Dosimetric comparison of various optimization techniques for high dose rate brachytherapy of interstitial cervix implants

Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) on the quality of IPSA-optimized treatment plans in comparison with graphical plans using plan quality scores (PQS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy optimized plans (graphical & IPSA with different DTDC values) of ten cervical cancer patients were generated. Various DVH parameters like D₉₀, V₁₀₀, V₁₅₀, V₂₀₀, V₃₀₀ were compared to evaluate the impact of DTDC on target coverage and high dose regions inside target for different plans. Similarly, for the OAR dose, values of D_2cc were compared. Various planning parameters like CI, COIN, DHI, DNR, ODI, EI and gain factor (GF) for different OARs were calculated. Based on these indices a plan quality score (PQS) was formulated and calculated. PQS values were used to see the impact of DTDC on plan quality of IPSA in comparison with dosimetric quality of graphical plan.

RESULTS

We have found that target coverage is similar for IPSA and graphically optimized treatment plans. However, dose homogeneity was improved in IPSA compared to graphical optimization whereas conformality was better in graphically optimized plans. OAR dose was less in IPSA plans. High-dose regions inside the target were also reduced in IPSA comparatively. However, IPSA plans optimized with various values of DTDC did not necessarily reduce high-dose regions beyond 0.6. Plan quality scores (PQS) were 6.31, 6.31, 6.34, and 6.17 for the graphically optimized plan, IPSA with DTDC values of 0.0, 0.4, and 1.0 respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that IPSA is dosimetrically advantageous over graphical optimization. IPSA with a DTDC value of 0.4 improved overall plan quality. However, DTDC value beyond 0.6 produces dosimetrically sub-optimal plans hence the use of DTDC should be very selective and limited.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy using inverse planning optimization with tandem and ovoid applicators for locally advanced cervical cancer: a simulation study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric advantage of inverse planning optimization (IPO) in locally advanced cervical cancer using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). IPO was compared with point A plan and geometric optimization (GO). The three planning methods were evaluated using doses to the virtual organ-at-risk (OAR) and D90 (the minimum dose covering of 90% of the volume) to the virtual high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) based on quantitative analysis. HR-CTV structures measuring 38.5 cm³ and 59.5 cm³ were created based on the outcomes of a European Group cohort study. The HR-CTVs were located either at the center of the cervix (cervical center model) or shifted toward the left (extensive disease model). The distances from the HR-CTVs to the rectum were set at 0 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm. We analyzed 336 conditions in this study. All doses were evaluated by conversion to doses in 2-Gy fractions of conventional radiotherapy. The D90 of the HR-CTV using GO and IPO could achieve the desired dose in all conditions, providing better results than that of point A plan. IPO makes it possible to deliver a sufficient dose for the D90 of the HR-CTV while reducing OAR doses with smaller HR-CTV values (< 38.5 cm³) in HDR BT. However, taking into consideration the whole treatment planning time, IPO should be used only when the HR-CTV-to-rectum distance is ≤ 5 mm, and the use of GO cannot spare OARs.

Dosimetric comparison of manual forward planning with uniform dwell times versus volume-based inverse planning in interstitial brachytherapy of cervical malignancies

Aim

Dosimetic comparison of manual forward planning(MFP) with inverse planning(IP) for interstitial brachytherapy(ISBT) in cervical carcinoma.

Background

Brachytherapy planning by MFP is more reliable but time-consuming method, whereas IP has been explored more often for its ease and rapidness. The superiority of either is yet to be established.

Methodology

Two plans were created on data sets of 24 patients of cervical carcinoma who had undergone ISBT, one by MFP with uniform dwell times and another IP on BrachyVision 13.7 planning system with a dose prescription of 600 cGy. Isodose shaper was used for improving conformity & homogeneity. Dosimetric parameters for target and organs at risk (OARs) were recorded. Conformity index (COIN), dose homogeneity index (DHI), overdose index (OI), Coverage index (CI) and dose nonuniformity ratio (DNR) were calculated.

Results

Mean high risk clinical target volume: 73.05(±20.7)cc, D90: 5.51 Gy vs. 5.6 Gy (p = 0.017), V100: 81.77 % vs. 83.74 % (p = 0.002), V150: 21.7 % vs. 24.93 % (p = 0.002), V200: 6.3 % vs. 6.4 % (p=0.75) for IP and MFP, respectively. CI: 0.81(IP) and 0.83(MFP) (p = 0.003); however, COIN was 0.79 for both plans. D2cc of OARs was statistically better with IP (bladder 54.7 % vs. 56.1 %, p = 0.03; rectum 63 % vs. 64.7 %, (p = 0.0008).

