Percutaneous PFO closure with Amplatzer PFO occluder: predictors of residual shunts at 6 months follow-up

Relationship between patent foramen ovale anatomical features and residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an effective strategy for preventing recurrence of paradoxical embolism. However, PFO closure is often associated with residual shunt, which is a risk of recurrent stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the anatomical features of PFO and residual shunt. The degree of residual shunt and its relationship with the anatomical features of PFO were evaluated in 106 patients who underwent PFO closure at our institution between March 2011 and January 2022 and in whom contrast transthoracic echocardiography was performed 1 year later. The mean PFO tunnel length was 9.3 ± 3.6 mm and the mean PFO height was 3.2 ± 2.2 mm. Atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) was found in 37 patients. After PFO closure, residual shunt was observed in 28 patients (grade 1, n = 8; grade 2, n = 16; grade 3, n = 3; grade 4, n = 1). Univariate logistic analysis identified ASA to be associated with residual shunt (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 6.79; p = 0.024). There was no association of residual shunt with the size of the PFO, the length of PFO tunnel, or the size of the device used for closure. Two of four patients with a large residual shunt of grade 3 or grade 4 were found to have device size mismatch. Residual shunt after PFO closure was observed in a quarter of patients and was related to the presence of ASA. A few patients had a large residual shunt due to the device size mismatch.

A Patent Foramen Ovale With an Atrial Septal Aneurysm in a Patient Presenting With Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an embryogenic remnant that can be found in healthy adults with no repercussions. However, it poses a risk of paradoxical embolism. In patients with known embolic stroke, the risk of recurrence is greater. A PFO can be accompanied by morphological variants such as atrial septal aneurysms (ASA). These have been shown to further increase the risk of stroke and embolism. This is a case of a patient who presented to the emergency department with deep vein thrombosis and sub-massive pulmonary embolism. An echocardiogram showed a PFO with an ASA as an incidental finding. The defect was closed with a transcatheter PFO closure device due to a high risk of paradoxical embolism.

Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure: Evolution and Ongoing Challenges

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) concerns nearly a quarter of the general population and incidence may reach up to 50% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Recent randomized clinical trials confirmed that percutaneous closure of PFO-related stroke reduces the risk of embolic event recurrence. PFO also comes into play in other pathogenic conditions, such as migraine, decompression sickness or platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, where the heterogeneity of patients is high and evidence for closure is less well-documented. In this review, we describe the current indications for PFO percutaneous closure and the remaining challenges, and try to provide future directions regarding the technique and its indications.

Percutaneous closure of 'complex' multi-fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm in visceral situs inversus using a multi-device approach: a case report

Background

Percutaneous closure is nowadays still deemed challenging in patent forame ovale (PFO) associated to multi-fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). This anatomic arrangement is still considered a significant risk factor for recurrence of paradoxical embolism. Theoretically, transcatheter approach could be theoretically even more complex in the case of dextrocardia and visceral situs inversus.

Case summary

A 59-year-old man with history of migraine with aura and multiple cryptogenic strokes was referred for percutaneous closure of a PFO with associated ASA. He had been previously submitted to repeat attempt of percutaneous closure with not self-centering and self-centering devices that failed due to unfavorable anatomic characteristics (dextrocardia with situs viscerum inversus, huge ASA, multiple fenestrations, large PFO). Based on this "complex" anatomy, a sequential 2-step interventional approach aiming to reduce size and mobility of the atrial septal aneurysm with a suture-based approach (Noblestich™ EL, HeartStitch, Fountain Valley, CA, USA) and to close any eventual accessory fenestrations with a not self-centering occluding device was planned. At the end of the procedure, the ASA completely disappeared and no residual shunt was imaged at TEE bubble test.

Discussion

We describe a very rare case of symptomatic ASA-PFO in dextrocardia with situs viscerum inversus as well as an innovative approach to treat such complex anatomic setting by using the suture-based closure of a PFO to reduce size and mobility of an ASA in order to deploy dedicated not-self-centering occluding devices.

Clinical Performance of the Gore Septal Occluder in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Different Septal Anatomies: 1-Year Results from a Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

PFO (Patent foramen ovale) is a common defect that affects about 25% of the population. Although its presence is asymptomatic in the majority of the cases, the remaining part becomes overt with different symptoms, including cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure is currently a widely available procedure in complex anatomy, with Amplatzer PFO Occluder (APO) being the most commonly used tool. However, the performance of another device, the GORE Septal Occluder (GSO), has not been completely explored with regard to different septal anatomies.

