Moving Beyond Boundaries: Utilization of Longitudinal Exposure-Response Model for Bounded Outcome Score to Inform Decision Making in the Accelerated Drug Development Paradigm

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

As drug development scientists strive to accelerate availability of therapies for patients, model-informed drug development (MIDD) plays an important role in contextualizing existing information and facilitating decision making. This paper describes an example of MIDD, where modeling and simulation informed decision making in the circumstance of a combined phase 2b and single pivotal study for ritlecitinib (JAK3/TEC family kinases inhibitor).

METHODS

Longitudinal exposure-response (ER) modeling was conducted to describe ritlecitinib efficacy in alopecia areata patients. The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (a continuous bounded outcome [CBO] score [0-100]) was used as the efficacy response. The average concentration during the time interval between two adjacent SALT scores was used as the exposure metric driving efficacy.

RESULTS

The developed model well described the longitudinal SALT profile of ritlecitinib as well as the frequency of boundary data. The CBO model indicated tested doses in the phase 2b/3 clinical trial are in the ascending region of ER and contextualized a loading dose effect that impacted onset of efficacy without long-term benefit. It also identified disease severity as the only covariate impacting efficacy. The model-based simulation further informed impact of treatment interruption on the loss of efficacy in the absence of a dedicated treatment withdrawal study. Results indicated temporary treatment interruption ≤ 6 weeks is not expected to result in significant loss of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The CBO modeling approach and simulation supported the single pivotal trial strategy and guided dose selection in the accelerated drug development program of ritlecitinib, which can be applied to many indications where efficacy is measured on a bounded scale.

Long-term efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with severe alopecia areata: 104-week results from BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor baricitinib for severe alopecia areata (AA) continuously increased over 52 weeks in two Phase 3 trials. There are limited long-term data on JAK inhibitors in AA.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of baricitinib for severe AA through 104 weeks of continuous therapy.

METHODS

Integrated data from the BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 Phase 3 trials included adults with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores ≥50 (≥50% scalp hair loss) randomized to and continuously treated with 2-mg or 4-mg baricitinib through Week 104. Patients who qualified to remain on continuous treatment included subjects who achieved SALT score ≤20 at Week 52 (Week-52 responders; 2-mg: N = 65; 4-mg: N = 129) and baricitinib 4-mg-treated patients who had SALT score >20 at Week 52 but achieved SALT score ≤20 at prior visit(s) and/or had significant improvement in eyebrow or eyelash hair growth relative to baseline by Week 52 (Week-52 mixed responders; N = 110). Week-104 outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving SALT score ≤20 (≤20% scalp hair loss). Data were censored after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Among baricitinib 4-mg-treated and baricitinib 2-mg-treated Week-52 responders, 90.7% and 89.2%, respectively, maintained SALT score ≤20 at Week 104. Among Week-52 mixed responders, 39.1% reached SALT score ≤20 by Week 104. Continued improvement in eyebrow and eyelash regrowth was observed across groups. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were COVID-19, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, nasopharyngitis, acne, urinary tract infection and creatine phosphokinase increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Baricitinib demonstrated a high level of maintenance of efficacy over 104 weeks in patients with severe AA. Efficacy increased in Week-52 mixed responders, illustrating that long-term treatment is necessary to observe maximum benefit in some patients. No new safety signals were observed.

Alopecia areata: What's new in the epidemiology, comorbidities, and pathogenesis?

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common, acquired, and nonscarring type of hair loss that affects people of every generation and is intractable in severe and relapsing cases. Patients with AA, especially those with greater scalp involvement, have poor health-related quality-of-life scores.

PURPOSE

Following our previous review article in the April 2017 issue of the Journal of Dermatological Science, we aim to provide a pair of review articles on recent progress in multidisciplinary approaches to AA.

MAIN FINDINGS

We found more than 1800 publications on AA from July 2016 to December 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we focused on the latest information on the epidemiology, comorbidities, and pathogenesis of AA.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerance of Baricitinib for the Treatment of Severe Alopecia Areata with 1-Year Follow-Up Data

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of conventional treatments for alopecia areata (AA) has been extremely variable and disappointing, with a high rate of relapse. Recent clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety of baricitinib (an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor) in alopecia areata.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and tolerance of baricitinib in alopecia areata in a real-life Belgian monocentric adult cohort. The primary outcome was evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of ≤ 20 at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected.

RESULTS

In this 19-patient series, with a median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up duration of 13 ± 16.2 months, we demonstrated that: (i) hair regrowth was observed in nearly 90% of patients between 4 and 16 weeks after initiation of baricitinib; (ii) at the end of the follow-up, more than 70% and, in particular, 100% of patients with patchy AA, reached the primary outcome (SALT score ≤ 20); (iii) almost half of the patients, mostly with patchy AA, showed a complete hair regrowth (SALT score = 0), within a median ± IQR treatment time of 8.5 ± 10 months; (iv) baricitinib was discontinued in three patients with total hair regrowth, two of whom relapsed; and (v) no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Baricitinib is effective in treating patients with alopecia areata, particularly for the patchy phenotype, but with a risk of relapse after discontinuation. Safety data are reassuring, with lipid changes being the most frequent adverse event.

