Potent β-Lactam Enhancer Activity of Zidebactam and WCK 5153 against Acinetobacter baumannii, Including Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates

Efflux pump-mediated resistance to new beta lactam antibiotics in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria

The emergence and spread of bacteria resistant to commonly used antibiotics poses a critical threat to modern medical practice. Multiple classes of bacterial efflux pump systems play various roles in antibiotic resistance, and members of the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) transporter superfamily are among the most important determinants of efflux-mediated resistance in gram-negative bacteria. RND pumps demonstrate broad substrate specificities, facilitating extrusion of multiple chemical classes of antibiotics from the bacterial cell. Several newer beta-lactams and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL/BLI) have been developed to treat infections caused by multidrug resistant bacteria. Here we review recent studies that suggest RND efflux pumps in clinically relevant gram-negative bacteria may play critical but underappreciated roles in the development of resistance to beta-lactams and novel BL/BLI combinations. Improved understanding of the genetic and structural basis of RND efflux pump-mediated resistance may identify new antibiotic targets as well as strategies to minimize the emergence of resistance.

New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat that requires urgent attention to slow the spread of resistant pathogens. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has emphasized clinician-driven antimicrobial stewardship approaches including the reporting and proper documentation of antimicrobial usage and resistance. Additional efforts have targeted the development of new antimicrobial agents, but narrow profit margins have hindered manufacturers from investing in novel antimicrobials for clinical use and therefore the production of new antibiotics has decreased. In order to combat this, both antimicrobial drug discovery processes and healthcare reimbursement programs must be improved. Without action, this poses a high probability to culminate in a deadly post-antibiotic era. This review will highlight some of the global health challenges faced both today and in the future. Furthermore, the new Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for resistant Gram-negative pathogens will be discussed. This includes new antimicrobial agents which have gained or are likely to gain FDA approval. Emphasis will be placed on which human pathogens each of these agents cover, as well as how these new agents could be utilized in clinical practice.

Current and novel therapies for management of Acinetobacter baumannii-associated pneumonia

Acinetobacter baumannii is a common pathogen associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia showing increased resistance to carbapenem and colistin antibiotics nowadays. Infections with A. baumannii cause high patient fatalities due to their capability to evade current antimicrobial therapies, emphasizing the urgency of developing viable therapeutics to treat A. baumannii-associated pneumonia. In this review, we explore current and novel therapeutic options for overcoming therapeutic failure when dealing with A. baumannii-associated pneumonia. Among them, antibiotic combination therapy administering several drugs simultaneously or alternately, is one promising approach for optimizing therapeutic success. However, it has been associated with inconsistent and inconclusive therapeutic outcomes across different studies. Therefore, it is critical to undertake additional clinical trials to ascertain the clinical effectiveness of different antibiotic combinations. We also discuss the prospective roles of novel antimicrobial therapies including antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophage-based therapy, repurposed drugs, naturally-occurring compounds, nanoparticle-based therapy, anti-virulence strategies, immunotherapy, photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy, for utilizing them as additional alternative therapy while tackling A. baumannii-associated pneumonia. Importantly, these innovative therapies further require pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation for safety, stability, immunogenicity, toxicity, and tolerability before they can be clinically approved as an alternative rescue therapy for A. baumannii-associated pulmonary infections.

Antibacterial agents active against Gram Negative Bacilli in phase I, II, or III clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to modern healthcare, and it is often regarded that the antibiotic pipeline is 'dry.'

AREAS COVERED

Antimicrobial agents active against Gram negative bacilli in Phase I, II, or III clinical trials were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Nearly 50 antimicrobial agents (28 small molecules and 21 non-traditional antimicrobial agents) active against Gram-negative bacilli are currently in clinical trials. These have the potential to provide substantial improvements to the antimicrobial armamentarium, although it is known that 'leakage' from the pipeline occurs due to findings of toxicity during clinical trials. Significantly, a lack of funding for large phase III clinical trials is likely to prevent trials occurring for the indications most relevant to loss of life attributed to antimicrobial resistance such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. Non-traditional antimicrobial agents face issues in clinical development such as a lack of readily available and reliable susceptibility tests, and the potential need for superiority trials rather than non-inferiority trials. Most importantly, concrete plans must be made during clinical development for access of new antimicrobial agents to areas of the world where resistance to Gram negative bacilli is most frequent.

Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022

The need for new antibacterial drugs to treat the increasing global prevalence of drug-resistant bacterial infections has clearly attracted global attention, with a range of existing and upcoming funding, policy, and legislative initiatives designed to revive antibacterial R&D. It is essential to assess whether these programs are having any real-world impact and this review continues our systematic analyses that began in 2011. Direct-acting antibacterials (47), non-traditional small molecule antibacterials (5), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (10) under clinical development as of December 2022 are described, as are the three antibacterial drugs launched since 2020. Encouragingly, the increased number of early-stage clinical candidates observed in the 2019 review increased in 2022, although the number of first-time drug approvals from 2020 to 2022 was disappointingly low. It will be critical to monitor how many Phase-I and -II candidates move into Phase-III and beyond in the next few years. There was also an enhanced presence of novel antibacterial pharmacophores in early-stage trials, and at least 18 of the 26 phase-I candidates were targeted to treat Gram-negative bacteria infections. Despite the promising early-stage antibacterial pipeline, it is essential to maintain funding for antibacterial R&D and to ensure that plans to address late-stage pipeline issues succeed.

Synthesis of Novel Ciprofloxacin-Avibactam Conjugates for the Development of Second-Generation Non-β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitors

To overcome the antibiotic resistance challenge, we synthesized a novel class of conjugates based on ciprofloxacin and avibactam, covalently linked by diverse amino acids. In vitro studies of these conjugates have shown improved antibacterial efficacy of avibactam when used alone against some ESKAPE pathogens, i.e., S. aureus, E. coli, and A. baumannii. Further, ceftazidime was screened in combination with all conjugates and found to be less synergistically effective than avibactam-ceftazidime co-dosing against K. pneumoniae and E. coli bacterial strains. Subsequently, the top-ranked active conjugates were investigated against the commercially available β-lactamase-II (Penicillinase from Bacillus cereus) through in vitro studies. These studies elucidated two conjugates i.e, 9 (IC₅₀ = 1.69 ± 0.35 nM) and 24b (IC₅₀ = 57.37 ± 5.39 nM), which have higher inhibition profile than avibactam (IC₅₀ = 141.08 ± 12.20 nM). These outcomes allude to avibactam integration with ciprofloxacin is a novel and fruitful approach to discovering clinically valuable next-generation non-β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors.

