1
|
Wang Y, Xiao B, Wang W, Kidron GJ. Interactions between biocrusts and herbaceous communities are divergent in dry and wet semiarid ecosystems. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 941:173759. [PMID: 38844240 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Biocrusts are a prevalent form of living cover in worldwide drylands, and their presence are intimately associated with herbaceous community, forming a spatially mosaic distribution pattern in dryland ecosystems. The role of biocrusts as modulators of herbaceous community assembly is extensively studied, whereas, less is known whether their interactions are permanent or changeable with various environmental conditions. This study conducted a field survey of herbaceous community accompanied by three types of biocrusts (cyanobacterial, cyanobacterial-moss mixed, and moss crusts) in two contrasting (dry and wet) semiarid climate regions in the Chinese Loess Plateau, to explore whether or not climatic aridity gradient affects the interactions between biocrusts and herbaceous community. Our results showed that in dry semiarid climate, the biomass, species richness, and diversity of herbaceous community from biocrust plots were 89 %, 179 %, and 52 % higher than that from the uncrusted plots, respectively, while in wet semiarid climate, those herbaceous community indices from biocrust plots were 68 %, 43 %, and 23 % lower than that from the uncrusted plots, respectively. The impacts of biocrusts on herbaceous community were highly dependent on the types and coverage of biocrusts. Regardless of aridity gradient, the richness and diversity of herbaceous community were the lowest in the moss-covered plots, followed by the cyanobacteria-covered plots and the plots with a mixed cyanobacteria and moss population. Along with increasing biocrust coverage, the species richness and diversity of herbaceous plants initially increased and then decreased in dry semiarid climate, while in wet semiarid climate they decreased linearly with biocrust coverage. Structural equation modeling revealed that the factors of biocrust types and coverage affected herbaceous community indirectly through soil properties in dry semiarid climate, whereas in wet semiarid climate they directly affected herbaceous community through biotic interactions. Together, our findings indicated that cyanobacterial and moss biocrusts facilitate the development of herbaceous community in dry semiarid climate by increasing soil stability and nutrient levels, but in wet semiarid climate they restrict herbaceous plant growth through competing niche space. These results highlight the divergent relationships between biocrusts and herbaceous community across aridity gradient in dryland ecosystems, and this knowledge may be critically important in light of the projected global climate change which is going to change the aridity of global drylands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Bo Xiao
- Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| | - Wanfu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Giora J Kidron
- Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram Campus, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diaz‐Troya S, Huertas MJ. Green microbes: Potential solutions for key sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol 2024; 17:e14546. [PMID: 39126420 PMCID: PMC11316392 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.14546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The latest assessment of progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has identified major obstacles, such as climate change, global instability and pandemics, which threaten efforts to achieve the SDGs even by 2050. Urgent action is needed, particularly to reduce poverty, hunger and climate change. In this context, microalgae are emerging as a promising solution, particularly in the context of food security and environmental sustainability. As versatile organisms, microalgae offer nutritional benefits such as high-quality proteins and essential fatty acids, and can be cultivated in non-arable areas, reducing competition for resources and improving the sustainability of food systems. The role of microalgae also includes other applications in aquaculture, where they serve as sustainable alternatives to animal feed, and in agriculture, where they act as biofertilizers and biostimulants. These microorganisms also play a key role in interventions on degraded land, stabilizing soils, improving hydrological function and increasing nutrient and carbon availability. Microalgae therefore support several SDGs by promoting sustainable agricultural practices and contributing to land restoration and carbon sequestration efforts. The integration of microalgae in these areas is essential to mitigate environmental impacts and improve global food security, highlighting the need for increased research and development, as well as public and political support, to exploit their full potential to advance the SDGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Diaz‐Troya
- Departamento de Bioquímica Vegetal y Biología Molecular, Facultad de BiologíaUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
- Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasSevillaSpain
| | - María José Huertas
- Departamento de Bioquímica Vegetal y Biología Molecular, Facultad de BiologíaUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
- Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Universidad de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasSevillaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jech SD, Day N, Barger NN, Antoninka A, Bowker MA, Reed S, Tucker C. Cultivating Resilience in Dryland Soils: An Assisted Migration Approach to Biological Soil Crust Restoration. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2570. [PMID: 37894228 PMCID: PMC10608944 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Land use practices and climate change have driven substantial soil degradation across global drylands, impacting ecosystem functions and human livelihoods. Biological soil crusts, a common feature of dryland ecosystems, are under extensive exploration for their potential to restore the stability and fertility of degraded soils through the development of inoculants. However, stressful abiotic conditions often result in the failure of inoculation-based restoration in the field and may hinder the long-term success of biocrust restoration efforts. Taking an assisted migration approach, we cultivated biocrust inocula sourced from multiple hot-adapted sites (Mojave and Sonoran Deserts) in an outdoor facility at a cool desert site (Colorado Plateau). In addition to cultivating inoculum from each site, we created an inoculum mixture of biocrust from the Mojave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and Colorado Plateau. We then applied two habitat amelioration treatments to the cultivation site (growth substrate and shading) to enhance soil stability and water availability and reduce UV stress. Using marker gene sequencing, we found that the cultivated mixed inoculum comprised both local- and hot-adapted cyanobacteria at the end of cultivation but had similar cyanobacterial richness as each unmixed inoculum. All cultivated inocula had more cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene copies and higher cyanobacterial richness when cultivated with a growth substrate and shade. Our work shows that it is possible to field cultivate biocrust inocula sourced from different deserts, but that community composition shifts toward that of the cultivation site unless habitat amelioration is employed. Future assessments of the function of a mixed inoculum in restoration and its resilience in the face of abiotic stressors are needed to determine the relative benefit of assisted migration compared to the challenges and risks of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra D Jech
