Clinical follow-up after cessation of chronic electrical neuromodulation in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a prospective randomized controlled study on putative involvement of sympathetic activity

Effect of neuromodulation for chronic pain on the autonomic nervous system: a systematic review

Background

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of neuromodulation as an alternative treatment option for chronic pain. Neuromodulation techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and peripheral nerve stimulation, have shown promising results in the management of various chronic pain conditions and involve targeted modulation of neural activity to alleviate pain and restore functional capacity. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial role in the regulation of various bodily functions including pain perception. However, the effects of neuromodulation on the ANS in the context of chronic pain remain poorly understood. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the existing literature about the effects of neuromodulation on the ANS in chronic pain settings.

Methods

Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science). The study protocol was registered before initiation of the review process. The Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate risk of bias.

Results

A total of 43 studies were included, of which only one was an animal study. Several studies have reported more than one outcome parameter in the same population of chronic pain patients. Cardiovascular parameters were the most frequently used outcomes. More specifically, 18 outcome parameters were revealed to evaluate the function of the ANS, namely heart rate variability (n=17), arterial blood pressure (n=15), tissue oxygenation/perfusion (n=5), blood markers (n=6), multiunit postganglionic sympathetic nerve activity (n=4), skin temperature (n=3), skin conductance (n=3), cephalic autonomic symptoms (n=2), ventilatory frequency (n=2), vasomotor tone (n=1), baroreflex sensitivity (n=1), sympathetic innervation of the heart, neural activity of intrinsic cardiac neurons (n=1), vascular conductance (n=1), arterial diameter (n=1), blood pulse volume (n=1), and vagal efficiency (n=1). Most studies evaluated SCS (62.79%), followed by DBS (18.6%), peripheral nerve stimulation (9.3%), DRG stimulation (4.65%), and vagus nerve stimulation (4.65%). Overall, inconsistent results were revealed towards contribution of SCS, DBS, and peripheral nerve stimulation on ANS parameters. For DRG stimulation, included studies pointed towards a decrease in sympathetic activity.

Conclusions

There are indications that neuromodulation alters the ANS, supported by high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence, however, heterogeneity in ANS outcome measures drives towards inconclusive results. Further research is warranted to elucidate the indirect or direct mechanisms of action on the ANS, with a potential benefit for optimisation of patient selection for these interventions.

Systematic review protocol

PROSPERO (CRD42021297287).

Cardiovascular Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation: The Highs, the Lows, and the Don't Knows

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are many potential etiologies of impaired cardiovascular control, from chronic stress to neurodegenerative conditions or central nervous system lesions. Since 1959, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported to modulate blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and HR variability (HRV), yet the specific stimulation sites and parameters to induce a targeted cardiovascular (CV) change for mitigating abnormal hemodynamics remain unclear. To investigate the ability and parameters of SCS to modulate the CV, we reviewed clinical studies using SCS with reported HR, BP, or HRV findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A keyword-based electronic search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed data bases, last searched on February 3, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies with human participants receiving SCS with comparison with SCS turned off, with reporting of either HR, HRV, or BP findings. Non-English studies, conference abstracts, and studies not reporting standalone effects of SCS when comparing SCS with non-SCS interventions were excluded. Results were plotted for visual analysis. When available, participant-specific stimulation parameters and effects were extracted and quantitatively analyzed using ordinary least squares regression.

RESULTS

A total of 59 studies were included in this review; 51 studies delivered SCS invasively through implanted/percutaneous leads. Eight studies used noninvasive, transcutaneous electrodes. We found numerous reports of cervical, high thoracic, and mid-to-low thoracolumbar SCS increasing resting BP, and cervical/mid-to-low thoracolumbar SCS decreasing BP. The effect of SCS location on HR and HRV was equivocal. We were unable to analyze stimulation parameters owing to inadequate parameter reporting in many publications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest CV neuromodulation, particularly BP modulation, with SCS to be a promising frontier. Further research with larger randomized controlled trials and detailed reporting of SCS parameters will be necessary for appropriate evaluation of SCS as a CV therapy.

