Patient involvement in surgical care-Healthcare personnel views and behaviour regarding patient involvement

Patient participation in surgical wound care in acute care settings: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections can significantly impact postoperative recovery. Patient participation, which involves patients actively engaging in wound care, has been linked to improved healing and reduced wound complications. However, there is limited synthesis of the literature that explores the patient's role and participation in the context of surgical wound care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' perceptions of how they participate in surgical wound care, within 30 days post-operation.

DESIGN

An integrative review guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363669).

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Complete), and EMBASE (Elsevier) databases in October 2023, supplemented by forward and backward citation searching.

REVIEW METHODS

Based on a priori eligibility criteria, two authors independently screened articles to select relevant studies. The quality of the included research articles was critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A descriptive and thematic synthesis was used to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

Of the 4701 records screened for titles and abstracts, 25 studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs were included. Three key themes were identified. In theme 1, 'I am healing: how my wound shapes me and my journey,' physical symptoms, psychological factors and previous experiences significantly influenced patients' engagement in wound care. Theme 2, 'Taking charge of my healing: my active engagement in wound care' described how patient participation in surgical wound care goes beyond clinical procedures and can include the use of technology and holistic self-care. Finally, theme 3, 'Navigating the path to recovery: How others shape my experience' showed that effective communication is crucial for promoting participation, yet issues like inadequate information can leave patients unprepared for wound management.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights opportunities to personalise and prioritise a patient-oriented approach to surgical wound care. Clinicians and educators should adopt an individualised approach by tailoring patient participation based on patient factors (i.e. physical symptoms) and adopt patient-centred communication approaches. Researchers should focus on exploring approaches to self-care and technology, as these approaches may enhance patient participation in wound care.

Patient participation in orthopaedic care-a survey on hip surgery patients' preferences for and experiences of engagement in their health and healthcare

INTRODUCTION

Quality in health services is increasingly associated with enabling patients to participate in their own health and healthcare by recognising their resources and needs. Despite a growing recognition as to whether such participation is enabled, little is known regarding opportunities for preference-based patient participation in orthopaedic care.

AIMS

To investigate preference-based participation for patients in orthopaedic care due to hip surgery.

METHODS

Patients across 17 Swedish orthopaedic units who had had hip surgery, due to hip fracture or osteoarthritis, January-April 2021 were invited to complete the validated 4Ps questionnaire. Of 1514 patients, 458 patients returned the questionnaire with reports on their preferences for and experiences of participation. Each of the 4Ps' 12 items were analysed separately using descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

A complete match in preferences for, and experiences of, participation was achieved with variation between items for 41%-50% of the patients; if almost matches were included, this occurred for 57%-77% of the patients. Less participation than preferred was most common in terms of having had reciprocal communication, opportunities for partaking in planning, and in learning how to manage symptoms/issues. Hip fracture surgery was significantly associated with experiencing lower levels of participation than preferred.

CONCLUSION

Though standardised care promotes efficient hip surgery care, our study suggests a need for more person-centred opportunities to engage. A discrepancy was noted between patients' resources and preparation for their participation in and beyond the hip surgery process, particularly for self-care activities, calling for better use of nursing resources. ID: NCT04700969 with the U.S National Institutes of Health Clinical Registry.

Patients' experiences of urinary retention and bladder care - A qualitative study in orthopaedic care

BACKGROUND

Urinary retention is a common complication associated with hip surgery. There are easily available, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines prescribing how to prevent both urinary retention and other voiding issues, by means of bladder monitoring and risk assessments. A detected lack of adherence to such guidelines increases risks for unnecessary suffering among patients but a greater understanding of patients' experiences can benefit tailored interventions to address quality and safety gaps in orthopaedic nursing and rehabilitation.

PURPOSE

The aim was to describe patients' experiences of urinary retention, bladder issues, and bladder care in orthopaedic care due to hip surgery.

METHOD

This was a qualitative study with a descriptive design: content analysis with an inductive approach was applied to interviews (n = 32) and survey free-text responses (n = 122) across 17 orthopaedic units in Sweden.

RESULTS

The patients had received no or limited details for the recurrent bladder care interventions (such as bladder scans and prompted voiding) while at the hospital. They relied on the staff for safe procedures but were left to themselves to manage and comprehend prevailing bladder issues. Despite the patients' experiences of bladder issues or the risk of urinary retention postoperatively, the link to hip surgery remained unknown to the patients, leaving them searching for self-management strategies and further care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' perspectives on bladder care, urinary retention and bladder issues can serve as a means for increased understanding of procedures and issues, reinforcing improved implementation of guidelines, including person-centred information. Safer bladder procedures imply further patient engagement, highlighted in guidelines.