Zidebactam restores sulbactam susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates

Carbapenems are commonly used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Unfortunately, carbapenem resistance is increasingly reported in many gram-negative bacteria, especially Acinetobacter baumannii. Diazabicyclooctane (DBO) β-lactamase inhibitors, such as avibactam (AVI), when combined with sulbactam successfully restore sulbactam susceptibility against certain carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) isolates. In the present study, we tested zidebactam, a novel DBO with an additional mechanism of action, in combination with sulbactam against CRAB isolates, including strains that exhibited resistance against sulbactam/avibactam combination. A panel of 43 geographically and genetically distinct CRAB isolates recovered from different hospitals and containing different mechanisms of resistance were included in the present study. We also tested three reference strains (AB0057, AB5075, and AYE). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for sulbactam (range 0.12-512 mg/l) and sulbactam plus 4 mg/l zidebactam were performed using microdilution according to CLSI Standards. A decrease ≥2 dilutions in sulbactam MICs was observed in 84% of the isolates when tested in combination with zidebactam. The sulbactam/zidebactam combination was able to restore sulbactam susceptibility in 91% of the isolates, including isolates that were resistant to sulbactam/avibactam combination. These data encouraged us to further explore sulbactam/zidebactam in other experimental models especially against CRAB isolates resistant to other DBOs.

Molecular Characterization of WCK 5222 (Cefepime/Zidebactam)-Resistant Mutants Developed from a Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate

WCK 5222 (cefepime/zidebactam) is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that is effective against a broad range of highly drug-resistant bacterial pathogens, including those producing metallo-β-lactamase. In this study, we isolated a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strain that is resistant to a variety of β-lactam antibiotics and the ceftazidime-avibactam combination. A metallo-β-lactamase gene blaDIM-2 was identified on a self-transmissible megaplasmid in the strain, which confers the resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, leaving WCK 5222 potentially one of the last treatment resorts. In vitro passaging assay combined with whole-genome sequencing revealed mutations in the pbpA gene (encoding the zidebactam target protein PBP2) in the evolved resistant mutants. Among the mutations, a V516M mutation increased the bacterial virulence in a murine acute pneumonia model. Reconstitution of the mutations in the reference strain PAO1 verified their roles in the resistance to zidebactam and revealed their influences on cell morphology in the absence and presence of zidebactam. Microscale thermophoresis (MST) assays demonstrated that the mutations reduced the affinity between PBP2 and zidebactam to various extents. Overall, our results revealed that mutations in the pbpA gene might be a major cause of evolved resistance to WCK 5222 in clinical settings. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic resistance imposes a severe threat on human health. WCK 5222 is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that is composed of cefepime and zidebactam. It is one of the few antibiotics in clinical trials that are effective against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including those producing metallo-β-lactamases. Understanding the mechanisms and development of bacterial resistance to WCK 5222 may provide clues for the development of strategies to suppress resistant evolvement. In this study, we performed an in vitro passaging assay by using a multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolate. Our results revealed that mutations in the zidebactam target protein PBP2 play a major role in the bacterial resistance to WCK 5222. We further demonstrated that the mutations reduced the affinities between PBP2 and zidebactam and resulted in functional resistance of PBP2 to zidebactam.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objectives

Ertapenem has proven to be an effective antimicrobial; however, increasing enzyme-mediated resistance has been noted. Combination with zidebactam, a β-lactam enhancer, is restorative. Human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of ertapenem and zidebactam alone and in combination (WCK 6777; 2 g/2 g q24h) were assessed for efficacy against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) in the pneumonia model.

Methods

Infected ICR mice were rendered neutropenic and exposed to various doses of ertapenem and zidebactam alone and in combination to develop the HSRs that were subsequently confirmed in additional pharmacokinetic studies. Twenty-one CP-KP (KPC or OXA-48-like producers) with WCK 6777 MICs of 1–8 mg/L were utilized. Mice were treated for 24 h with saline or HSRs of ertapenem, zidebactam and WCK 6777. Efficacy was defined as change in mean lung bacterial density relative to 0 h.

Results

Confirmatory pharmacokinetic analysis showed agreement between predicted human exposures (%fT_>MIC) and those achieved in vivo for all three HSRs. The 0 h bacterial density across all isolates was 6.69 ± 0.31 log₁₀ cfu/lungs. At 24 h, densities increased by 2.57 ± 0.50, 2.2 ± 0.60 and 2.05 ± 0.71 log₁₀ cfu/lungs in the 24 h control, ertapenem HSR and zidebactam HSR groups, respectively. Overall, 18/21 of the isolates exposed to the WCK 6777 HSR displayed a killing profile that exceeded the translational benchmark for efficacy of a 1 log₁₀ cfu reduction. Among the remaining three isolates, two displayed ∼0.5 log₁₀ kill and stasis was observed in the third.

Conclusions

Human-simulated exposures of WCK 6777 demonstrated potent in vivo activity against CP-KP, including those with WCK 6777 MICs up to 8 mg/L.

Structural analysis of the boronic acid β-lactamase inhibitor vaborbactam binding to Pseudomonas aeruginosa penicillin-binding protein 3

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mediated by β-lactamases is the major and leading cause of resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins among Gram-negative bacteria. β-Lactamases, periplasmic enzymes that are widely distributed in the bacterial world, protect penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), the major cell wall synthesizing enzymes, from inactivation by β-lactam antibiotics. Developing novel PBP inhibitors with a non-β-lactam scaffold could potentially evade this resistance mechanism. Based on the structural similarities between the evolutionary related serine β-lactamases and PBPs, we investigated whether the potent β-lactamase inhibitor, vaborbactam, could also form an acyl-enzyme complex with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PBP3. We found that this cyclic boronate, vaborbactam, inhibited PBP3 (IC50 of 262 μM), and its binding to PBP3 increased the protein thermal stability by about 2°C. Crystallographic analysis of the PBP3:vaborbactam complex reveals that vaborbactam forms a covalent bond with the catalytic S294. The amide moiety of vaborbactam hydrogen bonds with N351 and the backbone oxygen of T487. The carboxyl group of vaborbactam hydrogen bonds with T487, S485, and S349. The thiophene ring and cyclic boronate ring of vaborbactam form hydrophobic interactions, including with V333 and Y503. The active site of the vaborbactam-bound PBP3 harbors the often observed ligand-induced formation of the aromatic wall and hydrophobic bridge, yet the residues involved in this wall and bridge display much higher temperature factors compared to PBP3 structures bound to high-affinity β-lactams. These insights could form the basis for developing more potent novel cyclic boronate-based PBP inhibitors to inhibit these targets and overcome β-lactamases-mediated resistance mechanisms.

