment intent and modality were palliative (50.4%) and hormonal (50.9%), respectively. The geriatric domains that had the greatest frequency of impairments were medication optimization (76.2%), functional status (68.8%), and falls risk (64.9%). The domains that had the highest frequency of "no recommendations made" following identification of impairment were nutrition (39.8%), social support (39.5%), and mood (26.4%). The prevalence of "no recommendations made" decreased over time in social support (54.6% in Year 1 to 27.8% in Year 3, p = 0.043) and possibly nutrition (53.1% in Year 1 to 34.3% in Year 3, p = 0.088) but not for mood (p = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition, social supports and mood were the CGA domains with the highest proportion of "no recommendations made" following an identification of impairment. This is the first quality assurance study to identify social supports, mood, and nutrition domains as less frequently addressed following an identification of an impairment amongst older patients with cancer. Subsequent prospective research is required to understand reasons for these observations and identification of barriers to address these geriatric domains amongst older adults with cancer.

Impact of an individual personalised rehabilitation program on mobility performance in older-old people

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown benefits of exercise interventions on preferred and fast gait speed in healthy older adults, but the impact of a personalised rehabilitation program targeting a large cohort of non-disabled older-old adults has rarely been examined.

AIMS

The purpose was to determine whether personalised intervention-related improvements in gait and mobility performance in older-old adults were dependent on cognitive status and/or history of falls.

METHODS

Based on a pre-post design, 483 older-old persons (mean age: 83.3 ± 5.1 years) were followed during a personalised rehabilitation program over a period of 7 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions (45 min each). Gait speed in four conditions (preferred, fast, and under two dual-task conditions), static postural sway, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit to Stand test, the ability to rise from the floor, and handgrip strength test were assessed.

RESULTS

Using a pre-post analysis of covariance, a significant increase in preferred gait speed (+ 20.1%), fast gait speed (+ 15.8%), and dual-task speed while counting (+ 13.4%) was observed after the rehabilitation, regardless of the baseline cognitive status and fall history. Similar improvements in TUG and maximal handgrip force were observed, with a significant reduction of performance time (-19.5%) or an increase of handgrip strength (+ 6.2%).

DISCUSSION

Results suggest the effectiveness of personalised intervention to improve a battery of physical performance measures in older-old adults, even for the frailest participants.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a personalised intervention for targeting the high-risk older-old adults in priority is critical regarding the clinically meaningful change in gait speed.

Geriatric Screening for Hospitalized Older Adults with Cancer: A Survey of the Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers

Objective Geriatric screening followed by a more detailed assessment and intervention is recommended for older adults with cancer. However, little is known regarding how the geriatric screening covered by Japanese health insurance is used for hospitalized older cancer patients. We surveyed all hospitals in Japanese Association of Clinical Cancer Centers (JACCC) to explore the current use of this approach. Methods The JACCC member hospitals specialize in cancer care from prevention, through diagnosis and treatment, to palliative care. We mailed paper questionnaires to the presidents of the hospitals in December 2019 and collected them by February 2020. The survey requested general hospital information and asked whether (and how) such geriatric screening for hospitalized older adults with cancer was conducted. Results Twenty-six of 32 hospitals completed the survey (81%). Fourteen hospitals are cancer centers, while the remaining 12 hospitals are general hospitals which care of both cancer and non-cancer patients. Eleven hospitals (42%) performed geriatric screening and the most common use of the results was for "early discharge planning" and for "applying for long-term care insurance." Most clinicians rated the screening "somewhat" or "a little" helpful and found it most helpful for "meeting patient-post discharge needs". The most frequently reported barrier to implementation was a "lack of leadership to improve the care of older adults." Conclusion Geriatric screening was used at less than half of the major cancer centers and hospitals in Japan. One feasible solution to this problem is to establish an interprofessional workgroup at each hospital with the shared goal of providing high-quality care for this population.