METHODS

From March 2012 to June 2020, 118 consecutive patients with an indication of PFO closure were treated using the GSO system, included in a prospective analysis, and followed. After 12 months, every patient underwent transcranial Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients evaluated, 107 showed effective PFO closure (96.4%), and 4 showed a residual shunt (3.6%). To better evaluate the device performance, the overall population was sorted into two clusters based on the echocardiographic characteristics. The main difference between groups was for PFO width (4.85 ± 1.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1 mm, p < 0.001) and PFO tunnel length (12.6 ± 3.8 vs. 7.2 ± 2, p < 0.001), allowing complex and simple anatomies to be identified, respectively. Regardless of the aforementioned cluster, the GSO performance required to reach an effective closure was independent of anatomy type and the chosen device size.

CONCLUSION

The GSO device showed a high closure rate at 1-year follow-up in patients, with at least one anatomical factor of complexity of PFO irrespective of the level of complexity itself.

Application of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Amplatzer Atrial Septal Defect Occluder for Percutaneous Closure of Large Patent Foramen Ovale

Objective. The Amplatzer patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder is the most commonly used device for percutaneous closure of a large PFO. However, its use may predispose the patient to postoperative residual shunting. To reduce the incidence of residual shunting, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder for percutaneous closure of a large PFO measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and evaluated the value of TEE in this procedure. Methods. Overall, 118 patients who were diagnosed with a large PFO (all with $a\ge 2$  mm left atrial side height after the Valsalva maneuver (VM) excluding those with a small ASD) using contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) and TEE underwent closure under TEE guidance at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. An ASD device was used in 48 patients (group I) and a PFO device in 70 (group II). After the procedure, we verified the safety and efficacy of different devices using c-TTE, TTE, and TEE. Results. In both groups, the preoperative TEE results showed a significantly increased left height of the PFO after VM compared with that at rest (all $P<0.01$ ). Compared with the left height of the PFO measured using TEE after VM, the PFO-stretch diameter (SD) measured by TEE after the delivery sheath passed the PFO was higher (all $P<0.01$ ). We selected the ASD occluder size according to this PFO-SD. In group II, most patients underwent the implantation of the larger PFO devices. Interventional treatment was successfully performed on all patients. The effective occlusion rate in group I at 12 months after the procedure was significantly higher than that in group II (93.7% vs. 78.6%, $P<0.05$ ). The TEE results showed that 18 patients with a medium and large residual shunt at 12 months after the procedure exhibited an intradisc tunnel-like shunt. Conclusion. The Amplatzer ASD device and Amplatzer PFO device are safe for large PFO closure, but the Amplatzer ASD device has a higher effective occlusion rate. TEE plays a crucial role in the use of the Amplatzer ASD occluder for percutaneous closure of a large PFO.

Recurrent stroke secondary to late patent foramen ovale-closure device thrombus: a case report

Background

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has been well established in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke with overall low rates of procedural complications. One such complication is PFO closure device thrombus formation which is now rarely reported with newer generation devices.

Case summary

We present the unusual case of a 59-year-old woman with myelofibrosis who developed late-onset recurrent embolic strokes related to Amplatzer PFO closure device thrombus whilst therapeutically anticoagulated on Warfarin. Surgical management was deemed too high risk and our patient was conservatively managed with enoxaparin. Serial transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a reduction in thrombus size and the patient had no further neurological events.

Discussion

Overall, the risk of serious complications following percutaneous PFO closure, such as device-associated thrombus, remains low. The risk of thrombus formation in patients with hypercoagulable states is not well characterized. Despite good evidence for the efficacy in preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke, the role of PFO closure in addition to anticoagulation is unclear. Given this uncertain benefit of PFO closure in anticoagulated patients and the unclear risk profile, patient selection, and thorough pre-procedural evaluation are vital when assessing the appropriateness of percutaneous PFO closure.

Patent Foramen Ovale: Pivotal Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Indications for Closure, Assessment of Varying Anatomies and Post-procedure Follow-up

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in 15%-30% of the general population and has been associated with various pathologic states, including cryptogenic stroke, platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, decompression sickness and migraine with auras. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has a major role in the diagnostic evaluation of PFO, as well as in the post-procedural assessment after transcatheter closure. The goals of this article were to synthesize the echocardiographic transesophageal techniques required for accurate PFO diagnosis and careful anatomic assessment of its anatomic variants, to focus TEE indications for device closure as complementary to clinical indications and to assess the role of TEE in the post-procedure follow-up.

