Using levels of evidence to compare clinical impact from research

The most influential studies concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research

Background

Bibliometric analysis is a unique tool that can be used to study the characteristics and trends of a given topic. This study aimed to report on the most influential studies concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research.

Methods

On July 4th, 2022, the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Knowledge Database was used to identify articles concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research. The top 50 most cited articles were selected and analyzed.

Results

The mean number of citations was 142 (median: 97; range 599-70). Most articles were published in the 2010s (56%), followed by the 2000s (38%), and 1990s (6%). The most common level of evidence (LOE) was LOE II (42%) followed by LOE IV (38%), LOE I and III each had 10%. The greatest number of papers were published in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (46%), followed by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery- American Version (14%).

Conclusion

This review can serve as a useful tool to study the most influential articles concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research. Most of the articles were classified as clinical outcomes (62%), followed by natural history/epidemiology (12%), and surgical technique (10%). Our findings suggest that high-quality studies (LOE I) are lacking and other areas of research besides clinical outcomes are not as well studied.

The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis

PURPOSE

This study identifies the most impactful papers on scapholunate reconstruction and provides a quantitative assessment of the impact of these papers in order to inform future clinical practice, education, and research of this condition.

METHODS

The Scopus database was used in May 2020 to identify the 50 most cited clinical articles pertaining solely to chronic scapholunate reconstruction. Citation number and density, publication variables, and Altmetric Attention Scores (AASs) were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The top 50 articles on chronic scapholunate reconstruction produced 1,868 total citations, with an average of 37.36 ± 39.90 citations per article (range 7-196) and an average citation density of 2.44 ± 2.27. US-based publications (n = 20) and articles published in Journal of Hand Surgery (n = 24) were associated with significantly higher citation number and density (p < 0.01 - p = 0.018). In addition, sample size was positively correlated with citation density (rho = 0.312, p = 0.029). Fourteen articles were associated with an AAS (mean score = 4.07 ± 4.70). There was no significant association between AAS and citation number or density, but AAS did significantly predict citation density (coefficient = 0.378, 95% CI: [0.013-0.741], p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Numerous factors, such as journal of publication, location, and sample size, were significantly associated with citation number and/or citation density. Interestingly, AAS was predictive of, but not directly correlated with citation density, suggesting that the impact of scapholunate literature may not be adequately captured with a citation analysis.