Parent and interdisciplinary professional perceptions of family-centered care in Thai NICU: A qualitative study

Perceived barriers of family-centred care in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Family-centered care (FCC) approach in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has been shown to improve family satisfaction and quality of care. However, several contextual barriers influence its use in NICUs, and these barriers are understudied in Ghana.

AIM

To describe FCC practice in Ghanaian NICUs in order to understand the contextual barriers.

STUDY DESIGN

The study employed a descriptive qualitative design. The researchers used a structured interview guide to collect the data in 24 interviews and 12 focus group discussions. We engaged families (n = 42), nurses and midwives (n = 33), and doctors (n = 9) to describe their perspectives on the barriers to FCC in two public tertiary hospital NICUs. The data were mapped, triangulated, and aggregated to inform the findings. Thematic analysis and MAXQDA qualitative software version 2020 were employed to analyse the data. This qualitative study followed the COREQ guidelines and checklist.

RESULTS

Perceived family barriers and perceived facility barriers to FCC were the two main themes. The perceived family barriers include family stress and anxiety, inadequate information sharing and education, culture and religion. The perceived facility barriers are inadequate space and logistics, workload and inadequate staff, restricted entry, and negative staff attitudes.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study shed light on the barriers to FCC practice in neonatal care in Ghanaian NICUs. Family stress and anxiety, a lack of information sharing, cultures and religious beliefs, NICU workload and staffing shortages, restrictions on family entry into NICUs, and staff attitudes towards families are all contextual barriers to FCC practice.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Health facility managers and NICU staff may consider addressing these barriers to implement FCC in the NICU in order to enhance family satisfaction and quality neonatal care. The design of future NICUs should consider family comfort zones and subunits to accommodate families and their sick infants for optimal health care outcomes. The development of communication models and guidelines for respectful NICU care may aid in integrating families into ICUs and promoting quality health care outcomes.

Family-centred care interventions in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review of randomised controlled trials providing a menu of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods

BACKGROUND

Benefits of different types of family-centred care (FCC) interventions in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have been reported. However, a comprehensive review of existing FCC intervention studies was lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed at synthesising the characteristics of FCC interventions, related outcomes and measurement methods in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in NICU, and providing menus of options to favour implementation and further research.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 31 January 2022. Interventions were mapped according to five categories as defined by a previous Cochrane review. We described outcome types, measurement populations, measurement methods and timelines. Subgroup analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Out of 6583 studies identified, 146 met eligibility criteria. Overall, 52 (35.6%) RCTs tested more than one category of intervention, with a large variety of combinations, with the most frequent category of intervention being the educational (138 RCTs, 94.5%). We identified a total of 77 different intervention packages, and RCTs comparing the same interventions were lacking. The 146 RCTs reported on 425 different outcomes, classified in 13 major categories with parental mental health (61 RCTs, 41.8% of total RCTs) being the most frequent category in parents, and neurobehavioural/developmental outcomes being the most frequent category in newborns (62 RCTs, 42.5%). For several categories of outcomes almost every RCT used a different measurement method. Educational interventions targeting specifically staff, fathers, siblings and other family members were lacking or poorly described. Only one RCT measured outcomes in health workers, two in siblings and none considered other family members.

CONCLUSIONS

A large variety of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods were used in FCC studies in NICU. The derived menus of options should be helpful for researchers and policy makers to identify interventions most suitable in each setting and to further standardise research methods.

Nursing practice of routine gastric aspiration in preterm infants and its link to necrotizing enterocolitis: is the practice still clinically relevant?

