Narcolepsy type 2: A rare, yet existing entity

High-resolution HLA sequencing and hypocretin receptor 2 autoantibodies in narcolepsy type 1 and type 2

Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder caused by an apparent degeneration of orexin/hypocretin neurons in the lateral hypothalamic area and a subsequent decrease in orexin/hypocretin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. Narcolepsy is classified into type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2). While genetic associations in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and candidate autoantibodies have been investigated in NT1 to imply an autoimmune origin, less is known about the pathogenesis in NT2. Twenty-six NT1 and 15 NT2 patients were included, together with control groups of 24 idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) patients and 778 general population participants. High-resolution sequencing was used to determine the alleles, the extended haplotypes, and the genotypes of HLA-DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DRB1, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1. Radiobinding assay was used to determine autoantibodies against hypocretin receptor 2 (anti-HCRTR2 autoantibodies). NT1 was associated with HLA-DRB5*01:01:01, -DRB1*15:01:01, -DQA1*01:02:01, -DQB1*06:02:01, -DRB5*01:01:01, -DRB1*15:01:01, -DQA1*01:02:01, -DQB1*06:02:01 (odds ratio [OR]: 9.15; p = 8.31 × 10-4) and HLA-DRB5*01:01:01, -DRB1*15:01:01, -DQA1*01:02:01, -DQB1*06:02:01, -DRB4*01:03:01, -DRB1*04:01:01, -DQA1*03:02//03:03:01, -DQB1*03:01:01 (OR: 23.61; p = 1.58 × 10-4) genotypes. Lower orexin/hypocretin levels were reported in the NT2 subgroup (n = 5) that was associated with the extended HLA-DQB1*06:02:01 haplotype (p = .001). Anti-HCRTR2 autoantibody levels were not different between study groups (p = .8524). We confirmed the previous association of NT1 with HLA-DQB1*06:02:01 extended genotypes. A subgroup of NT2 patients with intermediate orexin/hypocretin levels and association with HLA-DQB1*06:02:01 was identified, indicating a possible overlap between the two distinct narcolepsy subtypes, NT1 and NT2. Low anti-HCRTR2 autoantibody levels suggest that these receptors might not function as autoimmune targets in either NT1 or NT2.

Narcolepsy Severity Scale-2 and Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale to better quantify symptoms severity and consequences in Narcolepsy type 2

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is an understudied central disorder of hypersomnolence sharing some similarities with narcolepsy type 1 and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). We aimed: (1) to assess systematically the symptoms in patients with NT2, with self-reported questionnaires: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), IH Severity Scale (IHSS), and (2) to evaluate the responsiveness of these scales to treatment.

METHODS

One hundred and nine patients with NT2 (31.4 ± 12.2 years old, 47 untreated) diagnosed according to ICSD-3 were selected in a Reference Center for Narcolepsy. They all completed the ESS, subgroups completed the modified NSS (NSS-2, without cataplexy items) (n = 95) and IHSS (n = 76). Some patients completed the scales twice (before/during treatment): 42 ESS, 26 NSS-2, and 30 IHSS.

RESULTS

Based on NSS-2, all untreated patients had sleepiness, 58% disrupted nocturnal sleep, 40% hallucinations, and 28% sleep paralysis. On IHSS, 76% reported a prolonged nocturnal sleep, and 83% sleep inertia. In the independent sample, ESS and NSS-2 scores were lower in treated patients, with same trend for IHSS scores. After treatment, ESS, NSS-2, and IHSS total scores were lower, with a mean difference of 3.7 ± 4.1, 5.3 ± 6.7, and 4.1 ± 6.2, respectively. The minimum clinically important difference between untreated and treated patients were 2.1 for ESS, 3.3 for NSS-2, and 3.1 for IHSS. After treatment, 61.9% of patients decreased their ESS > 2 points, 61.5% their NSS-2 > 3 points, and 53.3% their IHSS > 3 points.

CONCLUSIONS

NSS-2 and IHSS correctly quantified symptoms' severity and consequences in NT2, with good performances to objectify response to medications. These tools are useful for monitoring and optimizing NT2 management, and for use in clinical trials.

Efficacy of once-nightly sodium oxybate (FT218) in narcolepsy type 1 and type 2: post hoc analysis from the Phase 3 REST-ON Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Post hoc analyses from the phase 3 REST-ON trial evaluated efficacy of extended-release once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB; FT218) vs placebo for daytime sleepiness and disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and 2 (NT2).

