Schedule-dependent efficacy of camptothecins in models of human cancer

How translational modeling in oncology needs to get the mechanism just right

Translational model‐based approaches have played a role in increasing success in the development of novel anticancer treatments. However, despite this, significant translational uncertainty remains from animal models to patients. Optimization of dose and scheduling (regimen) of drugs to maximize the therapeutic utility (maximize efficacy while avoiding limiting toxicities) is still predominately driven by clinical investigations. Here, we argue that utilizing pragmatic mechanism‐based translational modeling of nonclinical data can further inform this optimization. Consequently, a prototype model is demonstrated that addresses the required fundamental mechanisms.

Beta-lactoglobulin-nutrition allergen and nanotransporter of different nature ligands therapy with therapeutic action

β-lactoglobulin is one of the nutrition allergens present in the milk of many mammals, with the exception of human. This protein belongs to the family of lipocalins, consisting of nine antiparallel β-strands (β-A to β-I) and one α-helix. This structure allows it to serve as a nanotransporter of various nature ligands in a pH dependent manner, which allows us to confidently consider it as a reliable carrier of drugs directly into the intestine, bypassing the destructive acidic environment of the stomach. Based on the latest data, this review describes the currently known methods of reducing the allergenicity of beta-lactoglobulin, as well as the mechanisms and methods of forming complexes of this protein with ligands, which emphasizes its importance and versatility and explains the growing interest in studying its properties in recent decades, and also opens up prospects for its practical application in medicine and pharmaceuticals.

Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A

PURPOSE

Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification.

METHODS

Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as 'extreme responders' to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as 'resistant'.

RESULTS

The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (r2 = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (r2 = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53, or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.

β-lactoglobulin-irinotecan inclusion complex as a new targeted nanocarrier for colorectal cancer cells

Beta-lactoglobulin (β-LG) is a lipocalin family member whose general function appears to be solubilizing and transport of hydrophobic molecules. Some properties such as avalability, ease of purification, and peculiar resistance to acidic environments can make β-LG as a carrier for hydrophobic and acid labile drugs for oral administration. In this protein vehicle, drug could be protected in acidic environment of stomach and then released within the basic small intestine. In this study, the potential of β-LG as a nanocarrier for oral delivery of a potent agent in colorectal cancer treatment, irinotecan, was evaluated. The nanoparticle was prepared by the physical inclusion complex method. Size, drug loading, encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro drug release at various pH values were investigated. The optimum formulation showed a narrow size distribution with an average diameter of 139.86 ± 13.75 nm and drug loading about 84.33 ± 5.03%. Based on the results obtained from docking simulation of irinotecan-complex, there are two distinct binding sites in this nanocarrier. Cytotoxicity of this nanocarrier on the HT-29 cancer cell line and AGS was measured by MTT assay. The cytotoxicity experiment showed that the drug-loaded nanocarrier was more effective than free drug. The higher release percent of drug from the β-LG complex at pH 7.4 compared to pH 1.2 indicated that the proposed nanocarrier could be introduced as a suitable nanovehicle for labile drugs in acidic medium targeted for colorectal segment.

Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Purpose Intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) includes patients with either nonmetastatic, unresected embryonal RMS (ERMS) with an unfavorable primary site or nonmetastatic alveolar RMS (ARMS). The primary aim of this study was to improve the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk RMS by substituting vincristine and irinotecan (VI) for half of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) courses. All patients received a lower dose of cyclophosphamide and earlier radiation therapy than in previous trials. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at study entry to either VAC (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 16.8 g/m²) or VAC/VI (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 8.4 g/m²) for 42 weeks of therapy. Radiation therapy started at week 4, with individualized local control plans permitted for patients younger than 24 months. The primary study end point was event-free survival (EFS). The study design had an 80% power (5% one-sided α-level) to detect an improved long-term EFS from 65% (with VAC) to 76% (with VAC/VI). Results A total of 448 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the 4-year EFS was 63% with VAC and 59% with VAC/VI ( P = .51), and 4-year overall survival was 73% for VAC and 72% for VAC/VI ( P = .80). Within the ARMS and ERMS subgroups, no difference in outcome by treatment arm was found. Severe hematologic toxicity was less common with VAC/VI therapy. Conclusion The addition of VI to VAC did not improve EFS or OS for patients with intermediate-risk RMS. VAC/VI had less hematologic toxicity and a lower cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, making VAC/VI an alternative standard therapy for intermediate-risk RMS.