AMPLATZER versus Figulla occluder for transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure

AIMS

The aim of this observational study was to compare acute and 12-month results of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with two occluder devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between June 2007 and October 2014, 406 consecutive patients (48.1±13.3 years, 243 women) underwent percutaneous PFO closure with either the AMPLATZER (n=179) or the Figulla (n=227) device after a stroke or a transient ischaemic attack ascribed to the PFO. A right-to-left shunt grade >1 was previously detected in all patients and atrial septal aneurysm was present in 111 (27.5%) patients. Patients were followed up with a contrast transthoracic echocardiogram and clinically at 24 hours, six months, and 12 months after the procedure. A high procedural success was observed in both groups. Despite a trend towards a higher incidence of acute residual shunt immediately after device deployment among Figulla occluder patients, a residual grade ≥2 right-to-left shunt was observed in 4.5% of patients, independently of the device used for PFO closure. The only difference reported after Figulla device implantation was a lower rate of supraventricular arrhythmias (9% vs. 17%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this two-centre study, PFO closure appears safe and effective with the Figulla occluder as well as with the AMPLATZER device.

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter closure in adults with large or small atrial septal defects

Background

In most patients with secundum atrial septal defects (ASD), transcatheter closure is the preferred treatment strategy, but whether device size affects clinical outcomes is unknown. We sought to study the efficacy and safety of large closure devices compared to the use of smaller devices.

Methods

Using a single-center, prospective registry of adult patients undergoing transcatheter ASD closure, patients receiving a large closure device (waist diameter ≥25 mm, n = 41) were compared to patients receiving smaller devices (waist diameter ≤24 mm, n = 66). We analyzed pre-interventional clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic data, interventional success and complication rates, and 6-month clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. The primary efficacy outcome was successful ASD closure achieved by a single procedure and confirmed by lack of a significant residual shunt at 6 months. The primary safety outcome was a composite of device embolization, major bleeding, and new-onset atrial arrhythmia occurring within 6 months.

Results

Transcatheter ASD closure using large devices was successful in 90 % compared to 97 % of patients receiving smaller devices as defined by the primary efficacy outcome (p = 0.20). The primary safety outcome occurred in 4 patients of the large and 6 patients of the small device group, resulting in an event-free rate of 90 and 91 %, respectively (p = 0.89). Similar significant symptomatic improvement was observed in both treatment groups after 6 months, indicated by a 50 % increase in the fraction of patients in NYHA class I (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline).

Conclusions

Transcatheter closure in this cohort of patients with large or small ASD was effective with similar complication rates during short-term follow-up irrespective of the size of the implanted device.

Percutaneous implantation of a second device in patients with residual right-to-left shunt after patent foramen ovale closure

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients with residual right-to-left shunt (rRLS) after percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is debated. The aim of this study was to define the incidence of moderate-to-large rRLS and to report the feasibility, safety and long-term clinical outcome of transcatheter closure of rRLS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From June 2000 to March 2013, 322 subjects underwent percutaneous PFO closure. In 39 patients (12.1%) with moderate-to-large rRLS on transcranial Doppler (TCD) and/or transesophageal echocardiogram a second cardiac catheterization was performed with the aim of completing the closure. A second closure device was implanted in 21 patients (53.8%). In the remaining 18 (46.2%), a second device was not delivered for the following reasons: in 13 (72.2%) no residual passage could be crossed, in 5 (27.8%) the residual shunt was deemed to be negligible. No complications occurred. After the second procedure, complete closure was proved by TCD in 16/21 (76.2%) subjects. One patient received a third device. During follow-up (41 ± 19 months), no cerebrovascular ischemic accidents occurred.

CONCLUSION

A second percutaneous PFO occlusion device can be safely implanted in patients with significant rRLS. However, a moderate-to-large rRLS on TCD and/or TEE may not necessarily represent a significant risk of further paradoxical embolization.

Residual shunting after percutaneous PFO closure: how to manage and how to close

INTRODUCTION

Initial transcatheter Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure attempt may be incomplete and result in persistent residual shunting. The optimal treatment strategy for these patients remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed to have a moderate-large residual shunt at least 12 months after initial PFO closure associated or not to a recurrent ischemic event and underwent a second procedure. Residual shunt characteristics were classified in two types: Type I: tunnel-like or between the disk defect (11 patients); Type II: accessory defect next to a device rim or accessory defect (16 patients).

RESULTS

Fourteen subjects had a recurrent transient ischemic attack/stroke (52%). Median time between the first and the second PFO closure procedure was 17 months (range 12-60 months). Deployment of a second device was successful in 92% (25/27) patients. A Type I defect was closed by using a coil or Amplatzer Vascular Plugs. In two patients a surgical option was chosen as a first option. A Type II defect was closed by using a double disc device. At a median follow-up of 36 months (range 12-60 months), two subjects showed significant residual shunting between the two disks of the device (Type I) at 12 months follow-up and were sent to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant residual shunts can be successfully closed by using a second device. Care is required to select an optimal device depending on anatomy and original device. In some subjects, lack of endothelial covering account for the persistence of a significant residual shunting.