Sulbactam Enhances in vitro Activity of β-Lactam Antibiotics Against Acinetobacter baumannii

Purpose

To evaluate in vitro activities of β-lactam antibiotics alone and in combination with sulbactam at different ratios against Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains from China.

Methods

A total of 300 clinical isolates of A. baumannii were collected from 29 hospitals across China in 2018. Susceptibility to common antibiotics was assessed, and β-lactamase genes were detected. In vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone and imipenem was tested alone and in combination with sulbactam at the ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:2.5 and 1:3.

Results

High resistant rates for common antibiotics were observed except tigecycline and polymyxin B. Among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, 97.3% isolates harbored bla_OXA-23. MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values for sulbactam were 32 mg/L and 64 mg/L, respectively. High resistant rates for ampicillin, cefoperazone and imipenem were observed (92.3%, 93% and 85.3%, respectively). A stepwise increase in the ratio of sulbactam to partner β-lactam antibiotics led to a stepwise decrease in the MICs and a stepwise increase in the susceptible rates. The susceptible rates for imipenem-sulbactam 1:3, ampicillin-sulbactam 1:3 and cefoperazone-sulbactam 1:3 reached 16.3%, 58.3% and 91%, respectively.

Conclusion

The increasing proportion of sulbactam could enhance antimicrobial activities of imipenem-sulbactam, ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against A. baumannii clinical strains in China, with cefoperazone-sulbactam as the most potent compound.

In vitro evolution of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: dynamics, mechanisms, fitness trade-off and impact on in vivo efficacy

OBJECTIVES

To study the dynamics, mechanisms and fitness cost of resistance selection to cefepime, zidebactam and cefepime/zidebactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

WT P. aeruginosa PAO1 and its ΔmutS derivative (PAOMS) were exposed to stepwise increasing concentrations of cefepime, zidebactam and cefepime/zidebactam. Selected mutants were characterized for change in susceptibility profiles, acquired mutations, fitness, virulence and in vivo susceptibility to cefepime/zidebactam. Mutations were identified through WGS. In vitro fitness was assessed by measuring growth in minimal medium and human serum-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth. Virulence was determined in Caenorhabditis elegans and neutropenic mice lung infection models. In vivo susceptibility to a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of cefepime/zidebactam was studied in neutropenic mice lung infection.

RESULTS

Resistance development was lower for the cefepime/zidebactam combination than for the individual components and high-level resistance was only achieved for PAOMS. Cefepime resistance development was associated with mutations leading to the hyperexpression of AmpC or MexXY-OprM, combined with PBP3 mutations and/or large chromosomal deletions involving galU. Zidebactam resistance was mainly associated with mutations in PBP2. On the other hand, resistance to cefepime/zidebactam required multiple mutations in genes encoding MexAB-OprM and its regulators, as well as PBP2 and PBP3. Cumulatively, these mutations inflicted significant fitness cost and cefepime/zidebactam-resistant mutants (MIC = 16-64 mg/L) remained susceptible in vivo to the HSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of cefepime/zidebactam resistance in P. aeruginosa required multiple simultaneous mutations that were associated with a significant impairment of fitness and virulence.

An update on cefepime and its future role in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors for MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Cefepime, a wide-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, has been in use for the treatment of serious bacterial infections for almost 25 years. Since its clinical development, there has been a dramatic shift in its dosing, with 2 g every 8 hours being preferred for serious infections to optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations. The advent of ESBLs has become a threat to its ongoing use, although future coadministration with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) under development is an area of intense study. There are currently four new cefepime/BLI combinations in clinical development. Cefepime/zidebactam is generally active against MBL-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in vitro and in animal studies, and cefepime/taniborbactam has activity against KPC and OXA-48 producers. Cefepime/enmetazobactam and cefepime/tazobactam are potential carbapenem-sparing agents with activity against ESBLs. Cefepime/enmetazobactam has completed Phase III and cefepime/taniborbactam is in Phase III clinical studies, where they are being tested against carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. While these combinations are promising, their role in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections can only be determined with further clinical studies.

Effective inhibition of PBPs by cefepime and zidebactam in the presence of VIM-1 drives potent bactericidal activity against MBL-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

The combination of cefepime and the novel β-lactam enhancer zidebactam (WCK 5222) is under development for the treatment of difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections. Against MBL-producing pathogens, cefepime and zidebactam induce cell elongation and spheroplast formation, indicating PBP3 and PBP2 dysfunction, respectively, having a potent bactericidal effect as a combination. The objective of the present study was to determine the mechanistic basis of the bactericidal effect of cefepime/zidebactam on MBL-expressing pathogens.

METHODS

Pseudomonal PBP-binding affinities of cefepime, zidebactam and imipenem were assessed at different timepoints and also in the presence of purified VIM-1 using a Bocillin FL competition assay. The antibacterial activity of cefepime/zidebactam against three VIM-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was assessed by time-kill and neutropenic mouse lung/thigh infection studies.

RESULTS

Amidst cefepime-hydrolysing concentrations of VIM-1, substantial cefepime binding to target PBPs was observed. High-affinity binding of zidebactam to PBP2 remained unaltered in the presence of VIM-1; however, MBL addition significantly affected imipenem PBP2 binding. Furthermore, the rate of cefepime binding to the primary target PBP3 was found to be higher compared with the imipenem PBP2 binding rate. Finally, complementary PBP inhibition by cefepime/zidebactam resulted in enhanced bactericidal activity in time-kill and neutropenic mouse lung/thigh infection studies against VIM-6-, VIM-10- and VIM-11-expressing P. aeruginosa, thus revealing the mechanistic basis of β-lactam enhancer action.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time ever (to the best of our knowledge), this study demonstrates that in the presence of VIM-1 MBL, β-lactamase-labile cefepime and β-lactamase-stable zidebactam produce effective inhibition of respective target PBPs. For cefepime, this seems to be a result of a faster rate of PBP binding, which helps it overcome β-lactamase-mediated hydrolysis.