Son of a Lesser God: The Case of Cell Therapy for Refractory Angina

In the last decades, various non-pharmacological solutions have been tested on top of medical therapy for the treatment of patients affected by refractory angina (RA). Among these therapeutics, neuromodulation, external counter-pulsation and coronary sinus constriction have been recently introduced in the guidelines for the management of RA in United States and Europe. Notably and paradoxically, although a consistent body of evidence has proposed cell-based therapies (CT) as safe and salutary for RA outcome, CT has not been conversely incorporated into current international guidelines yet. As a matter of fact, published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses (MTA) cumulatively indicated that CT can effectively increase perfusion, physical function and well-being, thus reducing angina symptoms and drug assumption in RA patients. In this review, we (i) provide an updated overview of novel non-pharmacological therapeutics included in current guidelines for the management of patients with RA, (ii) discuss the Level of Evidence stemmed from available clinical trials for each recommended treatment, and (iii) focus on evidence-based CT application for the management of RA.

Systematic Review of Research Methods and Reporting Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain

This systematic review assessed design characteristics and reporting quality of published randomized clinical trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of pain in adults and adolescents. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018090412). Relevant articles were identified by searching the following databases through December 31, 2018: MEDLINE, Embase, WikiStim, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forty-six studies were included. Eighty-seven percent of articles identified a pain-related primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included physical functioning, health-related quality of life, and reductions in opioid use. Nineteen of the 46 studies prespecified adverse events as an outcome, with 4 assessing them as a primary outcome. Eleven studies stated that they blinded participants. Of these, only 5 were assessed as being adequately blinded. The number of participants enrolled was generally low (median 38) and study durations were short (median 12 weeks), particularly in studies of angina. Fifteen studies employed an intention-to-treat analysis, of which only seven specified a method to accommodate missing data. Review of these studies identified deficiencies in both reporting and methodology. The review's findings suggest areas for improving the design of future studies and increasing transparency of reporting. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a systematic review of research methods and reporting quality of randomized clinical trials of SCS for the treatment of various pain complaints. The review identifies deficiencies in both methodology and reporting, which may inform the design of future studies and improve reporting standards.

Refractory Angina: the Current State of Mechanical Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Refractory angina (RA), which is characterized by tissue ischemia along with neurological, mitochondrial, and psychogenic dysfunction, is becoming a major cause of morbidity in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss in detail the invasive mechanical non-cell therapy-based options, the evidence behind these therapies, and future trends.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is extensive ongoing research in the areas of spinal-cord stimulation, transmyocardial laser revascularization, sympathectomy, angiogenesis, and other non-cell-based therapies to explore the best therapy for refractory angina. There is conflicting data in the literature suggesting subjective improvement in angina, but very few studies boast improvement in core objective parameters such as myocardial blood flow, survival, or rehospitalizations. Patients with refractory angina are a complex group of patients that need novel approaches to help alleviate their symptoms and reduce mortality. A carefully selected sequence of therapies may provide the best results in this patient population.

Spinal Cord Stimulation 50 Years Later: Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation Based on Randomized Clinical Trials-A Systematic Review

To assess the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for each indication, one must critically assess each specific clinical outcome to identify outcomes that benefit from SCS therapy. To date, a comprehensive review of clinically relevant outcome-specific evidence regarding SCS has not been published. We aimed to assess all randomized controlled trials from the world literature for the purpose of evaluating the clinical outcome-specific efficacy of SCS for the following outcomes: perceived pain relief or change pain score, quality of life, functional status, psychological impact, analgesic medication utilization, patient satisfaction, and health care cost and utilization. Interventions were SCS, without limitation to the type of controls or the type of SCS in the active arms. For each study analyzed, a quality assessment was performed using a validated scale that assesses reporting, external validity, bias, confounding, and power. Each outcome was assessed specific to its indication, and the primary measure of each abovementioned outcome was a summary of the level of evidence. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials were analyzed (7 for trunk and limb pain, inclusive of failed back surgery syndrome; 8 for refractory angina pectoris; 1 for cardiac X syndrome; 3 for critical limb ischemia; 2 for complex regional pain syndrome; and 2 for painful diabetic neuropathy). Evidence assessments for each outcome for each indication were depicted in tabular format. Outcome-specific evidence scores were established for each of the abovementioned indications, providing both physicians and patients with a summary of evidence to assist in choosing the optimal evidence-based intervention. The evidence presented herein has broad applicability as it encompasses a breadth of patient populations, variations of SCS therapy, and comparable controls that, together, reflect comprehensive clinical decision making.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives:

Paresthesia-free stimulation such as high frequency and burst have been demonstrated as effective therapies for neuropathic pain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of refractory angina pectoris (RAP).

