1
|
Fathy MM, Hassan BZ, El-Gebaly RH, Mokhtar MH. Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2023; 62:97-106. [PMID: 36576578 PMCID: PMC9950215 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) widths (10 mm and 5 mm) on plan quality during the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the MLC mode of energy on the Agility flattening filter (FF), MLC Agility-free flattening filter (FFF), and MLCi2 for patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. Two radiotherapy techniques; Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT), were used in this research. In the present study, computed tomography simulations of ten patients (six plans per patient) with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Various dosimetric parameters were assessed, including monitor units, treatment delivery times, conformity, and homogeneity indices. To evaluate the plan quality, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each technique. The results demonstrated that the determined dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV)p (such as D mean, conformity, and homogeneity index) showed greater improvement with MLC Agility FF and MLC Agility FFF than with MLCi2. Additionally, the treatment delivery time was reduced in the MLC Agility FF (by 31%) and MLC Agility FFF (by 10.8%) groups compared to the MLCi2 group. It is concluded that for both the VMAT and IMRT techniques, the smaller width (5 mm) MLCs revealed better planning target volume coverage, improved the dosimetric parameters for PTV, reduced the treatment time, and met the constraints for OARs. It is therefore recommended to use 5 mm MLCs for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment due to better target coverage and better protection of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Fathy
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
| | - Belal Z Hassan
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
- Department of Radiotherapy, Al-Ziraeyeen Hospital, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Reem H El-Gebaly
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Maha H Mokhtar
- Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Physics Unit, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dosimetric sensitivity of leaf width on volumetric modulated arc therapy plan quality: an objective approach. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:76-85. [PMID: 35402026 PMCID: PMC8989436 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several authors investigated a dosimetric impact of leaf width on radiotherapy plan quality subjectively, and concluded that thinner leaf-width multileaf collimators (MLC) are beneficial because of their better coverage of clinically relevant structures. Study aimed to investigate the dosimetric effect of MLC leaf width on volumetric modulated arc therapy plan quality by objective approach. Materials and methods Twelve of each prostate and head-and-neck patients were planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments for MLC leaf widths of 4 mm and 10 mm. Three different VMAT schemes single-arc, dual-arc and two combined independent single-arcs were optimized. Dose volume histogram and Isodose distribution were used for quantitative and qualitative comparison of the treatment plan, respectively. Dose-volume-indices of the planning target volume, organs at risk and number of delivered monitor units were compared. The 4 mm leaf width being reference over 10 mm and results were noted as statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 using student t-test. Results All VMAT schemes for both tumor sites showed a gain in target coverage, similar organs at risk doses and higher monitor units to be delivered, when changing leaf width from 10 mm to 4 mm. The p-values were significant for majority of head-and-neck dose indices. Conclusion The thinner-leaf MLCs, owing to their better spatial resolution, result in an overall gain for target coverage, while maintaining permissible doses to the organs at risk.
Collapse
|
3
|
Li C, Tao C, Bai T, Li Z, Tong Y, Zhu J, Yin Y, Lu J. Beam complexity and monitor unit efficiency comparison in two different volumetric modulated arc therapy delivery systems using automated planning. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:261. [PMID: 33691654 PMCID: PMC7945217 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07991-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the beam complexity and monitor unit (MU) efficiency issues for two different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery technologies for patients with left-sided breast cancer (BC) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS Twelve left-sided BC and seven NPC cases were enrolled in this study. Each delivered treatment plan was optimized in the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system with the Auto-Planning module for the Trilogy and Synergy systems. Similar planning dose objectives and beam configurations were used for each site in the two different delivery systems to produce clinically acceptable plans. The beam complexity was evaluated in terms of the segment area (SA), segment width (SW), leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), and modulation complexity score (MCS) based on the multileaf collimator sequence and MU. Plan delivery and a gamma evaluation were performed using a helical diode array. RESULTS With similar plan quality, the average SAs for the Trilogy plans were smaller than those for the Synergy plans: 55.5 ± 21.3 cm2 vs. 66.3 ± 17.9 cm2 (p < 0.05) for the NPC cases and 100.7 ± 49.2 cm2 vs. 108.5 ± 42.7 cm2 (p < 0.05) for the BC cases, respectively. The SW was statistically significant for