Research into ageing and frailty

Research into ageing covers opportunities and challenges posed by an older population, and research to understand the ageing processes across the lifespan. The evidence base for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is well established and efforts should now shift to understanding how to implement its principles across different healthcare contexts. Research around syndromes common in older people has progressed with variable success; while effective therapies for falls and cognitive impairment have been identified, older people with advanced frailty have commonly been excluded from Parkinson's disease and continence research. Research to understand the mechanisms of ageing has potential to mitigate against or treat emerging sarcopenia and cognitive impairment, and thus modify frailty trajectories. Pharmacogenetics could individualise therapeutics to reduce polypharmacy. These issues can only be addressed with development of infrastructure, capacity and expertise in ageing research. Commonly used research methodologies must be adapted to take account of frailty, cognitive impairment and functional dependency.

Methods for frailty screening and geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the latest development in the use of geriatric assessment(GA) and frailty assessment for older adults with cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

From 2019, there were six large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) completed of GA for older adults with cancer, as well as several studies of frailty screening tools.

SUMMARY

The findings in this review highlight the benefits of implementing GA, followed by interventions to address the identified issues (GA -guided interventions). Four of six RCTs that implemented GA for older adults with cancer showed positive impact on various outcomes, including treatment toxicity and quality of life. GA implementation varied significantly between studies, from oncologist acting on GA summary, geriatrician comanagement, to full GA by a multidisciplinary team. However, there were several barriers reported to implementing GA for all older adults with cancer, such as access to geriatrics and resource issues. Future research needs to elucidate how to best operationalize GA in various cancer settings. The authors also reviewed frailty screening tools and latest evidence on their use and impact.

Providing Medical Information to Older Adults in a Web-Based Environment: Systematic Review

Background

Cancer is a disease that predominantly affects older adults, and several organizations recommend the completion of a geriatric assessment to help with cancer treatment decision-making. Owing to a shortage of geriatric teams and the vast number of older adults diagnosed with cancer each year, a web-based geriatric assessment may improve access to geriatric assessment for older adults. We systematically reviewed the literature to obtain the latest evidence for the design of our web-based geriatric assessment tool Comprehensive Health Assessment for My Plan.

Objective

This review aimed to probe the following questions: what is the impact of providing health test results to older adults in a web-based environment without the presence of a health care provider for patient-centered outcomes, including satisfaction, perceived harm, empowerment, quality of life, and health care use (eg, hospitalization, physician visits, emergency room visits, and costs), and what recommendations do older adults and developers have for designing future apps or websites for older adults?

Methods

This systematic review was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) statement. Studies were limited to publications in English that examined a web-based tool that provided test results to older adults (aged ≥65 years) without the presence of a health care provider. A health sciences librarian performed the search on November 29, 2019, on the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018. The findings are summarized narratively and in tabular format.

Results

A total of 26,898 titles and abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers, of which 94 studies were selected for a full-text review, and 9 studies were included in this review. There were only 2 randomized controlled trials of high quality that explored the effects of receiving health care results on the web via eHealth tools for older adults or provided evidence-based recommendations for designing such tools. Older adults were generally satisfied with receiving screening results via eHealth tools, and several studies suggested that receiving health screening results electronically improved participants’ quality of life. However, user interfaces that were not designed with older adults in mind and older adults’ lack of confidence in navigating eHealth tools proved challenging to eHealth uptake and use. All 9 studies included in this systematic review made recommendations on how to design eHealth tools that are intuitive and useful for older adults.

Conclusions

eHealth tools should incorporate specific elements to ensure usability for older adults. However, more research is required to fully elucidate the impact of receiving screening and results via eHealth tools without the presence of a health care provider for patient-centered outcomes in this target population.

Landscape of education and clinical practice in geriatric oncology: a Japanese nationwide survey

Objective

The aim of this survey was to describe how geriatric oncology is integrated in undergraduate teaching and graduate training as well as in daily clinical oncology practice in Japan.