Materials and Methods:

Relevant randomized controlled trials that investigated SCS for patients with RAP were comprehensively searched in Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Five meta-analyses were performed examining the changes in Canadian Cardiovascular Society classes, exercise time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of pain, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and nitroglycerin use in RAP patients after SCS therapy. We analyzed standardized mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome by Review Manager 5.0 and STATA 12.0.

Results:

A total of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 476 RAP patients were identified. A trend of reduction in the angina frequency (MD=−9.03, 95% CI, −15.70 to −2.36) and nitroglycerin consumption (MD=−0.64, 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.45) could be observed in the SCS group. Compared with the control group, SCS showed benefit on increasing exercise time (MD=0.49, 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) and treatment satisfaction (MD=6.87, 95% CI, 2.07-11.66) with decreased VAS scores of pain (MD=−0.50, 95% CI, −0.81 to −0.20) and disease perception (MD=−8.34, 95% CI, −14.45 to −2.23). However, the result did not reach the significance level in terms of physical limitation (95% CI, −8.75 to 3.38; P=0.39) or angina stability (95% CI, −7.55 to 3.67; P=0.50).

Discussion:

The current meta-analysis suggested that SCS was a potential alternative in the treatment of PAP patients. Further investigation for finding the appropriate intensity of stimulation is required before this treatment should be widely recommended and applied.

Calming the Nervous Heart: Autonomic Therapies in Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The disease is characterised by autonomic imbalance with increased sympathetic activity and withdrawal of parasympathetic activity. Despite the use of medical therapies that target, in part, the neurohormonal axis, rates of HF progression, morbidity and mortality remain high. Emerging therapies centred on neuromodulation of autonomic control of the heart provide an alternative device-based approach to restoring sympathovagal balance. Preclinical studies have proven favourable, while clinical trials have had mixed results. This article highlights the importance of understanding structural/functional organisation of the cardiac nervous system as mechanistic-based neuromodulation therapies evolve.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The RASCAL (Refractory Angina Spinal Cord stimulation and usuAL care) pilot study seeks to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial to assess if addition of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to usual care is clinically superior and more cost-effective than usual care alone in patients with refractory angina.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is an external pilot, patient-randomized controlled trial.The study will take place at three centers in the United Kingdom - South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (The James Cook University Hospital), Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.The subjects will be 45 adults with refractory angina, that is, limiting angina despite optimal anti-angina therapy, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional Classification Class III and IV, angiographically documented coronary artery disease not suitable for revascularization, satisfactory multidisciplinary assessment and demonstrable ischemia on functional testing.The study will be stratified by center, age and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional Classification.Interventions will involve spinal cord stimulation plus usual care ('SCS group') or usual care alone ('UC group'). Usual care received by both groups will include consideration of an education session with a pain consultant, trial of a transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, serial thoracic sympathectomy and oral/systemic analgesics.Expected outcomes will be recruitment and retention rates; reasons for agreeing/declining participation; variability in primary and secondary outcomes (to inform power calculations for a definitive trial); and completion rates of outcome measures. Trial patient-related outcomes include disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life, angina exercise capacity, intake of angina medications, frequency of angina attacks, complications and adverse events, and satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

The RASCAL pilot trial seeks to determine the feasibility and design of a definitive randomized controlled trial comparing the addition of spinal cord stimulation to usual care versus usual care alone for patients with refractory angina.Fifteen patients have been recruited since recruitment opened in October 2011. The trial was originally scheduled to end in April 2013 but due to slow recruitment may have to be extended to late 2013.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN65254102.

Spinal cord stimulation for long-term treatment of severe angina pectoris: what does the evidence say?

Patients who continue to suffer from severe and disabling angina pectoris, despite optimum treatment in terms of conventional pharmacological therapy and/or revascularization procedures, have been termed as having refractory angina pectoris. The future group of patients with refractory angina pectoris will be different from today’s patients and represent a ‘moving target’ as risk factors, efficacy of treatment and indications continue to change. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is today considered as first-line treatment of refractory angina pectoris, by the European Society of Cardiology, with an anti-ischemic effect. There is strong evidence for SCS giving symptomatic benefits (decrease in anginal attacks), improved quality of life and improvement of functional status. In addition, SCS seems to be cost effective with a ‘break-even’ after approximately 15–16 months.