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Natalie Day
- Colorado Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Grand Junction, CO 81506, USA
| | - Nichole N Barger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Anita Antoninka
- School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
| | - Matthew A Bowker
- School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
- Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
| | - Sasha Reed
- Southwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Moab, UT 84532, USA
| | - Colin Tucker
- Manti-La Sal National Forest, U.S. Forest Service, Monticello, UT 84535, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jech SD, Havrilla CA, Barger NN. The influence of disturbance scale on the natural recovery of biological soil crusts on the Colorado Plateau. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1176760. [PMID: 37601344 PMCID: PMC10434622 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1176760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Up to 35% of global drylands have experienced degradation due to anthropogenic impacts, including physical disturbances like trampling and soil removal. These physical disturbances can result in the loss of soil communities known as biological soil crusts (biocrusts) and the important functions they provide, such as soil stability and fertility. The reestablishment of biocrust organisms after disturbance is determined by many factors, including propagule availability, climate, and vascular plant community structure. The role of these factors in natural recovery may be intensified by the extent (or size) of a disturbance. For example, large disturbances can result in reduced propagule availability or enhanced erosion, which impact both the dispersal and establishment of biocrust organisms on disturbed soils, leading to a slower natural recovery. To test how disturbance extent impacts biocrust's natural recovery, we installed four disturbance extents by completely removing biocrust from the mineral soil in plots ranging from 0.01 m2 to 1 m2 and measured productivity and erosion resistance. We found that small disturbance extents did not differ in chlorophyll a content, total exopolysaccharide content, or soil stability after 1.5 years of natural recovery. However, the concentration of glycocalyx exopolysaccharide was higher in the smallest disturbances after the recovery period. Our results indicate that disturbances <1 m2 in scale recover at similar rates, with soil stability returning to high levels in just a few years after severe disturbance. Our findings align with prior work on biocrust natural recovery in drylands and highlight the opportunity for future work to address (1) cyanobacteria, moss, and lichen propagule dispersal; (2) rates and mechanisms of biocrust succession; and (3) the role of wind or water in determining biocrust colonization patterns as compared to lateral growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra D. Jech
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - Caroline A. Havrilla
- Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Nichole N. Barger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schultz NL, Sluiter IRK, Allen GG, Machado-de-Lima NM, Muñoz-Rojas M. Biocrust Amendments to Topsoils Facilitate Biocrust Restoration in a Post-mining Arid Environment. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:882673. [PMID: 35958145 PMCID: PMC9360975 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.882673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Soil cryptogamic biocrusts provide many ecological functions in arid zone ecosystems, though their natural reestablishment in disturbed areas is slow. Accelerating reestablishment of biocrusts may facilitate the establishment of vascular plant communities within the timeframes of restoration targets (typically 5–15 years). One technique is to inoculate the soil surface using slurries of biocrust material harvested from another site. However, this is destructive to donor sites, and hence the potential to dilute slurries will govern the feasibility of this practice at large spatial scales. We conducted a replicated experiment on a disturbed mine site to test the individual and combined effects of two strategies for accelerating soil cryptogamic biocrust reestablishment: (1) slurry inoculation using biocrust material harvested from native vegetation; and (2) the use of psyllium husk powder as a source of mucilage to bind the soil surface, and to potentially provide a more cohesive substrate for biocrust development. The experiment comprised 90 experimental plots across six treatments, including different dilutions of the biocrust slurries and treatments with and without psyllium. Over 20 months, the reestablishing crust was dominated by cyanobacteria (including Tolypothrix distorta and Oculatella atacamensis), and these established more rapidly in the inoculated treatments than in the control treatments. The inoculated treatments also maintained this cover of cyanobacteria better through prolonged adverse conditions. The dilute biocrust slurry, at 1:100 of the biocrust in the remnant vegetation, performed as well as the 1:10 slurry, suggesting that strong dilution of biocrust slurry may improve the feasibility of using this technique at larger spatial scales. Psyllium husk powder did not improve biocrust development but helped to maintain a soil physical crust through hot, dry, and windy conditions, and so the potential longer-term advantages of psyllium need to be tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick L. Schultz
- The Future Regions Research Centre, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Nick L. Schultz,
| | - Ian R. K. Sluiter
- School of Geography Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Ogyris Ecological Research, Birdwoodton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Nathali M. Machado-de-Lima