The practice of routine gastric residual aspiration in preterm infants remains controversial, with conflicting evidence regarding its impact on necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). As front-line caregivers, nurses play a vital role in gastric aspiration procedures and must be informed by evidence. This quasi-experimental nursing study aimed to assess whether gastric aspiration is clinically relevant in reducing the risk of NEC in preterm infants.A total of 250 preterm infants from two NICUs in Egypt were allocated to the gastric aspiration (n = 125) and non-aspiration (n = 125) groups. Feeding practices, gastric residuals, and incidence/severity of NEC were compared between groups according to modified Bell's criteria. Risk factors were analyzed using multivariate regression. There were no significant baseline differences between the groups. The gastric residual attributes and feeding outcomes did not differ substantially from aspiration. The overall incidence of NEC was 14-15%, with no significant differences in the odds of onset or progression of NEC by stage between the groups. Lower gestational age and birth weight emerged as stronger predictors of NEC. Routine gastric aspiration does not appear to directly prevent or reduce the severity of NEC in this population. Although gastric residuals retain clinical importance, study findings question assumptions that aspiration protects against NEC and informs nursing practice. Evidence-based feeding protocols must continually evolve through ongoing research on modifiable risk factors for this devastating intestinal disease in preterm infants.

"Thai Nurses' and Midwives' Perceptions Regarding Barriers, Facilitators, and Competence in Neonatal Pain Management"

BACKGROUND

Effective neonatal pain management is reliant upon the expert care of nurses and midwives working in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Previous research has explored barriers, facilitators, and some aspects of nurse competence in managing neonatal pain; however, this research has been predominantly performed in Western countries. To date, little is known about the barriers, facilitators, and perceived competence of Thai nurses and midwives in relation to neonatal pain management in NICUs. Exploring Thai nurses' and midwives' perceptions in these areas is crucial for understanding the contextual nuances of neonatal pain management, which can guide the provision of care for these high-risk neonates.

PURPOSE

To investigate nurses' and midwives' perceptions of barriers, facilitators, and competence regarding effective neonatal pain management in Thai NICUs.

METHODS

Data were collected using virtual one-to-one, semistructured interviews with 12 neonatal nurses and midwives between July and August 2021 in 3 units of 2 tertiary hospitals in Southern Thailand. Inductive thematic analysis was used to examine interview data.

RESULTS

These data revealed following 3 major themes: ( a ) barriers to effective neonatal pain management, ( b ) facilitators of effective neonatal pain management, and ( c ) perceptions of competence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Assisting nurses and midwives in overcoming barriers and strengthening facilitators while enhancing their competence may result in better neonatal pain management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

This study adds to our understanding that further research is needed to develop the interventions designed to change at individual, unit, and organizational levels, particularly implementing parent-friendly visitation and ongoing professional development in neonatal pain management.

Nurses' beliefs and perceptions regarding family-centered care services in acute pediatric healthcare settings

OBJECTIVES

To describe pediatrics nurses' beliefs about family-centered services (FCS) as a model of providing healthcare to children in acute care settings in Jordan.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. Nurses who provide direct acute care to children (n = 246) completed the 'Measure of Beliefs about Participation in Family-Centered Service' questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe nurses' beliefs about participation, practical feasibility, implementation self-efficacy, principles, and potential adverse outcomes of FCS.

RESULTS

Many nurses feel confident (70%) about their ability to work with others in providing FCS and perceive having the ability to operate according to family-centered care (FCC) principles (68%). Many (75%) nurses believed parents should be encouraged to decide how much they want to be involved in the child's care. However, only 46% of the nurses valued attending to family priorities if the health decisions made by the family differed from the healthcare providers' priorities. Many nurses (70%) believed that healthcare professionals' competencies and capacities to work utilizing FCC are more important than their personal preferences and opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study clearly indicate that nurses positively viewed providing children's care within a FCS. This supports the efforts to reasonably integrate FCC as an operating model in the pediatric healthcare settings in Jordan.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

FCS is a complex task requiring integrating multidisciplinary effort and healthcare providers' positive attitudes toward families as care partners. Steps should help maximize the organizational resources to facilitate family presence and create opportunities for professional-families partnerships for children's care.