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the most effective modalities for management of re- fractory neuropathic pain unresponsive to conservative therapies. The SCS has been successful in providing analgesia, improving function, and enhancing quality of life for patients suffering from chronic pain conditions such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, ischaemic and phantom limb pain, and coronary artery disease. This technique has proven to be cost effective in the long term despite its high initial cost. In this review article, we discuss the history of SCS development, mechanism of action, and indications for SCS. Key words: Failed back surgery syndrome, Ischaemic pain, Neuropathic pain

Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Ventricular Function and Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias in a Canine Postinfarction Heart Failure Model

Background— Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) reduces the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in experimental models. This study investigated the effects of long-term SCS on ventricular function in a postinfarction canine heart failure model.

Methods and Results— In stage 1, dogs underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and embolization of the left anterior descending artery followed by right ventricular pacing (240 ppm) for 3 weeks to produce heart failure. In stage 2, 28 surviving animals were assigned to the SCS (delivered at the T4/T5 spinal region for 2 hours 3 times a day), medicine (MED; carvedilol therapy at 12.5 mg PO BID), or control (CTRL; no therapy) group for the initial phase 1 study. In a subsequent phase 2 study, 32 stage 1 survivors were equally randomized to the SCS, MEDS (carvedilol plus ramipril 2.5 mg PO QD), SCS plus MEDS (concurrent therapy), or CTRL group. Animals were monitored for 5 weeks (phase 1) or 10 weeks (phase 2). In stage 3, all phase 1 animals underwent circumflex artery balloon occlusion for 1 hour. In the SCS group, left ventricular ejection fraction was 65±5% at baseline, 17±3% at the end of stage 1, and 47±7% at the end of stage 2. In the MED group, left ventricular ejection fraction was 61±4% at baseline, 18±3% at the end of stage 1, and 34±4% at the end of stage 2. In the CTRL group, left ventricular ejection fraction was 64±5% at baseline, 19±5% at the end of stage 1, and 28±3% at the end of stage 2. Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly improved in the SCS compared with the MED and CTRL groups ( P <0.001 for both). The mean number of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias during stage 2 and the occurrence of ischemic ventricular tachyarrhythmias during stage 3 also were significantly decreased in the SCS (27±17 and 27%, respectively; P <0.03) and MED (58±42 and 33%; P <0.05) versus CTRL (88±52 and 76%) group. After 10 weeks in the phase 2 studies, the greatest recovery in ejection fraction was noted in the SCS (52±5%) and SCS+MEDS (46±4%) groups compared with the MEDS (38±2%) and CTRL (31±4%) groups.

Conclusion— SCS significantly improved cardiac contractile function and decreased ventricular arrhythmias in canine heart failure.

Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

The aim of this paper was undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the management of refractory angina.

Methods

We searched a number of electronic databases including Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library up to February 2008 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting exercise capacity, ischemic burden, functional class, quality of life, usage of anti-anginal medication, costs and adverse events including mortality. Results were reported both descriptively for each study and using random effects meta-analysis. Given the variety in outcomes reported, some outcome results were pooled as standardised mean differences (SMD) and reported in standard deviation units.

Results

Seven RCTs were identified in a total of 270 refractory angina patients. The outcomes of SCS were found to be similar when directly compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR). Compared to a 'no stimulation' control, there was some evidence of improvement in all outcomes following SCS implantation with significant gains observed in pooled exercise capacity (SMD: 0.76, 0.07 to 1.46, p = 0.03) and health-related quality of life (SMD: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.34, p = 0.001). Trials were small and were judged to range considerably in their quality. The healthcare costs of SCS appeared to be lower than CABG at 2-years follow up.

Conclusion

SCS appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in the management of refractory angina patients and of similar efficacy and safety to PMR, a potential alternative treatment. Further high quality RCT and cost effectiveness evidence is needed before SCS can be accepted as a routine treatment for refractory angina.