Extended topoisomerase 1 inhibition through liposomal irinotecan results in improved efficacy over topotecan and irinotecan in models of small-cell lung cancer

Liposomal irinotecan (irinotecan liposome injection, nal-IRI), a liposomal formulation of irinotecan, is designed for extended circulation relative to irinotecan and for exploiting discontinuous tumor vasculature for enhanced drug delivery to tumors. Following tumor deposition, nal-IRI is taken up by phagocytic cells followed by irinotecan release and conversion to its active metabolite, SN-38. Sustained inhibition of topoisomerase 1 by extended SN-38 exposure as a result of delivery by nal-IRI is hypothesized to enable superior antitumor activity compared with traditional topoisomerase 1 inhibitors such as conventional irinotecan and topotecan. We evaluated the antitumor activity of nal-IRI compared with irinotecan and topotecan in preclinical models of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) including in a model pretreated with carboplatin and etoposide, a first-line regimen used in SCLC. Nal-IRI demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models of SCLC at clinically relevant dose levels, and resulted in complete or partial responses in DMS-53, DMS-114, and NCI-H1048 cell line-derived models as well as in three patient-derived xenograft models. The antitumor activity of nal-IRI was superior to that of topotecan in all models tested, which generally exhibited limited control of tumor growth and was superior to irinotecan in four out of five models. Further, nal-IRI demonstrated antitumor activity in tumors that progressed following treatment with topotecan or irinotecan, and demonstrated significantly greater antitumor activity than both topotecan and irinotecan in NCI-H1048 tumors that had progressed on previous carboplatin plus etoposide treatment. These results support the clinical development of nal-IRI in patients with SCLC.

Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefit and can, alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy), be used for treating primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier, high intraperitoneal drug concentration can be achieved by intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas systemic concentration remains low. Bidirectional chemotherapy may provide in addition adequate drug concentrations from the side of the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal tumour nodules. Major pharmacological problems of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are limited tissue penetration and poor homogeneity of drug distribution to the entire seroperitoneal surface. Significant pharmacological determinants of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are choice of drug, drug dosage, solution volume, carrier solution, intra-abdominal pressure, temperature, duration, mode of administration, extent of peritonectomy and interindividual variability. Drugs most commonly applied for intraperitoneal chemotherapy include mitomycin C, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluoruracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, premetrexed and melphalan. The drugs and their doses that are used vary widely among centres. While the adequate drug choice for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy is essential, randomized clinical trials to determine the most optimal drug or drug combination are lacking, and only eight retrospective comparative clinical studies are available. Further clinical pharmacological studies are required to determine the most effective drug regimen for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy in various indications. In the future, reliable drug sensitivity testing and genetic profiling of peritoneal metastases will be needed for enabling patient-specific therapy.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of an Orally Active Novel Camptothecin Analog, DRF-1042, in Refractory Cancer Patients in a Phase I Dose Escalation Study

The objective of this study was to characterize the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor effects of DRF-1042, a novel camptothecin analog, in refractory solid tumor patients. DRF-1042 was given for 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks at 1.5 to 270 mg/m(2). Adverse events were monitored following NCI-CTC. Pharmacokinetics of lactone and total forms were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and noncompartmental methods. Efficacy was evaluated applying World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The 1st course was used to determine DLT and MTD. Twenty-five patients received 73 courses of therapy. Myelosuppression and diarrhea were DLTs. MTD was 120 mg/m(2)/day. AUC increased approximately linearly with dose. The t(1/2) for lactone and total forms was 9.9 and 29 hours, respectively. AUCs correlated significantly with nadir leucopenia and grade 4 diarrhea. Two complete responses (CRs) and 2 partial responses (PRs) were observed. In addition, 4 stable diseases were observed. The recommended phase II dose is 80 mg/m(2)/day.

Initial testing of topotecan by the pediatric preclinical testing program

BACKGROUND

Topotecan is a small molecule DNA topoisomerase I poison, that has been successful in clinical trials against pediatric solid tumors and leukemias. Topotecan was evaluated against the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) tumor panels as part of a validation process for these preclinical models.

PROCEDURES

In vivo three measures of antitumor activity were used: (1) an objective response measure modeled after the clinical setting; (2) a treated to control (T/C) tumor volume measure; and (3) a time to event (fourfold increase in tumor volume for solid tumor models, or > or =25% human CD45+ cells in the peripheral blood for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL models) measure based on the median event-free survival (EFS) of treated and control animals for each xenograft.

