Pregnancy outcomes after emergent laparoscopic surgery for acute adnexal disorders at less than 10 weeks of gestation

TU-LESS procedure for acute abdomen in late pregnancy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute abdominal conditions during pregnancy are significant risks to maternal and fetal health, necessitating timely diagnosis and intervention. The choice of surgical approach is a major concern for obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TU-LESS procedure for acute abdomen in late pregnancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients who underwent TU-LESS for acute abdominal conditions in the third trimester from 2020 to 2023. We reviewed medical records for clinical characteristics, surgical interventions, postoperative complications, and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included patients with a median age of 27 (range 20-35) and a BMI of 24.33 kg/m2 (range 21.34-31.96). The median gestational age at surgery was 30 weeks (range, 28 + 3-32 + 4 weeks), with surgeries lasting an average of 60 min (range, 30-163 min). Blood loss was 2-20 mL, and the median hospital stay post-surgery was 6 days (range, 2-16 days). There were no significant complications. The median time to delivery after TU-LESS was 56 days (range, 26-66 days), resulting in 8 full-term deliveries, 2 preterm cesareans, and 2 preterm vaginal deliveries. All newborns were healthy, with no fetal losses or neonatal deaths.

CONCLUSION

TU-LESS, performed by experienced obstetricians and gynecologists with proper preoperative preparation, is safe and effective for managing acute abdomen in late pregnancy, without the need to delay surgery due to gestational age.

Adnexal torsion in pregnancy: A systematic review of case reports and case series

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications, and predisposing factors of adnexal torsion in pregnant women.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2022. All case reports and case series with full-text English language reporting adnexal torsion in pregnant women were included. Medical history, clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications related to adnexal torsion, and predisposing factors were independently extracted by two investigators.

RESULTS

A total of 182 articles reporting 662 pregnant women with adnexal torsion were included. Most of the adnexal torsions occurred during the first trimester (54.63%), while others occurred during the second (26.36%) and third (19.00%) trimesters. The most common symptom of adnexal torsion was sudden-onset pain (80.60%). Enlargement of the adnexa was the most prevalent ultrasound finding in a twisted adnexa (95.20%). Additionally, about half of the patients had decreased blood flow in Doppler ultrasound (53.80%). Laparoscopic surgery was the favorite option (56.88%), while cystectomy and detorsion were the most commonly performed procedure (29.06%). Expectant management was reported in only 2.99% of the patients. In addition, the most common complications were preterm labor (27.58%) and emergent cesarean sections (25.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should think of adnexal torsion when pregnant women complain of sudden-onset pain. Then, using ultrasound, adnexal enlargement or masses should be explored seriously. They should take invasive and urgent therapy to preserve ovaries and prevent complications.

Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative outcomes between single-port laparoscopy (SPL) and conventional laparoscopy (CL) to remove adnexal masses during pregnancy.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included all patients who had undergone laparoscopic removal of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy between October 2010 and January 2020. Multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes were retrospectively analysed and compared between patients who had undergone SPL versus CL, including cosmetic satisfaction with the scar, measured on a 10-point scale (10 indicating very satisfied).

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were included (SPL, n = 22; and CL, n = 42). Overall scar satisfaction scores significantly favoured SPL versus CL (9.1 ± 1.7 versus 8.1 ± 1.3, respectively), however, surgery duration was significantly longer for SPL than CL (69.2 ± 21.0 min versus 54.7 ± 20.7 min). No incisional hernia was detected in the study. Operative blood loss, decrease in estimated haemoglobin level, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses were comparable between the two groups. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes were not remarkably different.

CONCLUSION

For removal of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy, SPL may offer superior cosmetic satisfaction versus CL, and was not associated with additional perioperative danger, economic burden, or adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Surgical Management of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy is 1% to 6%. Although surgery is often indicated, there are no definitive management guidelines. We aimed to investigate the optimal approach to surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy on the basis of a meta-analysis of previous studies.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to July 17, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

There were no restrictions on study type, language, or publication date. Comparative and noncomparative retrospective studies that reviewed operative techniques used in surgery of adnexal masses in pregnancy were included. Meta-analyses were performed to assess outcomes. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019129709).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Comparative studies were identified for laparoscopy vs laparotomy and elective vs emergent surgery (11 and 4, respectively). Elective surgery is defined as a scheduled antepartum procedure. For laparoscopy vs laparotomy, the mean maternal ages and gestational ages at time of surgery were similar (27.8 years vs 27.7 years, p = .85; 16.2 weeks in laparoscopy vs 15.4 weeks in laparotomy, p = .59). Mass size was larger in those undergoing laparotomy (mean 8.8 cm vs 7.8 cm, p = .03). The most common pathologic condition was dermoid cyst (36%), and the risk of discovering a malignant tumor was 1%. Laparoscopy was not associated with a statistically increased risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) or preterm delivery (PTD) (odds ratio [OR] 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-3.52; p = .31 and OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.47-1.89; p = .88, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.5 days after laparoscopy vs 5.3 days after laparotomy (p <.001). The decrease in estimated blood loss in laparoscopy was not statistically significant (94.0 mL in laparotomy vs 54.0 mL in laparoscopy, p = .06). Operative times were similar in laparoscopy and laparotomy (80.0 minutes vs 72.5 minutes, p = .09). Elective surgery was associated with a decreased risk of PTD (OR 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.48; p = .05). Noncomparative studies were identified for laparoscopy and laparotomy. Laparotomy had more SABs and PTDs than laparoscopy (pooled proportion = 0.02 vs 0.07 and pooled proportion = 0.02 vs 0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy is associated with shorter length of hospital stay and similar risk of SAB or PTD. Elective surgery is associated with a decreased risk of PTD.

