Peri-operative pain management in children with cerebral palsy: comparative efficacy of epidural vs systemic analgesia protocols

Regional anesthesia and analgesia in patients with spastic cerebral palsy undergoing orthopedic surgery: a historical cohort study

PURPOSE

We sought to examine the incidence of severe postoperative pain in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) in the first 48 hr after surgery performed under combined regional and general anesthesia and its association with patient and surgical factors.

METHODS

In a historical cohort study, we reviewed the electronic records of 452 patients with spastic CP who underwent orthopedic surgeries of the upper and lower extremities from April 2016 to February 2020. Collected data included patient characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, details of anesthesia and surgery, types of regional anesthesia applied, success rate of anesthesia, incidence of severe pain, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 440 patients; 404 patients underwent lower extremity surgery, 20 upper extremity surgery, and 15 both, and one patient required stem cell injection. All patients received general anesthesia before block performance. Single-injection neuraxial anesthesia was performed in 241 (54.8%) patients, brachial plexus block in 27 (6.1%) patients, and femoral/sciatic nerve blocks in 17 (3.9%) patients. Continuous neuraxial, brachial plexus, and femoral/sciatic nerve blocks were performed in 149 (33.9%), four (0.9%), and seven (1.6%) of the patients, respectively. Major and complex major surgeries were performed in 161 (36.6%) and 72 (16.4%) patients, respectively and continuous catheters were inserted in 50.3% of patients undergoing major surgery and in 91.7% of patients undergoing complex major surgery. Severe pain was reported by the caregivers of 68 (15.5%) patients who received nonopioid analgesic interventions.

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of regional anesthesia, approximately 15% of patients with spastic CP undergoing orthopedic surgery for spastic cerebral palsy experienced severe pain that responded to treatment adjustments.

STUDY REGISTRATION

CTRI.nic.in (027002); registered 5 August 2020.

Postoperative pain and pain management following selective dorsal rhizotomy

BACKGROUND

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical procedure that reduces lower limb spasticity, performed in some children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Effective pain management after SDR is essential for early rehabilitation. This study aimed to describe the anaesthetic and early pain management, pain and adverse events in children following SDR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Participants were all children who underwent SDR at a single Australian tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2020. Electronic medical records of all children identified were reviewed. Data collected included demographic and clinical data (pain scores, key clinical outcomes, adverse events and side effects) and medications used during anaesthesia and postoperative recovery.

RESULTS

22 children (n=8, 36% female) had SDR. The mean (SD) age at surgery was 6 years and 6 months (1 year and 4 months). Common intraoperative medications used were remifentanil (100%), ketamine (95%), paracetamol (91%) and sevoflurane (86%). Postoperatively, all children were prescribed opioid nurse-controlled analgesia (morphine, 36%; fentanyl, 36%; and oxycodone, 18%) and concomitant ketamine infusion. Opioid doses were maximal on the day after surgery. The mean (SD) daily average pain score (Wong-Baker FACES scale) on the day after surgery was 1.4 (0.9), decreasing to 1.0 (0.5) on postoperative day 6 (POD6). Children first attended the physiotherapy gym on median day 7 (POD8, range 7-8). Most children experienced mild side effects or adverse events that were managed conservatively. Common side effects included constipation (n=19), nausea and vomiting (n=18), and pruritus (n=14). No patient required return to theatre, ICU admission or prolonged inpatient stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Most children achieve good pain management following SDR with opioid and ketamine infusions. Adverse events, while common, are typically mild and managed with medication or therapy. This information can be used as a baseline to improve postoperative care and to support families' understanding of SDR before surgery.

