A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults

The American Society for Microbiology collaboration with the CDC Laboratory Medicine Best Practices initiative for evidence-based laboratory medicine

SUMMARYClinical medicine has embraced the use of evidence for patient treatment decisions; however, the evaluation strategy for evidence in laboratory medicine practices has lagged. It was not until the end of the 20th century that the Institute of Medicine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Laboratory Systems (CDC DLS), focused on laboratory tests and how testing processes can be designed to benefit patient care. In collaboration with CDC DLS, the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) used an evidence review method developed by the CDC DLS to develop a program for creating laboratory testing guidelines and practices. The CDC DLS method is called the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) initiative and uses the A-6 cycle method. Adaptations made by ASM are called Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines (EBLMPG). This review details how the ASM Systematic Review (SR) Processes were developed and executed collaboratively with CDC's DLS. The review also describes the ASM transition from LMBP to the organization's current EBLMPG, maintaining a commitment to working with agencies in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other partners to ensure that EBLMPG evidence is readily understood and consistently used.

Clostridioides difficile infection: an update

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a Gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobic bacterium emerged as a leading cause of diarrhea globally. CDI's (Clostridioides difficile infection) impact on healthcare systems is concerning due to high treatment cost and increased hospitalisation time. The incidence of CDI has been influenced by hypervirulent strains such as the 027 ribotype, responsible for significant outbreaks in North America and Europe. CDI's epidemiology has evolved, showing increased community-acquired cases alongside traditional hospital-acquired infections. Mortality rates remain high, with recurrent infections further elevating the risk. Transmission of C. difficile primarily occurs via spores, which survive in healthcare settings and play a pivotal role in transmission. Not only health workers, but also the food chain could have a significant impact on the transmission of infection, although no confirmed foodborne cases have been documented. Pathogenicity of C. difficile involves spore germination and toxin production. Toxins A and B can cause cellular damage and inflammatory responses in the host, leading to colitis. Clinical picture can range from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis with toxic megacolon, and bowel perforation. Risk factors for CDI include antibiotic exposure, advanced age, hospitalization, and use of proton pump inhibitors. Patients who experience abdominal surgery or patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are particularly susceptible due to their compromised gut microbiota. Management of CDI has evolved, with fidaxomicin emerging as a superior treatment option over vancomycin for initial and recurrent infections due to its reduction of recurrence rate. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent CDI, restoring gut eubiosis. Bezlotoxumab, a monoclonal antibody against C. difficile toxin B, has shown promise in reducing recurrence rates. Severe cases of CDI may require surgical intervention, particularly in instances of toxic megacolon or bowel perforation. In conclusion, CDI remains a significant clinical entity. Further research are needed to improve patients' outcome and reduce the burden on healthcare systems.

An ultrasensitive genosensor for detection of toxigenic and non-toxigenic Clostridioides difficile based on a conserved sequence in surface layer protein coding gene

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is the most common agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, leading to intestinal infection through the secretion of two major toxins. Not all strains of this bacterium are toxigenic, but some of them cause infection via their accessory virulence factors, such as surface layer protein (SlpA). SlpA is conserved in both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile. In the present work, an amplification-free electrochemical genosensor was designed for the detection of the slpA gene. A glassy carbon electrode coated with gold nanoparticle-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite was used as the working electrode, and its surface was modified using a simple thiolated linear oligonucleotide as the bioreceptor. Moreover, the hexaferrocenium tri[hexa(isothiocyanato) iron(III)] trihydroxonium (HxFc) complex was used as an intercalator, and its redox signal was recorded using differential pulse voltammetry. Scan rate studies indicated a quasi-reversible adsorption-controlled process for the HxFc complex. This genosensor showed high sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.2 fM, a linear response range of 0.46-1900 fM, and a satisfactory specificity toward the synthetic slpA target gene. Also, the genosensor indicated responses in the mentioned linear range toward the genome extracted from either toxigenic or non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile.

Clostridioides difficile infection: history, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, clinical manifestations, treatment, and future options

SUMMARYClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the major issues in nosocomial infections. This bacterium is constantly evolving and poses complex challenges for clinicians, often encountered in real-life scenarios. In the face of CDI, we are increasingly equipped with new therapeutic strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies and live biotherapeutic products, which need to be thoroughly understood to fully harness their benefits. Moreover, interesting options are currently under study for the future, including bacteriophages, vaccines, and antibiotic inhibitors. Surveillance and prevention strategies continue to play a pivotal role in limiting the spread of the infection. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of epidemiological aspects, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tools, and current and future prophylactic and therapeutic options for C. difficile infection.