the two delivery systems (NPC: 6.87 ± 1.95 cm vs. 6.72 ± 2.71 cm, p < 0.05; BC: 8.84 ± 2.56 cm vs. 8.09 ± 2.63 cm, p < 0.05). The LSV was significantly smaller for Trilogy (NPC: 0.84 ± 0.033 vs. 0.86 ± 0.033, p < 0.05; BC: 0.89 ± 0.026 vs. 0.90 ± 0.26, p < 0.05). The mean AAV was significantly larger for Trilogy than for Synergy (NPC: 0.18 ± 0.064 vs. 0.14 ± 0.037, p < 0.05; BC: 0.46 ± 0.15 vs. 0.33 ± 0.13, p < 0.05). The MCS values for Trilogy were higher than those for Synergy: 0.14 ± 0.016 vs. 0.12 ± 0.017 (p < 0.05) for the NPC cases and 0.42 ± 0.106 vs. 0.30 ± 0.087 (p < 0.05) for the BC cases. Compared with the Synergy plans, the average MUs for the Trilogy plans were larger: 828.6 ± 74.1 MU and 782.9 ± 85.2 MU (p > 0.05) for the NPC cases and 444.8 ± 61.3 MU and 393.8 ± 75.3 MU (p > 0.05) for the BC cases. The gamma index agreement scores were never below 91% using 3 mm/3% (global) distance to agreement and dose difference criteria and a 10% lower dose exclusion threshold. CONCLUSIONS The Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning system can optimize BC and NPC plans to achieve the same plan quality using both the Trilogy and Synergy systems. We found that these two systems resulted in different SAs, SWs, LSVs, AAVs and MCSs. As a result, we suggested that the beam complexity should be considered in the development of further methodologies while optimizing VMAT autoplanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Cheng Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Tong Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Zhenjiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Ying Tong
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China.
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park H, Choi HJ, Hee Min C, Kim JI. Monte Carlo simulation of a 2D dynamic multileaf collimator to improve the plan quality in radiotherapy plan: a proof-of-concept study. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:245009. [PMID: 31726432 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab57c4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The leaf width of a multileaf collimator (MLC) determines the dose conformity to the target volume. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a two-dimensional dynamic MLC (2DDMLC) to improve the treatment plan quality with a fixed leaf width. The treatment head of the Clinac™ linear accelerator with the Millennium 120™ MLC was modelled with the Geant4 (for GEometry ANd Tracking) tollkit using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. The 2DDMLC produces a beam aperture by moving the MLC bank vertically to the leaf movement. Thus, the effect of the 2DDMLC motion on beam divergence and beam fluence resolution was evaluated by comparing the dose distributions between the conventional MLC motion and the 2DDMLC. Finally, the 2DDMLC was employed for dynamic conformal arc therapy for 13 brain cancer patients. The dose-volumetric parameters, including the dose delivered to 98% of the target volume (D 98%), percent volume given 20% of the prescribed dose (V 20%), and conformity index (CI) were compared with those of the conventional MLC. For the 6 MV beam of the MC model, the depth dose and lateral dose distribution differed by less than 2% between the simulation and measurement. The 2DDMLC did not significantly influence beam divergence and sharpened the beam. In clinical use, the dose delivered to the target was almost identical between the 2DDMLC and conventional MLC (D 98% = 29.74 Gy versus 29.71 Gy, p = 0.18). The CI was improved with the use of the 2DDMLC (CI = 1.49 versus 1.47, p = 0.14). Moreover, irradiation of normal tissue was reduced with the 2DDMLC compared with conventional MLC (V 20% = 17.22% versus 17.45%, p < 0.001). The 2DDMLC improved the dose conformity to the target volume and reduced the irradiation of the normal tissue compared with the conventional MLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyojun Park
- Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
K BT, Ganesh KM, A P. Is High Definition MLC Dosimetrically Superior to Standard Definition MLC for SIB-SBRT for Carcinoma Prostate. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019; 20:3817-3823. [PMID: 31870127 PMCID: PMC7173375 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2019.20.12.3817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study was conducted to quantitatively evaluate the dosimetric effects of high definition (2.5 mm) and standard definition (5.0 mm) MLC on the quality of SBRT plans using SIB-IMRT and SIB-VMAT technique for carcinoma prostate and also to evaluate the dosimetric advantage of one technique over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventeen annonymized planning CT data sets were used to generate plans for both VMAT and IMRT techniques using 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm MLC.The prescription to the nodule was 45Gy in 5 fractions and to the prostate was 35Gy in 5 fractions.CI, GI, D2%, D98%, D50% and V95% for target; D2%, Dmean, V80%, V20% for OAR's; V5% of the irradiated volume, and delivered MU's were analyzed.An independent t-test was used to compare the plans. Patient specific QA for all plans were also performed and analyzed. RESULTS Minor difference in dosimetric indices was observed between 2.5mm and 5mm MLC VMAT plans, except D2% (PTV35) and D98% (GTV45) were better in 2.5mm MLC plans (p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bijina T K
- Research and Development center, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore,
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Healthcare Global Enterprises,
| | - K M Ganesh
- Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India.
