Lack of effect of terfenadine on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 substrate buspirone

Cytochrome P450 3A Time-Dependent Inhibition Assays Are Too Sensitive for Identification of Drugs Causing Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions: A Comparison of Human Liver Microsomes and Hepatocytes and Definition of Boundaries for Inactivation Rate Constants

Time-dependent inhibition (TDI) of CYP3A is an important mechanism underlying numerous drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and assays to measure this are done to support early drug research efforts. However, measuring TDI of CYP3A in human liver microsomes (HLMs) frequently yields overestimations of clinical DDIs and thus can lead to the erroneous elimination of many viable drug candidates from further development. In this investigation, 50 drugs were evaluated for TDI in HLMs and suspended human hepatocytes (HHEPs) to define appropriate boundary lines for the TDI parameter rate constant for inhibition (k_obs) at a concentration of 30 µM. In HLMs, a k_obs value of 0.002 minute^-1 was statistically distinguishable from control; however, many drugs show k_obs greater than this but do not cause DDI. A boundary line defined by the drug with the lowest k_obs that causes a DDI (diltiazem) was established at 0.01 minute^-1 Even with this boundary, of the 33 drugs above this value, only 61% cause a DDI (true positive rate). A corresponding analysis was done using HHEPs; k_obs of 0.0015 minute^-1 was statistically distinguishable from control, and the boundary was established at 0.006 minute^-1 Values of k_obs in HHEPs were almost always lower than those in HLMs. These findings offer a practical guide to the use of TDI data for CYP3A in early drug-discovery research. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A is responsible for many drug interactions. In vitro assays are employed in early drug research to identify and remove CYP3A time-dependent inhibitors from further consideration. This analysis demonstrates suitable boundaries for inactivation rates to better delineate drug candidates for their potential to cause clinically significant drug interactions.

Population-Based Assessments of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions: Qualitative Indices or Quantitative Measures?

Population-based assessments of drug-drug interactions have become more common since the introduction and acceptance of the population pharmacokinetic approach. Unlike traditional methods, population-based studies provide clinically relevant results that can be applied directly to a target patient population. Furthermore, population-based studies do not demand the traditional requirements of intensive pharmacokinetic sampling, rigorous inpatient stays, or stringent assessment schedules. As such, the population-based approach can effectively be used to confirm known drug-drug interactions and further characterize anticipated interactions. A prospectively designed analysis can also reveal drug-drug interactions that might otherwise have gone undetected with traditional methods. Ultimately, these results could help to alleviate clinicians' concerns about using widely marketed drugs in combination therapies and also reduce patients' risk of experiencing unacceptable side effects. This article intends to provide a balanced overview of the population-based approach and its merits, drawbacks, and potential utility in the assessment of drug-drug interactions during clinical drug development.

Identification of CYP3A4 as the primary cytochrome P450 responsible for the metabolism of tandospirone by human liver microsomes

The present study was carried out to characterize the human P450 isoforms involved in the metabolism of tandospirone, an anxiolytic agent known for its superior efficacy and safety. Among 11 yeast-expressed recombinant P450 isoforms tested, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 exhibited the highest tandospirone metabolic activity. Although there was no qualitative difference between the two isoforms, a quantitative difference in metabolite profiling was found i.e., M4 (hydroxylation of the pyrimidine ring) was the major metabolite formed with CYP2D6 while M2 (hydroxylation of the norbornan ring) and 1-PP (oxidative cleavage of the butyl chain) predominated with CYP3A4. The metabolite profile on incubation with CYP3A4 was qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that obtained with human liver microsomes. In vitro intrinsic clearance (CLint) values derived from kinetic analysis using both P450 isoforms were similar (2.2 and 1.6 ml/min/nmol P450), but the hepatic content of CYP3A4 was found to be more abundant than that of CYP2D6. The in vitro metabolism of tandospirone by human liver microsomes was markedly inhibited by ketoconazole (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) but not by quinidine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor). These results indicate that the metabolism of tandospirone by human liver microsomes primarily involves CYP3A4, and to a lesser extent CYP2D6.

Which concentration of the inhibitor should be used to predict in vivo drug interactions from in vitro data?

When the metabolism of a drug is competitively or noncompetitively inhibited by another drug, the degree of in vivo interaction can be evaluated from the [I]u/Ki ratio, where [I]u is the unbound concentration around the enzyme and Ki is the inhibition constant of the inhibitor. In the present study, we evaluated the metabolic inhibition potential of drugs known to be inhibitors or substrates of cytochrome P450 by estimating their [I]u/Ki ratio using literature data. The maximum concentration of the inhibitor in the circulating blood ([I]max), its maximum unbound concentration in the circulating blood ([I]max,u), and its maximum unbound concentration at the inlet to the liver ([I]in,max,u) were used as [I]u, and the results were compared with each other. In order to calculate the [I]u/Ki ratios, the pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug were obtained from the literature, together with their reported Ki values determined in in vitro studies using human liver microsomes. For most of the drugs with a calculated [I]in,max,u/Ki ratio less than 0.25, which applied to about half of the drugs investigated, no in vivo interactions had been reported or "no interaction" was reported in clinical studies. In contrast, the [I]max,u/Ki and [I]max/Ki ratio was calculated to be less than 0.25 for about 90% and 65% of the drugs, respectively, and more than a 1.25-fold increase was reported in the area under the concentration-time curve of the co-administered drug for about 30% of such drugs. These findings indicate that the possibility of underestimation of in vivo interactions (possibility of false-negative prediction) is greater when [I]max,u or [I]max values are used compared with using [I]in,max,u values.