Comparative in vivo activity of human-simulated plasma and epithelial lining fluid exposures of WCK 5222 (cefepime/zidebactam) against KPC- and OXA-48-like-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model

OBJECTIVES

This was a comparative assessment of WCK 5222 (cefepime/zidebactam 2/1 g as a 1 h infusion every 8 h) efficacy using human-simulated plasma and ELF exposures against serine-carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model.

METHODS

Ten clinical isolates were utilized: eight were serine-carbapenemase-producing (KPC, n = 4; OXA-48-like, n = 4) Enterobacterales with WCK 5222 MICs (1:1) ranging from 1 to 4 mg/L; and two were previously studied MDR isolates serving as quality controls. Lungs of mice were inoculated with 50 μL of 107 cfu/mL. Treatment mice received human-simulated regimens of cefepime, zidebactam or WCK 5222 derived from plasma or epithelial lining fluid (ELF) profiles obtained from healthy subjects. Lung bacterial densities resulting from the humanized exposures in plasma and ELF were compared.

RESULTS

Initial lung bacterial densities ranged from 6.06 to 6.87 log10 cfu/lungs, with a mean bacterial burden increase to 9.06 ± 0.42 after 24 h. Human-simulated plasma and ELF exposures of cefepime and zidebactam monotherapy had no activity. Human-simulated WCK 5222 plasma exposures resulted in a >1 log10 cfu/lungs reduction in bacterial burden for all isolates. Humanized WCK 5222 ELF exposures achieved a >1 log10 cfu/lungs reduction for all isolates. While statistically significant differences in bacterial burden reduction were observed between the plasma and ELF exposures for WCK 5222 in 5/8 isolates, all treatments achieved the translational kill target of a >1 log10 cfu reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically achievable WCK 5222 plasma and ELF exposures produced in vivo killing of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model that is predictive of efficacy in humans.

Activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against 'problem' antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria sent to a national reference laboratory

BACKGROUND

Triple-action diazabicyclooctanes, e.g. zidebactam, combine β-lactamase inhibition, antibacterial activity, and 'enhancement' of PBP3-targeted β-lactams.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the activity of cefepime/zidebactam against consecutive 'problem' Gram-negative bacteria referred to the UK national reference laboratory.

METHODS

MICs were determined by BSAC agar dilution for 1632 Enterobacterales, 745 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 450 other non-fermenters, categorized by carbapenemase detection and interpretive reading.

RESULTS

Universal susceptibility to cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L was seen for otherwise multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales with AmpC, extended-spectrum, K1, KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases, or with impermeability and 'unassigned' mechanisms. Unlike ceftazidime/avibactam and all other comparators, cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L also inhibited most (190/210, 90.5%) Enterobacterales with MBLs. Resistance in the remaining minority of MBL producers, and in 13/24 with both NDM MBLs and OXA-48-like enzymes, was associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae ST14. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MICs of cefepime/zidebactam rose with efflux grade, but exceeded 8 + 8 mg/L for only 11/85 isolates even in the highly-raised efflux group. Among 103 P. aeruginosa with ESBLs or MBLs, 97 (94.5%) were inhibited by cefepime/zidebactam 8 + 8 mg/L whereas fewer than 15% were susceptible to any comparator. MICs for Acinetobacter baumannii with acquired OXA carbapenemases clustered around 8 + 8 to 32 + 32 mg/L, with higher values for MBL producers. A strong enhancer effect augmented activity against many isolates that were highly resistant to cefepime and zidebactam alone and which had mechanisms not inhibited by zidebactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming successful clinical trials, cefepime/zidebactam has scope to widely overcome critical resistances in both Enterobacterales and non-fermenters.

A plethora of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: no end to a long insidious genetic journey

Acinetobacter baumannii, notorious for causing nosocomial infections especially in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and burn units, is best at displaying resistance to all existing antibiotic classes. Consequences of high potential for antibiotic resistance has resulted in extensive drug or even pan drug resistant A. baumannii. Carbapenems, mainly imipenem and meropenem, the last resort for the treatment of A. baumannii infections have fallen short due to the emergence of carbapenem resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). Though enzymatic degradation by production of class D β-lactamases (Oxacillinases) and class B β-lactamases (Metallo β-lactamases) is the core mechanism of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii; however over-expression of efflux pumps such as resistance-nodulation cell division (RND) family and variant form of porin proteins such as CarO have been implicated for CRAB inception. Transduction and outer membrane vesicles-mediated transfer play a role in carbapenemase determinants spread. Colistin, considered as the most promising antibacterial agent, nevertheless faces adverse effects flaws. Cefiderocol, eravacycline, new β-lactam antibiotics, non-β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors, polymyxin B-derived molecules and bacteriophages are some other new treatment options streamlined.

Present and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Options for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are included in the list of the most threatening antibiotic resistance microorganisms, being responsible for often insurmountable therapeutic issues, especially in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. The enzymatic resistance to carbapenems is encoded by different β-lactamases belonging to A, B or D Ambler class. Besides compromising the activity of last-resort antibiotics, CRE have spread from the clinical to the environmental sectors, in all geographic regions. The purpose of this review is to present present and future perspectives on CRE-associated infections treatment.

In vitro activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against recent Gram-negative isolates collected from high resistance settings of Greek hospitals

Cefepime/zidebactam is in clinical development for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. MICs of cefepime/zidebactam (1:1) and comparators against Enterobacterales (n = 563), Pseudomonas (n = 172) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n =181) collected from 15 Greek hospitals (2014-2018) were determined by reference broth microdilution method. The isolates exhibited high carbapenem resistance rates [(Enterobacterales (75%), Pseudomonas (75%) and A. baumannii (98.3%)]. Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC_50/90 of 0.5/2 mg/L, against Enterobacterales including metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producers. Reduced susceptibility rates to tigecycline (16.8%), colistin (47.4%), ceftazidime/avibactam (59.8%), and imipenem/relebactam (61%) indicated high prevalence of multi-drug resistance among Greek Enterobacterales. Cefepime/zidebactam exhibited MIC_50/90 of 8/16 mg/L against Pseudomonas including MBL-producers. The MIC_50/90 of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam were high (≥32 mg/L). Cefepime/zidebactam showed MIC₉₀ of 64 mg/L against A. baumannii which is within its therapeutic scope. Other antibiotics including colistin showed limited activity against A. baumannii. The activity of cefepime/zidebactam against multi-drug-resistant isolates is attributable to zidebactam mediated novel β-lactam-enhancer mechanism.