| | - Pichandi A
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Healthcare Global Enterprises,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park JM, Park SY, Wu HG, Kim JI. Improvement of VMAT plan quality for head and neck cancer with high resolution fluences generated by couch shift between arcs. Phys Med 2018. [PMID: 29519394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the changes in quality of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with couch-shift between arcs by half of a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf width. METHODS A total of 22 patients with head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively selected. Since the smallest MLC leaf width was 5 mm in this study, the couch was shifted by 2.5 mm in the longitudinal-direction between arcs to increase the resolution of fluence map. A total of three types of VMAT plans were generated for each patient; the three types of plans were a two-full-arc plan without couch-shift (NS plan), a two-half-arc-pair plan with couch-shift (HAS plan), and a two-full-arc pair plan with couch-shift (FAS plan). Changes in the dose-volumetric parameters were investigated. RESULTS The FAS plan showed the best plan quality for the target volumes and organs at risk compared to the NS and HAS plans. However, the magnitudes of differences among the three types of plans were minimal, and every plan was clinically acceptable. The average integral doses of the NS, HAS, and FAS plans were 160,549 ± 37,600 Gy-cc, 147,828 ± 33,343 Gy-cc, and 156,030 ± 36,263 Gy-cc, respectively. The average monitor unit of the NS, HAS, and FAS plans were 717 ± 120 MU, 648 ± 100 MU, and 763 ± 158 MU, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The HAS plan was better than the others in terms of normal tissue sparing and plan efficiency. By shifting the couch by half of the MLC leaf width in the longitudinal direction between arcs, the VMAT plan quality could be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Robotics Research Laboratory for Extreme Environments, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Yeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park JM, Park SY, Kim JI, Kang HC, Choi CH. A comparison of treatment plan quality between Tri-Co-60 intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical cancer. Phys Med 2017; 40:11-16. [PMID: 28760506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the plan quality of tri-Co-60 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer. METHODS A total of 20 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer were selected. For each patient, a tri-Co-60 IMRT plan for which the target volume was the planning target volume (PTV) generated by adding 1mm isotropic margins from the clinical target volume (CTV) and a VMAT plan for which the target volume was the PTV generated by adding 7mm and 10mm margins from the CTV were generated. The tri-Co-60 IMRT plans were generated with the ViewRay™ system while the VMAT plans were generated with 15-MV photon beams from a linear accelerator (prescription dose=50.4Gy in 28 fractions). RESULTS The average volumes of the PTVs and CTVs were 704.9cc±87.8cc and 271.6cc±51.6cc, respectively. No noticeable differences in the dose-volumetric parameters for the target volumes were observed between the tri-Co-60 IMRT and VMAT plans. The values of V40Gy for the small bowel and rectal wall, V45Gy of the bladder, and V35Gy of the femoral heads for the VMAT plans were 14.6%±7.8%, 54.4%±4.2%, 30.0%±4.7%, and 8.9%±3.3%, respectively. Those of the tri-Co-60 IMRT plans were 2.8%±2.1%, 23.0%±8.9%, 17.1%±6.1%, and 0.3%±0.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Owing to the target margin reduction capability, the tri-Co-60 IMRT plans were more favorable than the VMAT plans for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Yeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Cheol Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Petersen N, Perrin D, Newhauser W, Zhang R. Impact of Multileaf Collimator Configuration Parameters on the Dosimetric Accuracy of 6-MV Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans. J Med Phys 2017; 42:151-155. [PMID: 28974861 PMCID: PMC5618462 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_88_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of selected configuration parameters that govern multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission and rounded leaf offset in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) (Pinnacle3, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) on the accuracy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculation. The MLC leaf transmission factor was modified based on measurements made with ionization chambers. The table of parameters containing rounded-leaf-end offset values was modified by measuring the radiation field edge as a function of leaf bank position with an ionization chamber in a scanning water-tank dosimetry system and comparing the locations to those predicted by the TPS. The modified parameter values were validated by performing IMRT quality assurance (QA) measurements on 19 gantry-static IMRT plans. Planar dose measurements were performed with radiographic film and a diode array (MapCHECK2) and compared to TPS calculated