RESULTS

Topotecan inhibited cell growth in vitro with IC(50) values between 0.71 and 489 nM. Topotecan significantly increased EFS in 32 of 37 (87%) solid tumor xenografts and in all 8 of the ALL xenografts. Seventy-five percent of solid tumors met EFS T/C activity criteria for intermediate (n = 17) or high activity (n = 7). Objective responses were noted in eight solid tumor xenografts (Wilms, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma). Among the six neuroblastomas, three achieved a PR. For the ALL panel, two maintained CRs, three CRs, and two PRs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan demonstrated broad activity in vitro and in vivo against both the solid tumor and ALL panels, with significant tumor growth delay generated in all the panels. These results further demonstrate the validity of the PPTP panel for preclinical testing of new drugs.

Using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation to evaluate importance of schedule in topotecan therapy for pediatric neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

The study aims to use mathematical modeling and simulation to assess the relative contribution of topotecan systemic exposure and scheduling in the activity and myelosuppression of topotecan in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were obtained from a phase II study for pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. The topotecan dosage was individualized to attain a topotecan lactone area under the plasma concentration-time curve between 80 and 120 ng/mL h and given over a protracted schedule (i.e., 10 days). Four mathematical models describing topotecan pharmacokinetics, tumor growth, and neutrophil and platelet dynamics were developed. The models were combined to simulate and compare different topotecan treatment strategies with respect to systemic exposure and schedule.

RESULTS

The median change in tumor volume was significantly different between schedules (5% increase for D x 5 versus 60% decrease for D x 5 x 2; P < 0.0001) when administering the same total systemic exposure. Whereas protracted schedules showed increased neutropenia (median of 7 versus 12 days below an absolute neutrophil count of 500/microL; P < 0.0001) and thrombocytopenia (median of 3 versus 10 days below a platelet count of 20,000/microL; P < 0.00001), simulations showed that delays in topotecan therapy would not be required. Simulations showed that an increase in topotecan exposure on the D x 5 schedule by 2.4-fold resulted in a modest decrease in tumor volume (i.e., median percentage change tumor volume of 24% versus 3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present mathematical model gave an innovative approach to determining relevant topotecan schedules for possible evaluation in the clinic, which could lead to improved tumor response with minimized toxicities.

Topotecan is active against Wilms' tumor: results of a multi-institutional phase II study

PURPOSE

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of topotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent Wilms' tumor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with favorable histology Wilms' tumor (FHWT) and recurrence after at least one salvage chemotherapy regimen or with anaplastic histology Wilms' tumor (AHWT) in first or subsequent recurrence were eligible. Patients were stratified according to histology, with statistical considerations based on the FHWT stratum. Topotecan was administered intravenously over 30 minutes for 5 days on 2 consecutive weeks. Treatment dosages were adjusted to achieve a target area under the curve (AUC) of 80 +/- 10 ng/mL*h. Tumor responses were measured after two cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (26 patients with FHWT) were enrolled and received a total of 94 cycles of topotecan (range, one to six cycles). The median topotecan dosage required to achieve the target AUC was 1.8 mg/m2 (range, 0.7 to 3.2 mg/m2). Of 25 assessable patients with FHWT, 12 had partial response (PR), six had stable disease (SD), and seven had progressive disease (PD), for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI, 27.8% to 68.7%). Of 11 assessable patients with AHWT, two had PR, one had SD, and eight had PD. The main toxicities were grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (median duration, 13 days) and thrombocytopenia (median duration, 7.5 days).

CONCLUSION

Topotecan administered on a protracted schedule is active against recurrent FHWT. Inclusion of topotecan in front-line clinical trials for patients with recurrent Wilms' tumor should be considered.

A phase I, randomized, open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-finding study of elacridar (GF120918) and oral topotecan in cancer patients

PURPOSE

Breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) substantially limits the oral bioavailability of topotecan. Coadministration with elacridar, an inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein-mediated drug transport, increases the bioavailability of topotecan. The aim of this study was to establish the lowest effective dose of elacridar to obtain maximum oral bioavailability of topotecan and to determine the optimal schedule of coadministration of oral topotecan and elacridar. In the second part of this study, dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of oral topotecan coadministered with elacridar, at a daily times five regimen administered every 21 days, were established.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In part I, 20 patients were randomized to receive 100, 300, 500, 700, or 1,000 mg of elacridar on days 1 and 8 1 h before or simultaneously with 2.0 mg oral topotecan, which was also randomized. On day 15, all patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. topotecan. In part II of the study, patients were treated daily with oral topotecan and with the lowest effective dose of elacridar following from part I. The maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity were determined in cohorts of three patients. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 8, and 15 of part I and on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2 of part II.

RESULTS

Complete apparent oral bioavailability of topotecan (102 +/- 7%) for all treatment arms with elacridar in both schedules was seen in part I. In the topotecan dose escalation part, two dose-limiting toxicities were seen at the 2.5 mg topotecan dose level.