Conclusion

Both MFP and IP are equally acceptable dosimetrically. With higher dose achieved to the target, for a similar OAR dose, MFP provides greater user flexibility of dwell positions within the target as well as better optimization. Isodose shaper may be carefully used for fine tuning. Larger sample sizes and clinical correlation will better answer the superiority of one over the other.

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy using cobalt-60 source for cervical cancer: dosimetric and clinical outcomes from a single institute

PURPOSE

To record and report dosimetric and clinical outcomes of interstitial brachytherapy using cobalt-60 (60Co) source in cervical cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy patients who underwent external beam radiotherapy with dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions were included into this study. The ISBT applicators were inserted under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was performed and axial CT images were transferred to treatment planning system. High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and organs at risks (OARs) were contoured. Four fractions of 6.5 Gy were prescribed to CTVHR using inverse planning technique. Patients were followed-up for 3 years. Dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes were recorded and compared with available literature.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with FIGO stage IIB-IVA were included in the study. The median EQD2 of 2 cm3 of bladder, rectum, sigmoid and D90 CTVHR were 70 Gy (53-75 Gy), 64 Gy (51-71 Gy), 48 Gy (44-72 Gy), and 77 Gy (70-86 Gy), and dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), coverage index (CI), overdose volume index (OI), and conformal index (COIN) were 0.58 (0.39-0.78), 0.42 (0.22-0.61), 0.87 (0.59-0.97), 0.19 (0.09-0.30) and 0.74 (0.52-0.85), respectively. Local control rate at 2 years was 87.14%. Eight patients had local recurrence and one patient had lung metastasis. Also, two patients with local recurrence had recto-vaginal fistula. Two patients had grade 2 proctitis (2.8%) and one patient developed grade 3 proctitis (1.4%). There was no grade 2 or higher bladder toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetric parameters, local control and toxicities of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients treated by 60Co radioactive source are similar, compared to available literature using iridium-192 (192Ir) source.

Calculation of dose volume parameters and indices in plan evaluation of HDR interstitial brachytherapy by MUPIT in carcinoma cervix

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of a HDR- interstitial brachytherapy plan is a challenging job. Owing to the complexities and diversity of the normalization and optimization techniques involved, a simple objective assessment of these plans is required. This can improve the radiation dose coverage of the tumour with decreased organ toxicity.

AIM

To study and document the various dose volume indices and parameters required to evaluate a HDR interstitial brachytherapy plan by Volume normalization and graphical optimization using MUPIT (Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template) in patients of carcinoma cervix.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Single arm, retrospective study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

35 patients of carcinoma cervix who received EBRT and HDR brachytherapy using MUPIT, were selected. The dose prescribed was 4 Gray/Fraction in four fractions (16Gy/4) treated twice daily, at least 6 hours apart. CTV and OARs were delineated on the axial CT image set. Volume normalization and graphical optimization was done for planning. Coverage Index (CI), Dose homogeneity index (DHI), Overdose index (OI), Dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), Conformity Index (COIN) and dose volume parameters i.e. D2cc, D1cc, D0.1cc of rectum and bladder were evaluated.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

SPSS version 16 was used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CI was 0.95 ± 1.84 which means 95% of the target received 100% of the prescribed dose. The mean COIN was 0.841 ± 0.06 and DHI was 0.502 ± 0.11. D2cc rectum and bladder was 3.40 ± 0.56 and 2.95 ± 0.62 respectively which was within the tolerance limit of this organs. There should be an optimum balance between these indices for improving the quality of the implant and to yield maximum clinical benefit out of it, keeping the dose to the OARs in limit. Dose optimization should be carefully monitered and an institutional protocol should be devised for the acceptability criteria of these plans.

Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical benefits of inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA)-based optimization over volume-based optimization for high-dose rate (HDR) cervix interstitial implants. Overall, 10 patients of cervical carcinoma were considered for treatment with HDR interstitial brachytherapy. Oncentra Master Plan brachytherapy planning system was used for generating 3-dimensional HDR treatment planning for all patients. All patient treatments were planned using volume-based optimization and inverse planning optimization (IPSA). The parameters V100, V150, and V200 for the target; D(2 cm³) of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon; and V80 and V100 for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon were compared using dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The conformity index (CI), relative dose homogeneity index, overdose volume index (ODI), and dose nonuniformity index (DNR) were computed from cumulative DVHs. Good target coverage for prescription dose was achieved with volume-based optimization as compared with IPSA-based dose optimization. Homogeneity was good with the IPSA-based technique as compared with the volume-based dose optimization technique. Volume-based optimization resulted in a higher CI (with a mean value of 0.87) compared with the IPSA-based optimization (with a mean value of 0.76). ODI and DNR are better for the IPSA-based plan as compared with the volume-based plan. Mean doses to the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon were least with IPSA. IPSA also spared the critical organs but with considerable target conformity as compared with the volume-based plan. IPSA significantly reduces overall treatment planning time with improved reduced doses to the organs at risk compared with the volume-based optimization treatment planning method.