Post-operative steroids in patients with patients with severe cerebral palsy undergoing posterior spinal fusion

INTRODUCTION

Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) represents a large physiologic challenge for children with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Perioperative complications are numerous with many occurring in the post-operative period due to pain and relative immobilization. This study assessed the impact of steroids on patients undergoing PSF for NMS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients managed at a single center with PSF for NMS was reviewed. Clinical and radiographic analysis was used to evaluate baseline demographics, curve characteristics, and post-operative course.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients who underwent PSF for NMS were included. Fifty-seven of these patients did not receive post-operative steroids (NS) while 32 patients were treated with post-operative steroids (dexamethasone, WS) for a median of 3 doses (median 6.0 mg/dose every 8 h after surgery). The demographic variables of the cohorts were similar with no difference in curve magnitude, number of vertebrae fused, number of osteotomies, or EBL between groups. A 70% decrease in the median post-operative morphine equivalents was observed in the steroid cohort (0.50 mg/kg WS vs 1.65 mg/kg NS, p value < 0.001). There was an association between post-operative morphine equivalents and length of stay (Spearman's rho = 0.22, p value = 0.04). There was no difference in wound healing, infection, and pulmonary or gastrointestinal complications between groups. No difference was found in pain at discharge, 30-day ED returns, or 30-day OR returns between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative dexamethasone resulted in a 70% decrease in morphine equivalent use after PSF for NMS without any increase in perioperative wound infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3: case-control series.

Efficacy of intrathecal morphine administration in pediatric patients undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine following selective dorsal rhizotomy in pediatric patients previously diagnosed with cerebral palsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cohort analysis over the course of four years. The analysis consisted of a treatment group which received intrathecal morphine (5 mcg/kg) injection and a control group that did not receive the injection prior to dural closure. All patients underwent multilevel laminectomies for selective dorsal rhizotomy at Akron Children's Hospital. The effectiveness of the treatment was measured by total dose of hydromorphone administered on patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), number of days on oral narcotics, and cumulative dose of oral narcotic.

RESULTS

Of the analyzed 15 pediatric patients, seven patients received intrathecal morphine injection while the other eight did not receive the treatment prior to dural closure. There was a difference of 1135 mcg in total PCA dose between the study group (3243 mcg) and the control group (4378 mcg). The total PCA dose based on weight was lower in the study group (163 mcg/kg) than in the control group (171 mcg/kg).

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, the administration of intrathecal morphine clinically reduces the opiate need in the first 96 hours post-operatively.

Evaluating the role for regional analgesia in children with spina bifida: a retrospective observational study comparing the efficacy of regional versus systemic analgesia protocols following major urological surgery

INTRODUCTION

Regional techniques are a key component of multimodal analgesia and help decrease opioid use perioperatively, but some techniques may not be suitable for all patients, such as those with spina bifida. We hypothesized peripheral regional catheters would reduce postoperative opioid use compared with no regional analgesia without increasing pain scores in pediatric patients with spina bifida undergoing major urological surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a multicenter database established for the study of enhanced recovery after surgery was performed of patients from 2009 to 2021 who underwent bladder augmentation or creation of catheterizable channels. Patients without spina bifida and those receiving epidural analgesia were excluded. Opioids were converted into morphine equivalents and normalized to patient weight.

RESULTS

158 patients with pediatric spina bifida from 7 centers were included, including 87 with and 71 without regional catheters. There were no differences in baseline patient factors. Anesthesia setup increased from median 40 min (IQR 34-51) for no regional to 64 min (IQR 40-97) for regional catheters (p<0.01). The regional catheter group had lower median intraoperative opioid usage (0.24 vs 0.80 mg/kg morphine equivalents, p<0.01) as well as lower in-hospital postoperative opioid usage (0.05 vs 0.23 mg/kg/day morphine equivalents, p<0.01). Pain scores were not higher in the regional catheters group.

DISCUSSION

Continuous regional analgesia following major urological surgery in children with spina bifida was associated with a 70% intraoperative and 78% postoperative reduction in opioids without higher pain scores. This approach should be considered for similar surgical interventions in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03245242.

