Amiodarone: value of programmed electrical stimulation and Holter monitoring

Risk stratification and prognosis of patients treated with amiodarone for malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction

Seventy-seven consecutive patients (mean age 62 years) with episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were evaluated to assess the long-term efficacy of first-line amiodarone treatment and to identify clinical and laboratory factors associated with a high risk of death or arrhythmia recurrence. The presenting arrhythmia was VT in 41 cases (53%) and VF in 36 (47%). VT or VF occurred between the 4th and 90th day after AMI in 45 cases (58%) and later (more than 90 days) in the remaining 32 (42%). The mean number of arrhythmic episodes was 4.2. Forty patients (52%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II, and 37 (48%) were in class III or IV. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 32%; ventricular aneurysm was present in 41 subjects. Most patients had multivessel coronary artery disease. Amiodarone was administered as a first-choice drug in all patients, in combination with other antiarrhythmic drugs in 14. By ventricular stimulation after loading doses of amiodarone, sustained VT was inducible in 46 (62%) and noninducible in 28 (38%). During a mean follow-up of 28 months the incidence of cardiac mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years was 21%, 37%, and 47%; of sudden death was 7%, 19%, and 23%; of nonfatal VT recurrence was 13%, 13%, and 24%, respectively. The overall incidence of amiodarone side effects was 35%.2+ was a weak predictor only by univariate analysis (p = 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amiodarone. An overview of its pharmacological properties, and review of its therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Amiodarone, originally developed over 20 years ago, is a potent antiarrhythmic drug with the actions of all antiarrhythmic drug classes. It has been successfully used in the treatment of symptomatic and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction amiodarone does not usually produce any clinically significant cardiodepression and the drug has relatively high antiarrhythmic efficacy. Preliminary studies indicate that amiodarone may have a beneficial effect on mortality and survival in certain groups of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, an action probably related to both its antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory effects. The adverse effect profile of amiodarone is diverse, involving the cardiac, thyroid, pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, neurological and dermatological systems. Interstitial pneumonitis and hepatitis are potentially fatal, but the vast majority of adverse events are less serious, and some may be dose dependent. Pretreatment monitoring, regular assessments and the use of minimum effective doses are, therefore, necessary. Thus, with appropriate monitoring to control its well recognised adverse effects amiodarone has an important place as an effective 'broad spectrum' antiarrhythmic drug which has, so far, been used when other treatments have proved ineffective. More recent preliminary data also suggest that it may also have a beneficial effect in the prevention of sudden death in some patients.

Values and limitations of programmed stimulation and ambulatory monitoring in the management of ventricular tachycardia

Programmed stimulation (PES) and ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring are both widely used to evaluate the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). PES is sensitive but nonspecific, and Holter is specific but insensitive. A failure to suppress ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) on Holter during drug therapy predicts a poor outcome. A suppression of VPCs by drug therapy, however, does not preclude a poor outcome. If VT is no longer induced by PES during drug therapy, the patients will have a good outcome. A persistent induction of VT during drug therapy, however, does not preclude good outcomes. Therefore some investigators have suggested alternative PES efficacy criteria such as the changes in the rate of induced VT during therapy. Further studies should be conducted to confirm this. Because both methods have values and limitations, a combined use of the 2 methods is recommended to improve the clinician's ability to predict the outcome of antiarrhythmic therapy. Studies designed to prove that 1 method is better than the other may prove futile.

Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in the management of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

Electrophysiologic studies are indicated in patients with sustained paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or aborted sudden death. These studies allow determination of mechanism and reproducibility of initiation as well as pacing termination of ventricular tachycardia, against which the effects of pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapies can be tested. Such studies are also indicated in certain patients with syncope in whom a strong suspicion exists for an arrhythmic cause. The content and conduct of electrophysiologic testing in these patients require attention to the physiology of the conduction system and systematic programmed stimulation of the right ventricle. The stimulation protocol should include, if necessary, twice-threshold stimulation at 2 sites at 3 or more cycle lengths, with up to 3 extrastimuli. Sufficient variability exists in electrophysiologic testing as in other clinical methods calling for careful attention to the reproducibility of tachycardia induction in a given patient, lest chance alone mimic beneficial or deleterious effects of antiarrhythmic regimens. Mapping-directed surgery for ventricular tachycardia remains the most effective therapy in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with a mortality similar to other forms of medical therapy.

