1
|
Chatani R, Kubo S, Tasaka H, Sakata A, Yoshino M, Maruo T, Kadota K. Safety and feasibility of atrial fibrillation ablation after left atrial appendage closure: A single-center experience of the left atrial appendage closure first strategy. J Arrhythm 2024; 40:879-890. [PMID: 39139871 PMCID: PMC11317688 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are not suitable for long-term anticoagulant therapy undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The safety and feasibility of left atrial catheter ablation (CA) procedures after LAAC remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and safety of CA after LAAC, including in the early phase within 180 days. Methods Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 46 patients with AF who had undergone both CA and LAAC within 2 years (mean age, 72 years; 29 men) were compared between those who had undergone CA-first (31 patients) and LAAC-first (15 patients). Results The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.8 and 3.3 points, respectively. The LAAC-first strategy was often used in patients with prior major bleeding and LAA thrombosis or sludge. In the LAAC-first group, the mean duration between both procedures was 212 days, and all LAAC-first patients, including seven patients in the early phase, could undergo CA without LAAC device-related complications; moreover, no cardiovascular adverse events were reported after both procedures (mean periods: 420 days). After CA post-LAAC, no device-related adverse events (device-related thrombosis, new peri-device leak appearance, peri-device leak increase, or device dislodgement) were observed, whereas, after LAAC post-CA, 3 new peri-device leak appearance events and 1 peri-device leak increase event were observed, especially patients who underwent LAAC in the early phase post-CA. Conclusion Based on single-center experience, left atrial CA in the presence of an LAAC device implanted including the early phase was safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryuki Chatani
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Shunsuke Kubo
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Hiroshi Tasaka
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Atsushi Sakata
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Mitsuru Yoshino
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Takeshi Maruo
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| | - Kazushige Kadota
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineKurashiki Central HospitalKurashikiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doehner W, Böhm M, Boriani G, Christersson C, Coats AJS, Haeusler KG, Jones ID, Lip GYH, Metra M, Ntaios G, Savarese G, Shantsila E, Vilahur G, Rosano G. Interaction of heart failure and stroke: A clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Stroke, the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:2107-2129. [PMID: 37905380 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a major disease in our society that often presents with multiple comorbidities with mutual interaction and aggravation. The comorbidity of HF and stroke is a high risk condition that requires particular attention to ensure early detection of complications, efficient diagnostic workup, close monitoring, and consequent treatment of the patient. The bi-directional interaction between the heart and the brain is inherent in the pathophysiology of HF where HF may be causal for acute cerebral injury, and - in turn - acute cerebral injury may induce or aggravate HF via imbalanced neural and neurovegetative control of cardiovascular regulation. The present document represents the consensus view of the ESC Council on Stroke, the Heart Failure Association and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis to summarize current insights on pathophysiological interactions of the heart and the brain in the comorbidity of HF and stroke. Principal aspects of diagnostic workup, pathophysiological mechanisms, complications, clinical management in acute conditions and in long-term care of patients with the comorbidity are presented and state-of-the-art clinical management and current evidence from clinical trials is discussed. Beside the physicians perspective, also the patients values and preferences are taken into account. Interdisciplinary cooperation of cardiologists, stroke specialists, other specialists and primary care physicians is pivotal to ensure optimal treatment in acute events and in continued long-term treatment of these patients. Key consensus statements are presented in a concise overview on mechanistic insights, diagnostic workup, prevention and treatment to inform clinical acute and continued care of patients with the comorbidity of HF and stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Doehner
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology (Campus Virchow) and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Böhm
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Saarland University (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin), Homburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | - Karl Georg Haeusler
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (UKW), Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ian D Jones
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, School of Nursing and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - George Ntaios
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Heart and Vascular and Neuro Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eduard Shantsila
- Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gemma Vilahur
- Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau and CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- St George's University Hospital, London, UK, San Raffaele Cassino, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|