Working with the Electronic Health Record and Laboratory Information System to Maximize Ordering and Reporting of Molecular Microbiology Results

Molecular microbiology assays have a higher cost of testing compared to traditional methods and need to be utilized appropriately. Results from these assays may also require interpretation and appropriate follow-up. Electronic tools available in the electronic health record and laboratory information system can be deployed both preanalytically and postanalytically to influence ordering behaviors and positively impact diagnostic stewardship. Next generation technologies, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, have the potential to expand upon the capabilities currently available and warrant additional study and development but also require regulation around their use in health care.

Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) can be challenging. First of all, there has been debate on which of the two reference assays, cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) or toxigenic culture (TC), should be considered the gold standard for CDI detection. Although the CCNA suffers most from suboptimal storage conditions and subsequent toxin degradation, TC is reported to falsely increase CDI detection rates as it cannot differentiate CDI patients from patients asymptomatically colonised by toxigenic C. difficile. Several rapid assays are available for CDI detection and fall into three broad categories: (1) enzyme immunoassays for glutamate dehydrogenase, (2) enzyme immunoassays or single-molecule array assays for toxins A/B and (3) nucleic acid amplification tests detecting toxin genes. All three categories have their own limitations, being suboptimal specificity and/or sensitivity or the inability to discern colonised patients from CDI patients. In light of these limitations, multi-step algorithmic testing has been advocated by international guidelines (IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID) in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. As a result, a survey performed in 2018-2019 in Europe revealed that most of all hospital sites reported using more than one test to diagnose CDI. CDI incidence rates are also influenced by sample selection criteria, as several studies have shown that if not all unformed stool samples are tested for CDI, many cases may be missed due to an absence of clinical suspicion. Since methods for diagnosing CDI remain imperfect, there has been a growing interest in alternative testing strategies like faecal microbiota biomarkers, immune modulating interleukins, cytokines and imaging methods. At the moment, these alternative methods might play an adjunctive role, but they are not suitable to replace conventional CDI testing strategies.

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile: A silent nosocomial pathogen

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) infection is still a threat to many healthcare settings worldwide. Clostridioides difficile epidemiology has changed over the last 20 years, largely due to the emergence of hypervirulent and antimicrobial-resistant C. difficile strains. The excessive use of antimicrobials, the absence of optimal antibiotic policies, and suboptimal infection control practices have fueled the development of this pressing health issue. The prudent use of antimicrobials, particularly broad-spectrum agents, and simple infection control measures, such as hand hygiene, can significantly reduce C. difficile infection rates. Moreover, the early detection of these infections and understanding their epidemiological behavior using accurate laboratory methods are the cornerstone to decreasing the incidence of C. difficile infection and preventing further spread. Although there is no consensus on the single best laboratory method for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection, the use of 2 or more techniques can improve diagnostic accuracy, and it is recommended.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection in symptomatic patients: what can we do better?

The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is challenging since this bacteria may be detected in healthy people and toxin production detection is not sensitive enough to be used alone. Thus, there is no single test with adequate sensitivity and specificity to be used in laboratory diagnosis. We evaluated the performance of tests used in the diagnosis of CDI in symptomatic patients with risk factors in hospitals in southern Brazil. Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and toxins A/B, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), GeneXpert system, and a two-step algorithm comprising GDH/TOXIN EIA performed simultaneously followed by GeneXpert for outliers were evaluated. Toxigenic strain in stool culture was considered CDI positive (gold standard). Among 400 samples tested, 54 (13.5%) were positive for CDI and 346 (86.5%) were negative. The diagnosis of the two-step algorithm and qPCR had an excellent performance with an accuracy of 94.5% and 94.2%, respectively. The Youden index showed that GeneXpert as a single test (83.5%) and the two-step algorithm (82.8%) were the most effective assays. Diagnosing CDI and non-CDI diarrhea could be successfully attained by the combination of clinical data with accuracy of laboratory tests.