Meta-analysis of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale in prevention of recurrent neurological events after presumed paradoxical embolism

OBJECTIVES

In this study, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to compare the rate of recurrent neurological events (RNE) between transcatheter closure and medical management of patients with cryptogenic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and concomitant patent foramen ovale (PFO).

BACKGROUND

A significant controversy surrounds the optimal strategy for treatment of cryptogenic stroke/TIA and coexistent PFO.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE search with standard search terms to determine eligible studies.

RESULTS

Adjusted incidence rates of RNE were 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 1.1) events and 5.0 (95% CI: 3.6 to 6.9) events/100 person-years (PY) in the transcatheter closure and medical management arms, respectively. Meta-analysis of the limited number of comparative studies and meta-regression analysis suggested that the transcatheter closure might be superior to the medical therapy in prevention of RNE after cryptogenic stroke. Comparison of the anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy subgroups of the medical arm yielded a significantly lower risk of RNE within patients treated with anticoagulants. Device-related complications were encountered at the rate of 4.1 (95% CI: 3.2 to 5.0) events/100 PY, with atrial arrhythmias being the most frequent complication. After transcatheter closure, RNE did not seem to be related to the pre-treatment shunt size or the presence of residual shunting in the follow-up period. Significant benefit of transcatheter PFO closure was apparent in elderly patients, patients with concomitant atrial septal aneurysm, and patients with thrombophilia.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of RNE with transcatheter closure and medical therapy in patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke or TIA were estimated at 0.8 and 5.0 events/100 PY. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively compare these 2 management strategies.

Influence of PFO Anatomy on Successful Transcatheter Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a risk factor for serious clinical syndromes, the most important of which is cryptogenic stroke in the setting of paradoxic embolism. The safety and feasibility of transcatheter PFO closure have been addressed in several studies; this procedure is performed worldwide with excellent results. Variations in the atrial septal configuration and PFO are frequent and have an impact on the technical aspects and success in transcatheter PFO closure. To minimize the rate of complications of percutaneous closure of PFO, patients must be carefully selected on the basis of morphology and location of the interatrial defect.

Three-dimensional imaging of the atrial septum and patent foramen ovale anatomy: defining the morphological phenotypes of patent foramen ovale

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is known to occur with greater prevalence in those with cryptogenic stroke. These observations support the role of a PFO as a channel for paradoxical embolism and a mechanism for cerebral ischaemic events. Transcatheter closure of PFO may be indicated in this setting. A prerequisite of procedural success is achieving complete closure of the shunt. Studies have shown a varying degree of successful shunt closure. Residual shunts are usually the result of a mismatch between the device shape and PFO anatomy. In this article, we review the features of PFO and their surrounding structures as seen by three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing transcatheter closure and relate these to the variations in morphology on anatomical specimens for a better appreciation of their suitability for closure devices. The salient features of the anatomical variations seen in adults undergoing transcatheter device closure have been summarized and used to produce a practical pre-procedural checklist.

Patent foramen ovale closure using a bioabsorbable closure device: safety and efficacy at 6-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using a bioabsorbable device (BioSTAR, NMT Medical, Boston, Massachusetts).

BACKGROUND

Closure of PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke has proven to be safe and effective using different types of permanent devices.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the bioabsorbable closure device between November 2007 and January 2009 were included. Residual shunt was assessed using contrast transthoracic echocardiography.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (55% women, mean age 47.7 ± 11.8 years) underwent PFO closure. The in-hospital complications were a surgical device retrieval in 2 patients (3.2%), device reposition in 1 (1.6%), and a minimal groin hematoma in 6 patients (9.7%). The short-term complications at 1-month follow-up (n = 60) were a transient ischemic attack in the presence of a residual shunt in 1 patient and new supraventricular tachycardia in 7 patients (11.3%). At 6-month follow-up (n = 60), 1 patient without residual shunt developed a transient ischemic attack and 1 developed atrial fibrillation. A mild or moderate residual shunt was noted in 51.7%, 33.9%, and 23.7% after 1-day, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up, respectively. A large shunt was present in 8.3%, 3.4%, and 0% after 1-day, 1-month, and 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Closure of PFO using the bioabsorbable device is associated with a low complication rate and a low recurrence rate of embolic events. However, a relatively high percentage of mild or moderate residual shunting is still present at 6-month follow-up.