dose distributions using default and modified configuration parameters. Based on measurements, the leaf transmission factor was changed from a default value of 0.001 to 0.005. Surprisingly, this modification resulted in a small but statistically significant worsening of IMRT QA gamma-index passing rate, which revealed that the overall dosimetric accuracy of the TPS depends on multiple configuration parameters in a manner that is coupled and not intuitive because of the commissioning protocol used in our clinic. The rounded leaf offset table had little room for improvement, with the average difference between the default and modified offset values being -0.2 ± 0.7 mm. While our results depend on the current clinical protocols, treatment unit and TPS used, the methodology used in this study is generally applicable. Different clinics could potentially obtain different results and improve their dosimetric accuracy using our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Petersen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - David Perrin
- Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Wayne Newhauser
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.,Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.,Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Influence of multi-leaf collimator leaf transmission on head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning. Jpn J Radiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s11604-017-0661-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Ho JH, Hagler S, Lujano C, Seng S, Starks C, Perrin K, Turner L, Court L. Can cost make a difference dosimetrically? Volumetric modulated arc therapy study for multileaf collimators of various widths for head and neck and prostate cancers. Med Dosim 2017; 42:12-17. [PMID: 28126474 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2016] [Revised: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a global health issue that disproportionately kills based on stage of disease, cellular pathology, and genetics, to name a few. Another variable to consider in this ongoing fight is treatment machine complexity that leads to elevated development and purchasing cost, leading to a reduced use. Reducing the complexity (in hopes of lowering costs) would benefit underdeveloped, low- and middle-income countries by introducing newer treatment technology, as their currently accepted standards do not meet standards of more advanced, developed countries. In this study, unilateral head and neck (H&N), and prostate cases using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were tested with multiple segment widths of 5, 10, 15, and 20mm to create treatable plans. Pinnacle 9.10v was used for planning purposes. A total of 12 cases were planned with varying multileaf collimator (MLC) widths. Treatment plans were evaluated retrospectively. Results show that altering the MLC widths from 5 through 20mm produces both comparable and treatable plans up to 99% and 98% target coverage for H&N and prostate, respectively, albeit clinically significant hot spots were shown to increase with increasing segment width. Furthermore, the results show that increasing widths can produce comparable treatment plans as measured against our current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment devices-leading to an increase in treatment efficacy in economically underdeveloped countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong-Han Ho
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Shane Hagler
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carrie Lujano
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sopaul Seng
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine Starks
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kelly Perrin
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lehendrick Turner
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laurence Court
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choi CH, Park SY, Kim JI, Kim JH, Kim K, Carlson J, Park JM. Quality of tri-Co-60 MR-IGRT treatment plans in comparison with VMAT treatment plans for spine SABR. Br J Radiol 2016; 90:20160652. [PMID: 27781486 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the plan quality of tri-Co-60 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS A total of 20 patients with spine metastasis were retrospectively selected. For each patient, a tri-Co-60 IMRT plan and a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan were generated. The spinal cords were defined based on MR images for the tri-Co-60 IMRT, while isotropic 1-mm margins were added to the spinal cords for the VMAT plans. The VMAT plans were generated with 10-MV flattening filter-free photon beams of TrueBeam STx™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), while the tri-Co-60 IMRT plans were generated with the ViewRay™ system (ViewRay inc., Cleveland, OH). The initial prescription dose was 18 Gy (1 fraction). If the tolerance dose of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription dose was reduced until the spinal cord tolerance dose was satisfied. RESULTS The mean dose to the target volumes, conformity index and homogeneity index of the VMAT and tri-Co-60 IMRT were 17.8 ± 0.8 vs 13.7 ± 3.9 Gy, 0.85 ± 0.20 vs 1.58 ± 1.29 and 0.09 ± 0.04 vs 0.24 ± 0.19, respectively. The integral doses and beam-on times were 16,570 ± 1768 vs 22,087 ± 2.986 Gy cm3 and 3.95 ± 1.13 vs 48.82 ± 10.44 min, respectively. CONCLUSION The tri-Co-60 IMRT seems inappropriate for spine SABR compared with VMAT. Advances in knowledge: For spine SABR, the tri-Co-60 IMRT is inappropriate owing to the large penumbra, large leaf width and low dose rate of the ViewRay system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Heon Choi