Neonatal nurses' educational needs in a family-centered partnership program: Five ways of knowing

BACKGROUND

Partnerships between parents and nurses are essential to provide comprehensive family-centered care (FCC) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the educational needs of neonatal nurses to develop a family-centered partnership program with parents based on five ways of knowing.

DESIGN

We conducted focus group interviews with 18 NICU nurses working at a tertiary hospital. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

METHOD

Data were collected from February to March 2023 through semi-structured interviews and then carefully transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach.

RESULTS

We used Carper and Chinn and Kramer's five ways of knowing as a framework for data analysis. Twelve categories emerged: staying updated with evidence-based practice, recognizing FCC, practicing neonatal nursing skills and participating in continued education and professional development (empirical knowledge); engaging in self-reflection and expressing therapeutic empathy (personal knowledge); fostering effective communication and leading cooperative readership, building integrity (esthetic knowledge); maintaining ethical responsibility (ethical knowledge); and developing collaborative teamwork, growing cultural competence (emancipatory knowledge).

CONCLUSIONS

This study could be used as a foundation for enhancing NICU nurses' partnerships with parents based on FCC and nurses' educational needs and preferences.

Staff Perceptions of Family-Centered Care in Italian Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Family Centered Care (FCC) in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) included family involvement in the care process of newborns and infants. Staff perceptions of FCC may influence clinical practice and management strategies in NICUs, with an impact on quality and humanization of the care. The Family-Centred Care Questionnaire-Revised (FCCQ-R) was adapted for the NICU setting, therefore the FCCQ-R@it-NICU was developed and used for the present study in 32 Italian NICUs. We calculated internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha correlation between Current and Necessary dimensions of the scale using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Furthermore, we investigated which characteristics could influence staff perceptions of FCC in NICUs. 921 NICU professionals participated in the study. The FCCQ-R@it-NICU revealed good internal consistency (0.96) and good correlation between dimensions (p < 0.05). Statistical and significant differences in Current and Necessary dimensions were found and some demographic characteristics were found predictable on FCC practice. The FCCQ-R@it-NICU is a valid tool to investigate staff perceptions about FCC in NICU settings. Profession, education level and work experience seem to positively influence the perception of what is required for FCC practice within NICUs.

Family-centred care change during COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Family-centred care (FCC) is an approach to promote family and health care provider partnership. This has been incorporated into neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide. However, FCC in low resource health settings, such as Thailand, is challenging and further impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

AIMS

To evaluate FCC innovations to improve respect, collaboration and support in a Thai NICU.

STUDY DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in an NICU in southern Thailand. Pre-implementation was prior to COVID-19, and parental and staff perceptions of FCC were measured via Perceptions of Family Centred Care-Parent (PFCC-P) and -Staff (PFCC-S) survey. The FCC innovations were developed by stakeholders based on the COVID-19 restrictions, pre-survey results, parents' and clinicians' interviews and integrative review, then implemented via a flowchart. Post-implementation evaluation was via repeated surveys. Comparisons were made pre-and post-implementation, with Mann-Whitney U-test statistics for parents and Wilcoxon's Rank Sum for staff.

RESULTS

A total of 185 (85 pre; 100 post) parents and 20 (pre and post; paired group) health care professionals participated. Because of COVID-19, many planned interventions were unfeasible, however, other innovations achieved (e.g., structured telephone updates, information booklet revision). There was an increase in parents' perception of respect ([median] 2.50-3.50), collaboration (2.33-3.33) and support (2.60-3.60) domains and overall (2.50-3.43; p < .001; 95% CI: 2.93-3.11). Interdisciplinary professionals' perception of FCC did not significantly change pre-and post-implementation/COVID-19 pandemic for respect (3.00-2.92), collaboration (3.22-3.33), support (3.20-3.20) and overall (3.15-3.20; 95% CI: 3.10-3.25).

CONCLUSION

Despite the challenges of COVID-19 restricting NICU access, the provision of FCC was maintained and even improved.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Further research is necessary to develop FCC practice innovations associated with communication, across diverse health care systems and resources.