Identification and phylogenetic relationships ofVahlkampfiaspp. (free-living amoebae) by riboprinting

Multiple Cosmopolitan Ecotypes within a Microbial Eukaryote Morphospecies

Microbial eukaryotes that are morphologically indistinguishable (i.e. 'morphospecies') tend to be genetically diverse. While most protist morphospecies have cosmopolitan distribution, it has been suggested that ribotypes (unique rRNA gene sequences) or rRNA sequence clusters do have biogeography and such clusters may correlate with particular (non-morphological) adaptations. We have studied this in the ciliated protozoan morphospecies Cyclidium glaucoma. Fifty-four isolates collected worldwide represented 31 distinct ribotypes. There was no evidence of biogeographic distribution patterns. For example, identical ribotypes occurred in samples from Argentina, Peru, Morocco, Russia and Ukraine; in samples from Denmark and Australia; and in samples from Great Salt Lake and hyperhaline ponds in Spain. The morphospecies Cyclidium glaucoma is euryhaline and occurs in freshwater, brackish water, seawater, and hyperhaline waters. Evidence suggests that one ribotype cluster occurs only in marine or brackish habitats, and another one has so far been found only in hyperhaline habitats. Two clades seem to occur only in freshwater, but one clade includes ribotypes that were found in freshwater as well as in brackish water.

Riboprinting: a tool for the study of genetic diversity in microorganisms

Classical morphology-based methods of taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis are inadequate in many groups of structurally simple eukaryotes. Molecular methods can generate data independently of the complexity of the organisms' morphology. Riboprinting is one such technique, and involves restriction enzyme analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplified small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. The utility of the method is illustrated with examples from several genera of intestinal and bloodstream parasites. Among the applications of riboprinting are the detection of cryptic genetic variation within species, organism misidentifications and culture mix-ups, independent verification of DNA sequences, and the rapid generation of data useful in phylogenetic analyses.

Intraspecific variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Entamoeba as revealed by riboprinting

Eighty-seven isolates of amebae assigned to the genus Entamoeba have been studied by riboprinting (restriction enzyme polymorphism analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplified small subunit ribosomal RNA genes). Twenty-four distinct patterns were obtained, most of which corresponded to previously described species. In three species (Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba gingivalis and Entamoeba moshkovskii) intraspecific variation was detected that led to the grouping of isolates into 'ribodemes' (populations of amebae that share the same riboprint pattern). The riboprint data were used to estimate genetic distances among and within species for the construction of phylogenetic trees based on parsimony and distance analyses. The trees obtained with the two methods are largely congruent. In some cases the estimated distances between species were greater than the upper limit recommended for the fragment comigration method of analysis indicating unusually deep branches within this genus. However, it appears that those species producing cysts with eight nuclei, those producing cysts with one nucleus, and those producing cysts with four nuclei form morphologically based groups that are supported by the riboprint data. The oral parasite Entamoeba gingivalis, which does not encyst, clusters with the third group indicating secondary loss of this ability.

On the identity of the amoeboflagellates Didascalus thorntoni and Adelphamoeba galeacystis

Didascalus thorntoni, Singh 1952 has been classified alternately as a separate genus or as a species of Naegleria. In the 18th edition of the American Type Culture Collection catalogue it is classified as Naegleria thorntoni. To resolve the question of its identity we have used riboprinting and sequencing of the small subunit ribosomal DNA. The results indicate that D. thorntoni does not belong to the genus Naegleria. The sequence of the small subunit ribosomal DNA differs only in 20 nucleotides (1%) from that of Paratetramitus jugosus. The difference is much smaller than between some species of Nageleria. Therefore, it is not clear whether D. thorntoni should be considered as a species of Paratetramitus or as a separate genus. The strain used in different laboratories as the type strain of Adelphamoeba galeacystis has been identified as a Naegleria strain. We believe that the type strain of A. galeacystis was mislabeled prior to submission to the American Type Culture Collection and to the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa. A recent isolate, which on the basis of morphology was identified as a strain of A. galeacystis, has the identical small subunit ribosomal DNA sequence as D. thorntoni. Our results prove Page was right when he stated that Adelphamoeba might be a synonym of Didascalus.