Assessing the inactivation capabilities of two commercially available platelet component pathogen inactivation systems: effectiveness at end of shelf life

Evaluation of bacterial safety approaches of platelet blood concentrates: bacterial screening and pathogen reduction

This mini-review analyzed two approaches to screening bacterial contamination and utilizing pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for Platelet concentrates (PCs). While the culture-based method is still considered the gold standard for detecting bacterial contamination in PCs, efforts in the past two decades to minimize transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections (TTBIs) have been insufficient to eliminate this infectious threat. PRTs have emerged as a crucial tool to enhance safety and mitigate these risks. The evidence suggests that the screening strategy for bacterial contamination is more successful in ensuring PC quality, decreasing the necessity for frequent transfusions, and improving resistance to platelet transfusion. Alternatively, the PRT approach is superior regarding PC safety. However, both methods are equally effective in managing bleeding. In conclusion, PRT can become a more prevalent means of safety for PCs compared to culture-based approaches and will soon comprehensively surpass culture-based bacterial contamination detection methods.

Growth and Distribution of Bacteria in Contaminated Whole Blood and Derived Blood Components

Introduction

Bacterial contamination of blood products presumably occurs mainly during blood collection, starting from low initial concentrations of 10-100 colony-forming units (CFUs) per bag. As little is known about bacterial growth behavior and distribution in stored whole blood (WB) and WB-derived blood products, this study aims to provide data on this subject.

Methods

WB units were inoculated with transfusion-relevant bacterial species (Acinetobacter baumannii, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica; n = 12 for each species), stored for 22-24 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged for separation into plasma, red blood cells (RBCs), and buffy coats (BCs). The latter were pooled with 3 random donor BCs and one unit of PAS-E each to yield plasma-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs). Samples for bacterial colony counting were collected after WB storage and immediately after blood component production. Sterility testing in PCs (n = 12 for each species) was performed by bacterial culture after 7 days of storage.

Results

Bacterial growth in WB varied remarkably between donations and species. Streptococcus species produced the highest titers in WB, whereas Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas fluorescens did not multiply. Centrifugation resulted in preferential accumulation of bacteria in BCs, with titers of up to 3.5 × 103 CFU/mL in BCs and up to ≤0.9 × 103 CFU/mL in BC-derived PCs. Overall, 72/144 PCs (50%) tested positive for bacteria after storage. Sterility test results were species-dependent, ranging from 12 of 12 PCs tested positive for Streptococcus pyogenes to 1 of 12 PCs positive for Escherichia coli. Bacterial contamination of RBC and plasma units was much less common and was associated with higher initial bacterial counts in the parent WB units.

Conclusions

Bacterial growth in WB is species-dependent and varies greatly between donations. Preferential accumulation of bacteria in BCs during manufacturing is a critical determinant of the contamination risk of BC-derived pooled PCs.

Bacterial Contamination of Platelet Products

Transfusion of bacterially contaminated platelets, although rare, is still a major cause of mortality and morbidity despite the introduction of many methods to limit this over the past 20 years. The methods used include improved donor skin disinfection, diversion of the first part of donations, use of apheresis platelet units rather than whole-blood derived pools, primary and secondary testing by culture or rapid test, and use of pathogen reduction. Primary culture has been in use the US since 2004, using culture 24 h after collection of volumes of 4-8 mL from apheresis collections and whole-blood derived pools inoculated into aerobic culture bottles, with limited use of secondary testing by culture or rapid test to extend shelf-life from 5 to 7 days. Primary culture was introduced in the UK in 2011 using a "large-volume, delayed sampling" (LVDS) protocol requiring culture 36-48 h after collection of volumes of 16 mL from split apheresis units and whole-blood derived pools, inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles (8 mL each), with a shelf-life of 7 days. Pathogen reduction using amotosalen has been in use in Europe since 2002, and was approved for use in the US in 2014. In the US, recent FDA guidance, effective October 2021, recommended several strategies to limit bacterial contamination of platelet products, including pathogen reduction, variants of the UK LVDS method and several two-step strategies, with shelf-life ranging from 3 to 7 days. The issues associated with bacterial contamination and these strategies are discussed in this review.

