Aprotinin decreases ischemic damage during coronary revascularization

Preservation of renal endothelial integrity and reduction of renal edema by aprotinin does not preserve renal perfusion and function following experimental cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a severe complication following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and is associated with capillary leakage and microcirculatory perfusion disturbances. CPB-induced thrombin release results in capillary hyperpermeability via activation of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1). We investigated whether aprotinin, which is thought to prevent thrombin from activating PAR1, preserves renal endothelial structure, reduces renal edema and preserves renal perfusion and reduces renal injury following CPB.

METHODS

Rats were subjected to CPB after treatment with 33.000 KIU/kg aprotinin (n = 15) or PBS (n = 15) as control. A secondary dose of 33.000 KIU/kg aprotinin was given 60 min after initiation of CPB. Cremaster and renal microcirculatory perfusion were assessed using intravital microscopy and contrast echography before CPB and 10 and 60 min after weaning from CPB. Renal edema was determined by wet/dry weight ratio and renal endothelial structure by electron microscopy. Renal PAR1 gene and protein expression and markers of renal injury were determined.

RESULTS

CPB reduced cremaster microcirculatory perfusion by 2.5-fold (15 (10-16) to 6 (2-10) perfused microvessels, p < 0.0001) and renal perfusion by 1.6-fold (202 (67-599) to 129 (31-292) au/sec, p = 0.03) in control animals. Both did not restore 60 min post-CPB. This was paralleled by increased plasma creatinine (p < 0.01), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL; p = 0.003) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1; p < 0.01). Aprotinin treatment preserved cremaster microcirculatory perfusion following CPB (12 (7-15) vs. 6 (2-10) perfused microvessels, p = 0.002), but not renal perfusion (96 (35-313) vs. 129 (31-292) au/s, p > 0.9) compared to untreated rats. Aprotinin treatment reduced endothelial gap formation (0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4 gaps, p < 0.0001), kidney wet/dry weight ratio (4.6 ± 0.2 vs. 4.4 ± 0.2, p = 0.046), and fluid requirements (3.9 ± 3.3 vs. 7.5 ± 3.0 ml, p = 0.006) compared to untreated rats. In addition, aprotinin treatment reduced tubulointerstitial neutrophil influx by 1.7-fold compared to untreated rats (30.7 ± 22.1 vs. 53.2 ± 17.2 neutrophil influx/section, p = 0.009). No differences were observed in renal PAR1 expression and plasma creatinine, NGAL or KIM-1 between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin did not improve renal perfusion nor reduce renal injury during the first hour following experimental CPB despite preservation of renal endothelial integrity and reduction of renal edema.

Pulmonary vascular resistance index during coronary artery bypass surgery with aprotinin

Low pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) reflects favorable redundant pulmonary circulation following coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB). This randomized study investigated whether aprotinin given in different modalities impacts PVRI after coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 40 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to four groups according to aprotinin dose: (1) high dose, (2) early low dose, (3) late low dose, and (4) without aprotinin. Oxygenation index, pulmonary shunt, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and PVRI were determined. PVRI was calculated as the transpulmonary pressure gradient divided by cardiac index multiplied by 80. The results showed that PVRI remained relative low in all patients provided aprotinin regardless of treatment dosage; PVRI increased at 4 h after restarting ventilation after CPB in patients without aprotinin as compared with aprotinin (266 ± 137, 266 ± 115, 244 ± 86 vs. 386 ± 121, dynes-s-cm^-5, respectively, p = .047). Elevated postoperative PVRI was predictive for patients without aprotinin (AUC 0.668; SE 0.40; p < .0001; CI 0.590-0.746). There were no statistical differences in oxygenation index, pulmonary shunt or alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient between the groups. In conclusion, aprotinin maintains a low PVRI in elective patients with healthy lungs during CPB. We suggest that aprotinin maintains pulmonary arterial endothelial integrity.

Effects of aprotinin on short-term and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent studies demonstrated that aprotinin use would increase the short-term and long-term mortality and complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study was to investigate effects of aprotinin during isolated primary CABG on short-term and long-term outcomes in Chinese patients.

METHODS

We studied 5,103 consecutive Chinese patients who underwent isolated primary CABG from 1999 to 2005. Of all the patients, 4,122 received aprotinin during operation (aprotinin group) and 981 received no aprotinin or other antifibrinolytic therapy (control group). Short-term and long-term mortality and major complications were analyzed with multivariate regression analysis. Propensity adjustment method was used to minimize the selection bias between the two groups, and propensity matching method was used to yield two well-matched groups for further comparison.

