Vaccine schedule recommendations and updates for patients with hematologic malignancy post-hematopoietic cell transplant or CAR T-cell therapy

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: diagnosis and management of a pediatric condition of clinical importance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, or low serum immunoglobulins, is associated with a variety of medications or medical conditions and may be symptomatic and lead to increased infectious risk. There is limited data regarding the study of acquired, or secondary, hypogammaglobulinemia (SHG) in pediatrics. The data to date has suffered from methodologic issues including retrospective study design, lack of baseline immunoglobulin measurements, and limited longitudinal follow-up.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is emerging research on the impact of B-cell depleting therapies, specifically rituximab and chimeric antigen T-cells, along with other autoimmune and malignant disease states, in the development of SHG in pediatric patients. This review will also summarize other relevant pediatric conditions related to SHG.

SUMMARY

The clinical relevance of SHG in pediatrics is increasingly appreciated. Improved understanding of the specific etiologies, risk factors, and natural history of SHG have informed screening and management recommendations.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for primary immunodeficiency

Primary immunodeficiencies, also commonly called inborn errors of immunity (IEI), are commonly due to developmental or functional defects in peripheral blood cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells. In light of this, for the past 50 years, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used as a definitive therapy for IEI. The fields of both clinical immunology and transplantation medicine have had significant advances. This, in turn, has allowed for both an increasing ability to determine a monogenic etiology for many IEIs and an increasing ability to successfully treat these patients with HSCT. Therefore, it has become more common for the practicing allergist/immunologist to diagnose and manage a broad range of patients with IEI before and after HSCT. This review aims to provide practical guidance for the clinical allergist/immunologist on the basics of HSCT and known outcomes in selected forms of IEI, the importance of pre-HSCT supportive care, and the critical importance of and guidance for life-long immunologic and medical monitoring of these patients.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the First Year After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant or Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines after cellular therapy is incompletely understood. The objectives of this study are to determine whether humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ if initiated <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 30 cancer centers in the United States. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was administered as part of routine care. We obtained blood prior to and after vaccinations at up to 5 time points and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) IgG in all participants and neutralizing antibodies for Wuhan D614G, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529 strains, as well as SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell receptors, in a subgroup.

RESULTS

We enrolled 466 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (n = 231), autologous HCT (n = 170), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy (n = 65) recipients between April 2021 and June 2022. Humoral and cellular responses did not significantly differ among participants initiating vaccinations <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy. Anti-S IgG ≥2500 U/mL was correlated with high neutralizing antibody titers and attained by the last time point in 70%, 69%, and 34% of allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell recipients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses were attained in 57%, 83%, and 58%, respectively. Pre-cellular therapy SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and baseline B-cell count were key predictors of post-cellular therapy immunity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination prior to, and reinitiation 3 to 4 months after, cellular therapies with allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T-cell therapy.

Varicella-Zoster Virus Reactivation After Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Single-Center Experience of Acyclovir Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation is the most common infectious complication in the late posthematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) period and is reported as 16%-41%. Acyclovir prophylaxis is recommended for at least 1 year after HSCT to prevent VZV infections. However, studies on the most appropriate prophylaxis are ongoing in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between January 1, 1996 and January 1, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to outline the characteristics of VZV reactivation after allogeneic HSCT in pediatric patients using 6 months acyclovir prophylaxis.

RESULTS

There were 260 patients and 273 HSCTs. Median age was 10.43 (0.47-18.38), and 56% was male. Median follow-up was 2325 days (18-7579 days). VZV reactivation occurred in 21.2% (n = 58) at a median of 354 (55-3433) days post-HSCT. The peak incidence was 6-12 months post-HSCT (43.1%). Older age at HSCT, female gender, history of varicella infection, lack of varicella vaccination, low lymphocyte, CD4 count, and CD4/CD8 ratio at 9 and 12 months post-HSCT was found as a significant risk for herpes zoster (HZ) in univariate analysis, whereas history of varicella infection and low CD4/CD8 ratio at 12 months post-HSCT was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailoring acyclovir prophylaxis according to pre-HCT varicella history, posttransplant CD4 T lymphocyte counts and functions, and ongoing immunosuppression may help to reduce HZ-related morbidity and mortality.

Overview of infectious complications among CAR T- cell therapy recipients

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has revolutionized the management of hematological malignancies. In addition to impressive malignancy-related outcomes, CAR T-cell therapy has significant toxicity-related adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), and opportunistic infections. Different CAR T-cell targets have different epidemiology and risk factors for infection, and these targets result in different long-term immunodeficiency states due to their distinct on-target and off- tumor effects. These effects are exacerbated by the use of multimodal immunosuppression in the management of CRS and ICANS. The most effective course of action for managing infectious complications involves determining screening, prophylactic, and monitoring strategies and understanding the role of immunoglobulin replacement and re-vaccination strategies. This involves considering the nature of prior immunomodulating therapies, underlying malignancy, the CAR T-cell target, and the development and management of related adverse events. In conclusion, we now have an increasing understanding of infection management for CAR T-cell recipients. As additional effector cells and CAR T-cell targets become available, infection management strategies will continue to evolve.