Use of Epidural Analgesia in Children With Neuromuscular Conditions Following Hip Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular conditions, such as cerebral palsy, are the most common motor disabilities in the pediatric population. Children with these conditions frequently have accompanying hip deformities that require pelvic and femur osteotomy to correct the spastic hip dislocations. However, postoperative pain management remains an elusive and challenging problem. The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative use of epidural analgesia in patients with neuromuscular conditions provided similar outcomes with regard to pain scores, length of stay, duration of foley placement, duration of pain control, and complications as compared to traditional pain management regimens. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the use of epidural analgesia to conventional pain relief modalities following hip reconstruction in patients with neuromuscular conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using records of pediatric patients with neuromuscular conditions treated at our tertiary care center between January 2009 and December 2019. Patients with neuromuscular conditions treated with epidural or non-epidural analgesia for pain relief following unilateral or bilateral proximal femoral osteotomies, pelvic osteotomies, or open hip reduction were eligible for study inclusion. Multiple linear regression was used to determine differences in length of stay, pain score, pain modality, duration of Foley placement, and complications between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. In all, 58 patients underwent unilateral procedures, of which 30 (52%) received epidural analgesia, and 28 (48%) received non-epidural pain control modalities. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar among the cohort, except for BMI, which varied slightly. Average pain scores and pain control duration were not statistically different between the pain control modalities. After controlling for demographics, procedure, and immobilization type, the epidural group experienced significantly increased length of stay (+3.18 days, P=0.032) and duration of Foley placement (+1.04 days, P=.013). Complication rates between the two groups were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of epidural analgesia in children with neuromuscular conditions was associated with comparable pain scores, despite the increased length of stay and duration of Foley placement. No statistically significant difference in complication rates was observed between patients receiving epidural anesthesia and those receiving traditional pain modalities.

Neuraxial anesthesia for post-operative pain control after hip surgery in children with cerebral palsy and pre-existing intrathecal baclofen pumps

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe the efficacy and adverse events of neuraxial anesthesia for post-operative pain control in non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy with pre-existing intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps undergoing hip reconstructive or palliative surgery.

METHODS

Twelve children (mean age 11.25 years) were included in the study with the following neuraxial anesthesia methods: indwelling epidural catheter (8 patients), neuraxial opioids administered through the side port of the ITB pump (3 patients), and single injection spinal anesthetic (1 patient). Observational pain scores and opioid requirements were quantified for all patients.

RESULTS

There were no ITB pump or surgical complications at a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. The average length of stay was 6 days. Patients had good post-operative pain control with a mean observational pain score of 0.7 and mean morphine equivalent use of 0.26mg/kg/day. Four patients required anti-emetics to control nausea and three patients had urinary retention requiring repeat catheterization, but all medical complications resolved prior to discharge.

CONCLUSION

Neuraxial anesthesia can effectively control post-operative pain in children with a pre-existing ITB pump. Utilizing the side port of the ITB pump for administration of neuraxial opioids is an option when epidural or spinal anesthesia is not possible.

Epidural analgesia for reduction of postoperative systemic opioid use following selective dorsal rhizotomy in children

OBJECTIVE

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) requires significant postoperative pain management, traditionally relying heavily on systemic opioids. Concern for short- and long-term effects of these agents has generated interest in reducing systemic opioid administration without sacrificing analgesia. Epidural analgesia has been applied in pediatric patients undergoing SDR; however, whether this reduces systemic opioid use has not been established. In this retrospective cohort study, the authors compared postoperative opioid use and clinical measures between patients treated with SDR who received postoperative epidural analgesia and those who received systemic analgesia only.