Spinal cord stimulation in severe angina pectoris--a systematic review based on the Swedish Council on Technology assessment in health care report on long-standing pain

Patients who continue to suffer from lasting and severely disabling angina pectoris despite optimum drug treatment and who are not suitable candidates for invasive procedures, suffer from a condition referred to as "chronic refractory angina pectoris". Based on the available data, spinal cord stimulation, SCS, is considered as the first-line additional treatment for these patients by the European Society of Cardiology. However, no systematic review of randomised controlled studies has yet been published. A systematic literature research, 1966-2003, as part of the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare (SBU) report on long-standing pain, and an additional research covering the years 2003-2007, were carried out. Acute studies, case reports and mechanistic reviews were excluded, and the remaining 43 studies were graded for study quality according to a modified Jadad score. The eight medium- to high-score studies formed the basis for conclusions regarding the scientific evidence (strong, moderately strong or limited) for the efficacy of SCS. There is strong evidence that SCS gives rise to symptomatic benefits (decrease in anginal attacks) and improved quality of life in patients with severe angina pectoris. There is also a strong evidence that SCS can improve the functional status of these patients, as illustrated by the improved exercise time on treadmill or longer walking distance without angina. In addition, SCS does not seem to have any negative effects on mortality in these patients (limited scientific evidence). The complication rate was found to be acceptable.

The effect of electrical neurostimulation on collateral perfusion during acute coronary occlusion

Background

Electrical neurostimulation can be used to treat patients with refractory angina, it reduces angina and ischemia. Previous data have suggested that electrical neurostimulation may alleviate myocardial ischaemia through increased collateral perfusion. We investigated the effect of electrical neurostimulation on functional collateral perfusion, assessed by distal coronary pressure measurement during acute coronary occlusion. We sought to study the effect of electrical neurostimulation on collateral perfusion.

Methods

Sixty patients with stable angina and significant coronary artery disease planned for elective percutaneous coronary intervention were split in two groups. In all patients two balloon inflations of 60 seconds were performed, the first for balloon dilatation of the lesion (first episode), the second for stent delivery (second episode). The Pw/Pa ratio (wedge pressure/aortic pressure) was measured during both ischaemic episodes. Group 1 received 5 minutes of active neurostimulation before plus 1 minute during the first episode, group 2 received 5 minutes of active neurostimulation before plus 1 minute during the second episode.

Results

In group 1 the Pw/Pa ratio decreased by 10 ± 22% from 0.20 ± 0.09 to 0.19 ± 0.09 (p = 0.004) when electrical neurostimulation was deactivated. In group 2 the Pw/Pa ratio increased by 9 ± 15% from 0.22 ± 0.09 to 0.24 ± 0.10 (p = 0.001) when electrical neurostimulation was activated.

Conclusion

Electrical neurostimulation induces a significant improvement in the Pw/Pa ratio during acute coronary occlusion.

Neurostimulation technology for the treatment of chronic pain: a focus on spinal cord stimulation

Over the past 40 years we have seen how electrical stimulation for the relief of pain has progressed from an experimental treatment based upon a clinical theory to being on the threshold of becoming a standard of medical practice. While tens of thousands of devices are implanted every year, the mechanism of action still evades complete understanding. Nevertheless, technological improvements have been considerable and the current neuromodulation devices are both extremely sophisticated and reliable. Unlike most conventional treatments, neurostimulation cannot be restricted to one speciality as its clinical applications ignore the boundaries of medical specialities. Conditions such as neuropathic pain in the back and the leg, complex regional pain syndrome, ischemic pain due to peripheral vascular disease and coronary artery disease are likely to respond to spinal cord stimulation. Even though the evidence for efficacy remains unsatisfactory, the stimulation of the dorsal column has been remarkably successful in relieving pain and improving function in patients who have failed conventional management. The development, the technicalities and the most important clinical applications of spinal cord stimulation are reviewed here.

Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative treatment option for refractory angina. Controlled trials demonstrate symptom relief and improvement in functional status. Since patients experience retrosternal prickling during active SCS, there is no option for blinding patients to active treatment or for placebo control.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the therapeutic effects of subthreshold SCS in patients with refractory angina in a placebo-controlled study.