CONCLUSION

The recommended schedule is 2.0 mg oral topotecan plus 100 mg elacridar administered concomitantly daily times five every 21 days.

Two consecutive phase II window trials of irinotecan alone or in combination with vincristine for the treatment of metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To estimate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan alone and in combination with vincristine when administered as window therapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients younger than age 21 years with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma received window therapy with two cycles of irinotecan (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, repeated for 2 weeks) and 50 patients received window therapy with vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (weeks 0, 1, 3, and 4) and two cycles of irinotecan (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, repeated for 2 weeks). Patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) received these agents alternating with vincristine (V; 1.5/mg/m2), dactinomycin (A; 1.5 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (C; 2.2 g/m2) during weeks 6 through 41. Nonresponders were treated with VAC alone. Radiotherapy was administered to sites of disease at weeks 15 to 21.

RESULTS

The window response rate (PR/CR) for patients who received irinotecan was 42% (95% CI, 38% to 80%) but the high progressive disease (PD) rate of 32% (95% CI, 11% to 52%) prompted closure of the trial. The window CR/PR rate for patients who received vincristine and irinotecan was 70% (95% CI, 57% to 83%), and the PD rate was only 8%. GI toxicities (abdominal pain, diarrhea, dehydration) were the most common adverse effects associated with the administration of irinotecan.

CONCLUSION

The combination of vincristine and irinotecan is highly active in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. The different mechanism of action and nonoverlapping toxicity profile with VAC makes this combination an attractive candidate for further testing in intermediate risk patients with rhabdomyosarcoma.

Concerted escalation of dose and dosing duration in a phase I study of the oral camptothecin gimatecan (ST1481) in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Gimatecan is an orally bioavailable camptothecin analogue with preclinical findings of promising antitumor activity. A phase I design of concerted dose escalation and dosing duration was implemented to assess the potential schedule dependency of tolerability that emerged from animal studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gimatecan was given daily for five consecutive days per week for 1, 2 or 3 weeks every 28 days. Plasma levels of total gimatecan were measured on the first and the last day of treatment in each schedule.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 patients were treated with 0.8-7.2 mg/m(2) of gimatecan per cycle. The main toxicity was myelosuppression with dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. In the 1-, 2- and 3-week schedule, the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5, 5.6 and 6.4 mg/m(2). Diarrhea and asthenia were of low grade and of minor clinical relevance, while the higher incidence of nausea and vomiting in the 1-week schedule required the use of antiemetic prophylaxis. Due to the prolonged half-life (approximately 77 h), the plasma concentration of gimatecan increased from the first to the last day of dosing. Six partial responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerability of gimatecan was schedule dependent. Further testing with schedules taking into account its long persistence in human plasma is worthwhile.

Topotecan and cyclophosphamide in patients with refractory or relapsed Ewing tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of Ewing tumor (ET) patients has significantly improved to cure rates approximating 70%. The prognosis in relapse, however, is poor. Promising response rates have recently been reported for the combination of topotecan (TOPO) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) encouraging wider application of this combination in patients with relapsed ETs. This report summarizes the experience of patients treated with TOPO/CYC for recurrent or refractory disease within the German ET trials.

PROCEDURE

Fifty-four patients aged 3.2-49.5 (median: 17.4) years received TOPO (0.75 mg/m2/day, days 1-5) and CYC (250 mg/m2/day, days 1-5) following first (40) or second (6) relapse or progression under first-line therapy (8).

RESULTS

A median of 3 (range: 1-11) TOPO/CYC courses were given. Sixteen patients (32.6%) showed partial response (PR), 13/49 (26.5%) had stable disease (SD), 14/49 (28.6%) progressed, 2/49 (4.1%) showed a mixed response (MR). In 4 patients response was not documented, 5/54 patients with complete initial resection at the diagnosis of relapse were excluded from the response analysis. At completion of relapse therapy, 24/54 patients had entered complete (19) or partial (5) remission, 2 had SD, 26 showed progression, information was unavailable in 2 patients. Of the 19 relapse patients achieving complete response (CR), 10 maintained remission (52.6%). At the time of evaluation, after a median follow-up for survivors of 23.1 (range: 7.8-59.8) months from the event prompting TOPO/CYC treatment, 14/54 patients (25.9%) were in continuous complete (13) or partial (1) remission. Overall survival (OAS) after 1 year was 0.61 (95%-CI 0.47-0.74).

CONCLUSION

TOPO/CYC is active in relapsed ETs and warrants further evaluation.

Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Orally Administered Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the daily maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity for the following administration schedules: oral irinotecan given over 14 days every 3 weeks (part I) and oral irinotecan administered concomitantly with capecitabine over 14 days every 3 weeks (part II). In total, 42 patients (17 male and 25 female) with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy entered the study.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Treatment in part I consisted of irinotecan administered orally as semisolid matrix capsules at doses of 25, 30, and 35 mg/m(2) once daily to confirm the MTD of our earlier study. In part II treatment, dose levels for irinotecan combined with capecitabine were 20/1,600, 25/1,600, 30/1,600, and 30/2,000 mg/m(2)/d.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles administered per patient was 2.0 (range, 1-12) in part I and 2.0 (range, 1-13) in study part II. Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grades 3 and 4 vomiting, and grades 3 and 4 diarrhea) were dose limiting in both parts of the study. There were no grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m(2)/d for irinotecan single agent and 30/1,600 mg/m(2)/d for the combination with capecitabine. Absorption of irinotecan was rapid, and peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 0 to 3 and 1.5 to 4.0 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, oral irinotecan and capecitabine is feasible and well tolerated, and the recommended dose for phase II studies is 30/1,600 mg/m(2)/d administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Topotecan Can Compensate for Protracted Radiation Treatment Time Effects in High Grade Glioma Xenografts*

PURPOSE

Several studies reported that prolongation of overall treatment time of fractionated radiotherapy reduces the chance of tumor control. In the present study, we hypothesize that combining topotecan with irradiation could compensate for this detrimental time effect on the radioresponse. Therefore, we investigated the efficiency of different schedules of topotecan (TPT), radiotherapy (RT) or concomitant combination TPT + RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Experiments were performed in two human high-grade glioma xenograft models (U87 and GBM Nan1). TPT and RT were delivered at a total dose of 3 mg/kg and 40 Gy, respectively. For the TPT + RT groups, TPT was injected 5 min before radiation. Total radiation doses were delivered in 5, 10, 20, or 30 fractions over 1, 2, 4, or 6 weeks, respectively. The efficiency of TPT, RT, and TPT + RT was evaluated by tumor growth delay (TGD).

RESULTS

At this low total dose, and independent of the schedule, no efficacy was found in TPT-treated glioma xenografts. Conversely, radiotherapy-induced antitumor effect decreased with prolongation of treatment time. For TPT + RT combination, antitumor activity was not influenced by schedule, and tumor response was always comparable to those measured for the shortest and the most efficient irradiation schedule (i.e. 1 week). When treatment was delivered over 4 or 6 weeks in U87 glioma xenografts, therapeutic enhancement ratios reached 2.6 and 3.7, respectively. This indicated that the interaction between ionizing radiation and topotecan was synergistic.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that concomitant topotecan can compensate for the detrimental effect of treatment time protraction on radiotherapy efficacy in two malignant glioma xenografts.

Development and validation of limited sampling models for topotecan lactone pharmacokinetic studies in children

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model (LSM) for intravenous and oral topotecan pharmacokinetic studies in children.

METHODS

Topotecan lactone concentration-time data from five trials were used to develop and validate LSM for intravenous and oral topotecan. Based on full sampling from one intravenous study (30 patients; 195 studies), a LSM for intravenous topotecan was determined using a modification of the D-optimality algorithm. For oral topotecan we used full sampling data from one oral topotecan study (27 patients; 47 studies) to develop an LSM. Accuracy and bias of each LSM were determined relative to the full sampling method. Predictive performance of the LSM was validated using additional data and Monte-Carlo simulations based on these data.

RESULTS

LSM for intravenous topotecan includes: 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of the 30 min infusion. The median accuracy (absolute predicted error) and bias (predicted error) are < or =8% and < or =6.1%, respectively. For oral topotecan, the optimal LSM includes: 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h. The median accuracy and bias are 6% and 4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the optimal sampling times for the intravenous LSM for topotecan in children consist of: predose, and 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of infusion. For oral topotecan the sample times are predose, 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h after dose administration. These LSM are invaluable to children receiving topotecan because it minimizes inconvenience and blood collection.

Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice

As a single agent the ERBB1 inhibitor, gefitinib (Iressa; ZD1839) showed minimal activity against a panel of 10 pediatric tumor xenografts that do not express the ERBB1 receptor. However, combined with irinotecan (CPT-11), significantly greater than additive activity was observed in four of eight models (P < 0.05), and the combination showed enhanced activity against three additional tumor lines. Breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2), a transporter that confers resistance to SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), was readily detected in six of nine xenograft models examined by immunohistochemistry. In vitro gefitinib potently reversed resistance to SN-38 only in a cell line that overexpressed functional ABCG2. However, overexpression of ABCG2 did not decrease accumulation nor increase the rate of efflux of [(14)C]gefitinib. On the basis of these results and the distribution of Abcg2 in mouse tissues, we assessed the ability of gefitinib to modulate irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Oral gefitinib coadministration resulted in no change in clearance of intravenously administered irinotecan. However, gefitinib treatment dramatically increased the oral bioavailability of irinotecan after simultaneous oral administration. It is concluded that gefitinib may modulate SN-38 activity at the cellular level to reverse tumor resistance mediated by ABCG2 through inhibiting drug efflux and may be used potentially in humans to modulate the oral bioavailability of a poorly absorbed camptothecin such as irinotecan.

Response to paclitaxel, topotecan, and topotecan-cyclophosphamide in children with untreated disseminated neuroblastoma treated in an upfront phase II investigational window: a pediatric oncology group study

PURPOSE

Most children older than 1 year of age with metastatic neuroblastoma (NB) die despite intensive chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. The Pediatric Oncology Group conducted a study of paclitaxel, topotecan, and topotecan-cyclophosphamide (topo-cyclo) in newly diagnosed children with stage IV NB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 102 patients enrolled between September 1993 and October 1995; two of them were later shown to be ineligible. Of the remaining 100 patients, the first cohort of 33 patients received paclitaxel 350 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) over 24 hours every 14 to 21 days; the next 33 patients received topotecan 2 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days IV every 21 days; a third cohort of 34 patients were treated with IV cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m(2) followed by topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) each day for 5 days every 21 days. Patients were re-evaluated after two courses and then treated with intensive induction therapy and bone marrow transplantation.

RESULTS

Objective responses (complete response + partial response + mixed response) were documented in 67% of children who received topotecan, 76% after topo-cyclo, and 25% after paclitaxel. Four patients had grade 3 to 4 allergic reactions to paclitaxel; most patients developed grade 3 to 4 marrow suppression after topotecan or topo-cyclo. Neither disease-free survival nor overall survival differed significantly between children who received a phase II agent and those who did not. The 6-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates for all 100 children were 18% +/- 5% and 26% +/- 5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Topotecan and topo-cyclo are active in children with NB, are well tolerated, and should be evaluated further in combination regimens.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

Oral topotecan in children with recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma: a Phase I/II study by the German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology

BACKGROUND

Continuous oral treatment with topotecan may be more effective than the typical 1-day and 5-day treatment schedules. In previous studies of continuous treatment with topotecan, increased intestinal side effects were reported in adult patients; however, the experience in pediatric patients and patients with high-grade glioma is quite limited.

METHODS

Thirty-two pediatric patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (16 females and 16 males; median age, 9.5 years) were enrolled in the current Phase I/II study. Tumor locations included the cerebral cortex (n = 5), pons (n = 18), and other sites (n = 9). An injectable formulation of topotecan was administered orally, in ice-cold orange juice, once daily. The starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2) per day was escalated on a patient-by-patient basis. At each patient's maximum dose, blood samples were obtained for the determination of plasma hydroxytopotecan and topotecan lactone concentrations and for the calculation of pharmacokinetic quantities.

RESULTS

The toxicity criteria for a maximum tolerated topotecan dose were met in only 19 patients. The primary toxicity type was hematologic. The median maximum tolerated dose was 0.9 mg/m(2) per day (n = 19). The calculated maximum total plasma topotecan concentration was 3.8 ng/mL (n = 7), with an area under the concentration-time curve of 38.4 ng. hours/mL and a half-life of 4.1 hours, which would result in the complete disappearance of topotecan from the plasma after 12 hours. Objective responses were observed in 2 of 13 evaluable patients and lasted for 2.5 and 9 months, respectively (continuous clinical remission, 1 of 14 patients; partial response, 2 of 14 patients; stable disease, 7 of 14 patients; progressive disease, 4 of 14 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral topotecan (median dose, 0.9 mg/m(2) per day) administered once daily was well tolerated and somewhat effective in children with recurrent high-grade glioma. A schedule in which the daily dose is split so that dosing is performed twice daily may be superior to the current schedule.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of topotecan administered orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of the injectable formulation of topotecan given orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (qd x 5 x 2) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohorts of two to six patients received oral topotecan at 0.8, 1.1, 1.4, 1.8, and 2.3 mg/m(2)/d every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. Twenty patients (median age, 10.6 years) received a total of 51 courses. Eight patients received topotecan capsules during course 2 only.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 2.3 mg/m(2)/d and consisted of prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), grade 3 stomatitis as a result of radiation recall (n = 1), grade 3 hemorrhage (epistaxis) in the presence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and grade 3 diarrhea in the presence of Clostridium difficile infection (n = 1). Dose-limiting, prolonged grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient at 1.4 mg/m(2)/d. Infrequent toxicities were mild nausea, vomiting, elevated liver ALT or AST, and rash. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 1.8 mg/m(2)/d; the mean (+/- standard deviation) area under the plasma concentration-time curve for topotecan lactone at this dosage was 20.9 +/- 8.4 ng/mL. h. The population mean (+/- standard error) oral bioavailability of the injectable formulation was 0.27 +/- 0.03; that of capsules was 0.36 +/- 0.06 (P =.16). Disease stabilized in nine of 19 assessable patients for 1.5 to 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Oral topotecan (1.8 mg/m(2)/d) on a qd x 5 x 2 schedule is well tolerated and warrants additional testing in pediatric patients.

