The role of the ICD in patients with dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

[The clinical practice guidelines of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología on cardiomyopathies and myocarditis]

Myocardial diseases are a extraordinarily heterogeneous group of processes that only have in common the fact that they involve heart muscle and that they cause a wide spectrum of myocardial dysfunction. The approach of the management and treatment of the cardiomyopathies is a continuous matter of discussion because the vast majority of alternatives in this field have not been based on the best scientific possible evidence and, since except for the case of heart failure associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. The majority of different options have not been studied by means of large (or even small) randomized trials. Nevertheless, this chapter has tried to provide the reader with different approaches on how to deal with important clinical problems in dilated, hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathies, and in myocarditis as well. For this, we have utilized the most relevant information found coupled with our best clinical judgment, although we admit that many of the clinical recommendations can be controversial.

Programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT).

BACKGROUND

Nonsustained VT in patients with IDC has been associated with a high incidence of sudden cardiac death.

METHODS

Over the course of 4 years, 34 patients with IDC, a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < or = 35%, and spontaneous nonsustained VT underwent PVS. All patients were prospectively followed for 24+/-13 months.

RESULTS

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 13 patients (38%). Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in three patients (9%), and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in another 10 patients (29%). No sustained ventricular arrhythmia could be induced in 21 study patients (62%). Prophylactic implantation of third-generation defibrillators (ICDs) with electrogram storage capability was performed in all 13 patients with inducible sustained VT or VF, and in nine of 21 patients (43%) without inducible sustained VT or VF. There were no significant differences between the additional use of amiodarone, d,I-sotalol, and beta-blocker therapy during follow-up in patients with and without inducible VT or VF. During 24+/-13 months of follow-up, arrhythmic events were observed in nine patients (26%) including sudden cardiac deaths in two patients and ICD shocks for rapid VT or VF in seven patients. Arrhythmic events during follow-up occurred in four of 13 patients with inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared with five of 21 patients without inducible ventricular arrhythmias at PVS (31% vs. 24%, p=NS).

CONCLUSION

PVS does not appear to be helpful for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients with IDC, a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and spontaneous nonsustained VT. Due to the limited number of patients, however, the power of this study is too small to exclude moderately large differences in outcome between patients with IDC with and without inducible VT or VF.

[Current indications for implantable automatic defibrillators]

Since the first implantation in man in 1980 implantable cardioverter defibrillator technology has greatly improved and the number of devices implanted has increased considerably in recent years. Non-thoracotomy lead systems and biphasic shocks are now the approach of choice, offering nearly a 100% success rate. This paper version reviews the current indications for the implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and is an upgraded of an article previously published by the Arrhythmia's Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for qualification of centres implanting defibrillators and follow up are also addressed.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: role of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

OBJECTIVES

We report the occurrence of cardiac events during long-term follow-up in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

BACKGROUND

The identification of patients at high risk for sudden death and the prevention of recurrence of sudden death in HCM represents a difficult problem.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the occurrence of cardiac events during follow-up of 13 patients with HCM who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) because of aborted sudden death (n = 10) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 3) (group I). Findings were compared with those in 215 patients with an ICD and other structural heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (group II).

RESULTS

After a mean (+/-SD) follow-up period of 26+/-18 months, 2 of 13 patients in group I received appropriate shocks. The calculated cumulative incidence of shocks was 21% in group I and 66% in group II after 40 months (p < 0.05). We observed a low incidence of recurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation during follow-up in patients with HCM. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ventricular tachyarrhythmias may not always be the primary mechanism of syncope and sudden death in patients with HCM. The ICD seems to have a less important impact on prognosis in patients with HCM than in patients with other etiologies of aborted sudden death.

The value of electrophysiology study and prophylactic implantation of cardioverter defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Fifty-three consecutive patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and no history of sudden death underwent electrophysiology (EP) study. Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 19 patients (35%). Patients with prior syncope or near syncope had a higher incidence of VT/VF inducibility. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (i.c.d.) was placed in 14 of the 19 patients. Of the remaining 5 patients with inducible VT/VF, three refused ICD implantation, while two underwent septal myectomy and VT/VF was no longer inducible after the operation. None of the patients received antiarrhythmic drugs. During a mean follow-up period of 47 +/- 31 (2-117) months, no events occurred in the 34 patients with negative EP study. Three events occurred among the 19 patients with inducible VT/VF. One patient died suddenly, one developed wide complex tachycardia which required resuscitation, and one patient received an appropriate ICD shock. In conclusion, sustained polymorphic VT/VF was inducible in about one-third of patients with HCM. Noninducibility of VT/VF appeared to predict a favorable prognosis. Although the overall event rate was low in patients with inducible VT/VF, prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with multiple risk factors may be appropriate.