Efficacy, safety, and Pharmacoeconomics of Three Common Strategies for Pediatric Alopecia Areata Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To evaluate and explore the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of three common strategies for pediatric alopecia areata.

Methods

Chinese pediatric alopecia areata patients meeting the criteria were included and divided into three groups based on the received treatments. The efficacy, adverse events and pharmacoeconomics of these treatments were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Twenty-four pediatric AA patients were recruited in this study. 100% (12/12) of patients from the traditional group achieved SALT100. In the tofacitinib group, 40.0% (2/5) of patients achieved SALT50. 20.0% (1/5) of patients achieved SALT75 and 40.0% (2/5) of patients achieved SALT100. In the MN group, 42.86% (3/7) of patients were non-responders. 14.28 (1/7) of patients achieved SALT75 and 42.86% (3/7) of patients achieved SALT100. The adverse effects (AEs) were mild in all three groups, and none of the patients discontinued the treatments due to the AEs. Comparing the other two groups, the MN treatment would be more time-intensive and more expensive.

Conclusion

For newly diagnosed or naive pediatric patients, the traditional treatment was the first-line approach. For long-duration, severe and refractory patients, tofacitinib and microneedling can be alternative options.

Alopecia Totalis in a Five-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report

Background: Alopecia totalis (AT) represent the severe form of alopecia areata with a worse prognosis. In population the prevalences of alopecia totalis, is 0,08%. This study shows that Prosential, minoxidil 2% and clobetasol propionate 0.05% therapy for hair loss could be considered Case presentation: A 5-year-old boy weighing 13.4 kg came to the hospital complaining of hair loss all over his head, bald since two months before. The eyebrows, eyelashes, and nose hairs were also missing. The diagnosis is alopecia totalis. The patient was given Prosential therapy for four months. After two months of treatment, hair started to grow slightly, evenly across the head, eyebrows, and eyelashes. After that, the patient was lost contact. 4 months later, the patient returned with hair loss complaints again.The patient’s vital signs are normal. Eyes, ENT, heart, lungs, abdomen: normal. Skin: no hair. Laboratorium: Hemoglobin 12.1 g/dL, leukocytes 6,480/uL, platelets 324,000/uL, hematocrit 35.5%, Diff Count: basophils 0%, eosinophils 22%, stems 1%, segments 27%, lymphocytes 41%, monocytes 9%. Feces and urine analysis were normal. Glucose 86 mg/dL, total cholesterol 128 mg/dL, triglycerides 46 mg/dL. Albumin 4.33 g/dL, globulin 1.41 g/dL. Uric acid 4.64 mg/dL. Kidney and liver function were normal. Thyroid function: FT4: 1.1 ng/dL, TsHs 0.916 uIU/mL. The ANA test was negative. Diagnosis: Idiopathic alopecia totalis with hypereosinophilia. The therapy was Prosential, minoxidil 2% and clobetasol propionate 0.05%. Conclusion: The etiology of AT should be sought in as much detail as possible because alopecia management requires a holistic approach, including psychosocial support. Hair loss is a significant factor affecting the self-esteem of children.

Alopecia areata - Current understanding and management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by acute or chronic non-scarring hair loss, with a heterogeneity in clinical manifestations ranging from patchy hair loss to complete scalp and body hair loss. An overview of the up-to-date pathophysiology and the underlying signaling pathways involved in AA together with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations will be provided. Current treatments, including topical, systemic and injectable interventions show varying response and frequent relapses reflecting the unmet clinical need. Thus, the new emerging concepts and therapeutic approaches, including Janus kinase inhibitors are eagerly awaited. Traditional and emerging therapies of AA will be discussed, in order to provide physicians with guidance for AA management. Since the latter is so challenging and often tends to take a chronic course, it can have an enormous psychosocial burden on patients, compromising their quality of life and often causing depression and anxiety. Therefore, the psychosocial aspects of the disease need to be evaluated and addressed, in order to implement appropriate psychological support when needed.

Validation of the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Questionnaire in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata

Introduction

Individuals with alopecia areata (AA) may experience significant impacts on their health-related quality of life. The novel Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) questionnaire has been developed to assess hair loss signs, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations associated with AA. The objective of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and establish scoring of the AAPPO in adults and adolescents with AA.