Predictors of efficacy of amiodarone and characteristics of recurrence of arrhythmia in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and coronary artery disease

The value of serial electropharmacologic testing during long-term oral amiodarone therapy for prediction of long-term drug efficacy as well as characteristics of arrhythmia recurrence is controversial. One-hundred four consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) underwent initial electrophysiologic (EP) evaluation in the drug-free state and again after an amiodarone loading period of 25 +/- 14 days (mean +/- SD). Twenty-six patients (25%) had no inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmia during therapy with amiodarone (VT control group), whereas arrhythmia inducibility persisted in the remaining 78 patients (VT noncontrol group). During 17.4 +/- 13.7 months of follow-up, two patients in the VT control group either had VT recurrence or died suddenly compared with 21 VT recurrences and eight sudden cardiac deaths in the VT noncontrol group (actuarial event rates at 36 months of 0.11 and 0.56, respectively, p = .0065). The cycle lengths of recurrent VT in these 21 patients in the VT noncontrol group were compared with those observed at final EP testing. A significant linear correlation was demonstrated (r = .76, p = .0001). Subgroup analysis of patients in the VT noncontrol group showed no EP predictors of outcome, including cycle length of induced VT. However, patients dying suddenly during the follow-up period had a higher prevalence of new or worsening congestive heart failure (75%) compared with patients with VT recurrence (19%) or those with no arrhythmic event (29%) (p less than .02).2off

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: patient survival, battery longevity and shock delivery analysis

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) has been shown to reduce the mortality rate of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This report describes experience with implantation of 36 automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AID-B and AID-BR models) in 22 persons over a 44 month patient follow-up period (mean 19.6 months). There were five deaths: two patients died suddenly 22 and 29 months, respectively, after their second implant, one died of congestive heart failure, one died of respiratory failure and one died of catheter sepsis. Although 11 (50%) of the 22 patients never received a countershock for a ventricular tachyarrhythmia and are still alive, the other 11 received one or more spontaneous countershocks. Nine patients (41%) experienced spurious shocks during the follow-up period. Assuming that the first shock for presumed ventricular tachyarrhythmia prevented death, the hypothetical cumulative survival of patients at 42 months would have been 34 +/- 14.1% in the absence of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator rather than the actual survival rate of 59 +/- 16.8%. The cumulative device survival of the 36 AID-B units was 92 +/- 5.62% at 15 months but diminished to 37 +/- 14.4% by 20 months. No unit lasted longer than 22 months. There were 12 battery depletions. The number of shocks emitted did not influence unit longevity. The manufacturer's elective replacement indicator is of uncertain validity. Six units remained active 7 to 17 months after surpassing their replacement indicator. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prolongs the life of many patients with otherwise intractable arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antitachycardia strategies

The development of an antitachycardia strategy requires a cascade of assessments and decisions. The patient's problem and level of risk must be assessed in order to determine the goals of therapy. Empirical therapy is appropriate in low-risk situations, and during that ultimate emergency, the treatment of cardiac arrest. Quantitative objective assessment of therapeutic efficacy is indicated in most other situations. Such assessments may be primarily passive, such as recording of drug blood levels or serial Holter monitoring; or provocative, as in serial electrophysiologic, exercise, or psychological stress testing. Selection of an antiarrhythmic modality requires a balance between the risk of therapy and the risks related to the arrhythmia. Any antitachycardia strategy must also consider relative costs, and regulatory and reimbursement policies.