Prevalence and Seasonality of Clostridiodes difficile over 12 Years at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil

Clostridioides difficile is the main pathogen responsible for antibiotic-associated diarrhea in adults. Besides its challenging diagnosis, C. difficile infection (CDI) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Commercially, there are assays with different targets and performances in sensitivity and specificity. The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate the prevalence and seasonal variability of CDI rates at a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil over 12 years and (2) determine the impact of using a two-step algorithm test in the laboratory diagnosis. Between January 2007 and May 2019, fecal samples from 2275 patients were analyzed in a cross-sectional study. Four commercial tests were adopted for the diagnosis of CDI, the immunochromatographic test for toxin A from 2007 to 2010; the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for toxins A and B from 2011 to March 2017; and the rapid enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for GDH and toxins A and B, associated with a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the toxin B gene from June 2017 to 2019. The annual prevalence was 8.7% from 2007 to March 2017, increasing between June 2017 and 2019 to 14.7% when the C. diff Quik Chek Complete + GeneXpert C. difficile (two-step algorithm) test was adopted. The number of samples (691) and percentage of CDI cases (10.5%) were higher in winter, but the difference has no statistical significance (P > 0.05). An accurate diagnosis and adequate knowledge of the local seasonality of CDI allow the effective implementation of prevention and control strategies for nosocomial CDI, in addition to effective treatment for patients.

Comparison of commercial assays and two-step approach to detect Clostridioides difficile in South Africa

Background

Clostridioides difficile is the number one cause of hospital-acquired diarrhoea. Accurate diagnosis of C. difficile is of utmost importance as it guides patient management and infection control practices. Studies evaluating the performance of commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) versus algorithms are lacking in resource-limited settings.

Objective

This study assessed the performance of three commercially available tests and a two-step approach for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection using toxigenic culture (TC) as the gold standard.

Methods

Two hundred and twenty-three non-duplicate loose stool samples were submitted to the National Health Laboratory Service Microbiology Laboratory at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, from October 2017 to October 2018. The samples were tested in parallel using the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and two NAATs (Xpert C. difficile and BD MAX Cdiff), and the results were compared to TC. The performance of a two-step approach consisting of the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE followed by the Xpert C. difficile was also determined.

Results

Of 223 faecal specimens tested, 37 (16.6%) were TC-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE were 54.1% and 98.9%; Xpert C. difficile, 86.4% and 96.8%; BD MAX Cdiff, 89.2% and 96.8%; and two-step approach, 89.2% and 96.2%.

Conclusion

The C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE, in a two-step approach with the Xpert C. difficile, performed similarly to the NAATs on their own and offer advantages in terms of cost and workflow in low-resource settings.

Detection of Newly Secreted Antibodies Predicts Non-recurrence in Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection

Background: Within eight weeks of primary Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as many as 30% of patients develop recurrent disease with the associated risks of multiple relapses, morbidity, and economic burden. There are no clear clinical correlates or validated biomarkers that can predict recurrence during primary infection. This study demonstrates the potential of a simple test for identifying hospitalized CDI patients at low risk for disease recurrence. Methods: Forty-six hospitalized CDI patients were enrolled at Emory University Hospitals. Serum and a novel matrix from circulating plasmablasts called "Medium Enriched for Newly Synthesized Antibodies" (MENSA) samples were collected during weeks 1, 2, and 4. Antibodies specific for ten C. difficile antigens were measured in each sample Results: Among the 46 C. difficile-infected patients, nine (19.5%) experienced recurrence within eight weeks of primary infection. Among the 37 non-recurrent patients, 23 (62%; 23/37) had anti-C. difficile MENSA antibodies specific for any of the three toxin antigens: TcdB-CROP, TcdBvir-CROP, and/or CDTb. Positive MENSA responses occurred early (within the first 12 days post-symptom onset), including six patients who never seroconverted. A similar trend was observed in serum responses, but they peaked later and identified fewer patients (51%; 19/37). In contrast, none (0%; 0/9) of the patients who subsequently recurred after hospitalization produced antibodies specific for any of the three C. difficile toxin antigens. Thus, patients with a negative early MENSA response against all three C. difficile toxin antigens had a 19-fold greater relative risk of recurrence. Discussion: MENSA and serum levels of IgA and/or IgG antibodies for three C. difficile toxins have prognostic potential. These immunoassays measure nascent immune responses that reduce the likelihood of recurrence thereby providing a biomarker of protection from recurrent CDI. Patients who are positive by this immunoassay are unlikely to suffer recurrence. Early identification of patients at-risk for recurrence by negative MENSA creates opportunities for targeted prophylactic strategies that can reduce the incidence, cost and morbidity due to recurrent CDI.

A cost of illness comparison for toxigenic Clostridioides difficile diagnosis algorithms in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Availability of several commercial tests with different Clostridioides difficile targets contributes to uncertainty and controversies around the optimal diagnostic algorithm. While numerous studies have estimated the financial impact of C. difficile infection, models to guide testing strategies decisions in developing countries, where economic value significantly impacts clinical practice, are currently not available.

