Persons with multiple sclerosis show altered joint kinetics during walking after participating in elliptical exercise

Development of an Elliptical Perturbation System that provides unexpected perturbations during elliptical walking (the EPES system)

BACKGROUND

'Perturbation-based balance training' (PBBT) is a training method that was developed to improve balance reactive responses to unexpected balance loss. This training method is more effective in reducing fall rates than traditional balance training methods. Many PBBTs are performed during standing or treadmill walking which targeted specifically step reactive responses, we however, aimed to develop and build a mechatronic system that can provide unexpected perturbation during elliptical walking the Elliptical Perturbation System (the EPES system), with the aim of improving specifically the trunk and upper limbs balance reactive control.

METHODS

This paper describes the development, and building of the EPES system, using a stationary Elliptical Exercise device, which allows training of trunk and upper limbs balance reactive responses in older adults.

RESULTS

The EPES system provides 3-dimensional small, controlled, and unpredictable sudden perturbations during stationary elliptical walking. We developed software that can identify a trainee's trunk and arms reactive balance responses using a stereo camera. After identifying an effective trunk and arms reactive balance response, the software controls the EPES system motors to return the system to its horizontal baseline position after the perturbation. The system thus provides closed-loop feedback for a person's counterbalancing trunk and arm responses, helping to implement implicit motor learning for the trainee. The pilot results show that the EPES software can successfully identify balance reactive responses among participants who are exposed to a sudden unexpected perturbation during elliptical walking on the EPES system.

CONCLUSIONS

EPES trigger reactive balance responses involving counter-rotation action of body segments and simultaneously evoke arms, and trunk reactive response, thus reactive training effects should be expected.

Mildly disabled persons with multiple sclerosis use similar net joint power strategies as healthy controls when walking speed increases

BACKGROUND

To improve walking in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), it is essential to understand the underlying mechanisms of walking. This study examined strategies in net joint power generated or absorbed by hip flexors, hip extensors, hip abductors, knee extensors, and plantar flexors in mildly disabled persons with MS and healthy controls at different walking speeds.

METHODS

Thirteen persons with MS and thirteen healthy controls participated and peak net joint power was calculated using 3D motion analysis.

RESULTS

In general, no differences were found between speed-matched healthy controls and persons with MS, but the fastest walking speed was significantly higher in healthy controls (2.42 m/s vs. 1.70 m/s). The net joint power increased in hip flexors, hip extensors, hip abductors, knee extensors and plantar flexors in both groups, when walking speed increased. Significant correlations between changes in walking speed and changes in net joint power of plantar flexors, hip extensors and hip flexors existed in healthy controls and persons with MS, and in net knee extensor absorption power of persons with MS only.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previous studies, these findings suggest that mildly disabled persons with MS used similar kinetic strategies as healthy controls to increase walking speed.

Impaired postural balance correlates with complex walking performance in mildly disabled persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

It is relevant to understand the possible influence of impaired postural balance on walking performance in multiple sclerosis (MS) gait rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

We expected associations between impaired postural balance and complex walking performance in mildly disabled persons with MS, but not in healthy controls.

METHODS

Thirteen persons with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale = 2.5) and 13 healthy controls' walking performance were measured at fast walking speed, Timed Up & Go and Timed 25 Feet Walking. Postural balance was measured by stabilometry, 95% confidence ellipse sway area and sway velocity.

RESULTS

Except from sway velocity (p = 0.07), significant differences were found between persons with MS and healthy controls in postural balance and walking. Significant correlations were observed between sway area and Timed Up & Go (r = 0.67) and fastest safe walking speed (r = -0.63) in persons with MS but not in healthy controls (r = 0.52 and r = 0.24, respectively). No other significant correlations were observed between postural balance and walking performance in neither persons with MS nor healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Findings add to the understanding of postural balance and walking in persons with MS, as impaired postural balance was related to complex walking performance. Exercises addressing impaired postural balance are encouraged in early MS gait rehabilitation.

Validity of the Instrumented Push and Release Test to Quantify Postural Responses in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To test the validity of wearable inertial sensors to provide objective measures of postural stepping responses to the push and release clinical test in people with multiple sclerosis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

University medical center balance disorder laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Total sample N=73; persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) n=52; healthy controls n=21.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stepping latency, time and number of steps required to reach stability, and initial step length were calculated using 3 inertial measurement units placed on participants' lumbar spine and feet.

RESULTS

Correlations between inertial sensor measures and measures obtained from the laboratory-based systems were moderate to strong and statistically significant for all variables: time to release (r=.992), latency (r=.655), time to stability (r=.847), time of first heel strike (r=.665), number of steps (r=.825), and first step length (r=.592). Compared with healthy controls, PwMS demonstrated a longer time to stability and required a larger number of steps to reach stability.