Women's Involvement in Decision-Making and Associated Factors Among Women Who Underwent a Caesarean Section in Sidama Region, South Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study

Background

A caesarean delivery without maternal involvement in decision-making reduces the quality of health care and breaks women's autonomy. However, the involvement of women in decision-making to have a caesarean delivery is minimal. Still, now paternalism is widely practised. The study aims to assess women's involvement in decision-making and associated factors among women who underwent a caesarean delivery.

Methods

Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Sidama region Public hospitals from June 22/2022-August 5/2022, among women who underwent a caesarean delivery. The total sample size was 457. The collected data was exported from the ODK toolbox server to excel and then to SPSS version 26 for further data cleaning and analysis. The variables with a p-value ≤ 0.25 in the bivariable analysis were included in a multivariable ordinal logistic regression model to control possible confounders. The resulting odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were computed, and a p-value of less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

Women's agreed decision-making involvement to have a caesarean delivery is 165(37.9%). Women who had an scheduled caesarean delivery [AOR: 7.6; 95% CI: 3.3, 17.8], had adequate information about caesarean delivery [AOR: 5.7; 95% CI:3.3, 10.0], had adequate time for decision-making [AOR: 4.6; 95% CI:2.09, 6.4], language of consent [AOR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.1], and women-healthcare providers relationship [AOR: 5.2; 95% CI: 3.2, 8.6]are higher odds of being involved in decision-making, but women's being primary school [AOR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3,0.97] are lower odds of involvement in decision-making to have a caesarean delivery.

Conclusion and recommendation

In this study, women's agreed decision-making involvement to have a caesarean delivery is low compared with other studies. Women-healthcare providers' relationship and an unscheduled caesarean delivery are highly affect their involvement in decision-making. Therefore, hospitals should translate and prepare the consent form in an understandable way for women and families, and healthcare providers should develop good relationship and encourage her involvement.

Attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals related to family participation in surgical cancer care-A mixed method study

AIM

This study investigated healthcare professionals' attitudes and perceptions towards the family's participation in surgical cancer care.

DESIGN

A prospective mixed method study.

METHODS

The study was conducted at three hospitals in Sweden with registered nurses, assistant nurses and surgeons. Data included 43 completed Families Importance in Nursing Care (FINC-NA) questionnaires answered by registered nurses and qualitative data from 14 interviews with surgeons and assistant nurses. Data analysis was performed according to the Creswell convergent parallel mixed method.

RESULTS

Both quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated that the family was an important resource in nursing care, was highly valued as a conversational partner and had resources that should be considered. Each family should be supported in determining their role and as implements for maintaining a functioning family constellation and increasing their participation.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Co-Developing Patient-Centered Information: A Focus Group Study of Asthma Patients’ Preferences and Attitudes towards New Medical Treatment Guidelines

Studies have suggested patient involvement as an important factor when seeking to improve patient-centered information. The objective of this study was to explore asthma patients’ preferences regarding information when co-developing patient-centered information and how they evaluate the material as a supportive initiative when they are deciding whether to switch to the new MART approach. The study was performed as a case study involving qualitative semi-structured focus group interviews inspired by the theoretical framework for supporting patient involvement in research. Two focus group interviews were held, with a total of nine interviewees. Three main interview themes were found: the identification of important topics about the new MART approach, feedback on the design and the preferred implementation of written patient-centered information. The asthma patients preferred written patient-centered material to be short and to be presented briefly at the local community pharmacy, and then discussed more thoroughly with their general practitioner (GP) at a consultation. In conclusion, this study identified asthma patients’ preferences when co-developing written patient-centered information and how the patients favored the material to be implemented as a support to them in their decision on whether to change asthma treatment.

Patient preferences and experiences of participation in surgical cancer care

BACKGROUND

Quality cancer care necessitates opportunities for patient participation, supposedly recognizing the individual's preferences and experiences for being involved in their health and healthcare issues. Previous research shows that surgical cancer patients wish to be more involved, requiring professionals to be sensitive of patients' needs.

AIMS

To explore preference-based patient participation in surgical cancer care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool (4Ps) was used, which includes 12 attributes of preferences for and experiences of patient participation. Data were analyzed with descriptive and comparative statistical methods.

RESULTS

The results are based on a total of 101 questionnaires. Having reciprocal communication and being listened to by healthcare staff were commonly deemed crucial for patient participation. While 60% of the patients suggested that taking part in planning was crucial for their participation, they had experienced this only to some extent. Learning to manage symptoms and phrasing personal goals were items most often representing insufficient conditions for preference-based patient participation.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

To support person-centered surgical care, further efforts to suffice preference-based participation are needed, including opportunities for patients to share their experiences and engage in the planning of healthcare activities.

