Extraperitoneal kidney transplantation: a comparison between children weighting ≤15 kg and >15 kg. Experience of a single institution

Pediatric kidney transplantation: is it safe to perform during night-time or day-off?

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of after-hours surgery on the outcomes of pediatric kidney transplantation (KT).

METHODS

Medical records of pediatric KTs performed at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The population was split into three groups according to the incision time and calendar: ordinary day (8.00 AM - 6.30 PM), day-off, and night-time (6.30 PM - 8.00 AM). The following endpoints were compared: ischemia times, length of surgery, complications, delayed graft function (DGF), primary graft non-function (PGNF), and eGFR at three-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety-six non-living donor KTs were performed, median age 11 (IQR 4.3-14) years and median body weight 26 (IQR 13-50) kg. Forty-one (43%) were performed during night-time and 28 (29%) during day-off. Ischemia times were similar (p = 0.769, p = 0.536). Day-off KTs presented an extended length of surgery (p = 0.011). Thirty-two complications were reported in 31 KTs. No difference in the overall rate of complications, DGF, PNGF, and three-month eGFR was found (p = 0.669, p = 0.383, p = 0.949, p = 0.093). Post-operative bleedings were more common in days-off (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The number of pediatric KTs performed during after-hours was considerable. Even though similar outcomes were reported, more caution should be focused on the KTs performed in days-off to avoid severe complications.

Changes in graft outcomes in recipients <10 kg over 25 years of pediatric kidney transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant (KT) was initially associated with poor outcomes, especially in smaller recipients. However, pediatric transplantation has evolved considerably over time. We investigated the impact of weight at the time of transplant and whether outcomes changed over 25 years for <10 kg recipients.

METHODS

Using the UNOS database, pediatric recipient outcomes were analyzed between 1/1/99 and 12/31/14. KT weight was stratified: <8.6 kg (mean weight of recipients <10 kg), 8.6-9.9 kg, 10-14.9 kg, 15-29.9 kg, and ≥30 kg. Outcomes in recipients <10 kg were then compared between 1990-1999 and 2000-2014.

RESULTS

17 314 pediatric KT recipients were included; 518 (3%) had a transplant weight <10 kg. The highest rates of allograft loss and death were in recipients <8.6 kg and ≥30 kg. Recipients <8.6 kg also had higher rates of delayed graft function, rejection, and longer hospital length of stay. In the multivariable Cox regression model, transplant weight was not a predictor of allograft loss. When compared with recipients <8.6 kg, patient survival hazard ratios associated with recipient weight of 10-14.9 kg, 15-29.9 kg, and ≥30 kg were 0.61 (95%CI: 0.4, 1), 0.42 (95%CI: 0.3, 0.7) and 0.32 (95%CI: 0.2, 0.6), respectively. In the later era of transplant, recipients <10 kg had improved outcomes on univariate analysis; however, the era of transplantation was not an independent predictor of allograft loss or patient survival in Cox regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in children weighing 8.6-9.9 kg at the time of KT were similar to higher weight groups and improved over time; however, special precautions should be taken for recipients <8.6 kg at the time of transplant.

Postoperative surgical complications after pediatric kidney transplantation in low weight recipients (<15 kg): a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation in low-weight recipients (<15 kg) is a challenging surgery with special characteristics. We proposed to perform a systematic review to determine the postoperative complication rate and the type of complications after kidney transplantation in low-weight recipients (<15 kg). The secondary objectives were to determine graft survival, functional outcomes, and patient survival after kidney transplantation in low-weight recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify all studies reporting outcomes on kidney transplantation in low-weight recipients (<15 kg).

RESULTS

A total of 1254 patients in 23 studies were included. The median postoperative complications rate was 20.0%, while 87.5% of those were major complications (Clavien ≥3). Further, urological and vascular complications rates were 6.3% (2.0-11.9) and 5.0% (3.0-10.0), whereas the rate of venous thrombosis ranged from 0 to 5.6%. Median 10-year graft and patient survival were 76 and 91.0%.

SUMMARY

Kidney transplantation in low-weight recipients is a challenging procedure complicated by a high rate of morbidity. Finally, pediatric kidney transplantation should be performed in centers with expertise and multidisciplinary pediatric teams.

Risk factors for end stage renal disease in children with anorectal malformation and outcome comparison to children with isolated urological anomalies

BACKGROUND

End stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring kidney transplant (KT) remains an important cause of morbidity in anorectal malformations (ARM) patients. Current literature is scarce on defining the risk factors for ESRD and the outcomes of KT in ARM patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify predisposing factors to ESRD in ARM patients and verify if the long term outcome of KT in these patients differs from pure urological anomalies (UA).

STUDY DESIGN

Databases of ARM and KT patients treated at our center between 2000 and 2016 were used for comparing characteristics of ARM cases which developed ESRD and those who did not, and the outcome features of MAR-KT vs UA-KT.

RESULTS

Out of 117 ARM patients, 9 developed ESRD. All of them had a complex ARM. Association with UA were significantly higher in ARM-KT compared to other ARM patients (100% vs. 52%, p = 0.001). The most common UA associated to KT in ARM patients was renal dysplasia. During the same period 23 patients underwent KT as a sequelae of pure urological anomalies (UA-KT group). The most represented UA were primary vesico-ureteral reflux (65.2%) and posterior urethral valves (14%) in UA-KT (table 2). ARM-KT patients required more often hemodialysis before KT (50% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.05) and an aorto-caval anastomosis at the transplant (75% vs. 30%, p = 0.04) compared to UA-KT. Moreover ARM-KT patients experienced more often graft failure and and the need for a second KT (50% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study describing the differences in terms of risk factors and outcomes of KT in ARM patients. We observed a need for KT in 7% of ARM, which is at the higher end of the range reported in the literature. Bilateral dysplasia and cloaca malformation seem the leading cause to ESRD for ARM patients compared to vesico-ureteral reflux and posterior urethral valve in UA-KT. Our experience showed that KT has worst outcome in ARM vs pure UA patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with complex ARM are more frequently associated to renal dysplasia which lead to KT. Graft in ARM patients seems to be the more vulnerable and prone to failure.