Neonatal Thrombocytopenia: Factors Associated With the Platelet Count Increment Following Platelet Transfusion

OBJECTIVE

To understand better those factors relevant to the increment of rise in platelet count following a platelet transfusion among thrombocytopenic neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed all platelet transfusions over 6 years in our multi-neonatal intensive care unit system. For every platelet transfusion in 8 neonatal centers we recorded: (1) platelet count before and after transfusion; (2) time between completing the transfusion and follow-up count; (3) transfusion volume (mL/kg); (4) platelet storage time; (5) sex and age of platelet donor; (6) gestational age at birth and postnatal age at transfusion; and magnitude of rise as related to (7) pre-transfusion platelet count, (8) method of enhancing transfusion safety (irradiation vs pathogen reduction), (9) cause of thrombocytopenia, and (10) donor/recipient ABO group.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1797 platelet transfusions administered to 605 neonates (median one/recipient, mean 3, and range 1-52). The increment was not associated with gestational age at birth, postnatal age at transfusion, or donor sex or age. The rise was marginally lower: (1) with consumptive vs hypoproductive thrombocytopenia (P < .001); (2) after pathogen reduction (P < .01); (3) after transfusing platelets with a longer storage time (P < .001); and (4) among group O neonates receiving platelets from non-group O donors (P < .001). Eighty-seven neonates had severe thrombocytopenia (<20 000/μL). Among these infants, poor increments and death were associated with the cause of the thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of post-transfusion rise was unaffected by most variables we studied. However, the increment was lower in neonates with consumptive thrombocytopenia, after pathogen reduction, with longer platelet storage times, and when not ABO matched.

Evaluation of amotosalen and UVA pathogen-reduced apheresis platelets after 7-day storage

BACKGROUND

Amotosalen/UVA pathogen-reduced platelet components (PRPCs) with storage up to 7 days are standard of care in France, Switzerland, and Austria. PRPCs provide effective hemostasis with reduced risk of transfusion-transmitted infections and transfusion-associated graft versus host disease, reduced wastage and improved availability compared with 5-day-stored PCs. This study evaluated the potency of 7-day PRPCs by in vitro characterization and in vivo pharmacokinetic analysis of autologous PCs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The in vitro characteristics of 7-day-stored apheresis PRPCs suspended in 100% plasma or 65% platelet additive solution (PAS-3)/35% plasma, thrombin generation, and in vivo radiolabeled post-transfusion recovery and survival of 7-day-stored PRPCs suspended in 100% plasma were compared with either 7-day-stored or fresh autologous conventional platelets.

RESULTS

PRPCs after 7 days of storage maintained pH, platelet dose, in vitro physiologic characteristics, and thrombin generation when compared to conventional 7-day PCs. In vivo, the mean post-transfusion survival was 151.4 ± 20.1 h for 7-day PRPCs in 100% plasma (Test) versus 209.6 ± 13.9 h for the fresh autologous platelets (Control), (T-ΔC: 72.3 ± 8.8%: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.5, 76.1) and mean 24-h post-transfusion recovery 37.6 ± 8.4% for Test versus 56.8 ± 9.2% for Control (T-ΔC: 66.2 ± 11.2%; 95% CI: 61.3, 71.1).

DISCUSSION

PRPCs collected in both 100% plasma as well as 65% PAS-3/35% plasma and stored for 7 days retained in vitro physiologic characteristics. PRPCs stored in 100% plasma for 7 days retained in vivo survival. Lower in vivo post-radiolabeled autologous platelet recovery is consistent with reported reduced count increments for allogenic transfusion.

In Vitro Comparative Study of Platelets Treated with Two Pathogen-Inactivation Methods to Extend Shelf Life to 7 Days

Background and Objectives: Since 2015, platelet products have been pathogen-inactivated (PI) at the Luxemburgish Red Cross (LRC) using Riboflavin and UV light (RF-PI). As the LRC should respond to hospital needs at any time, platelet production exceeds the demand, generating a discard rate of 18%. To reduce this, we consider the extension of storage time from 5 to 7 days. This study’s objective was to evaluate the in vitro 7-day platelet-storage quality, comparing two PI technologies, RF-PI and amotosalen/UVA light (AM-PI), for platelet pools from whole-blood donations (PPCs) and apheresis platelets collected from single apheresis donation (APCs). Materials and Methods: For each product type, 6 double-platelet concentrates were prepared and divided into 2 units; one was treated with RF-PI and the other by AM-PI. In vitro platelet-quality parameters were tested pre- and post-PI, at days 5 and 7. Results: Treatment and storage lesions were observed in PPCs and APCs with both PI methods. We found a higher rate of lactate increase and glucose depletion, suggesting a stronger stimulation of the glycolytic pathway, a higher Annexin V binding, and a loss of swirling in the RF-PI-treated units from day 5. The platelet loss was significantly higher in the AM-PI compared with the RF-PI units. Conclusions: Results suggest that RF-PI treatment has a higher deleterious impact on in vitro platelet quality compared to AM-PI, but we observed higher loss of platelets with AM-PI due to the post-illumination amotosalen adsorption step. If 7-day storage is needed, it can only be achieved with AM-PI, based on our quality criteria.