RESULTS

Blood loss after operation was significantly reduced in the aprotinin group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Aprotinin use was neither associated with the perioperative mortality (p = 0.45, relative risk, 1.34) or major complications, nor was it associated with long-term mortality (p = 0.21, relative risk, 1.26) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p = 0.82, relative risk, 0.98). After propensity adjustment for the baseline characteristics, we obtained similar results. In addition, comparison between the two well-matched groups showed no significant difference either in baseline characteristics or in short-term and long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin use during isolated primary CABG reduced blood loss significantly, but was not associated with short-term or long-term mortality and complications. Aprotinin use in relatively low-risk CABG patients was effective and safe in a Chinese (Asian) population.

Aprotinin in primary cardiac surgery: operative outcome of propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Some recent multicenter series have questioned the safety of aprotinin in primary cardiac operations. We report a large, single-center experience with aprotinin therapy in primary cardiac operations and discuss the limitations and potential confounders of current treatment strategies.

METHODS

We compared myocardial infarction, neurologic events, renal insufficiency, and operative death after first-time coronary or valve procedures, or both, in 3334 patients treated with full-dose aprotinin with 3417 patients not treated with aprotinin who underwent operation between March 1998 and January 2007. Further analysis was performed for 341 propensity score-matched pairs.

RESULTS

There were substantial differences between the groups. Aprotinin patients were higher risk on account of older age, unstable symptoms, poor ejection fraction, preoperative hemodynamic support, emergency/urgent operations, and combined coronary/valve operations. Postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion were considerably reduced in aprotinin patients, as was median duration of mechanical ventilation. Aprotinin was neither a predictor of postoperative myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, or operative death. Achieving parity between the groups by propensity score matching eliminated the elevated rates of postoperative renal insufficiency, neurologic dysfunction, and operative death observed in aprotinin patients in the unmatched comparison. These adverse outcomes were evenly distributed between matched groups. Conversely, blood transfusion had univariate associations with all adverse outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Full-dose aprotinin use was not associated with myocardial infarction, neurologic dysfunction, renal insufficiency, or death after coronary or valve operations. We observed less postoperative bleeding and blood product transfusion, and early extubation with the use of aprotinin.

Aprotinin exerts differential and dose-dependent effects on myocardial contractility, oxidative stress, and cytokine release after ischemia-reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery can result in left ventricular ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor, and oxidative stress with release of myeloperoxidase. Although aprotinin has been used in cardiac surgery, the likely multiple effects of this serine protease inhibitor limit clinical utility. This study tested the hypothesis that different aprotinin doses cause divergent effects on left ventricular contractility, cytokine release, and oxidative stress in the context of I/R.

METHODS

Left ventricular I/R (30 minutes I, 60 minutes R) was induced in mice, and left ventricular contractility (maximal end-systolic elastance) determined. Mice were randomly allocated to 2 x 10(4) kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU)/kg aprotinin (n = 11), 4 x 10(4) KIU/kg aprotinin (n = 10), and vehicle (saline, n = 10). Based upon a fluorogenic assay, aprotinin doses of 2 and 4 x 10(4) KIU/kg resulted in plasma concentrations similar to those of the half and full Hammersmith doses, respectively.

RESULTS

After I/R, maximal end-systolic elastance fell by more than 40% from baseline (p < 0.05), and this effect was attenuated by 2 x 10(4) KIU/kg but not 4 x 10(4) KIU/kg aprotinin. Tumor necrosis factor increased by more than 60% from control (p < 0.05) with I/R, but was reduced with 4 x 10(4) KIU/kg aprotinin. Myeloperoxidase increased with I/R, and was reduced to the greatest degree by 2 x 10(4) KIU/kg aprotinin.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin influences left ventricular contractility, cytokine release, and oxidative stress, which are dose dependent. These results provide mechanistic evidence that multiple pathways are differentially affected by aprotinin in a context relevant to cardiac surgery.

Anti-inflammatory actions of aprotinin provide dose-dependent cardioprotection from reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Myocardial injury following ischaemia and reperfusion has been attributed to activation and transmigration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) with release of mediators including oxygen-derived radicals and proteases causing damage.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We studied the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin in an in vivo rabbit model of 1 h of myocardial ischaemia followed by 3 h of reperfusion (MI+R). Aprotinin (10,000 Ukg(-1)) or its vehicle were injected 5 min prior to the start of reperfusion.