METHODS

12 responders to treatment who had already been treated with SCS for refractory angina were enrolled. Patients were randomised into four consecutive treatment arms, each for 4 weeks, with various stimulation timing and output parameters: 3 x 2 h/day (phase A) and 24 h/day with conventional output (phase B); 3 x 2 h/day with a subthreshold output (phase C); and 24 h/day with 0.1 V output, which served as control (phase D). Functional status, quality of life, Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification and nitrate usage were assessed at the end of each 4-week period.

RESULTS

In phase D, patients showed a significant reduction in walking distance compared with phases A and C. Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification worsened in phase D compared with phases A-C. Frequency of angina attacks and the visual analogue scale were significantly worse in phase D than in phases A-C. In three patients, it was necessary to prematurely terminate phase D owing to intolerable angina attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first placebo-controlled trial to apply SCS in patients with refractory angina, improvement in functional status and symptoms was revealed in phases with conventional or subthreshold stimulation, in comparison to a low-output (placebo) phase.

Spinal cord stimulation: indications and outcomes

✓Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most commonly used implantable neurostimulation modality for management of pain syndromes. In this paper the authors describe the current indications for SCS and its efficacy in the treatment of those diseases. Specifically, the literature on patient selection and outcomes after SCS for failed–back surgery syndrome (FBSS), refractory angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type I was reviewed. Effective pain relief was obtained in 60 to 80% of patients with FBSS and CRPS Type I. Furthermore, these patients had significant improvements in quality of life (QOL) and a significantly greater chance of returning to work than patients who did not undergo SCS. The use of SCS in patients with inoperable angina (that is, refractory angina pectoris) resulted in significant decreases in chest pain and hospital admissions as well as increased exercise duration, with less morbidity than with open procedures that were performed for pain control only. Patients with inoperable PVD also demonstrated significant improvements in pain relief, QOL, and limb mobility. Reported complications were mostly related to hardware and were relatively minor. Review of randomized controlled studies supports the use of SCS as an effective treatment modality for pain associated with FBSS, refractory angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, and CRPS Type I.

Spinal cord stimulation for the management of refractory angina pectoris

Despite sophisticated medical and surgical procedures, including percutaneous endovascular methods, a large number of patients suffer from chronic refractory angina pectoris. Improvement of pain relief in this category of patients requires the use of adjuvant therapies, of which spinal cord stimulation (SCS) seems to be the most promising. Controlled studies suggest that in patients with chronic refractory angina, SCS provides symptomatic relief that is equivalent to that provided by surgical or endovascular reperfusion procedures, but with a lower rate of complications and rehospitalization. Similarly, SCS proved cost effective compared to medical as well as surgical or endovascular approaches in a comparable group of patients. This technique is still met with reluctance by the medical community. Reasons for this disinclination may be related to incomplete understanding of the mechanism of action of SCS and the fact that SCS refers to the modulation of neuroendocrine parameters rather than to revascularization, which is currently the dominant treatment paradigm in coronary artery disease.

Thoracic spinal cord stimulation reduces the risk of ischemic ventricular arrhythmias in a postinfarction heart failure canine model

BACKGROUND

Thoracic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising therapy in treating refractory angina. This study was designed to investigate SCS with regard to the risk of arrhythmias during myocardial ischemia and its cardiac electrophysiological effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 22 dogs with healed anterior myocardial infarction (MI) and superimposed heart failure (HF) induced by rapid ventricular pacing. SCS was applied at the dorsal T1-T2 segments of the spinal cord (at 50 Hz, 0.2 ms) for 15 minutes. Transient (2-minute) myocardial ischemia was induced on 2 separate occasions (no SCS and SCS) to provoke ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation; VT/VF). Ischemic episodes were separated by 90 minutes, and dogs were randomly assigned to receive SCS or no SCS before the first or second ischemic episode. SCS reduced the occurrence of VT/VF from 59% to 23% when SCS was applied during transient myocardial ischemia (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.1626 to 0.5646; P=0.0009). SCS also decreased sinus rate by 7.5+/-14 bpm (P=0.048), increased the PR interval by 11.1+/-14.7 ms (P=0.009), and reduced systolic blood pressure by 9.8+/-13.6 mm Hg (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic SCS appears to protect against ischemic VT/VF in a canine model of healed MI and HF. SCS reduced sinus rate and systolic blood pressure, changes consistent with the previously known antisympathetic effect of SCS, which may have contributed to the antiarrhythmic benefits.