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Miriam Muñoz-Rojas
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antoninka A, Faist A, Rodriguez‐Caballero E, Young KE, Chaudhary VB, Condon LA, Pyke DA. Biological soil crusts in ecological restoration: emerging research and perspectives. Restor Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Antoninka
- School of Forestry Northern Arizona University 200 E Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff AZ 86011 U.S.A
| | - Akasha Faist
- Department of Animal and Range Sciences New Mexico State University Box 30003 MSC 3‐I, Las Cruces NM 88003 U.S.A
| | - Emilio Rodriguez‐Caballero
- Centro de Investigación de Colecciones Científicas de la Universidad de Almería (CECOUAL) University of Almería 04120 Almería Spain
| | - Kristina E. Young
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso 500 West University Avenue, El Paso TX 79968 U.S.A
| | - V. Bala Chaudhary
- Department of Environmental Science and Studies DePaul University 1110 West Belden Avenue, Chicago IL 60614 U.S.A
| | - Lea A. Condon
- U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Corvallis OR 97331 U.S.A
| | - David A. Pyke
- U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Corvallis OR 97331 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kidron GJ, Xiao B, Benenson I. Data variability or paradigm shift? Slow versus fast recovery of biological soil crusts-a review. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 721:137683. [PMID: 32197290 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Biological soil crusts, known also as biocrusts, provide valuable ecosystem services, especially in arid and semiarid regions. They may affect geomorphological (stability), hydrological (infiltration, evaporation), biochemical (carbon and nitrogen fixation) and ecological (germination and growth of vascular plants) processes, and their disturbance may have important ecological consequences. The common view, as reflected in hundreds of papers, regards biocrusts as having extremely slow recovery with characteristic time of up to hundreds and even thousands of years. Long recovery time implies that disturbance or climate change may have severe long-lasting consequences even once the conditions return to their initial state, triggering ample efforts to hasten biocrust recovery by inoculation. We critically analyze available estimates of the crust recovery time and present systematic measurements and theoretical considerations that attest to relatively rapid recovery of the crusts. We conclude that the likely recovery time of cyanobacterial crusts is 5-10 years, while that of lichen- and moss-dominated crusts is 10-20 years. Subsequently, costly and potentially negative effects to the ecosystem during inoculation should be weighed against the fast natural recovery of the biocrusts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giora J Kidron
- Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University, Givat Ram Campus, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
| | - Bo Xiao
- College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
| | - Itzhak Benenson
- Department of Geography and Human Environment, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ayuso SV, Giraldo‐Silva A, Barger NN, Garcia‐Pichel F. Microbial inoculum production for biocrust restoration: testing the effects of a common substrate versus native soils on yield and community composition. Restor Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Velasco Ayuso
- School of Life SciencesArizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 U.S.A
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA‐CONICET), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires C1417DSE Argentina
| | - Ana Giraldo‐Silva
- School of Life SciencesArizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 U.S.A
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign InstituteArizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 U.S.A
| | - Nichole N. Barger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Colorado Boulder CO 80309 U.S.A
| | - Ferran Garcia‐Pichel
- School of Life SciencesArizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 U.S.A
- Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign InstituteArizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faist AM, Antoninka AJ, Belnap J, Bowker MA, Duniway MC, Garcia‐Pichel F, Nelson C, Reed SC, Giraldo‐Silva A, Velasco‐Ayuso S, Barger NN. Inoculation and habitat amelioration efforts in biological soil crust recovery vary by desert and soil texture. Restor Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Akasha M. Faist
- Department of Animal and Range SciencesNew Mexico State University Las Cruces NM 88003 U.S.A
| | | | - Jayne Belnap
- Southwest Biological Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey Moab UT 84532 U.S.A
| | - Matthew A. Bowker
- School of ForestryNorthern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ 86011 U.S.A
| | - Michael C. Duniway
- Southwest Biological Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey Moab UT 84532 U.S.A
| | - Ferran Garcia‐Pichel
- School of Life Sciences and Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign InstituteArizona State University Tempe AZ 85281 U.S.A
| | - Corey Nelson
- School of Life Sciences and Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign InstituteArizona State University Tempe AZ 85281 U.S.A
| | - Sasha C. Reed
- Southwest Biological Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey Moab UT 84532 U.S.A
| | - Ana Giraldo‐Silva
- School of Life Sciences and Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign InstituteArizona State University Tempe AZ 85281 U.S.A
| | - Sergio Velasco‐Ayuso
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires C1417DSE Argentina
| | - Nichole N. Barger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Colorado Boulder CO 80309 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosentreter R. Biocrust lichen and moss species most suitable for restoration projects. Restor Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Rosentreter
- Department of BiologyBoise State University 2032 S. Crystal Way Boise ID 83706 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fick SE, Day N, Duniway MC, Hoy‐Skubik S, Barger NN. Microsite enhancements for soil stabilization and rapid biocrust colonization in degraded drylands. Restor Ecol 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E. Fick
- US Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Moab UT U.S.A
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Colorado Boulder CO U.S.A
| | - Natalie Day
- US Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Moab UT U.S.A
| | | | - Sean Hoy‐Skubik
- US Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Moab UT U.S.A
| | - Nichole N. Barger
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Colorado Boulder CO U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|