Single versus multichannel applicator in high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy optimized by inverse treatment planning

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare the potential dosimetric advantages of a multichannel vaginal applicator vs. a single channel one in intracavitary vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy after hysterectomy, and evaluate the dosimetric advantage of fractional re-planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We randomly selected 12 patients with endometrial carcinoma, who received adjuvant vaginal cuff HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel applicator. For each brachytherapy fraction, two inverse treatment plans (for central channel and multichannel loadings) were performed and compared. The advantage of fractional re-planning was also investigated.

RESULTS

Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) analysis showed limited, but statistically significant difference (p = 0.007) regarding clinical-target-volume dose coverage between single and multichannel approaches. For the organs-at-risk rectum and bladder, the use of multichannel applicator demonstrated a noticeable dose reduction, when compared to single channel, but statistically significant for rectum only (p = 0.0001). For D2cc of rectum, an average fractional dose of 6.1 ± 0.7 Gy resulted for single channel vs. 5.1 ± 0.6 Gy for multichannel. For D2cc of bladder, an average fractional dose of 5 ± 0.9 Gy occurred for single channel vs. 4.9 ± 0.8 Gy for multichannel. The dosimetric benefit of fractional re-planning was demonstrated: DVH analysis showed large, but not statistically significant differences between first fraction plan and fractional re-planning, due to large inter-fraction variations for rectum and bladder positioning and filling.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal HDR brachytherapy using a multichannel vaginal applicator and inverse planning provides dosimetric advantages over single channel cylinder, by reducing the dose to organs at risk without compromising the target volume coverage, but at the expense of an increased vaginal mucosa dose. Due to large inter-fraction dose variations, we recommend individual fraction treatment plan optimization.

Treatment planning methods in high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric and radiobiological analysis

Treatment planning is a trial and error process that determines optimal dwell times, dose distribution, and loading pattern for high dose rate brachytherapy. Planning systems offer a number of dose calculation methods to either normalize or optimize the radiation dose. Each method has its own characteristics for achieving therapeutic dose to mitigate cancer growth without harming contiguous normal tissues. Our aim is to propose the best suited method for planning interstitial brachytherapy. 40 cervical cancer patients were randomly selected and 5 planning methods were iterated. Graphical optimization was compared with implant geometry and dose point normalization/optimization techniques using dosimetrical and radiobiological plan quality indices retrospectively. Mean tumor control probability was similar in all the methods with no statistical significance. Mean normal tissue complication probability for bladder and rectum is 0.3252 and 0.3126 (P = 0.0001), respectively, in graphical optimized plans compared to other methods. There was no significant correlation found between Conformity Index and tumor control probability when the plans were ranked according to Pearson product moment method (r = −0.120). Graphical optimization can result in maximum sparing of normal tissues.

First clinical implementation of the Capri applicator

This study was to assess the Capri applicator for patients with endometrial cancer undergoing high‐radiation dose treatments following external‐beam radiation therapy. The Capri applicator is an inflatable vaginal cylinder with multiple channels. It is used to tailor the dose distribution to an asymmetric vaginal disease, and better spare organs at risk. Five patients with high‐risk endometrial cancer were selected for this study. The patients were treated with a high dose of radiation using the Capri applicator: daily fraction of 7 Gy was prescribed for a total dose of 21 Gy. The treatment plans included radiobiological parameters such as equivalent uniform dose (EUD), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and tumor control probability (TCP). Based on the dose‐volume histograms (DVH), we also calculated four quality factors: conformity index (CI), dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose nonuniformity index (DNR), and overdose index (OI). The TCP values range from 82.26% to 95.92%. Very low values of NTCP were observed for the bladder and rectum. The EUDs to organs at risk ranged from 4.65 Gy to 18.22 Gy for the bladder, and from 3.41 Gy from to 6.56 Gy for the rectum. The mean CI was 1.05(SD=0.0008). The mean DNR was 0.10(range0.0−0.295,SD=0.100). The mean OI was 0.019(SD=0.028). The DHIs were in the range of 1.0−0.754(mean0.886,SD=0.116). The use of a multichannel vaginal cylinder may not only help cover extensive vaginal disease, but also reduce the dose to the rectum. This dosimetric analysis shows that rectal doses could be reduced using a multichannel cylinder. However, the dose delivered to the bladder based on EUD calculation may be higher than that obtained with other methods. Each patient must be evaluated independently to determine if a multichannel treatment is appropriate. Clinical followup will show whether this rectal dose sparing translates into a real toxicity improvement.

PACS number: 3.6.96.0