METHODS

Participants were stratified by narcolepsy type and randomized 1:1 to ON-SXB (4.5 g, week 1; 6 g, weeks 2-3; 7.5 g, weeks 4-8; and 9 g, weeks 9-13) or placebo. Assessments included mean sleep latency on Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) rating (coprimary endpoints) and sleep stage shifts, nocturnal arousals, and patient-reported sleep quality, refreshing nature of sleep, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (secondary endpoints) separately in NT1 and NT2 subgroups.

RESULTS

The modified intent-to-treat population comprised 190 participants (NT1, n = 145; NT2, n = 45). Significant improvements were demonstrated with ON-SXB vs placebo in sleep latency for NT1 (all doses, p < .001) and NT2 (6 and 9 g, p < .05) subgroups. Greater proportions of participants in both subgroups had CGI-I ratings of much/very much improved with ON-SXB vs placebo. Sleep stage shifts and sleep quality significantly improved in both subgroups (all doses vs placebo, p < .001). Significant improvements with all ON-SXB doses vs placebo in refreshing nature of sleep (p < .001), nocturnal arousals (p < .05), and ESS scores (p ≤ .001) were reported for NT1 with directional improvements for NT2.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful improvements of a single ON-SXB bedtime dose were shown for daytime sleepiness and DNS in NT1 and NT2, with less power for the limited NT2 subgroup.

Narcolepsies, update in 2023

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2), also known as narcolepsy with and without cataplexy, are sleep disorders that benefited from major scientific advances over the last two decades. NT1 is caused by the loss of hypothalamic neurons producing orexin/hypocretin, a neurotransmitter regulating sleep and wake, which can be measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A low CSF level of hypocretin-1/orexin-A is a highly specific and sensitive biomarker, sufficient to diagnose NT1. Orexin-deficiency is responsible for the main NT1 symptoms: sleepiness, cataplexy, disrupted nocturnal sleep, sleep-related hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. In the absence of a lumbar puncture, the diagnosis is based on neurophysiological tests (nocturnal and diurnal) and the presence of the pathognomonic symptom cataplexy. In the revised version of the International Classification of sleep Disorders, 3rd edition (ICSD-3-TR), a sleep onset rapid eye movement sleep (REM) period (SOREMP) (i.e. rapid occurrence of REM sleep) during the previous polysomnography may replace the diurnal multiple sleep latency test, when clear-cut cataplexy is present. A nocturnal SOREMP is very specific but not sensitive enough, and the diagnosis of cataplexy is usually based on clinical interview. It is thus of crucial importance to define typical versus atypical cataplectic attacks, and a list of clinical features and related degrees of certainty is proposed in this paper (expert opinion). The time frame of at least three months of evolution of sleepiness to diagnose NT1 was removed in the ICSD-3-TR, when clear-cut cataplexy or orexin-deficiency are established. However, it was kept for NT2 diagnosis, a less well-characterized disorder with unknown clinical course and absence of biolo biomarkers; sleep deprivation, shift working and substances intake being major differential diagnoses. Treatment of narcolepsy is nowadays only symptomatic, but the upcoming arrival of non-peptide orexin receptor-2 agonists should be a revolution in the management of these rare sleep diseases.

How reliable is a simplified MSLT nap termination protocol?

OBJECTIVE

According to current practical guidelines, naps of the Mean Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) must be terminated 15 min after sleep onset, which requires ad hoc scoring. For clinical convenience, some sleep clinics use a simplified protocol with fixed nap lengths of 20min. Its diagnostic accuracy remains unknown.

METHODS

A subset of MSLT naps of 56 narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), 98 Parkinson's disease (PD), 117 sleep disordered breathing (SDB), 22 insufficient sleep syndrome (ISS) patients, and 24 patients with idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), originally performed according to the simplified protocol, were retrospectively adjusted to standard protocol (nap termination 15min after sleep onset or after 20min when no sleep occurs). This was feasible in 60% of MSLT naps; in this subset, we compared sensitivity and specificity of both MSLT protocols for identification of patients with and without NT1.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of classical MSLT criteria for NT1, i.e. mean sleep latency ≤8.0min and ≥2 sleep onset rapid eye movement periods (SOREMPs), did not differ between protocols (95%). Specificity, however, was slightly lower (88.1% vs. 89.7%) in the simplified nap termination protocol, with 3 SDB patients and 1 ISS patient having false-positive MSLT findings in the simplified but not in the standard protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a simplified MSLT protocol with fixed nap duration had no impact on MSLT sensitivity for NT1, but the longer sleep periods in the simplified protocol increased the likelihood of REM sleep occurrence particularly in non-NT1 conditions, resulting in a slightly lower MSLT specificity compared to the standard protocol.

Pharmacological options for narcolepsy: are they the way forward?