Methods

All schools of medicine in Japan are allied with graduate schools of medicine. We conducted a survey of all Japanese medical and graduate schools (n = 81), and designated cancer hospitals (n = 437) from July 2018 to August 2018. The survey of the schools asked about existence of geriatrics division and geriatric oncology service and if an education curriculum in geriatrics and geriatric oncology was used. The survey of designated cancer hospitals requested general hospital information and the current practice patterns of general geriatric and cancer patients.

Results

Forty-eight medical schools (59%) participated in this survey, and teaching in geriatrics and geriatric oncology was implemented in 23 schools and 1 school, respectively. Forty-two graduate schools of medicine (52%) responded; five had an education curriculum in geriatrics, but none provided geriatric oncology training. Among 151 participating hospitals (35%), 5 had a geriatrics division and 20 hospitals employed geriatricians. There was no geriatric oncology service or geriatric oncology specialists in any of the 151 hospitals. Seventy percent of the hospitals reported performing a geriatric assessment for at least some older adults with cancer.

Conclusions

This survey provides information on the current state of Japanese education and clinical practice in geriatric oncology. In Japan, a nation with among the largest population of older citizens in the world, education and training greatly need to be promoted to disseminate a core set of geriatrics knowledge and skills to students, trainees and healthcare professionals.

An Enhanced Role in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Community-Nurse Case Managers

We evaluated an enhanced role in comprehensive geriatric assessment for community-nurse case managers. Following practicum education in geriatric assessment, two community-nurse case managers conducted assessments of frail older clients and served as a resource for their case-manager teams. Impacts on their colleagues' assessment skills were investigated in a non-randomized, controlled trial. Intervention-group case managers had higher confidence in assessing and managing the health and social concerns of older persons, greater use of standard assessment tools, and higher case-study assessment scores, than did control-group case managers. Case managers reported that interaction with the enhanced-role case managers had enhanced their skills and benefited clients; family physicians reported that improved patient outcomes had resulted from the assessment information received. Community case managers with enhanced training in geriatric assessment can have a valuable clinical and educational role. Issues include resource implications and integrating the enhanced role into home care operations.

The abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment (aCGA): a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment that is designed to detect health problems. A barrier to conducting the CGA is the length of time required to complete the entire assessment.

OBJECTIVE

To understand what items contained in the instruments that make up the CGA could be compiled to construct an abbreviated CGA (aCGA).

DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective chart review of patients at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Over 500 charts between 1995 and 2001 were reviewed on patients 70 and over.

MEASUREMENTS

Item-to-total correlations and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were calculated. Construct validity was assessed using a Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Fifteen items were compiled to form the aCGA. Cronbach's alpha was 0.65-0.92 on each instrument of the entire CGA compared to 0.70-0.94 on the aCGA. Correlations ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 for the entire CGA and the aCGA.

CONCLUSION

An aCGA can be helpful in screening for those seniors who would benefit from the entire CGA.

Evaluation of a guided protocol for quality improvement in identifying common geriatric problems

OBJECTIVES

Many common geriatric problems are underrecognized and undertreated. A simple and reliable tool to facilitate a standard approach to evaluating geriatric patients might improve the quality of medical care delivered to geriatric patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate a standardized, semistructured quality-improvement protocol (the guided geriatric care protocol) for the assessment of common geriatric problems.

DESIGN

Sequential comparison cohorts, with chart review to evaluate study measures before and after introduction of the guided geriatric care protocol.

SETTING

The outpatient consultative geriatric assessment center of Yale-New Haven Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred consecutive new patients before and 100 consecutive new patients after introduction of the guided geriatric care protocol.

MEASUREMENTS

Number and type of problems identified and recommendations made during the clinical encounter, duration of the clinical encounter, clinician acceptance.