Current understanding and management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of several haematological malignancies and is being investigated in patients with various solid tumours. Characteristic CAR T cell-associated toxicities such as cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are now well-recognized, and improved supportive care and management with immunosuppressive agents has made CAR T cell therapy safer and more feasible than it was when the first regulatory approvals of such treatments were granted in 2017. The increasing clinical experience with these therapies has also improved recognition of previously less well-defined toxicities, including movement disorders, immune effector cell-associated haematotoxicity (ICAHT) and immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), as well as the substantial risk of infection in patients with persistent CAR T cell-induced B cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinaemia. A more diverse selection of immunosuppressive and supportive-care pharmacotherapies is now being utilized for toxicity management, yet no universal algorithm for their application exists. As CAR T cell products targeting new antigens are developed, additional toxicities involving damage to non-malignant tissues expressing the target antigen are a potential hurdle. Continued prospective evaluation of toxicity management strategies and the design of less-toxic CAR T cell products are both crucial for ongoing success in this field. In this Review, we discuss the evolving understanding and clinical management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities.

Managing Infection Complications in the Setting of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell (CAR-T) Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has changed the paradigm of management of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Multiple Myeloma. Infection complications have emerged as a concern that can arise in the setting of therapy and lead to morbidity and mortality. In this review, we classified infection complications into three categories, pre-infusion phase from the time pre- lymphodepletion (LD) up to day zero, early phase from day of infusion to day 30 post-infusion, and late phase after day 30 onwards. Infections arising in the pre-infusion phase are closely related to previous chemotherapy and bridging therapy. Infections arising in the early phase are more likely related to LD chemo and the expected brief period of grade 3-4 neutropenia. Infections arising in the late phase are particularly worrisome because they are associated with adverse risk features including prolonged neutropenia, dysregulation of humoral and adaptive immunity with lymphopenia, hypogammaglobinemia, and B cell aplasia. Bacterial, respiratory and other viral infections, protozoal and fungal infections can occur during this time . We recommend enhanced supportive care including prompt recognition and treatment of neutropenia with growth factor support, surveillance testing for specific viruses in the appropriate instance, management of hypogammaglobulinemia with repletion as appropriate and extended antimicrobial prophylaxis in those at higher risk (e.g. high dose steroid use and prolonged cytopenia). Finally, we recommend re-immunizing patients post CAR-T based on CDC and transplant guidelines.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the first year after hematopoietic cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: A prospective, multicenter, observational study (BMT CTN 2101)

Background

The optimal timing of vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines after cellular therapy is incompletely understood.

Objective

To describe humoral and cellular responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination initiated <4 months versus 4-12 months after cellular therapy.

Design

Multicenter prospective observational study.

Setting

34 centers in the United States.

Participants

466 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT; n=231), autologous HCT (n=170), or chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy (n=65) recipients enrolled between April 2021 and June 2022.

Interventions

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as part of routine care.

Measurements

We obtained blood prior to and after vaccinations at up to five time points and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) IgG in all participants and neutralizing antibodies for Wuhan D614G, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529 strains, as well as SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell receptors (TCRs), in a subgroup.

Results

Anti-S IgG and neutralizing antibody responses increased with vaccination in HCT recipients irrespective of vaccine initiation timing but were unchanged in CAR-T cell recipients initiating vaccines within 4 months. Anti-S IgG ≥2,500 U/mL was correlated with high neutralizing antibody titers and attained by the last time point in 70%, 69%, and 34% of allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T cell recipients, respectively. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were attained in 57%, 83%, and 58%, respectively. Humoral and cellular responses did not significantly differ among participants initiating vaccinations <4 months vs 4-12 months after cellular therapy. Pre-cellular therapy SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination were key predictors of post-cellular therapy anti-S IgG levels.

Limitations

The majority of participants were adults and received mRNA vaccines.

Conclusions

These data support starting mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination three to four months after allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, and CAR-T cell therapy.

Funding

National Marrow Donor Program, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Novartis, LabCorp, American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Adaptive Biotechnologies, and the National Institutes of Health.

Infections after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have revolutionized the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma but come at the price of unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and long-term "on-target off-tumor" effects.

METHODS

All of these factors increase infection risk in an already highly immunocompromised patient population. Indeed, infectious complications represent the key determinant of non-relapse mortality after CAR-T cells. The temporal distribution of these risk factors shapes different infection patterns early versus late post-CAR-T-cell infusion. Furthermore, due to the expression of their targets on B lineage cells at different stages of differentiation, CD19, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T cells induce distinct immune deficits that could require different prevention strategies. Infection incidence is the highest during the first month post-infusion and subsequently decreases thereafter. However, infections remain relatively common even a year after infusion.

RESULTS

Bacterial infections predominate early after CD19, while a more equal distribution between bacterial and viral causes is seen after BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy, and fungal infections are universally rare. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other herpesviruses are increasingly breported, but whether routine monitoring is warranted for all, or a subgroup of patients, remains to be determined. Clinical practices vary substantially between centers, and many areas of uncertainty remain, including CMV monitoring, antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis and duration, use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy, and timing of vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Risk stratification tools are available and may help distinguish between infectious and non-infectious causes of fever post-infusion and predict severe infections. These tools need prospective validation, and their integration in clinical practice needs to be systematically studied.