INTRODUCTION

Narcolepsy is an under-recognized, rare neurologic disorder of hypersomnolence that is associated with increased mortality and medical and psychiatric co-morbidities. Narcolepsy exerts a substantial economic burden on patients and society. There is currently no cure, and life-long symptomatic therapy is needed. Available drugs do not modify the disease course.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides an overview of narcolepsy symptoms, diagnosis, pathophysiology, current pharmacotherapies, and emerging treatments. Gaps and unresolved issues in diagnosis and management of narcolepsy are discussed to answer whether pharmacological options are the way forward.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy (ICSD-3) need revision and greater clarity. Improved recognition of cataplexy and other symptoms through educational outreach, new biomarkers, improved test scoring through artificial intelligence algorithms, and use of machine learning may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. Pharmacological options need improved symptomatic therapy in addition to targeted therapies that address the loss of hypocretin signaling. Optimal narcolepsy care also needs a better understanding of the pathophysiology, recognition of the different phenotypes in narcolepsy, identification of at-risk individuals and early recognition of symptoms, better diagnostic tools, and a database for research and disease monitoring of treatment, side-effects, and comorbidities.

The evolving diagnosis and classification of CNS hypersomnolence disorders

Purpose of Review

We describe the evolution and limitations of current diagnostic criteria and classification systems of CNS hypersomnolence disorders and propose some changes.

Recent Findings

An unsupervised cluster analysis of 1100 Europeans with hypersomnolence identified the narcolepsy type 1 phenotype but not other categories listed in ICSD-3.

Summary

There are long-standing unsolved issues regarding the diagnosis and classification of central disorders of hypersomnolence. These include delineating and identifying phenotypes and unique conditions (“sui generis”), sleep deprivation’s impact on phenotypes and how to separate sleep deprivation as a trigger from other causes, as well as the association of excessive sleepiness with other disorders. We discuss these issues and present a novel, straightforward classification system with consistent terminology to get out of the impasse and do justice to people with hypersomnolence.

Temporal distribution of sleep onset REM periods and N3 sleep in the MSLT and night polysomnogram of narcolepsy type 1 and other hypersomnias

INTRODUCTION

The presence of ≥2 sleep onset REM periods (SOREMP) in the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and the previous night polysomnogram (PSG) is part of the diagnostic criteria of narcolepsy, with every SOREMP having the same diagnostic value, despite evidence suggesting that time of SOREMP appearance and their preceding sleep stage might be relevant. We studied the temporal distribution of SOREMPs and associated sleep stages in the MSLT of patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and other hypersomnias (OH).

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive five-nap MSLTs and their preceding PSG from 83 untreated adult patients with hypersomnolence and ≥1 SOREMPs. Wake/N1(W/N1)-SOREMPs, N2-SOREMPs, and N3 sleep presence and time of appearance were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients had NT1 and 44 OH. There were 183 (78%) SOREMPs in patients with NT1 and 83 (31%) in OH. Sixty-seven percent of SOREMPs in NT1 were from W/N1, and 20% -none from wake-in OH (p < 0.001). Most patients (94%) with ≥2 W/N1-SOREMPs had NT1 (specificity 95%, sensitivity 82%). In patients with NT1 but not in OH, W/N1-SOREMPs decreased throughout the day (from 79% in the 1st nap to 33% in the preceding night, p < 0.001), whereas N2-SOREMPs did not change. N3 sleep frequency in the 5th nap was higher in NT1 than in OH (28% vs. 7%, p:0.009). Nocturnal-SOREMP plus ≥4 daytime SOREMPs, Wake-REM transitions, and REM followed by N3 were only seen in NT1.

CONCLUSION

Measuring the sleep stage sequence and temporal distribution of SOREMP helps to identify patients with narcolepsy in the MSLT.

TCM syndrome differentiation and treatment of narcolepsy based on neurobiological mechanism: A review

Narcolepsy is a relatively rare brain disorder caused by the selective loss of orexin neurons. Narcolepsy is divided into Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1) and Narcolepsis Type 2 (NT2). The pathogenesis of NT1 has been well established due to the severe loss of orexin neurons, while NT2 is still poorly understood, and little is known about its underlying neurobiological mechanisms. human leukocyte antigen alleles have been found to strongly influence the development of narcolepsy, with more than 90% of NT1 patients carrying the human leukocyte antigen II allele DQB1*06:02. In addition to the genetic evidence for the DQBI*06:02 allele, some other evidence suggests that a T cell-mediated immune mechanism destroys the orexin neurons of NT1, with CD4 + T cells being key. For this disease, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy has its own characteristics and advantages, especially the combination of acupuncture and medicine in the treatment of this disease in TCM, which has made considerable and gratifying progress. The purpose of this review is to introduce the frontier progress of neurobiology of narcolepsy, and to explore the syndrome differentiation and treatment of narcolepsy with the combined use of TCM and Western medicine combined with TCM.