Preclinical activity of an i.v. formulation of rubitecan in IDD-P against human solid tumor xenografts

An i.v. formulation of rubitecan (9-nitrocamptothecin) was evaluated in five human solid tumor xenograft models. Rubitecan in IDD-P, a particulate suspension of the insoluble analog, produced significant tumor growth delay in athymic nude mice bearing A375 melanoma, and MX-1 breast, SKMES non-small-cell lung, Panc-1 pancreatic and HT29 colon carcinomas. The activity of i.v. rubitecan was similar or somewhat superior to those of i.p. regimens with the reference drugs, irinotecan and topotecan. Tumor sensitivity to rubitecan in IDD-P was MX-1>A375>SKMES >Panc-1>HT29. Some complete regression responses were seen with MX-1, A375 and SKMES tumors treated with 2.5 mg/kg on a schedule of two 5-day dosing cycles separated by 2 drug-free days. In nude mice, the MTD of rubitecan in IDD-P lies between 2 and 2.5 mg/kg on this schedule; antitumor efficacy was achieved with doses between 2.5 and 1.25 mg/kg. Dosing with 6.6 mg/kg rubitecan in IDD-P on intermittent schedules (4- or 7-day intervals) was tolerated, but less efficacious, when tested in the A375 model. The good responses obtained with rubitecan in IDD-P suggest it could be used clinically in circumstances where an i.v. formulation offers advantages to oral or aerosol formulations.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin: an overview of the novel chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in humans and an important cause of cancer death. Metastatic colorectal cancer remains incurable with available systemic therapeutic options. The most active cytotoxic drug against this malignancy, the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil, was developed more than forty years ago, and as a single agent produces responses in only 10 to 15% of patients which in general last less than one year. Efforts to ameliorate these poor results resulted in the 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combination, which enhances response rates about two-fold, without, however, significantly improving survival rates. The recent emergence of a handful of new 5-fluorouracil analogues and folate antagonists, as well as the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, and the third-generation platinum compound oxaliplatin, is likely to alter this gloomy scenario. These agents are at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, both untreated and previously treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. This has led to the approval of irinotecan as second-line treatment for 5-fluorouracil-refractory disease, while the use of oxaliplatin has been suggested for patients having a defective 5-fluorouracil catabolism. Recently, FDA approved the combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for first-line treatment of advanced colon cancer. Based on the synergistic preclinical antitumor effects of some of these agents, their meaningful single-agent activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity and resistance, and only partially overlapping toxicity profiles, effective combination regimens are now being developed, which are likely to lead to a new, more hopeful era for patients suffering from advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Oral chemotherapeutic agents for colorectal cancer

A number of novel oral chemotherapeutic agents are entering practice or are under development in the United States. Many of these agents display significant clinical activity against colorectal cancer. Many classes of compounds, including fluoropyrimidine analogs, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitors, topoisomerase inhibitors, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, and others, are being developed for oral administration. This manuscript describes the progress of clinical development of these agents and also explores the relative merits and challenges of these approaches. Economic issues, patient preference, and patient selection issues surrounding oral chemotherapy for colorectal cancer will also be discussed.