First Penicillin-Binding Protein Occupancy Patterns for 15 β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus

Mycobacterium abscessus causes serious infections that often require over 18 months of antibiotic combination therapy. There is no standard regimen for the treatment of M. abscessus infections, and the multitude of combinations that have been used clinically have had low success rates and high rates of toxicities. With β-lactam antibiotics being safe, double β-lactam and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are of interest for improving the treatment of M. abscessus infections and minimizing toxicity. However, a mechanistic approach for building these combinations is lacking since little is known about which penicillin-binding protein (PBP) target receptors are inactivated by different β-lactams in M. abscessus We determined the preferred PBP targets of 13 β-lactams and 2 β-lactamase inhibitors in two M. abscessus strains and identified PBP sequences by proteomics. The Bocillin FL binding assay was used to determine the β-lactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited Bocillin binding (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC₅₀s]). Principal component analysis identified four clusters of PBP occupancy patterns. Carbapenems inactivated all PBPs at low concentrations (0.016 to 0.5 mg/liter) (cluster 1). Cephalosporins (cluster 2) inactivated PonA2, PonA1, and PbpA at low (0.031 to 1 mg/liter) (ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) or intermediate (0.35 to 16 mg/liter) (ceftazidime and cefoxitin) concentrations. Sulbactam, aztreonam, carumonam, mecillinam, and avibactam (cluster 3) inactivated the same PBPs as cephalosporins but required higher concentrations. Other penicillins (cluster 4) specifically targeted PbpA at 2 to 16 mg/liter. Carbapenems, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime were the most promising β-lactams since they inactivated most or all PBPs at clinically relevant concentrations. These first PBP occupancy patterns in M. abscessus provide a mechanistic foundation for selecting and optimizing safe and effective combination therapies with β-lactams.

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

Emerging Strategies to Combat β-Lactamase Producing ESKAPE Pathogens

Since the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in 1929 as a therapeutic agent against staphylococci, β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) remained the most successful antibiotic classes against the majority of bacterial strains, reaching a percentage of 65% of all medical prescriptions. Unfortunately, the emergence and diversification of β-lactamases pose indefinite health issues, limiting the clinical effectiveness of all current BLAs. One solution is to develop β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) capable of restoring the activity of β-lactam drugs. In this review, we will briefly present the older and new BLAs classes, their mechanisms of action, and an update of the BLIs capable of restoring the activity of β-lactam drugs against ESKAPE (Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.) pathogens. Subsequently, we will discuss several promising alternative approaches such as bacteriophages, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) cas technology, or vaccination developed to limit antimicrobial resistance in this endless fight against Gram-negative pathogens.

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

Activity of cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii endemic to New York City medical centres

BACKGROUND

The combination of cefepime and zidebactam (WCK5222), a novel β-lactam enhancer, has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of Gram-negative pathogens and is currently under clinical evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the activity of cefepime/zidebactam against: (i) a contemporary collection of Gram-negative isolates from New York City; (ii) a collection of carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates; and (iii) a collection of isolates with characterized resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Susceptibility tests were performed using broth microdilution for cefepime, zidebactam and cefepime/zidebactam (1:1).

RESULTS

More than 99% of a contemporary collection of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. had cefepime/zidebactam MICs ≤2 mg/L, the susceptibility breakpoint for cefepime. For K. pneumoniae, the acquisition of blaKPC resulted in increased MICs, although MICs remained ≤2 mg/L for 90% of KPC-possessing isolates. Overall for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 98% of isolates had MICs ≤8 mg/L and MICs were affected by increased expression of ampC. For carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 78% of isolates had cefepime/zidebactam MICs ≤8 mg/L. The activity of cefepime/zidebactam against Acinetobacter baumannii was lower, with 85% of all isolates and 34% of carbapenem-resistant isolates with MICs ≤8 mg/L (cefepime interpretative criteria).

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime/zidebactam demonstrated excellent activity against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, although activity was reduced in carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates. The activity against A. baumannii was reduced and studies examining the therapeutic efficacy in strains with high cefepime/zidebactam MICs are warranted.

Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions

Infections of antibiotic-resistant pathogens pose an ever-increasing threat to mankind. The investigation of novel approaches for tackling the antimicrobial resistance crisis must be part of any global response to this problem if an untimely reversion to the pre-penicillin era of medicine is to be avoided. One such promising avenue of research involves so-called antibiotic resistance breakers (ARBs), capable of re-sensitising resistant bacteria to antibiotics. Although some ARBs have previously been employed in the clinical setting, such as the β-lactam inhibitors, we posit that the broader field of ARB research can yet yield a greater diversity of more effective therapeutic agents than have been previously achieved. This review introduces the area of ARB research, summarises the current state of ARB development with emphasis on the various major classes of ARBs currently being investigated and their modes of action, and offers a perspective on the future direction of the field.

Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019

The development of new and effective antibacterial drugs to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria, especially Gram-negative (G−ve) pathogens, is acknowledged as one of the world’s most pressing health issues; however, the discovery and development of new, nontoxic antibacterials is not a straightforward scientific task, which is compounded by a challenging economic model. This review lists the antibacterials, β-lactamase/β-lactam inhibitor (BLI) combinations, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) first launched around the world since 2009 and details the seven new antibiotics and two new β-lactam/BLI combinations launched since 2016. The development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, lead source, and administration route for the 44 small molecule antibacterials, eight β-lactamase/BLI combinations, and one antibody drug conjugate (ADC) being evaluated in worldwide clinical trials at the end of October 2019 are described. Compounds discontinued from clinical development since 2016 and new antibacterial pharmacophores are also reviewed. There has been an increase in the number of early stage clinical candidates, which has been fueled by antibiotic-focused funding agencies; however, there is still a significant gap in the pipeline for the development of new antibacterials with activity against β-metallolactamases, orally administered with broad spectrum G−ve activity, and new treatments for MDR Acinetobacter and gonorrhea.

Colistin-sparing approaches with newer antimicrobials to treat carbapenem-resistant organisms: Current evidence and future prospects

Antimicrobial resistance is on the rise across the globe. Increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem resistance organisms is becoming difficult to treat, due to the limited availability of therapeutic agents. Very few agents such as colistin, fosfomycin, tigecycline and minocycline are widely used, despite its toxicity. However, with the availability of novel antimicrobials, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor-based and non-beta-lactam-based agents could be of great relief. This review covers three important aspects which include (i) current management of carbapenem-resistant infections, (ii) determination of specific types of carbapenemases produced by multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens and (iii) the currently available novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors and non-beta-lactam-based agents' laboratory findings, clinical outcome and implications.