KEY RESULTS

Myocardial injury was significantly reduced with aprotinin treatment as indicated by a reduced necrotic area (11+/-2.7% necrosis as percentage of area at risk after aprotinin; 24+/-3.1% after vehicle; P<0.05) and plasma creatine kinase activity (12.2+/-1.5 and 17.3+/-2.3 IU g(-1) protein in aprotinin and vehicle groups, respectively, P<0.05). PMN infiltration (assessed by myeloperoxidase activity) was significantly decreased in aprotinin-treated animals compared to vehicle (P<0.01). Histological analysis also revealed a substantial increase in PMN infiltration following MI+R and this was significantly reduced by aprotinin therapy (44+/-15 vs 102+/-2 PMN mm2 in aprotinin vs vehicle-treated animals, P<0.05). In parallel in vitro experiments, aprotinin inhibited neutrophil-endothelium interaction by reducing PMN adhesion on isolated, activated aortic endothelium. Finally, immunohistochemical analysis illustrated aprotinin significantly reduced myocardial apoptosis following MI+R.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Inhibition of serine proteases by aprotinin inhibits an inflammatory cascade initiated by MI+R. The cardioprotective effect appears to be at least partly due to reduced PMN adhesion and infiltration with subsequently reduced myocardial necrosis and apoptosis.

Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Conventional and Novel Mechanisms of Action

Induction of the coagulation and inflammatory cascades can cause multiorgan dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In light of these observations, strategies that can stabilize the coagulation process as well as attenuate the inflammatory response during and after cardiac surgery are important. Aprotinin has effects on hemostasis. In addition, aprotinin may exert multiple biologically relevant effects in the context of cardiac surgery and CPB. For example, it decreases neutrophil and macrophage activation and chemotaxis, attenuates release and activation of proinflammatory cytokines, and reduces oxidative stress. Despite these perceived benefits, the routine use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with CPB has been called into question. In this review, we examined this controversial drug by discussing the classical and novel pathways in which aprotinin may be operative in the context of cardiac surgery.

Effects of Aprotinin on Gene Expression and Protein Synthesis After Ischemia and Reperfusion in Rats

Background— Reperfusion injury of ischemic myocardium has been attributed to neutrophil infiltration, inflammatory activation and cardiac necrosis/apoptosis. Serine protease inhibition with aprotinin is cardioprotective, but the mechanism is unknown.

Methods and Results— We studied aprotinin in a rat model of myocardial ischemia for 20 minutes and reperfusion for 20 minutes, 8 hours or 24 hours. Aprotinin (20 000 IU/kg) given 5 minutes before reperfusion significantly reduced leukocyte accumulation ( P <0.01), myocardial injury (determined by CK depletion, P <0.01) and myocyte apoptosis ( P <0.05) compared with vehicle treated rats. Differential gene expression analysis showed myocardial ischemia plus reperfusion increased expression of proinflammatory genes like P-selectin, E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule, tumor necrosis factor-α, tumor necrosis factor-α receptor, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, p53, and Fas (CD59). Aprotinin before reperfusion suppressed expression of these inflammatory genes. Finally, differential protein expression analysis demonstrated increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1, tumor necrosis factor-α, and p53 after myocardial ischemia plus reperfusion, and this effect was diminished by aprotinin.

Conclusions— We demonstrated myocardial ischemia plus reperfusion induced leukocyte accumulation, inflammation, gene expression, protein expression and finally tissue injury and showed aprotinin limiting reperfusion injury through each of these stages, even after 24 hours of reperfusion. This effect seems partly attributable to suppression of proinflammatory genes and leukocyte accumulation. This work casts further light on the complex signaling of ischemia and reperfusion.

Is There Still a Role for Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery?

Cardiac surgery is associated with a systemic inflammatory response and systemic coagulopathy, which can result in significant organ dysfunction and bleeding. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, can limit systemic inflammation, and has been associated with myocardial, pulmonary and cerebral protection in addition to its proven haemostatic efficacy. Data are currently conflicting regarding the haemostatic efficacy of aprotinin relative to alternative agents including tranexamic acid. Recent studies have demonstrated aprotinin usage is associated with increased rates of thrombotic and renal complications, but these findings are at odds with the majority of studies relating to aprotinin safety to date. The lack of adequately powered, randomised studies evaluating aprotinin and alternative agents limits drawing conclusions about the complete use or disuse of aprotinin presently and requires individualised patient selection based on bleeding risk and co-morbidities for its usage.