Inguinal hernia in very low-birthweight infants: Follow up to adolescence

Inguinal Hernia in Premature Infants: To Operate Before or After Discharge from Hospital?

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to find out the optimal timing for herniotomy for premature infants with inguinal hernia (IH): early during hospitalisation or delayed after hospital discharge.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on premature infants diagnosed with IH during their initial hospitalization between 2015 and 2020. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were compared between infants undergoing herniotomy before discharge ("early") and those who were discharged without herniotomy ("delayed"). Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 219 premature infants, 189 (86.3%) underwent early herniotomy, while 30 were discharged with unoperated IH. In the delayed group, 15 (50%) underwent planned delayed herniotomy, and the remaining 15 experienced spontaneous resolution (absence of inguinal bulge over at least 1-year follow-up). The gestational age and birth weight of both groups were similar. At surgery, the delayed group median (interquartile range) was significantly older (42.1[38-49] vs 37.7 [36-40] weeks, p < 0.001) and heavier (3.27 [2.21-4.60] vs 2.22 [2.00-2.70] kg, p < 0.001). Two infants (1%) in the early group presented with incarcerated IH requiring urgent operation. In the delayed group, no infant developed incarcerated IH while awaiting elective operation (time from diagnosis to operation 44 [21-85] days). There was no statistically significant difference in respiratory and surgical complications between the two groups, although the delayed group had lesser surgical complications (0% vs 9.5%).

CONCLUSION

Deferring herniotomy after discharge for premature infants is safe with close monitoring and associated with a chance of spontaneous resolution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, treatment study.

Delayed versus early repair of inguinal hernia in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of herniotomy in preterm infants undergoing early versus delayed repair, the risk factors for complications, and to identify best timing of surgery.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Central databases were searched from inception until 25 Jan 2021 to identify publications comparing the timing of neonatal inguinal hernia repair between early intervention (before discharge from first hospitalization) and delayed (after first hospitalisation discharge) intervention. Inclusion criteria was preterm infants diagnosed with inguinal hernia during neonatal intensive care unit admission. Results were analyzed using fixed and random effects meta-analysis (RevManv5.4).

RESULTS

Out of 721 articles found, six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the early group had lower odds of developing incarceration [odds ratio (OR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.55, I² = 0%, p < 0.001]; but higher risk of post-operative respiratory complications (OR 4.36, 95% CI 2.13-8.94, I² = 40%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were reported in recurrence rate (OR 3.10, 95% CI 0.90-10.64, I² = 0%, p = 0.07) and surgical complication rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.18-4.83, I² = 0%, p = 0.94) between early and delayed groups.

CONCLUSION

While early inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants reduces the risk of incarceration, it increases the risk of post-operative respiratory complications compared to delayed repair. Surgeons should discuss the risks and benefits of delaying inguinal hernia repair with the caregivers to make an informed decision best suited to the patient physiology and circumstances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, level 3.

Laparoscopic repair of bilateral inguinal hernias each containing sigmoid colon in a premature infant

Inguinal hernias are rare in the general population but are more frequently seen in premature infants. Risk factors include male gender, small for gestational age, low birth weight and respiratory distress. Infant inguinal hernias most frequently contain small bowel. Other contents can include the appendix and cecum, and rarely, the sigmoid colon. Sigmoid colon as content of inguinal hernia in children has only been reported twice in literature, and in both cases it was unilateral. We present the first reported case of bilateral inguinal hernias containing the sigmoid colon in a premature boy, who additionally had the appendix and the cecum in the right hernia. This is also the first reported laparoscopic repair of such a hernia.

Risk of incarceration in children with inguinal hernia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgical repair is recommended for all children with inguinal hernia due to fear of incarceration. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of incarceration and strangulation of inguinal hernias in children treated with delayed surgery or no surgery.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in three databases. We included studies reporting on children with inguinal hernia, with the majority ≤ 10 years old. The interventions were non-acute inguinal hernia surgery or no surgery. The main outcomes were incarceration and strangulation. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included.

RESULTS

We included 22 studies with 14,959 children. All studies reported on elective repairs. None of the studies specifically reported on watchful waiting. Of the studies reporting wait time as mean or median, the median wait time was 46 days (range 1-552). The crude incarceration rate across the included studies was 7% for all children and 11% for preterm children. The testicular atrophy rate was 1% and the recurrence rate was 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of incarceration in children awaiting inguinal hernia surgery is substantial. In general, we cannot support delaying surgery unnecessarily. However, there may be benefits of delaying surgery in individual cases. In such cases, the surgeon should assess if the benefits may overrule the risk of incarceration.