Preserving the Dwindling β-lactams-Based Empiric Therapy Options for Gram-Negative Infections in Challenging Resistance Scenario: Lessons Learned and Way Forward

Appropriate empiric therapy reduces mortality and morbidity associated with serious Gram-negative infections. β-lactams (BLs) owing to their safety, efficacy, and coverage spectrum are the most preferred agents for empiric use. Inappropriate use of older penicillins and cephalosporins led to selection and spread of resistant clones. As a result, these valuable agents have lost their reliability compelling clinicians to often use erstwhile last-line therapies such as carbapenems. Excessive carbapenems use imposed collateral damage by selecting difficult-to-treat carbapenem-resistant organisms. Lack of empiric therapeutic options amenable for use in infections caused by contemporary pathogens was realized by the pharmaceutical industry leading to intensive efforts in discovering novel antibiotics. These efforts led to the approval of newer β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combination. This review elaborates the past trends in empirical use of BLs and ensuing patterns of resistance emergence in Gram-negatives. Furthermore, a critical appraisal of newer BL-BLIs has been presented to identify the appropriate clinical situations for their use to ensure clinical efficacy coupled with minimal resistance selection. These learning have been derived from past trends of clinical usage of older empiric therapies so that the therapeutic utility of newer agents is preserved for long in light of dwindling global antibiotics pipeline.

The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is a significant threat to global health. β-Lactams (BL) are one of the safest and most-prescribed classes of antibiotics on the market today. The acquisition of β-lactamases, especially those which hydrolyze carbapenems, is eroding the efficacy of BLs for the treatment of serious infections. During the past decade, significant advances were made in the development of novel BL-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations to target β-lactamase-mediated resistant Gram-negatives.Areas covered: The latest progress in 20 different approved, developing, and preclinical BL-BLI combinations to target serine β-lactamases produced by Gram-negatives are reviewed based on primary literature, conference abstracts (when available), and US clinical trial searches within the last 5 years. The majority of the compounds that are discussed are being evaluated as part of a BL-BLI combination.Expert opinion: The current trajectory in BLI development is promising; however, a significant challenge resides in the selection of an appropriate BL partner as well as the development of resistance linked to the BL partner. In addition, dosing regimens for these BL-BLI combinations need to be critically evaluated. A revolution in bacterial diagnostics is essential to aid clinicians in the appropriate selection of novel BL-BLI combinations for the treatment of serious infections.

β-Lactamase Inhibitors To Restore the Efficacy of Antibiotics against Superbugs

Infections caused by resistant bacteria are nowadays too common, and some pathogens have even become resistant to multiple types of antibiotics, in which case few or even no treatments are available. In recent years, the most successful strategy in anti-infective drug discovery for the treatment of such problematic infections is the combination therapy "antibiotic + inhibitor of resistance". These inhibitors allow the repurposing of antibiotics that have already proven to be safe and effective for clinical use. Three main types of compounds have been developed to block the principal bacterial resistance mechanisms: (i) β-lactamase inhibitors; (ii) outer membrane permeabilizers; (iii) efflux pump inhibitors. This Perspective is focused on β-lactamase inhibitors that disable the most prevalent cause of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., the deactivation of the most widely used antibiotics, β-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporines, carbapenems, and monobactams), by the production of β-lactamases. An overview of the most recently identified β-lactamase inhibitors and of combination therapy is provided. The article also covers the mechanism of action of the different types of β-lactamase enzymes as a basis for inhibitor design and target inactivation.

WCK 5222 (Cefepime/Zidebactam) Pharmacodynamic Target Analysis against Metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Neutropenic Mouse Pneumonia Model

WCK 5222 is a combination of cefepime and the novel β-lactam enhancer (BLE) zidebactam. Zidebactam has a dual mechanism of action involving high-affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP) 2 binding as well as inhibition of Ambler class A, and C, enzymes. In the current study, we evaluated the effect of zidebactam on the cefepime pharmacodynamic target time above MIC (T>MIC) exposure required for efficacy against a diverse group of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) secondary to MBL-production. Plasma and ELF pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed for both cefepime (6.25, 25, and 100 mg/kg) and zidebactam (3.125, 12.5, and 50 mg/kg) after subcutaneous administration to mice. Only total drug was considered as protein binding is <10%. Both drugs exhibited similar PK exposures including terminal elimination half-life (cefepime ∼0.4 h, zidebactam 0.3-0.5 h). The penetration into ELF was concentration dependent for both drugs, reaching 50% and 70% for cefepime and zidebactam, respectively. Dose ranging studies were performed in lung-infected mice with one of eight MBL-producing clinical strains. WCK 5222 was administered in Q4- and Q8-hourly regimens to vary exposures from 0-100% T>MIC. The results were modelled to evaluate the relationship between cefepime T>MIC, when zidebactam was co-administered, and therapeutic effect. The results revealed a strong association between T>MIC and effect (R² 0.82). Net stasis in organism burden occurred at cefepime T>MIC exposures of only 18%. A 1-log kill endpoint was demonstrated for the group of organisms at approximately 31% T>MIC. These target exposures for stasis and 1-log kill are much lower than previously observed cephalosporin monotherapy PK/PD targets.

What the Clinical Microbiologist Should Know About Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in the Era of Emerging Multidrug Resistance: Focusing on β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

As a class, β-lactamase inhibitors have proved successful in extending the clinical utility of β-lactam antibiotics by circumventing β-lactamase-mediated resistance. However, the rapid evolution of these β-lactamases calls for a critical reevaluation of the relationships between susceptibility, drug exposures, and bacterial response. The existing paradigm for in vitro susceptibility testing and development of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations may not optimally facilitate clinical use. Thus, alternative approaches for pairing these combinations and evaluating in vitro susceptibility are needed to provide better guidance to clinicians.