Treatment of refractory angina pectoris

Refractory angina pectoris is defined as Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV angina, where there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activity or inability to perform ordinary physical activity without discomfort, with an objective evidence of myocardial ischemia and persistence of symptoms despite optimal medical therapy, life style modification treatments, and revascularization therapies. The patients with refractory angina pectoris may have diffuse coronary artery disease, multiple distal coronary stenoses, and or small coronary arteries. In addition, a substantial portion of these patients cannot achieve complete revascularization and continue to experience residual anginal symptoms that may impair quality of their life and increase morbidity. This represents an end-stage coronary artery disease characterized by a severe myocardial insufficiency usually with impaired left ventricular function. As the life expectancy is increasing, patients with angina pectoris refractory to conventional antianginal therapeutics are a challenging problem. We review the nonconventional therapies to treat the refractory angina pectoris, including pharmacotherapy, therapeutic angiogenesis, transcutaneus electrical nerve and spinal cord stimulation, enhanced external counterpulsation, surgical transmyocardial laser revascularization, percutaneous transmyocardial laser revascularization, percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterializations, and percutaneous in situ coronary artery bypass. These therapies are not supported by a large body of data and have only a complementary role; therefore, the aggressive traditional and proven treatment of angina pectoris should be continued along with these therapies, used on an individual basis.

Long-term modulation of the intrinsic cardiac nervous system by spinal cord neurons in normal and ischaemic hearts

Electrical excitation of the dorsal aspect of the rostral thoracic spinal cord imparts long-term therapeutic benefits to patients with angina pectoris. Such spinal cord stimulation also induces short-term suppressor effects on the intrinsic cardiac nervous system. The purpose of this study was to determine whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) induces long-term effects on the intrinsic nervous system, particularly in the presence of myocardial ischaemia. The activity generated by right atrial neurons was recorded in 10 anesthetized dogs during basal states, during prolonged (15 min) occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, and during the subsequent reperfusion phase. Neuronal activity and cardiovascular indices were also monitored when the dorsal T1-T4 segments of the spinal cord were stimulated electrically (50 Hz; 0.2 ms) at an intensity 90% of motor threshold (mean 0.32 mA) for 17 min. SCS was performed before, during and after 15-min periods of regional ventricular ischaemia. Occlusion of a major coronary artery, one that did not perfuse investigated neurons, resulted in their excitation. Ischaemia-induced neuronal excitatory effects were suppressed (-76% from baseline) by SCS. SCS suppression of intrinsic cardiac neuronal activity persisted during the subsequent reperfusion period; after terminating 17 min of SCS, at least 20 min elapsed before intrinsic cardiac neuronal activity returned to baseline values. It is concluded that populations of intrinsic cardiac neurons are activated by inputs arising from the ischaemic myocardium. Ischaemia-induced activation of these neurons is nullified by SCS. The neuronal suppressor effects that SCS induces persist not only during reperfusion, but also for an extended period of time thereafter. These long-term effects may account, in part, for the fact that SCS imparts clinical benefit to patients with angina of cardiac origin not only during its application, but also for a time thereafter.

Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Comparison of Efficacy versus Other Novel Treatments for Refractory Angina Pectoris

Recently much attention has been directed toward novel treatment alternatives for refractory angina pectoris. Refractory angina is persistent stable class III or IV angina despite maximally tolerated medical treatment in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease. Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR), gene therapy, intermittent urokinase therapy, enhanced external balloon counterpulsation, and spinal cord stimulation have all been employed to treat refractory angina pectoris. TMLR and gene therapy are invasive open-chest procedures that have yielded controversial results. Intermittent urokinase and enhanced external balloon counterpulsation studies have limited follow-up times and require multiple clinic visits for treatment. Spinal cord stimulation has a proven short- and long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of refractory angina. When compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), it has been shown to decrease the frequency of anginal attacks and consumption of short-acting nitrates to the same extent in refractory angina. Spinal cord stimulation's safety profile has also been well established and it can be used concurrently with cardiac pacemakers or MRI systems, provided the proper precautions are taken. Since spinal cord stimulation is a minimally invasive procedure with a favorable efficacy and safety profile, it should be considered as a valid treatment alternative after medical management has failed in refractory angina prior to implementing invasive modalities such as TMLR or gene therapy.