METHODS

All patients who underwent SDR at Boston Children's Hospital between June 2013 and November 2019 were reviewed. Treatment used the same surgical technique. Postoperative systemic opioid dosage (in morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram [MME/kg]), pain scores, need for respiratory support, vomiting, bowel movements, and length of hospital and ICU stay were compared between patients who received postoperative epidural analgesia and those who did not, by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were identified, including 18 females (51.4%), with a median age at surgery of 6.1 years. Thirteen patients received postoperative epidural and systemic analgesia and 22 patients received systemic analgesia only. Groups were otherwise similar, with treatment selection based solely on surgeon routine. Patients who received epidural analgesia required less systemic morphine milligram equivalents/kg on postoperative days (PODs) 0-4 (p ≤ 0.042). Patients who did not receive epidural analgesia were more likely to require respiratory support on POD 1 (45% vs 8%; p = 0.027). Reported pain scores did not differ between groups, although patients receiving epidural analgesia trended toward less severe pain on PODs 1 and 2. Groups did not differ with respect to postoperative vomiting or time to first bowel movement, although epidural analgesia use was associated with a longer hospital stay (median 7 vs 5 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received postoperative epidural analgesia required less systemic opioid use and had at least equivalent reported pain scores on PODs 1-4, and they required less respiratory support on POD 1, although they remained in the hospital longer when compared to patients who received systemic analgesia only. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm whether epidural analgesia lowers systemic opioid use in children, contributes to a safer postoperative hospital stay, and results in better pain control following SDR.

Regional anesthesia in pediatric patients with preexisting neurological disease

Preexisting neurological disease in pediatric patients presents unique challenges to the anesthesiologist. In-depth knowledge of the disease processes and awareness of sequalae that uniquely influence the risks and benefits of anesthetics are needed to make informed decisions. Because these vulnerable populations are often susceptible to perioperative airway or cardiopulmonary complications, the use of regional anesthesia can be advantageous. However, these clinical conditions already involve compromised neural tissue and, as such, create additional concern that regional anesthesia may result in new or worsened deficits. The following discussion is not intended to be a full review of each disease process, but rather provides a concise, yet thorough, discussion of the available literature on regional anesthesia in the more common, but still rare, pediatric neurological disorders. We aim to provide a framework for pediatric anesthesiologists to reengage in a healthy discussion about the risks and benefits of utilizing regional anesthesia in this vulnerable population.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy: an illustrated review of operative techniques

OBJECTIVE

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a procedure primarily performed to improve function in a subset of children with limitations related to spasticity. There is substantial variability in operative techniques among centers and surgeons. Here, the authors provide a technical review of operative approaches for SDR.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were queried in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. All studies included described a novel surgical technique. The technical nuances of each approach were extracted, including extent of exposure, bone removal, and selection of appropriate nerve roots. The operative approach preferred at the authors' institution (the "2 × 3 exposure") is also detailed.

RESULTS

Five full-text papers were identified from a total of 380 articles. Operative approaches to SDR varied significantly with regard to level of exposure, extent of laminectomy, and identification of nerve roots. The largest exposure involved a multilevel laminectomy, while the smallest exposure involved a keyhole interlaminar approach. At the Hospital for Sick Children, the authors utilize a two-level laminoplasty at the level of the conus medullaris. The benefits and disadvantages of the spectrum of techniques are discussed, and illustrative figures are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical approaches to SDR vary considerably and are detailed and illustrated in this review as a guide for neurosurgeons. Future studies should address the long-term impact of these techniques on functional outcomes and complications such as spinal deformity.

Epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion analgesia on optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric patients: A prospective, double-blind, randomised trial

The use of programmed intermittent epidural bolus for postoperative analgesia may have greater analgesic efficacy than continuous epidural infusion. However, the rapid delivery speed used with an epidural bolus is more likely to increase intracranial pressure. We compared the effects of lumbar epidural bolus versus continuous infusion epidural analgesia on intracranial pressure in children using optic nerve sheath diameter as a marker. We randomly assigned 40 paediatric patients to bolus or infusion groups. Epidural analgesia (0.15% ropivacaine 0.3 ml·kg⁻¹) was administered via bolus or infusion. Ultrasonography was used to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter before (T0), at 3 min (T1), 10 min (T2), and 70 min (T3) after starting the pump. There were statistically significant between-group differences in optic nerve sheath diameter over time (P_{Group x Time} = 0.045). From T0–T3, the area under the curve values were similar between the two groups. Although there were differences in the patterns of optic nerve sheath diameter change according to the delivery mode, the use of lumbar epidural bolus did not increase the risk of intracranial pressure increase over that of continuous infusion. Further research is needed to investigate intracranial pressure changes after continuous application of each delivery mode.

