Regulation of the expression of cholesterol transporters by lipid-lowering drugs ezetimibe and pemafibrate in rat liver and intestine

Ezetimibe and pemafibrate are lipid-lowering drugs and promote reverse cholesterol transport. However, it is unknown whether cholesterol is mainly excreted by hepatobiliary excretion or by non-biliary transintestinal cholesterol efflux (TICE). We evaluated the effects of ezetimibe and pemafibrate on hepatic and intestinal cholesterol transporter regulation in Sham-operated rats, and examined the effects of these drugs on TICE in bile duct-ligated rats. Seven-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated as follows for two weeks: 1) Sham, Sham operation; 2) BDL, bile duct ligation; 3) E-Sham, Sham + ezetimibe; 4) E-BDL, BDL + ezetimibe; 5) P-Sham, Sham + pemafibrate; and 6) P-BDL, BDL + pemafibrate. Blood, liver, jejunum, and feces were collected 72 h post-surgery. Hepatic cholesterol levels were decreased in P-Sham and E-Sham, and were lower in E-BDL and P-BDL than in BDL. Fecal cholesterol levels increased in E-Sham and P-Sham compared with Sham, and were higher in E-BDL and P-BDL than in BDL. In liver, Abcg5 mRNA showed induction in E-Sham, Abcg5 and Abca1 mRNA were induced in P-Sham, Abcg5 mRNA was reduced in E-BDL, and Abca1 mRNA was increased in P-BDL. In jejunum, Abcg5 mRNA was induced in E-Sham. Abcg8 mRNA was induced in E-Sham and P-Sham. NPC1L1 mRNA showed reduced expression in P-Sham and P-BDL. SR-B1 mRNA was reduced in P-Sham, and the expression decreased in P-BDL. LDL receptor mRNA was induced in BDL and P-BDL. Ezetimibe and pemafibrate may promote TICE by increasing Abcg5/g8, while pemafibrate may inhibit intestinal cholesterol absorption by decreasing SR-B1 and NPC1L1.

Hyperlipidaemia and cardioprotection: Animal models for translational studies

Hyperlipidaemia is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and therefore, many animal model have been developed to mimic the human abnormal elevation of blood lipid levels. In parallel, extensive research for the alleviation of ischaemia/reperfusion injury has revealed that hyperlipidaemia is a major co-morbidity that attenuates the cardioprotective effect of conditioning strategies (preconditioning, postconditioning and remote conditioning) and that of pharmacological interventions by interfering with cardioprotective signalling pathways. In the present review article, we summarize the existing data on animal models of hypercholesterolaemia (total, low density and HDL abnormalities) and hypertriglyceridaemia used in ischaemia/reperfusion injury and protection from it. We also provide recommendations on preclinical animal models to be used for translations of the cardioprotective strategies into clinical practice. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications in cardioprotection. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.23/issuetoc.

Hypertriglyceridemia and Atherosclerosis: Using Human Research to Guide Mechanistic Studies in Animal Models

Human studies support a strong association between hypertriglyceridemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, whether a causal relationship exists between hypertriglyceridemia and increased CVD risk is still unclear. One plausible explanation for the difficulty establishing a clear causal role for hypertriglyceridemia in CVD risk is that lipolysis products of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), rather than the TRLs themselves, are the likely mediators of increased CVD risk. This hypothesis is supported by studies of rare mutations in humans resulting in impaired clearance of such lipolysis products (remnant lipoprotein particles; RLPs). Several animal models of hypertriglyceridemia support this hypothesis and have provided additional mechanistic understanding. Mice deficient in lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the major vascular enzyme responsible for TRL lipolysis and generation of RLPs, or its endothelial anchor GPIHBP1, are severely hypertriglyceridemic but develop only minimal atherosclerosis as compared with animal models deficient in apolipoprotein (APO) E, which is required to clear TRLs and RLPs. Likewise, animal models convincingly show that increased clearance of TRLs and RLPs by LPL activation (achieved by inhibition of APOC3, ANGPTL3, or ANGPTL4 action, or increased APOA5) results in protection from atherosclerosis. Mechanistic studies suggest that RLPs are more atherogenic than large TRLs because they more readily enter the artery wall, and because they are enriched in cholesterol relative to triglycerides, which promotes pro-atherogenic effects in lesional cells. Other mechanistic studies show that hepatic receptors (LDLR and LRP1) and APOE are critical for RLP clearance. Thus, studies in animal models have provided additional mechanistic insight and generally agree with the hypothesis that RLPs derived from TRLs are highly atherogenic whereas hypertriglyceridemia due to accumulation of very large TRLs in plasma is not markedly atherogenic in the absence of TRL lipolysis products.