CONCLUSIONS

The instrumented push and release test is a valid measure of postural responses in PwMS and could be used as a clinical outcome measures for patient care decisions or for clinical trials aimed at improving postural control in PwMS.

Neurorehabilitation Strategies Focusing on Ankle Control Improve Mobility and Posture in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The neuromuscular impairments seen in the ankle plantarflexors have been identified as a primary factor that limits the mobility and standing postural balance of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, few efforts have been made to find effective treatment strategies that will improve the ankle plantarflexor control. Our objective was to determine whether an intensive 14-week neurorehabilitation protocol has the potential to improve the ankle plantarflexor control of individuals with MS. The secondary objectives were to determine whether the protocol would also improve postural control, plantarflexion strength, and mobility.

METHODS

Fifteen individuals with MS participated in a 14-week neurorehabilitation protocol, and 20 healthy adults served as a comparison group. The primary measure was the amount of variability in the submaximal steady-state isometric torque, which assessed plantarflexor control. Secondary measures were the Sensory Organization Test composite score, maximum plantarflexion torque, and the spatiotemporal gait kinematics.

RESULTS

There was less variability in the plantarflexion torques after the neurorehabilitation protocol (preintervention, 4.15% ± 0.5%; postintervention, 2.27% ± 0.3%). In addition, there were less postural sway (preintervention, 51.87 ± 0.2 points; postintervention, 67.8 ± 0.5 points), greater plantarflexion strength (preintervention, 0.46 ± 0.04 Nm/kg; postintervention, 0.57 ± 0.05 Nm/kg), and faster walking speeds (preferred preintervention, 0.71 ± 0.05 m/s; preferred postintervention, 0.81 ± 0.05 m/s; fast-as-possible preintervention, 0.95 ± 0.06 m/s; postintervention, 1.11 ± 0.07 m/s). All of the outcome variables matched or trended toward those seen in the controls.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of this exploratory study suggest that the neurorehabilitation protocol employed in this investigation has the potential to promote clinically relevant improvements in the ankle plantarflexor control, standing postural balance, ankle plantarflexion strength, and the mobility of individuals with MS. Video abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A110).

Multiple sclerosis influences the precision of the ankle plantarflexon muscular force production

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the precision of the steady-state isometric control of the ankle plantarflexors musculature of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), and to evaluate if the precision is related to the mobility impairments.

METHODS

Individuals with MS and healthy adults performed a submaximal steady-state isometric contraction with the ankle plantarflexors. The coefficient of variation was used to assess the amount of variability or error in the precision of the torques generated by the ankle plantarflexor musculature. The participants also walked across a digital mat at their preferred and fast-as-possible walking speeds, which recorded their spatiotemporal gait kinematics.

RESULTS

The individuals with MS: (1) had reduced maximal voluntary torques at the ankle, (2) a greater amount of variability in the precision of the isometric ankle torques, (3) altered and more variable spatiotemporal gait kinematics, and (4) a greater amount of variability in the isometric ankle torques were related to a slower walking speed and cadence, shorter step length and a greater amount of gait variability.

CONCLUSIONS

These results further fuels the impression that a reduction in control of the ankle joint musculature may be a key factor in the mobility and balance impairments seen in individuals with MS.

Accelerometry reveals differences in gait variability between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls

Variability of movement reflects important information for the maintenance of the health of the system. For pathological populations, changes in variability during gait signal the presence of abnormal motor control strategies. For persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), extensive gait problems have been reported including changes in gait variability. While previous studies have focused on footfall variability, the present study used accelerometers on the trunk to measure variability during walking. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the variability of the acceleration pattern of the upper and lower trunk in PwMS compared to healthy controls. We extracted linear and nonlinear measures of gait variability from 30 s of steady state walking for 15 PwMS and 15 age-matched healthy controls. PwMS had altered variability compared to controls with greater Lyapunov exponent in the ML (p < 0.001) and AP (p < 0.001) directions, and greater frequency dispersion in the ML direction (p = 0.034). PwMS also demonstrated greater mean velocity in the ML direction (p = 0.045) and lower root mean square of acceleration in the AP direction (p = 0.040). These findings indicate that PwMS have altered structure of variability of the trunk during gait compared to healthy controls and agree with previous findings related to changes in gait variability in PwMS.

Multiple sclerosis alters the mechanical work performed on the body's center of mass during gait

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have less-coordinated movements of the center of mass resulting in greater mechanical work. The purpose of this study was to quantify the work performed on the body's center of mass by patients with MS. It was hypothesized that patients with MS would perform greater negative work during initial double support and less positive work in terminal double support. Results revealed that patients with MS perform less negative work in single support and early terminal double support and less positive work in the terminal double support period. However, summed over the entire stance phase, patients with MS and healthy controls performed similar amounts of positive and negative work on the body's center of mass. The altered work throughout different periods in the stance phase may be indicative of a failure to capitalize on passive elastic energy mechanisms and increased reliance upon more active work generation to sustain gait.