The international experience of bacterial screen testing of platelet components with automated microbial detection systems: An update

In 2014, the bacterial subgroup of the Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases working party of ISBT published a review on the International Experience of Bacterial Screen Testing of Platelet Components (PCs) with an Automated Microbial Detection System. The purpose of this review, which is focused on publications on or after 2014, is to summarize recent experiences related to bacterial contamination of PCs and the use of an automated culture method to safeguard the blood supply. We first reviewed septic transfusion reactions after PC transfusion as reported in national haemovigilance systems along with a few reports from various countries on bacterial contamination of blood products. Next, we reviewed PC automated culture protocols employed by national blood services in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and large blood collection organization and hospital transfusion services in the United States. Then, we acknowledged the limitations of currently available culture methodologies in abating the risks of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection, through a review of case reports. This review was neither meant to be critical of the literature reviewed nor meant to identify or recommend a best practice. We concluded that significant risk reduction can be achieved by one or a combination of more than one strategy. No one approach is feasible for all institutions worldwide. In selecting strategies, institutions should consider the possible impact on platelet components availability and entertain a risk-based decision-making approach that accounts for operational, logistical and financial factors.

Hemostatic efficacy of pathogen-reduced platelets in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) often require blood component transfusions. Pathogen-reduction (PR) of platelets reduces the risk of microbial contamination; however, its effect on hemostatic efficacy in this population is unclear. This study sought to characterize the hemostatic efficacy of PR platelets in children undergoing CPB.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit following CPB surgery from 2015 to 2019. Demographic data, validated scoring of repair complexity, products received, and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was postoperative chest tube bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients were enrolled. The majority of surgeries (124/140) were Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS) 1-3 repairs. Seventy-four percent of patients (104/140) received only standard platelets whereas 26% (36/140) received PR platelets. There were no differences between the groups in the age (p = .90), sex (p = .20) or RACHS score (p = .06). Postoperatively, there was no difference in the median chest tube output for 1 h (p = .27), 2 h (p = .26), 4 h (p = .09), 8 h (p = .16), or for the first 24 h following surgery (p = .23) in patients who received standard versus PR platelets. There was also no difference in receipt of platelets (p = .18), cell saver (p = .79), or cryoprecipitate (p = .28).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving PR platelets did not have more blood loss or require more transfusions than those who received standard platelets. This suggests that PR platelets may provide acceptable hemostasis with the additional benefits of reduced risk of microbial contamination in pediatric patients undergoing CPB.

Efficient inactivation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in human apheresis platelet concentrates with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light

Objectives

The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in blood and platelet concentrates from asymptomatic donors, and the detection of viral particles on the surface and inside platelets during in vitro experiments, raised concerns over the potential risk for transfusion-transmitted-infection (TTI). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of the amotosalen/UVA pathogen reduction technology for SARS-CoV-2 in human platelet concentrates to mitigate such potential risk.

Material and methods

Five apheresis platelet units in 100% plasma were spiked with a clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate followed by treatment with amotosalen/UVA (INTERCEPT Blood System), pre- and posttreatment samples were collected as well as untreated positive and negative controls. The infectious viral titer was assessed by plaque assay and the genomic titer by quantitative RT-PCR. To exclude the presence of infectious particles post-pathogen reduction treatment below the limit of detection, three consecutive rounds of passaging on permissive cell lines were conducted.

Results

SARS-CoV-2 in platelet concentrates was inactivated with amotosalen/UVA below the limit of detection with a mean log reduction of > 3.31 ± 0.23. During three consecutive rounds of passaging, no viral replication was detected. Pathogen reduction treatment also inhibited nucleic acid detection with a log reduction of > 4.46 ± 0.51 PFU equivalents.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 was efficiently inactivated in platelet concentrates by amotosalen/UVA treatment. These results are in line with previous inactivation data for SARS-CoV-2 in plasma as well as MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1 in platelets and plasma, demonstrating efficient inactivation of human coronaviruses.