Identification of Mutations in the mrdA Gene Encoding PBP2 That Reduce Carbapenem and Diazabicyclooctane Susceptibility of Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates with Mutations in ftsI (PBP3) and Which Carry bla NDM-1

Emerging antibacterial resistance is a consequence of the continued use of our current antibacterial therapies, and it is limiting their utility, especially for infections caused by multidrug-resistant isolates. β-Lactams have enjoyed extensive clinical success, but their broad usage is linked to perhaps the most extensive and progressive example of resistance development for any antibacterial scaffold. In Gram-negative pathogens, this largely involves constant evolution of new β-lactamases able to degrade successive generations of this scaffold. In addition, more recently, alterations in the targets of these compounds, penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), are being described in clinical isolates, which often also have multiple β-lactamases. This study underscores the multifactorial nature of β-lactam resistance by uncovering alterations of PBP2 that reduce susceptibility to carbapenems in E. coli clinical isolates that also have alterations of PBP3 and express the NDM-1 β-lactamase. The changes in PBP2 also reduced susceptibility to the intrinsic antibacterial activity of some diazabicyclooctane (DBO) compounds that can target PBP2. This may have implications for the development and use of the members of this relatively newer scaffold that are inhibitors of PBP2 in addition to their inhibition of serine-β-lactamases.

Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are essential for bacterial cell wall biosynthesis, and several are clinically validated antibacterial targets of β-lactam antibiotics. We identified mutations in the mrdA gene encoding the PBP2 protein in two Escherichia colibla_NDM-1 clinical isolates that reduce susceptibility to carbapenems and to the intrinsic antibacterial activity of a diazabicyclooctane (DBO) PBP2 and β-lactamase inhibitor. These mutations coexisted with previously described mutations in ftsI (encoding PBP3) that reduce susceptibility to monobactams, penicillins, and cephalosporins. Clinical exposure to β-lactams is driving the emergence of multifactorial resistance that may impact the therapeutic usefulness of existing antibacterials and novel compounds that target PBPs.

IMPORTANCE Emerging antibacterial resistance is a consequence of the continued use of our current antibacterial therapies, and it is limiting their utility, especially for infections caused by multidrug-resistant isolates. β-Lactams have enjoyed extensive clinical success, but their broad usage is linked to perhaps the most extensive and progressive example of resistance development for any antibacterial scaffold. In Gram-negative pathogens, this largely involves constant evolution of new β-lactamases able to degrade successive generations of this scaffold. In addition, more recently, alterations in the targets of these compounds, penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), are being described in clinical isolates, which often also have multiple β-lactamases. This study underscores the multifactorial nature of β-lactam resistance by uncovering alterations of PBP2 that reduce susceptibility to carbapenems in E. coli clinical isolates that also have alterations of PBP3 and express the NDM-1 β-lactamase. The changes in PBP2 also reduced susceptibility to the intrinsic antibacterial activity of some diazabicyclooctane (DBO) compounds that can target PBP2. This may have implications for the development and use of the members of this relatively newer scaffold that are inhibitors of PBP2 in addition to their inhibition of serine-β-lactamases.

5-Carboxytetramethylrhodamine-Ampicillin Fluorescence Anisotropy-Based Assay of Escherichia coli Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Transpeptidase Inhibition

The high-molecular mass penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are the essential targets of the β-lactam classes of antibacterial drugs. In the Gram-negative pathogen Escherichia coli, these include PBP1a, PBP1b, PBP2, and PBP3. Techniques that enable facile measurement of the potency of inhibition of these targets are valuable for understanding structure-activity relationships in programs aimed at discovering new antibiotics to combat drug-resistant infections. Continuous fluorescence anisotropy-based assays for inhibition of soluble constructs of PBP1a, PBP2, and PBP3 from the serious Gram-negative bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii and PBP3 from E. coli using the fluorescent phenoxypenicillin analogue BOCILLIN FL have been described previously, but this technique was not useful for PBP2 from E. coli due to a lack of change in fluorescence anisotropy or intensity upon reaction. Here, we report that a fluorescent analogue of ampicillin, 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine-ampicillin (5-TAMRA-ampicillin), was useful as the indicator in a continuous fluorescence anisotropy-based kinetic assay for inhibition of a soluble construct of PBP2 from E. coli. The assay enables measurement of the bimolecular rate constant for inhibition k_inact /K_i. This measurement was made for representative drugs from four classes of β-lactams and for the diazabicyclooctenone ETX2514. 5-TAMRA-ampicillin was also useful in a fluorescence anisotropy-based assay for P. aeruginosa PBP2 and in fluorescence intensity-based assays with PBP1a and PBP3 from P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii and PBP3 from E. coli.

In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of β-Lactams in Combination with the Novel β-Lactam Enhancers Zidebactam and WCK 5153 against Multidrug-Resistant Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Zidebactam and WCK 5153 are novel bicyclo-acyl hydrazide (BCH) agents that have previously been shown to act as β-lactam enhancer (BLE) antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii The objectives of this work were to identify the molecular targets of these BCHs in Klebsiella pneumoniae and to investigate their potential BLE activity for cefepime and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing strains in vitro and in vivo Penicillin binding protein (PBP) binding profiles were determined by Bocillin FL assay, and 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀s) were determined using ImageQuant TL software. MICs and kill kinetics for zidebactam, WCK 5153, and cefepime or aztreonam, alone and in combination, were determined against clinical K. pneumoniae isolates producing MBLs VIM-1 or NDM-1 (plus ESBLs and class C β-lactamases) to assess the in vitro enhancer effect of BCH compounds in conjunction with β-lactams. Additionally, murine systemic and thigh infection studies were conducted to evaluate BLE effects in vivo Zidebactam and WCK 5153 showed specific, high PBP2 affinity in K. pneumoniae The MICs of BLEs were >64 μg/ml for all MBL-producing strains. Time-kill studies showed that a combination of these BLEs with either cefepime or aztreonam provided 1 to >3 log₁₀ kill against MBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains. Furthermore, the bactericidal synergy observed for these BLE-β-lactam combinations translated well into in vivo efficacy even in the absence of MBL inhibition by BLEs, a characteristic feature of the β-lactam enhancer mechanism of action. Zidebactam and WCK 5153 are potent PBP2 inhibitors and display in vitro and in vivo BLE effects against multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae clinical isolates producing MBLs.