Patient-reported participation in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care: A pilot intervention study with patient-owned fast-track protocols

Objective

Fast‐track concepts have been implemented in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care to improve postoperative recovery. For optimal postoperative care, patient participation is also required. The aim was to investigate and analyse whether an intervention with patient‐owned fast‐track protocols (PFTPs) may lead to increased patient participation and improve information for patients who underwent surgery for hepatopancreatobiliary cancer.

Methods

A quantitative comparative design with a control and intervention group was used. The participants in the intervention group followed a PFTP during their admission. After discharge, the patients answered a questionnaire regarding patient participation. Data analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA.

Results

The results are based on a total of 222 completed questionnaires: 116 in the control group and 106 in the intervention group. It is uncertain whether the PFTP increased patient participation and information, but its use may indicate an improvement for the patient group.

Conclusion

A successful implementation strategy for the use of PFTP, with daily reconciliations, could be part of the work required to improve overall satisfaction with patient participation.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04061902

Patients’ Perceptions of Quality of Care: A Teamwork Intervention Study in a Surgical Ward

Introduction

Improving teamwork competencies among health care professionals is important for patient safety. Few previous studies have investigated whether a teamwork intervention has an impact on patients’ perceptions of quality of care.

Objective

To investigate patients’ perceptions of quality of care before and after the implementation of a team training program in a surgical ward.

Methods

A quasi-experimental pre- and posttest design was used. The TeamSTEPPS® team training program was implemented in a surgical ward. Three groups of consecutively sampled patients responded to the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire including four dimensions with 25 items. In addition to the QPP, six items were developed for this study. In total, 223 patients responded to the questionnaire. The mean age was 59.6 years, and there were 128 males and 94 females.

Results

The physical-technical condition dimension and four items showed significantly higher scores after six months of intervention. The majority of the patients scored quality of care in the four dimensions as very high at all three time points. Younger patients reported the lowest care quality.

Conclusion

The results in this study indicate that the teamwork intervention had a minimal impact on the patients’ perceptions of quality of care, with only significant differences between baseline and six months of intervention in one dimension and three items. At each data collection time point, the numbers of patients who perceived quality of care as modest decreased slightly. Younger patients were more likely to perceive care quality as modest.

FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HOSPITAL SERVICES: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

ABSTRACT Objective to identify the facilitating factors and barriers that influence patient involvement in hospital services. Method integrative review; search of articles published between January 2011 and December 2020, in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, Lilacs and Scopus, using descriptors related to "patient involvement", Barriers, Facilitators, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Data collection was performed from May to June 2021, identifying 32 publications that met the inclusion criteria. Results the analysis resulted in three categories of facilitating factors and barriers: communication, actors of involvement and organizational culture, allowing the elaboration of a theoretical model of patient involvement. This model shows that in the centrality of the process are the actors involved, that is, patients and professionals, inserted in an organizational context, being influenced by leadership, culture, environment, available resources and processes, where communication permeates as a basis for involvement. Conclusion the facilitating factors and barriers identified in this review, synthesized in a theoretical model, allow transcending theoretical knowledge for practice. The complexity to operationalize this model requires patients, professionals, health services and society join forces to make this theoretical proposition a practice incorporated by the services.

FACILITADORES E BARREIRAS DO ENVOLVIMENTO DO PACIENTE NOS SERVIÇOS HOSPITALARES: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA

RESUMO Objetivo identificar os fatores facilitadores e as barreiras que influenciam no envolvimento do paciente nos serviços hospitalares. Método revisão integrativa; realizada busca de artigos publicados entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2020, nas bases eletrônicas PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl, Lilacs e Scopus, utilizando descritores relacionados a “patient involvement”, Barriers, Facilitators, nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português. Coleta de dados realizada de maio a junho de 2021, identificando-se 32 publicações que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Resultados a análise resultou em três categorias de fatores facilitadores e barreiras: comunicação, atores do envolvimento e cultura organizacional, permitindo a elaboração de um modelo teórico de envolvimento do paciente. Esse modelo mostra que na centralidade do processo estão os atores envolvidos, ou seja, pacientes e profissionais, inseridos em um contexto organizacional, sendo influenciados pela liderança, cultura, ambiente, recursos disponíveis e processos, onde a comunicação perpassa como base para o envolvimento. Conclusão os fatores facilitadores e as barreiras identificadas nesta revisão, sintetizados num modelo teórico, permitem transcender o conhecimento teórico para a prática. A complexidade para operacionalizar esse modelo requer que pacientes, profissionais, serviços de saúde e sociedade unam os esforços para tornar esta proposição teórica em uma prática incorporada pelos serviços.