AIM

To determine the cost of illness of different C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnostic strategies in developing countries.

METHODS

Cost-comparison analysis was performed to compare eleven different algorithms of CDI diagnosis. The basis of calculation was a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adult inpatients suspected of CDI. We analyzed turnaround time of test results (i.e., time from taking sample to results emission), test performance (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) and testing costs. Patients were divided in true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative in order to integrate test performance and economics effects. Additional medical costs were calculated: costs of hygiene, medication, length of stay and intensive care unit costs, based on a Brazilian University Hospital costs. CDI prevalence was considered 22.64%.

FINDINGS

From laboratory-assisted tests, simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) presented the lowest cost of illness (450,038.70 USD), whereas standalone NAAT had the highest (523,709.55 USD). Empirical diagnosis only presented the highest overall cost (809,605.44 USD).

CONCLUSION

The two-step algorithm with simultaneous GDH and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by NAAT seems to be the best strategy for CDI diagnosis in developing countries.

Novel immunoassay for diagnosis of ongoing Clostridioides difficile infections using serum and medium enriched for newly synthesized antibodies (MENSA)

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) have been a challenging and increasingly serious concern in recent years. While early and accurate diagnosis is crucial, available assays have frustrating limitations.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a simple, blood-based immunoassay to accurately diagnose patients suffering from active CDI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Uninfected controls (N = 95) and CDI patients (N = 167) were recruited from Atlanta area hospitals. Blood samples were collected from patients within twelve days of a positive CDI test and processed to yield serum and PBMCs cultured to yield medium enriched for newly synthesized antibodies (MENSA). Multiplex immunoassays measured Ig responses to ten recombinant C. difficile antigens.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of CDI patients produced measurable responses to C. difficile antigens in their serum or MENSA within twelve days of a positive CDI test. Fifty-two of the 167 CDI patients (31%) were detectable in both serum and MENSA, but 32/167 (19%) were detectable only in MENSA, and 27/167 (16%) were detectable only in serum.

DISCUSSION

We describe the results of a multiplex immunoassay for the diagnosis of ongoing CDI in hospitalized patients. Our assay resolved patients into four categories: MENSA-positive only, serum-positive only, MENSA- and serum-positive, and MENSA- and serum-negative. The 30% of patients who were MENSA-positive only may be accounted for by nascent antibody secretion prior to seroconversion. Conversely, the serum-positive only subset may have been more advanced in their disease course. Immunocompromise and misdiagnosis may have contributed to the 34% of CDI patients who were not identified using MENSA or serum immunoassays.

IMPORTANCE

While there was considerable overlap between patients identified through MENSA and serum, each method detected a distinctive patient group. The combined use of both MENSA and serum to detect CDI patients resulted in the greatest identification of CDI patients. Together, longitudinal analysis of MENSA and serum will provide a more accurate evaluation of successful host humoral immune responses in CDI patients.

Critical Care Management of the Patient with Clostridioides difficile

OBJECTIVES

To review published clinical evidence on management of Clostridioides difficile infection in critically ill patients.

DATA SOURCES

We obtained relevant studies from a PubMed literature review and bibliographies of reviewed articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected English-language studies addressing aspects of C. difficile infection relevant to critical care clinicians including epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, with a focus on high-quality clinical evidence.

DATA EXTRACTION

We reviewed potentially relevant studies and abstracted information on study design, methods, patient selection, and results of relevant studies. This is a synthetic (i.e., not systematic) review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

C. difficile infection is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the United States. Antibiotics are the most significant C. difficile infection risk factor, and among antibiotics, cephalosporins, clindamycin, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and piperacillin-tazobactam confer the highest risk. Age, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, and end-stage renal disease are risk factors for C. difficile infection development and mortality. C. difficile infection diagnosis is based on testing appropriately selected patients with diarrhea or on clinical suspicion for patients with ileus. Patients with fulminant disease (C. difficile infection with hypotension, shock, ileus, or megacolon) should be treated with oral vancomycin and IV metronidazole, as well as rectal vancomycin in case of ileus. Patients who do not respond to initial therapy should be considered for fecal microbiota transplant or surgery. Proper infection prevention practices decrease C. difficile infection risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong clinical evidence supports limiting antibiotics when possible to decrease C. difficile infection risk. For patients with fulminant C. difficile infection, oral vancomycin reduces mortality, and adjunctive therapies (including IV metronidazole) and interventions (including fecal microbiota transplant) may benefit select patients. Several important questions remain regarding fulminant C. difficile infection management, including which patients benefit from fecal microbiota transplant or surgery.