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Yeon Park
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joel Carlson
- 5 Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Min Park
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,3 Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,6 Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advance Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park JM, Park SY, Kim JH, Carlson J, Kim JI. The effect of extremely narrow MLC leaf width on the plan quality of VMAT for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:85. [PMID: 27338929 PMCID: PMC4917980 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0664-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the effect of multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) with leaf width of 1.25 mm on the plan quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. METHODS A total of 20 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively selected. Using a high definition MLC (HD MLC), primary and boost VMAT plans with two full arcs were generated for each patient (original plan). After that, by shifting the isocenter position of the 2nd arc by 1.25 mm in the cranio-caudal direction, we simulated fluences made with MLCs with leaf width of 1.25 mm. After shifting, primary and boost plans were generated for each patient (shifted plan). A sum plan was generated by summation of the primary and boost plan for each patient. Dose-volumetric parameters were calculated and compared. RESULTS Both the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of the shifted plans were better than those of the original plans in primary plans (HI = 0.065 vs. 0.059 with p < 0.001 and CI = 1.056 vs. 1.044 with p = 0.006). Similarly, the shifted plans for the boost target volume showed better homogeneity and conformity than did the original plans (HI = 0.060 vs. 0.053 with p < 0.001 and CI = 1.015 vs. 1.009 with p < 0.001). The target mean dose of the original plans was closer to the prescription dose than that of the shifted plans in the case of sum plans (81.45 Gy vs. 81.12 Gy with p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of extremely narrow MLCs could increase dose homogeneity and conformity of the target volume for prostate VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| | - So-Yeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joel Carlson
- Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. .,Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Capability of leaf interdigitation with different inverse planning strategies in Monaco: an investigation of representative tumour sites. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:82. [PMID: 27316707 PMCID: PMC4912757 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0655-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to experimentally assess the dosimetric impact of leaf interdigitation using different inverse treatment strategies for representative tumour sites and to identify the situations in which leaf interdigitation can benefit these tumour sites. Material and methods Sixty previously treated patients (15 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 15 multiple brain metastasis (MBM), 15 cervical cancer and 15 prostate cancer) were re-planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), sliding window IMRT (dMLC) and step-and-shoot IMRT (ssIMRT) with and without leaf interdigitation. Various dosimetric variables, such as PTV coverage, OARs sparing, delivery efficiency and planning time, were evaluated for each plan. In addition, a protocol developed by our group was applied to identify the situations in which leaf interdigitation can achieve benefits in clinical practice. Results Leaf interdigitation produced few benefits in PTV homogeneity for the MBM VMAT plans and NPC ssIMRT plans. For OARs, sparing was equivalent with and without leaf interdigitation. Leaf interdigitation showed an increase in MUs for dMLC plans and a decrease in MUs for ssIMRT plans. Leaf interdigitation resulted in an increase in segments for dMLC plans and a decrease in segments for NPC and MBM ssIMRT plans. For beam on time, leaf interdigitation showed an increase in MBM dMLC, NPC ssIMRT and prostate ssIMRT plans. In addition, leaf interdigitation saved planning time for VMAT and dMLC plans but increased planning time for ssIMRT plans. Conclusion Leaf interdigitation does not improve plan quality when performing inverse treatment strategies, regardless of whether the target is simple or complex. However, it influences the delivery efficiency and planning time. Based on these observations, our study suggests that leaf interdigitation should be utilized when performing MBM VMAT plans and NPC ssIMRT plans. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0655-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kantz S, Söhn M, Troeller A, Reiner M, Weingandt H, Alber M, Belka C, Ganswindt U. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:184. [PMID: 26328628 PMCID: PMC4556413 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) design and IMRT technique on plan quality and delivery improvements for head-and-neck and meningioma patients is compared in a planning study. Material and methods Ten previously treated patients (5 head-and-neck, 5 meningioma) were re-planned for step-and-shoot IMRT (ssIMRT), sliding window IMRT (dMLC) and VMAT using the MLCi2 without (−) and with (+) interdigitation and the Agility-MLC attached to an Elekta 6MV linac. This results in nine plans per patient. Consistent patient individual optimization parameters are used. Plans are generated using the research tool Hyperion V2.4 (equivalent to Elekta Monaco 3.2) with hard constraints for critical structures and objectives for target structures. For VMAT plans, the improved segment shape optimization is used. Critical structures are evaluated based on QUANTEC criteria. PTV coverage is compared by EUD, Dmean, homogeneity and conformity. Additionally, MU/plan, treatment times and number of segments are evaluated. Results As constrained optimization is used, all plans fulfill the hard constraints. Doses to critical structures do not differ more than 1Gy between the nine generated plans for each patient. Only larynx, parotids and eyes differ up to 1.5Gy (Dmean or Dmax) or 7 % (volume-constraint) due to (1) increased scatter, (2) not avoiding structures when using the full range of gantry rotation and (3) improved leaf sequencing with advanced segment shape optimization for VMAT plans. EUD, Dmean, homogeneity and conformity are improved using the Agility-MLC. However, PTV coverage is more affected by technique. MU increase with the use of dMLC and VMAT, while the MU are reduced by using the Agility-MLC. Fastest treatments are always achieved using Agility-MLC, especially in combination with VMAT. Conclusion Fastest treatments with the best PTV coverage are found for VMAT plans with Agility-MLC, achieving the same sparing of healthy tissue compared to the other combinations of ssIMRT, dMLC and VMAT with either MLCi2−/+ or Agility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Kantz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Söhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Almut Troeller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Helmut Weingandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Markus Alber
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peters S, Schiefer H, Plasswilm L. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:153. [PMID: 25011529 PMCID: PMC4107584 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The newest release of the Eclipse (Varian) treatment planning system (TPS) includes an optimizing engine for Elekta volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this new algorithm and to compare it to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for various disease sites by creating single- and double-arc VMAT plans. Methods A total of 162 plans were evaluated in this study, including 38 endometrial, 57 head and neck, 12 brain, 10 breast and 45 prostate cancer cases. The real-life IMRT plans were developed during routine clinical cases using the TPS Eclipse. VMAT plans were generated using a preclinical version of Eclipse with tumor-region-specific optimizing templates without interference of the operator: with one full arc (1A) and with two full arcs (2A), and with partial arcs for breast and prostate with hip implant cases. All plans were evaluated based on target coverage, homogeneity and conformity. The organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed according to plan objectives, such as the mean and maximum doses. If one or more objectives were exceeded, the plan was considered clinically unacceptable, and a second VMAT plan was created by adapting the optimization penalties once. Results Compared to IMRT, single- and double-arc VMAT plans showed comparable or better results concerning the target coverage: the maximum dose in the target for 1A is the same as that for IMRT; for 2A, an average reduction of 1.3% over all plans was observed. The conformity showed a statistically significant improvement for both 1A (+3%) and 2A (+6%). The mean total body dose was statistically significant lower for the considered arc techniques (IMRT: 16.0 Gy, VMAT: 15.3 Gy, p < 0.001). However, the sparing of OARs shows individual behavior that depends strongly on the different tumor regions. A clear difference is found in the number of monitor units (MUs) per plan: VMAT shows a reduction of 31%. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that based on optimizing templates with minimal interaction of the operator, the Eclipse TPS is able to achieve a plan quality for the Elekta VMAT delivery technique that is comparable to that of fixed-field IMRT. Plans with two arcs show better dose distributions than plans with one arc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St, Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007 St, Gallen, Switzerland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|