Treatment of Infections Due to MDR Gram-Negative Bacteria

The treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections in critically ill patients presents many challenges. Since an effective treatment should be administered as soon as possible, resistance to many antimicrobial classes almost invariably reduces the probability of adequate empirical coverage, with possible unfavorable consequences. In this light, readily available patient's medical history and updated information about the local microbiological epidemiology remain critical for defining the baseline risk of MDR-GNB infections and firmly guiding empirical treatment choices, with the aim of avoiding both undertreatment and overtreatment. Rapid diagnostics and efficient laboratory workflows are also of paramount importance both for anticipating diagnosis and for rapidly narrowing the antimicrobial spectrum, with de-escalation purposes and in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii are being reported with increasing frequencies worldwide, although with important variability across regions, hospitals and even single wards. In the past few years, new treatment options, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, plazomicin, and eravacycline have become available, and others will become soon, which have provided some much-awaited resources for effectively counteracting severe infections due to these organisms. However, their optimal use should be guaranteed in the long term, for delaying as much as possible the emergence and diffusion of resistance to novel agents. Despite important progresses, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization of dosages and treatment duration in critically ill patients has still some areas of uncertainty requiring further study, that should take into account also resistance selection as a major endpoint. Treatment of severe MDR-GNB infections in critically ill patients in the near future will require an expert and complex clinical reasoning, of course taking into account the peculiar characteristics of the target population, but also the need for adequate empirical coverage and the more and more specific enzyme-level activity of novel antimicrobials with respect to the different resistance mechanisms of MDR-GNB.

The Novel β-Lactam Enhancer Zidebactam Augments the In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Activity of Cefepime in a Neutropenic Mouse Lung Acinetobacter baumannii Infection Model

WCK 5222 is a combination of cefepime and the high-affinity PBP2-binding β-lactam enhancer zidebactam. The cefepime-zidebactam combination is active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenemase-expressing Acinetobacter baumannii The mechanism of action of the combination involves concurrent multiple penicillin binding protein inhibition, leading to the enhanced bactericidal action of cefepime. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of the zidebactam-mediated enhanced in vitro bactericidal action in modulating the percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (percent fT>MIC) for cefepime required for the in vivo killing of A. baumannii Cefepime and cefepime-zidebactam MICs were comparable and ranged from 2 to 16 mg/liter for the A. baumannii strains (n = 5) employed in the study. Time-kill studies revealed the improved killing of these strains by the cefepime-zidebactam combination compared to that by the constituents alone. Employing a neutropenic mouse lung infection model, exposure-response analyses for all the A. baumannii strains showed that the cefepime fT>MIC required for 1-log₁₀ kill was 38.9%. In the presence of a noneffective dose of zidebactam, the cefepime fT>MIC requirement dropped significantly to 15.5%, but it still rendered a 1-log₁₀ kill effect. Thus, zidebactam mediated the improvement in cefepime's bactericidal effect observed in time-kill studies, manifested in vivo through the lowering of cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirement. This is a first-ever study demonstrating a β-lactam enhancer role of zidebactam that helps augment the in vivo activity of cefepime by reducing the magnitude of its pharmacodynamically relevant exposures against A. baumannii.

Activity of Cefepime-Zidebactam against Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Gram-Negative Pathogens

This study compared the activity of cefepime + zidebactam (FEP-ZID) and selected currently available antibacterial agents against a panel of multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates chosen to provide an extreme challenge for antibacterial activity. FEP–ZID had a very broad and potent in vitro spectrum of activity, and was highly active against many MDR isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Notably, it inhibited isolates producing carbapenemases of Ambler classes A, B, and D, and P. aeruginosa isolates with multiple resistance mechanisms including combinations of upregulated efflux, diminished or non-functional OprD porins, and AmpC overproduction. Its clinical role will be determined initially by the breakpoints assigned to it, comparison studies with other investigational β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and ultimately by the developing body of therapeutic outcome data.

Current trends in the treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Pneumonia is one of the most common infections worldwide. Morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs increase substantially when pneumonia is caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). The ongoing spread of antimicrobial resistance has made treating MDR-GNB pneumonia increasingly difficult. Fortunately, there have been some recent additions to our antibiotic armamentarium in the US and Europe for MDR-GNB, along with several agents that are in advanced stages of development. In this article, we review the risk factors for and current management of MDR-GNB pneumonia as well as novel agents with activity against these important and challenging pathogens.

Single-Center Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam Combination) in Subjects with Renal Impairment

WCK 5222 is a novel β-lactam-β-lactam-enhancer combination of cefepime (FEP) and zidebactam (ZID). ZID is a novel β-lactam enhancer with a dual action of binding to Gram-negative penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) and β-lactamase inhibition. WCK 5222 is being developed as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of complicated multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogen infections. We investigated the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of WCK 5222 in 48 subjects based on Cockcroft-Gault-estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR). We enrolled mild (n = 6; CLCR, 60 to <90 ml/min), moderate (n = 6; CLCR, 30 to <60 ml/min), and severe (n = 6; CLCR, <30 ml/min; not on dialysis) impairment, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) (n = 6), and matched normal controls (n = 24; CLCR, ≥90 ml/min). Healthy control subjects and mild and moderate renal impairment subjects received a single 60-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g WCK 5222 (2 g FEP/1 g ZID); severe renal impairment and HD subjects received a single 60-min i.v. infusion of 1.5 g WCK 5222 (1 g FEP plus 0.5 g ZID). Body and renal clearance decreased, and plasma half-life (t1/2) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ [h µg/ml]) increased in a graded relationship with severity of renal impairment for both FEP and ZID. Our findings suggest that dose adjustments for WCK 5222 will be required according to the degree of renal impairment. Overall, WCK 5222 (FEP-ZID) was found to be safe and well tolerated in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02942810.).

New Treatment Options against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a perilous nosocomial pathogen causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Current treatment options for CRAB are limited and suffer from pharmacokinetic limitations, such as high toxicity and low plasma levels. As a result, CRAB is declared as the top priority pathogen by the World Health Organization for the investment in new drugs. This urgent need for new therapies, in combination with faster FDA approval process, accelerated new drug development and placed several drug candidates in the pipeline. This article reviews available information about the new drugs and other therapeutic options focusing on agents in clinical or late-stage preclinical studies for the treatment of CRAB, and it evaluates their expected benefits and potential shortcomings.

In Vivo Efficacy of Humanized WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) Exposures against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the Neutropenic Thigh Model

Herein, we describe the in vivo efficacy of human-simulated WCK 5222 (cefepime-zidebactam) exposure against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Five of the six isolates examined expressed OXA-23 or OXA-24. WCK 5222, despite showing MICs of 16 to 64 mg/liter, produced remarkable in vivo activity; human-simulated exposure showed a decline in the bacterial burden for all isolates (mean reduction, -2.09 ± 1.01 log₁₀ CFU/thigh), while a lack of activity was observed with cefepime and zidebactam monotherapies.