The impact of narcolepsy on social relationships in young adults

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Narcolepsy often begins during adolescence and young adulthood, which are crucial periods for social development. The symptoms of narcolepsy likely impact social interactions, but little research has assessed the effects of narcolepsy on social relationships. The current study investigated the impact of narcolepsy on friendships and romantic and sexual relationships.

METHODS

Young adults (18-39 years) with narcolepsy were recruited through national narcolepsy patient organizations. Participants (n = 254) completed an online survey assessing their friendships and romantic and sexual relationships, including communication about their social relationships with medical providers.

RESULTS

All participants (mean age = 28.8 years; 87% female, 92% White/Caucasian) reported that narcolepsy made their social life more challenging. They reported receiving more support from significant others, compared to family or friends (P < .05). Most (80%) indicated that narcolepsy currently impacted their sex life. Only a few participants reported that their providers asked about their social and sex lives, though they wanted providers to ask.

CONCLUSIONS

Narcolepsy impacts social functioning in young adults. Many individuals with narcolepsy prioritize single, meaningful, romantic relationships as developing and sustaining new relationships may be challenging. In addition, narcolepsy symptoms impact sexual functioning. Though many participants wanted to discuss their social and sex lives with providers, only a few providers ask. Treatment of narcolepsy in young adulthood should include supporting individuals regarding the impact on social, romantic, and sexual health.

CITATION

Davidson RD, Biddle K, Nassan M, Scammell TE, Zhou ES. The impact of narcolepsy on social relationships in young adults. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(12):2751-2761.

Clinical characteristics of a large cohort of patients with narcolepsy candidate for pitolisant: a cross-sectional study from the Italian PASS Wakix® Cohort

Introduction

Narcolepsy is a chronic and rare hypersomnia of central origin characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and a complex array of symptoms as well as by several medical comorbidities. With growing pharmacological options, polytherapy may increase the possibility of a patient-centered management of narcolepsy symptoms. The aims of our study are to describe a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were candidates for pitolisant treatment and to compare patients’ subgroups based on current drug prescription (drug-naïve patients in whom pitolisant was the first-choice treatment, switching to pitolisant from other monotherapy treatments, and adding on in polytherapy).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey based on Italian data from the inclusion visits of the Post Authorization Safety Study of pitolisant, a 5-year observational, multicenter, international study.

Results

One hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (76.4% with narcolepsy type 1 and 23.6% with narcolepsy type 2). Most patients (63.4%) presented at least one comorbidity, mainly cardiovascular and psychiatric. Pitolisant was prescribed as an add-on treatment in 120/191 patients (62.8%), as switch from other therapies in 42/191 (22.0%), and as a first-line treatment in 29/191 (15.2%). Drug-naive patients presented more severe sleepiness, lower functional status, and a higher incidence of depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Our study presents the picture of a large cohort of Italian patients with narcolepsy who were prescribed with pitolisant, suggesting that polytherapy is highly frequent to tailor a patient-centered approach.

Differential characteristics of repeated polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test parameters in narcolepsy type 1 and type 2 patients: a longitudinal retrospective study

PURPOSE

Narcolepsy is a chronic disorder and its phenotype is dichotomized into narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). The clinical course and pathophysiological mechanisms of these two clinical entities and their differences are not adequately defined. This study aimed to explore the differential longitudinal patterns of polysomnography (PSG) and multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) in NT1 and NT2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study demographic characteristics, PSG, and MSLT parameters at baseline and follow-up were compared between NT1 and NT2 patients. Patients with both follow-up MSLT and PSG were selected for sub-group analysis. Baseline and follow-up MSLT and PSG parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Of 55 patients with narcolepsy, mean follow-up periods were 7.4 ± 3.5 years for NT1 and 5.5 ± 2.9 for NT2. Demographic data showed increased body mass index and prevalence of sleep paralysis in NT1. Baseline PSG characteristics between NT1 and NT2 showed decreased sleep latency (p = 0.016) and REM latency (p = 0.046) in NT1 group when compared with NT2. Nocturnal SOREMP on PSG was more prevalent in NT1 (p = 0.017), and half of NT2 patients with nocturnal SOREMP on PSG changed their diagnoses to NT1. On follow-up PSG, NT1 displayed reductions in sleep stage N2 (p = 0.006) and N3 (p = 0.048), while wake after sleep onset (WASO) (p = 0.023) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (p = 0.007) were significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Differential MSLT and PSG characteristics of NT1 and NT2 in at baseline and follow-up indicate that NT1 and NT2 are distinct disease phenotypes, and that they present with a contrasting course of disease.