Characterisation of a synergistic interaction between a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, ZD1694, and a novel lipophilic topoisomerase I inhibitor karenitecin, BNP1100: mechanisms and clinical implications

We developed a combination protocol for inhibitors of thymidylate synthase (TS) and DNA topoisomerase I (Topo I) that can exert highly lethal effects in vitro against HCT-8 human colorectal cancer cells. The specific schedule was constructed so that a TS inhibitor could induce not only primary DNA damage but also cellular conditions optimal for the efficient action of a Topo I inhibitor. The initial drug treatment consisted of a brief exposure to a quinazoline-based antifolate, ZD1694. After an interval of approximately one cell-doubling time, cells were exposed for 8-24 h to BNP1100, a Karenitecin-class 7-thiomethyl-camptothecin, in the presence of 1-10 microM thymidine; the latter acted as a crucial factor to promote the collision of moving replication forks with the drug-stabilised DNA-Topo I cleavable complexes even under continuous TS inhibition. Clonogenic analyses confirmed that these mechanistically distinct drugs at clinically achievable concentrations worked in a highly synergistic manner, with a maximum effect abolishing the viability of virtually all cancer cells (> 99.9%). The pretreatment with ZD1694 increased the amount of DNA-bound Topo I by up to 4-fold and the DNA-damaging capability of BNP1100 by up to 15-fold. The possibility of at least four DNA-damaging pathways is proposed which might have resulted from the individual actions of TS and Topo I inhibitors as well as their concerted actions. Taken together, the present findings provided a logically permissible explanation as to why TS and Topo I inhibitors in concerted interactions induced a highly lethal effect which was more than a simple additive effect. Since these drugs are effective specifically on actively proliferating cancer cells, but not on non-cycling G0/G1 cells, this mechanism-based protocol may warrant consideration for clinical verification.

Radiation enhancement by 9-aminocamptothecin: the effect of fractionation and timing of administration

PURPOSE

The camptothecins (CPTs) are potent radiation sensitizers in vivo but the optimal schedule of administration is unknown. In this article, the effects of irradiation combined with 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC) on a mouse mammary cancer and the gastrointestinal tract were compared for single and fractionated treatment. We also examined the circadian dependency for cytotoxicity, radiation sensitization, and acute toxicity after single doses of 9AC given at six different times over 24 h.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

9AC was administered intramuscularly to C3Hf/Kam mice with and without an 8 mm mouse mammary carcinoma (MCa-4). Acute toxicity was assessed by examination of body weight loss, peripheral blood counts, clinical assessment of diarrhea, and survival. Radiation sensitization was assessed using the tumor regrowth delay model.

RESULTS

Regrowth delay of MCa-4 tumor after a single treatment of 15 Gy is comparable to 28 Gy given in 14 fractions (absolute regrowth delays of 7.1 days and 6.6 days, respectively). With 9AC alone, comparable tumor regrowth was obtained with a total dose of 4 mg/kg given intramuscularly repeated twice weekly (1 mg/kg doses X 4), or as a single injection of 4 mg/kg (2.9 days and 3.8 days, respectively). 9-AC and irradiation together in single doses of 15 Gy and 4 mg/kg resulted in little radiation sensitization compared to the repeated 9AC schedule combined with fractionated irradiation [Dose Modifying Factors (DMF) of 1.12 vs. 2.8, respectively]. Acute normal tissue toxicity after single or fractionated 9AC treatment was assessed at six times over a 24-h period (6 A.M., 10 A.M., 2 P.M., 6 P.M., 10 P.M., and 2 A.M.) and was highest at 2 A.M. after either single or multiple doses. A single dose of 9AC administered with single fraction irradiation could be escalated by 33% when given at the best-tolerated time.

CONCLUSION

The frequency and timing of CPT administration with irradiation are important factors to be considered in the design of clinical protocols. CPTs are S-phase inhibitors that are better tolerated by the mouse when given during the rest phase when intestinal mucosal proliferation is relatively low. A modest increase in CPT dosage was possible by choosing the best tolerated time to administer the radiation sensitizer. This concept could potentially be evaluated in clinical trials with this class of agents.

Animal models for studying the action of topoisomerase I targeted drugs

Almost 30 years after the unsuccessful clinical evaluation of camptothecin sodium, there has been a revival in interest in this class of agent that poisons topoisomerase I. Currently there are four camptothecin analogues in clinical trials each at different levels of advancement. Clinical data suggest that patterns of antitumor activity and toxicity profiles differ between analogues. In preclinical models antitumor activity appears to be highly schedule-dependent. Here we review rodent and human tumor models used in evaluation of efficacy, and models used to predict toxicities of these compounds. The major limitation of rodent models is that the mouse tolerates significantly greater systemic exposure to each camptothecin analogue than do patients. This leads to a false overprediction of potential clinical activity. However, responses of human tumor xenografts in mice are highly predictive of responses of clinical cancer when camptothecins are administered at dose levels achieving similar systemic exposure in mice. Development of assays that identify analogues that maintain therapeutic activity in mice, but have less species differential toxicity, particularly to the hematopoietic system, may provide an early screen to select compounds having greater clinical utility.