Reducing opioid usage: a pilot study comparing postoperative selective dorsal rhizotomy protocols

OBJECTIVE

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical procedure used to treat spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Currently, there is a lack of work examining the efficacy of optimizing pain management protocols after single-level laminectomy for SDR. This pilot study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SDR completed with a traditional pain management protocol versus one designed for opioid dosage reduction.

METHODS

The Texas Comprehensive Spasticity Center prospective database was queried for all patients who underwent SDR between 2015 and 2018. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data for all patients who underwent SDR were collected from medical records. The study was designed as a retrospective study between the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and dexmedetomidine infusion (INF) groups with 80% power to detect a 50% difference at a significance level of 0.05. Patients in the INF group received perioperative gabapentin, intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion, and scheduled acetaminophen and NSAIDs postoperatively.

RESULTS

Medication administration records, pain scores, and therapy notes were collected for 30 patients. Patients who underwent SDR between June 2015 and the end of December 2017 received traditional pain management (PCA group, n = 14). Patients who underwent SDR between January 2018 and the end of December 2018 received modified pain management (INF group, n = 16). No patients were lost to follow-up. Differences in age, weight, height, preoperative Gross Motor Function Classification System scores, operative duration, hospital length of stay, and sex distribution were not statistically different between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Analysis of analgesic medication doses demonstrated that the INF group required fewer doses and lower amounts of opioids overall, and also fewer NSAIDs than the PCA group. When converted to the morphine milligram equivalent, the patients in the INF group used fewer doses and lower amounts of opioids overall than the PCA group. These differences were either statistically significant (p < 0.05) or trending toward significance (p < 0.10). Both groups participated in physical and occupational therapy similarly postoperatively (p > 0.05). Pain scores were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05) despite patients in the INF group requiring fewer opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion with dexmedetomidine during SDR surgery combined with perioperative gabapentin and scheduled acetaminophen and NSAIDs postoperatively resulted in similar pain scores to traditional pain management with opioids. In addition, this pilot study demonstrated that patients who received the INF pain management protocol required reduced opioid dosages and were able to participate in therapy similarly to the control PCA group.

Postoperative Pain Protocol in Children after Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy

INTRODUCTION

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) provides lasting relief of spasticity for children suffering from cerebral palsy, although controlling postoperative pain is challenging. Postoperatively, escalation of therapies to include a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and intensive care unit (ICU) admission is common.

OBJECTIVES

We developed a multimodal pain management protocol that included intraoperative placement of an epidural catheter with continuous opioid administration. We present the 3-year results of protocol implementation.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, all patients who were subjected to SDR at our institution were identified for review. Hourly pain scores were recorded. Adverse effects of medication, including desaturation, nausea/vomiting, and pruritus, were also noted. Comparisons were made between patients treated with PCA and those treated with multimodal pain control using t and χ2 tests as appropriate.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients undergoing the procedure with protocolized pain control (average age 6.8 years, 57% male) were compared to 7 PCA-treated controls (average age 6.6 years, 54% male). Pain control was satisfactory in both groups, with average pain scores of 1.5 in both groups on postoperative day 0, decreasing by postoperative day 3 to 1.1 in the PCA group and 0.5 in the protocol group. No patients under the protocol required ICU admission; all patients with PCA spent at least 1 day in the ICU. Desaturations were seen in 16 patients in the protocol group (41%), but none required ICU transfer. Treatment for pruritis was given to 57% of PCA patients and 15% of protocol patients. Treatment for nausea and vomiting was given to 100% of PCA patients and 51% of protocol patients. Medication requirements for the hospitalization were decreased from 1.1 to 0.28 doses per patient for pruritis, and from 3 to 1.1 doses per patient for nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal analgesia is an excellent alternative to PCA for postoperative pain after SDR. Actual analgesia is comparative to that of controls without the need for intensive care monitoring. Side effects of high-dose opiates were less frequent and required less medication. With the protocol, patients were safely treated outside the ICU.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia After Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy

OBJECTIVES

Multimodal analgesia (MMA) may reduce opioid use among children who are hospitalized, and may contribute toward enhanced recovery after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for patients with spasticity in pediatric cerebral palsy. In this retrospective cohort study, we assess an MMA protocol consisting of scheduled nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug doses (ketorolac or ibuprofen), alternating with scheduled acetaminophen and diazepam doses, with as-needed opioids. It was hypothesized that protocol use would be associated with reductions in opioid requirements and other clinical improvements.

METHODS

Data were obtained for 52 patients undergoing SDR at an academic tertiary care pediatric hospital (2012-2017, with the protocol implemented in 2014). Using a retrospective cohort design, we compared outcomes between protocol and nonprotocol patients, employing both univariate t test and Wilcoxon rank test comparisons as well as multivariable regression methods. The primary outcome was total as-needed opioid requirements over postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 2, measured in oral morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram. Additional outcomes included antiemetic medication doses, discharge opioid prescriptions, total direct cost, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Twelve patients received the MMA protocol, and 40 patients did not. POD-0 MMA initiation was independently associated with a reduction of 0.14 morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram in mean opioid requirements over PODs 0 to 2 in the multiple regression analysis (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.28; P = .04). No statistically significant differences were demonstrated in doses of antiemetic medications, discharge opioid prescriptions, total direct cost, and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This MMA protocol may help reduce opioid use after SDR. Improving protocol implementation in a prospective, multisite study will help elucidate further MMA effects on pain, costs, and recovery.

Post-Operative Pain Assessment and Management in Cerebral Palsy (CP): A Two-Pronged Comparative Study on the Experience of Surgical Patients

INTRODUCTION

This study compares the current practice patterns of pain assessment and management between children with and without CP following either posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) or hip osteotomy (HO).

METHODS

Two cohorts of CP patients were retrospectively identified and matched with non-CP patients based on age, surgical procedure, and approach to post-operative pain management. Sixteen CP patients undergoing PSIF and twenty-two undergoing HO were respectively matched with the same numbers of non-CP patients receiving the same procedures. The frequency of assessments conducted, highest pain scores recorded on each post-operative day (POD), and the amount of adjuvant analgesics administered were collected for POD 0-4.

RESULTS

Patients with CP were significantly more frequently evaluated for pain post-operatively, tended to have lower pain scores as measured by current scales, and received slightly fewer analgesics. Patients with CP differed from their non-CP counterparts in both frequency and method of post-operative pain assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this study is to elucidate the current state of post-operative pain assessment and management in children with CP undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries, to improve CP patient/caregiver understanding and expectation of the post-operative experience regarding pain, and to provide recommendations for improving the post-operative care for these patients.

Management of pain in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review

AIM

To determine the efficacy of interventions for the management of pain in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHOD

Electronic databases were searched from the earliest date possible to April 2018 using a mixture of subject headings and free text. Inclusion criteria comprised of studies with (1) diagnosis of CP, (2) under the age of 18 years, (3) intervention for the management of pain, (4) outcome measure of pain, and (5) studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria. Pain related to (n=number of studies): hypertonia (n=17), spastic hip disease (n=13), procedures for the management of CP (n=7), postoperative (n=18), and other (n=2). Most of the studies were of level III to level V evidence.

INTERPRETATION

There is level II evidence to support intrathecal baclofen therapy for pain secondary to hypertonia in spastic and spastic-dyskinetic CP, and non-pharmacological interventions for procedural pain and pharmacological interventions for postoperative pain. Most studies were restricted by retrospective design and limited use of validated outcome measures. Future research is needed to explore multidisciplinary interventions for chronic pain and pain secondary to dystonia. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from a standardized approach to pain assessment.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

The strongest evidence exists for pharmacological treatments for postoperative pain in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). There is moderate evidence for the efficacy of intrathecal baclofen for pain related to hypertonia in predominately spastic CP. There is a lack of standardization in the assessment of pain. There is limited evidence for multimodal and non-pharmacological strategies in paediatric CP.