Methods

Scoring and measurement properties of the AAPPO were examined using baseline and 2-week follow-up data from a prospective, noninterventional, web-based study of 121 patients with AA (85 adults aged ≥ 18 years, 36 adolescents aged 12–17 years) with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) ≥ 25% scalp hair loss.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported four single Hair Loss (HL) items, an Emotional Symptoms domain (ES; 4 items), and an Activity Limitations domain (AL; 3 items). Among all patients, the multi-item ES and AL domains had strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.87); all HL items and domain scores had strong test-retest reliability (weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78). All HL item scores demonstrated strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.52) compared with the patient-reported Alopecia Areata Symptom and Impact Scale (AASIS) hair loss subscale score; ES and AL domain scores exhibited strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.66) compared with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Using SALT scores, HL mean item scores were better (lower) in the 25–49% SALT subgroup versus those with highest SALT scores (76–100%); however, ES mean domain scores were better in the SALT 76–100% subgroup in the same comparison (p < 0.0001). Using AASIS and MCS score–created subgroups, ES and AL mean domain scores demonstrated hypothesized differences across subgroups (all p values < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The AAPPO questionnaire is a reliable, valid disease-specific measure of hair loss severity and impact in individuals with AA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00648-z.

Alopecia areata: a review on diagnosis, immunological etiopathogenesis and treatment options

Patients suffering from alopecia areata (AA) can lose hair in focal regions, the complete scalp, including eyelashes and eyebrows, or even the entire body. The exact pathology is not yet known, but the most described theory is a collapse of the immune privilege system, which can be found in some specific regions of the body. Different treatment options, local and systemic, are available, but none of them have been proven to be effective in the long term as well for every treatment there should be considered for the possible side effects. In many cases, treated or non-treated, relapse often occurs. The prognosis is uncertain and is negatively influenced by the subtypes alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis and characteristics such as associated nail lesions, hair loss for more than 10 years and a positive familial history. The unpredictable course of the disease also makes it a mental struggle and AA patients are more often associated with depression and anxiety compared to the healthy population. Research into immunology and genetics, more particularly in the field of dendritic cells (DC), is recommended for AA as there is evidence of the possible role of DC in the treatment of other autoimmune diseases such as multiple Sclerosis and cancer. Promising therapies for the future treatment of AA are JAK-STAT inhibitors and PRP.

Consensus on the treatment of alopecia areata - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata is a highly frequent disease with an impact on quality of life and several treatment options with little clinical confirmatory evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To disseminate the recommendations of Brazilian dermatologists with expertise in the treatment of alopecia areata.

METHODS

Eight specialists with expertise in alopecia areata from different university centers were appointed by the Brazilian Society of Dermatology to reach a consensus on its treatment. Based on the adapted DELPHI methodology, the relevant elements were considered; then, an analysis of recent literature was carried out and the consensus was written down. Consensus on the management of alopecia areata was defined with the approval of at least 70% of the panel.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional injectable corticotherapy was considered the first option for localized disease in adults. In extensive cases with signs of activity, systemic corticosteroid therapy should be considered and can be used together with immunosuppressants (corticosteroid-sparing agents). The use of an immunosensitizer (diphencyprone) is an option for stable long-term cases. Evaluation of side effects is as important as the rate of hair regrowth.

Hydroxychloroquine treatment for Alopecia Universalis: Report of six cases

Recent reports indicate that hydroxychloroquine is a potential new treatment option for alopecia universalis; thus, we aimed to report on the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in 6 patients with refractory alopecia universalis that were treated with 400 mg/d continuously for ≥6 months. The treatment outcome was retrospectively evaluated using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT), and at the end of 6 months, patients with a ≥50% decrease in the SALT score were considered as strong responders, a 5%-50% decrease as intermediate responders and a <5% decrease as non-responders. The present findings indicate that hydroxychloroquine is not an effective treatment since in 5 of the 6 patients it was discontinued at the end of 6 months due to lack of hair regrowth, whereas only a 6-year-old boy responded with a SALT score change of 8% after the 12th month.

Management of skin adverse reactions in oncology

Chemo and targeted anticancer therapies present significant skin adverse reactions, which impair the patients' quality of life. Cutaneous toxicities lead to poor treatment adherence, drug cessation, and psychosocial distress. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge concerning the prevention and management of skin toxicity arising from these therapies. A systematic literature search on online databases was conducted. The categorization of the main preventive and treatment measures was performed according to the level of evidence. Management of skin adverse reactions of oncology treatments is very heterogeneous, which can be explained by the lack of sound evidence-based treatments. The most studied adverse effects are papulopustular eruption, xerosis, and hand-foot syndrome. Prevention of xerosis stands out as the strategy most supported by level II studies. With respect to treatment, the use of antibiotics in papulopustular eruption resulting from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents is the most evidence-based approach. In general, the number of studies published in the literature classified with a level II of evidence (52%) is similar to the ones classified as level IV (33%), making clear the need of more randomized controlled trials regarding the effectiveness of preventive and treatment measures of skin adverse reactions of chemo and targeted anticancer therapies.