RESULTS

The two patient groups were similar in sociodemographics, cognitive and functional status, and reasons for evaluation. Significantly more problems were identified after (mean 5.51) than before (mean 3.49) introduction of the guided geriatric care protocol (P< .001); likewise, significantly more recommendations were made after (mean 10.45) than before (mean 8.48) introduction of the protocol (P< .001). The duration of the clinical encounter did not differ significantly between the two groups. The protocol was well accepted by participating clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the guided geriatric care protocol assured a standard approach to evaluating common geriatric problems and may have led to the identification and treatment of more problems than usual care without increasing the duration of the clinical encounter. A quality-improvement tool that standardizes the evaluation of common geriatric problems, if validated in other clinical settings, holds the potential to improve the quality of care for vulnerable older patients.

Chronic care clinics: a randomized controlled trial of a new model of primary care for frail older adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a new model of primary care, Chronic Care Clinics, can improve outcomes of common geriatric syndromes (urinary incontinence, falls, depressive symptoms, high risk medications, functional impairment) in frail older adults.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with 24 months of follow-up. Physician practices were randomized either to the Chronic Care Clinics intervention or to usual care.

SETTING

Nine primary care physician practices that comprise an ambulatory clinic in a large staff-model HMO in western Washington State.

PARTICIPANTS

Those patients aged 65 and older in each practice with the highest risk for being hospitalized or experiencing functional decline.

INTERVENTION

Intervention practices (5 physicians, 96 patients) held half-day Chronic Care Clinics every 3 to 4 months. These clinics included an extended visit with the physician and nurse dedicated to planning chronic disease management; a pharmacist visit that emphasized reduction of polypharmacy and high-risk medications; and a patient self-management/support group. Control practices (4 physicians, 73 patients) received usual care.

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in self-reported urinary incontinence, frequency of falls, depressive symptoms, physical function, and satisfaction were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis adjusted for baseline differences, covariates, and practice-level variation. Prescriptions for high-risk medications and cost/utilization data obtained from administrative data were similarly analyzed.

RESULTS

After 24 months, no significant improvements in frequency of incontinence, proportion with falls, depression scores, physical function scores, or prescriptions for high risk medications were demonstrated. Costs of medical care including frequency of hospitalization, hospital days, emergency and ambulatory visits, and total costs of care were not significantly different between intervention and control groups. A higher proportion of intervention patients rated the overall quality of their medical care as excellent compared with control patients (40.0% vs 25.3%, P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Although intervention patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with Chronic Care Clinics, improved outcomes for selected geriatric syndromes were not demonstrated. These findings suggest the need for developing greater system-wide support for managing geriatric syndromes in primary care and illustrate the challenges of conducting practice improvement research in a rapidly changing delivery system.

Outpatient geriatric evaluation and management

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development and operation of a practical model of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) for high-risk, community-dwelling older adults.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries age 70 years and older who were medically stable but had a high probability of repeated admission to hospitals (P(ra) > .40) in the future (n = 248).

INTERVENTION

Outpatient GEM.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic, clinical, and use-of-hospital characteristics of patients; nature and quantity of GEM services; satisfaction of patients and their established primary physicians.

RESULTS

At enrollment, the average patient was 78.7 years old, took 5.0 long-term prescription medications and was unable to perform 0.5 (of six) activities of daily living (ADL) and 1.4 (of seven) instrumental ADL. Many patients (71.3%) reported hospital days during the previous year. Each of three interdisciplinary teams (geriatrician, gerontological nurse practitioner, nurse and social worker) performed comprehensive assessments and then provided primary care and case management to a case load of 45 to 52 patients. On average, GEM required 6 months, during which patients visited the GEM clinic 7.4 times, had 10.4 active problems addressed, spoke to GEM staff members weekly by telephone, and were referred to two other providers. Most patients (94.4%) completed the GEM program; 66.7% completed advance directives. Satisfaction with GEM was high among the patients and their established primary physicians. The cost of the GEM personnel averaged about $1540 per patient treated.

CONCLUSIONS

This model of outpatient GEM provided 6 months of targeted intensive care at a reasonable cost. The satisfaction ratings of patients and their primary physicians were high.