Epidural analgesia is superior to local infiltration analgesia in children with cerebral palsy undergoing unilateral hip reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment of postoperative pain in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is a major challenge. We investigated the effect of epidural analgesia, high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and an approximated placebo control on early postoperative pain in children with CP who were undergoing unilateral hip reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2014, we included 18 children with CP. The first part of the study was a randomized double-blind trial with allocation to either LIA or placebo for postoperative pain management, in addition to intravenous or oral analgesia. In the second part of the study, the children were consecutively included for postoperative pain management with epidural analgesia in addition to intravenous or oral analgesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain 4 h postoperatively using 2 pain assessment tools (r-FLACC and VAS-OBS) ranging from 0 to 10. The secondary outcome was opioid consumption over the 21-h study period.

RESULTS

The mean level of pain 4 h postoperatively was lower in the epidural group (r-FLACC: 0.7; VAS-OBS: 0.6) than in both the LIA group (r-FLACC: 4.8, p = 0.01; VAS-OBS: 5.2, p = 0.02) and the placebo group (r-FLACC: 5.2, p = 0.01; VAS-OBS: 6.5, p < 0.001). Corrected for body weight, the mean opioid consumption was lower in the epidural group than in the LIA group and the placebo group (both p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Epidural analgesia is superior to local infiltration analgesia for early postoperative pain management in children with cerebral palsy who undergo unilateral hip reconstruction.

Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version

In 2010, under the guidance of the DGAI (German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine) and DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine), twelve German medical societies published the “Evidence- and Consensus-based Guidelines on the Management of Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium in Intensive Care”. Since then, several new studies and publications have considerably increased the body of evidence, including the new recommendations from the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) in conjunction with Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) from 2013. For this update, a major restructuring and extension of the guidelines were needed in order to cover new aspects of treatment, such as sleep and anxiety management. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated using the criteria of the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine. The body of evidence used to formulate these recommendations was reviewed and approved by representatives of 17 national societies. Three grades of recommendation were used as follows: Grade “A” (strong recommendation), Grade “B” (recommendation) and Grade “0” (open recommendation). The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence and consensus-based set of level 3 guidelines. This publication was designed for all ICU professionals, and takes into account all critically ill patient populations. It represents a guide to symptom-oriented prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium, anxiety, stress, and protocol-based analgesia, sedation, and sleep-management in intensive care medicine.

Epidural Baclofen for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Children With Cerebral Palsy

INTRODUCTION

Children with cerebral palsy undergoing soft tissue and bony procedures often experience pain and spasticity postoperatively. Differentiation of pain from spasticity complicates management, so controlling spasticity with a continuous infusion of baclofen, an antispasmodic, through an already present indwelling epidural catheter holds interest.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with cerebral palsy undergoing single event, multilevel lower extremity surgery at a single institution who received epidural analgesia with or without continuous baclofen infusion. Primary outcomes included need for supplemental narcotic analgesics and benzodiazepines postoperatively. Duration of hospitalization, pain scores, and complications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were identified, ranging in age from 3 to 17 years, 19 of whom received epidural baclofen. No differences were found in use of supplemental narcotic analgesia, benzodiazepines, or duration of hospitalization. Differences in pain scores were not statistically significant (0.82±0.95 for baclofen vs. 1.48±0.99 for controls) (P=0.391). Mean arterial pressure was lower in patients receiving baclofen (P=0.004). No potential side effects attributable to baclofen were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous epidural baclofen infusion seems unlikely to alter the pain-spasm cycle experienced by patients with cerebral palsy following orthopaedic surgery to a clinically significant degree. More effective, and cost-effective, measures at assessing and controlling pain and muscle spasm should be explored to benefit cerebral palsy patients postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic study.