Disturbed Interstitial Pregnancy: A First Case of Successful Treatment Using a Mini-Laparoscopic Approach

Interstitial ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a life-threatening condition due to the risk of massive hemorrhage in the event of its disturbance. We present the case of a 27-year-old patient who was admitted with massive hemoperitoneum, caused by the rupture of an interstitial pregnancy in the area of the fallopian tube stump, which had been removed after a previous ectopic pregnancy. The condition was overcome using a mini-laparoscopic approach (2.6 mm, 30° optics), with one 3 mm port for micro-laparoscopic instruments and one 10 mm port. Such an approach has not yet been reported in the available literature, among the casuistically reported cases of pregnancy in the tubal stump. We consider that the technique is safe, completely in the interest of the patient, applicable by an experienced team, and in agreement with modern trends regarding the minimization of operative access.

Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis is to investigate and compare the pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of ovarian tumors during pregnancy.

METHODS

Search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases from January 1990 to November 2018. A broad search strategy was used to identify studies comparing laparoscopy and open surgery in pregnancy. Inclusion criteria included comparative studies with the quantitative outcome data on gravida. Two authors independently reviewed and assessed for the quality of included studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were extracted for fetal loss, preterm delivery, duration of surgery, blood loss and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective trials were identified involving 985 patients. No statistical significance was found in fetal loss between laparoscopy and open surgery (P value = 0.334). The pooled estimate for preterm labor statistically significantly decreased for laparoscopy group (P value = 0.014). Reduced operative blood loss was found in laparoscopy group by 83.81 ml (P value = 0.015). Duration of operation may be longer in the laparoscopy group, but without statistical significance (P value = 0.346). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopy group with reduction of 1.95 days (P value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The available low-grade evidence suggests that laparoscopic surgery might be a feasible alternative for pregnant women with adnexal masses.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Management of Heterotopic Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic pregnancy occurs when two pregnancies occur simultaneously in the uterus and an ectopic location. Treatment includes removal of the ectopic pregnancy with preservation of the intrauterine pregnancy. Treatment is done laparoscopically with either a Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or a multiport laparoscopic surgery.

CASE

We present a case of a first trimester heterotopic pregnancy in a 42-year-old gravida 5, para 0-1-3-1 female with previous history of left salpingectomy, who underwent laparoscopic right salpingectomy and lysis of adhesions (LOA) via Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS).

CONCLUSION

Although LESS for benign OB/GYN cases is feasible, safe, and equally effective compared to the conventional laparoscopic techniques, studies have suggested no clinically relevant advantages in the frequency of perioperative complications between LESS and conventional methods. No data on the cost effectiveness of LESS versus conventional methods are available. LESS utilizes only one surgical incision which may lead to decreased pain and better cosmetic outcome when compared to multiport procedure. One significant undesirable aspect of LESS is the crowding of the surgical area as only one incision is made. Therefore, all instruments go through one port, which can lead to obstruction of the surgeon's vision and in some cases higher rate of procedure failure resulting in conversion to multiport procedure.

Isolated adnexal torsion in a 20-week spontaneous twin pregnancy

•

Diagnosis of adnexal torsion can be difficult during pregnancy.

•

Delay in diagnosis can lead to necrosis and loss of the affected ovary.

•

Laparoscopy is an effective approach in diagnosis and treatment of adnexal torsion even in advanced pregnancies.

Background

Adnexal torsion can be a life-threatning condition in pregnancy, while the risk of late diagnosis is increased, in second and third trimester in particular. Laparoscopy is an effective approach in diagnosis and treatment of adnexal torsion. However, entry to abdomen may be challenging in more advanced pregnancies.

Case report

Herein, we report a case of adnexal torsion during 20th week of twin pregnancy, which was detorsioned laparoscopically. The woman delivered healthy infants at her 36th week of pregnancy.

Discussion

Adnexal torsion as a cause of acute abdomen may be kept in mind in pregnants, even if there is no predisposing factor. Laparoscopy may be performed safely in 2nd trimester for acute abdomen.

A case of successful laparoscopic surgery for tubal stump pregnancy after tubectomy

The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is approximately 1.3–2% of all pregnancies, and more than 90% of ectopic pregnancies are detected in the ampulla of the fallopian tube. Ectopic pregnancy occurring in tubal stump after tubectomy is extremely rare, and the frequency of tubal stump pregnancy is approximately 0.4% of all pregnancies. We report one of these rare cases of ectopic pregnancy in a 26-year-old Japanese woman, gravida 4, parity 1. She had undergone laparoscopic tubectomy because of a tubal pregnancy two years ago. She was presented to our hospital with a positive pregnancy test, but no gestational sac was detected in the uterus by echography, even though the level of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the blood was elevated to 8,900 mIU/mL. Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy was performed. During surgery, the position of the pregnancy was found to be in the tubal stump, where tubectomy had already been performed, and the gestational sac was successfully removed. After the surgery, the condition of the patient uneventfully improved and she was discharged from the hospital three days after the surgery. The diagnosis of tubal stump pregnancy is more difficult than that of the more common positions of an ectopic pregnancy in the fallopian tube, and so it is more important to carefully examine the patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Laparoscopic surgery is one of the options for tubal stump pregnancy if diagnosed early and if the condition of the patient is stable.