An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5.5 mm Limited-Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Fixation with a 4.5 mm Limited-Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones

Biomechanical properties of a novel locking compression plate to stabilize oblique tibial osteotomies in buffaloes

OBJECTIVE

Quantitation of mechanical properties of a novel locking compression plate (LCP) for bovine tibia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective in vitro study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Adult Murrah buffalo (250-350 kg) tibiae.

METHODS

Forty tibiae were randomly assigned to five treatment groups (n = 8/group): intact bone and bone constructs with a standard nonlocking plate, single LCP, double LCP, and novel LCP. During implant application, a mid-diaphyseal, oblique osteotomy was performed in all constructs, which were subsequently tested in axial compression (n = 4 each) or three-point craniocaudal bending (n = 4 each). Novel LCP alone (n = 4) was tested only in bending. Stiffness, yield load, ultimate failure load, and bending moment were determined from the load deformation curves and compared among different treatment groups (P < .05).

RESULTS

Under compression, yield load of the novel LCP (24.07 ± 3.45 kN) was greater than that of the nonlocking plate (11.10 ± 2.46 kN) and the single LCP (18.01 ± 2.07 kN) but less than that of the double LCP (30.61 ± 1.95 kN), and ultimate failure load of the novel LCP (25.85 ± 4.32 kN) was greater than that of the nonlocking plate (13.18 ± 2.91 kN) but similar to that of the single LCP (21.17 ± 2.33 kN) and the double LCP (32.40 ± 1.46 kN). Bending moment, yield load, and ultimate failure load of the novel LCP were 565.37 ± 79.30 Nm, 7.90 ± 1.14 kN, 9.83 ± 1.38 kN, respectively, which were greater than those of the nonlocking plate and the single LCP but comparable to those of the double LCP.

CONCLUSION

The novel LCP developed for bovine tibia was mechanically superior to the standard nonlocking plate or the single LCP and comparable to the double LCP.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The novel LCP may provide rigid fixation of tibial diaphyseal fractures in buffaloes and cattle weighing 250 to 350 kg.

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated ao cortical bone screws for a limited contact: dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVES

To compare the monotonic biomechanical properties of a broad 4.5 mm limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) fixation secured with hydroxyapatite (HA) coated cortical bone screws (HA-LC-DCP) versus uncoated cortical bone screws (AO-LC-DCP) to repair osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n = 12 pair).

METHODS

Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (4 pairs each) for: (1) 4 point bending single cycle to failure testing; (2) 4 point bending cyclic fatigue testing; and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. For the HA-LC-DCP-MC3 construct, an 8-hole broad LC-DCP (Synthes Ltd, Paoli, PA) was secured on the dorsal surface of each randomly selected MC3 bone with a combination of four 5.5 mm and four 4.5 mm HA-coated cortical screws. For the AO-LC-DCP-MC3 construct, an 8-hole 4.5 mm broad LC-DCP was secured on the dorsal surface of the contralateral MC3 bone with a combination of four 5.5 mm and four 4.5 mm uncoated cortical screws. All MC3 bones had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load, and failure bending moment, under 4 point bending, single cycle to failure, of the HA-LC-DCP fixation were significantly greater than those of the AO-LC-DCP fixation. Mean ± SD values for the HA-LC-DCP and the AO-LC-DCP fixation techniques, respectively, in single cycle to failure under 4 point bending were: yield load, 26.7 ± 2.15 and 16.3 ± 1.38 kN; yield bending moment, 527.4 ± 42.4 and 322.9 ± 27.2 N-m; composite rigidity, 5306 ± 399 and 3003 ± 300 N-m/rad; failure load, 40.6 ± 3.94 and 26.5 ± 2.52 kN; and failure bending moment, 801.9 ± 77.9 and 522.9 ± 52.2 N-m. Mean cycles to failure in 4 point bending of the HA-LC-DCP fixation (116,274 ± 13,211) was significantly greater than that of the AO-LC-DCP fixation 47,619 ± 6580. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load under torsional testing, single cycle to failure was significantly greater for the broad HA-LC-DCP fixation compared with the AO-LC-DCP fixation. In single cycle to failure under torsion, mean ± SD values for the HA-LC-DCP and the AO-LC-DCP fixation techniques, respectively, were: yield load, 101.3 ± 14.68 and 70.54 ± 10.20 N-m; composite rigidity, 437.9 ± 32.9 and 220.7 ± 17.6 N-m/rad; and failure load: 105.7 ± 15.5 and 75.28 ± 10.1 N-m.

CONCLUSION

HA-LC-DCP was superior to AO-LC-DCP in resisting the static overload forces (palmarodorsal 4 point bending and torsional) and in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4 point bending.

In vitro biomechanical comparison of dynamic compression plates with a rough contact surface and a polished contact surface for fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVES

To compare the number of cycles to failure of 4.5 mm broad dynamic compression plates (DCP), 4.5 mm broad limited-contact dynamic compression plates (4.5-LC-DCP), and 5.5 mm broad limited-contact dynamic compression plates (5.5-LC-DCP) having a rough (denoted by a prefix R-) versus a standard smooth contact surface for the fixation of osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental.

ANIMAL POPULATION

Fifteen pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones.

METHODS

Fifteen pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (5 pairs each) for comparison of (1) R-DCP fixation with DCP fixation, (2) R-4.5-LC-DCP fixation with 4.5-LC-DCP fixation, and (3) R-5.5-LC-DCP fixation with 5.5-LC-DCP fixation to repair osteotomized equine MC3 bones under palmarodorsal 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing. For each group an 8-hole plate with rough contact surface was applied to the dorsal surface of one randomly selected bone from each pair and a corresponding 8-hole plate with smooth contact surface was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. All plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean number of cycles to failure for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Mean cycles to failure ± standard deviation was significantly greater for the R-DCP fixation (230,025 ± 23,129) compared with the DCP fixation (103,451 ± 14,556), for the R-4.5-LC-DCP fixation (99,237 ± 14,390) compared with the 4.5-LC-DCP fixation (46,464 ± 6325) and for the R-5.5-LC-DCP fixation (65,113 ± 7796) compared with the 5.5-LC-DCP fixation (34,224 ± 3835).

CONCLUSION

For the fixation of osteotomized MC3 bones, the constructs with plates having rough contact surface were superior to the corresponding constructs with plates having standard smooth contact surfaces in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4-point bending.

In vitro biomechanical comparison of a modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation with a 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVES

To compare number of cycles to failure for palmarodorsal 4-point bending of a modified 5.5 mm broad locking compression plate (M5.5-LCP) fixation with a 5.5 mm broad LCP (5.5-LCP) fixation used to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical testing.

ANIMAL POPULATION

Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=6 pairs).

METHODS

An 8-hole, M5.5-LCP, obtained by having a 1.0 mm thickness removed from the bone contact portion of the 5.5-LCP, was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected MC3 from each pair, and an 8-hole, 5.5-LCP was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair using a combination of cortical and locking screws. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques to MC3 bones with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy. MC3 constructs had palmarodorsal 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing. Mean cycles to failure for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05.

RESULTS

Mean±SD cycles to failure of the M5.5-LCP fixation (188,641±17,971) was significantly greater than that of the 5.5-LCP fixation (166,497±15,539).

CONCLUSION

M5.5-LCP fixation was superior to 5.5-LCP fixation of osteotomized equine MC3 bones in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4-point bending.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This suggests that biological plate fixation is not the ideal choice for osteotomized equine MC3 bones.