Multicenter Prevalence Study Comparing Molecular and Toxin Assays for Clostridioides difficile Surveillance, Switzerland

Public health authorities in the United States and Europe recommend surveillance for Clostridioides difficile infections among hospitalized patients, but differing diagnostic algorithms can hamper comparisons between institutions and countries. We compared surveillance based on detection of C. difficile by PCR or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in a nationwide C. difficile prevalence study in Switzerland. We included all routinely collected stool samples from hospitalized patients with diarrhea in 76 hospitals in Switzerland on 2 days, 1 in winter and 1 in summer, in 2015. EIA C. difficile detection rates were 6.4 cases/10,000 patient bed-days in winter and 5.7 cases/10,000 patient bed-days in summer. PCR detection rates were 11.4 cases/10,000 patient bed-days in winter and 7.1 cases/10,000 patient bed-days in summer. We found PCR used alone increased reported C. difficile prevalence rates by <80% compared with a 2-stage EIA-based algorithm.

Changes in the Association between Diagnostic Testing Method, PCR Ribotype, and Clinical Outcomes from Clostridioides difficile Infection: One Institution's Experience

BACKGROUND

In patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the relationship between clinical, microbial, and temporal/epidemiological trends relate and disease severity and adverse outcomes is incompletely understood. Here, in a follow-up to our study conducted in 2010-2013, we evaluate stool toxin levels and C. difficile PCR ribotypes. We hypothesized that elevated stool toxins and infection with ribotype 027 associate with severe disease and adverse outcomes.

METHODS

In a cohort of 565 subjects at the University of Michigan with CDI diagnosed by positive testing for toxins A/B by EIA or PCR for the tcdB gene, we quantified stool toxin levels via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay, isolated C. difficile by anaerobic culture, and performed PCR ribotyping. Severe CDI was defined by IDSA criteria, and primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, ICU admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analyses included bivariable tests and adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

199 samples were diagnosed by EIA and 447 were diagnosed by PCR. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity, but not primary outcomes. In 2016, compared to 2010-2013, ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, ribotype 027 fell from 16.5% to 9.3%, and ribotype 014-027 remained stable at 18.9%. Ribotype 014-020 associated with IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (P=.001).

CONCLUSION

Toxin positivity by EIA and CCA associated with IDSA severity, but not with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, and this may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for and clinical severity of CDI.

Clinical evaluation of a non-purified direct molecular assay for the detection of Clostridioides difficile toxin genes in stool specimens

Recently, a new rapid assay for the detection of tcdB gene of Clostridioides difficile was developed using the GENECUBE. The assay can directly detect the tcdB gene from stool samples without a purification in approximately 35 minutes with a few minutes of preparation process. We performed a prospective comparative study of the performance of the assay at eight institutions in Japan. Fresh residual stool samples (Bristol stool scale ≥5) were used and comparisons were performed with the BD MAX Cdiff assay and toxigenic cultures. For the evaluation of 383 stool samples compared with the BD MAX Cdiff assay, the sensitivity, and specificity of the two assays was 99.0% (379/383), 98.1% (52/53), 99.1% (327/330), respectively. In the comparison with toxigenic culture, the total, sensitivity, and specificity were 96.6% (370/383), 85.0% (51/60), and 98.8% (319/323), respectively. The current investigation indicated the GENECUBE Clostridioides difficile assay has equivalent performance with the BD MAX Cdiff assay for the detection of tcdB gene of C. difficile.

Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. CDI diagnosis involves laboratory testing in conjunction with clinical assessment. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of various C. difficile tests and to compare clinical characteristics, Xpert C. difficile/Epi (PCR) cycle threshold (C_T ), and Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) concentrations between groups with discordant test results. Unformed stool specimens from 200 hospitalized adults (100 PCR positive and 100 negative) were tested by cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Quik Chek), Premier Toxins A and B, and Clarity. Clinical data, including CDI severity and CDI risk factors, were compared between discordant test results. Compared to CCNA, PCR had the highest sensitivity at 100% and Quik Chek had the highest specificity at 100%. Among clinical and laboratory data studied, prevalences of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and hospitalizations were consistently higher across all subgroups in comparisons of toxin-positive to toxin-negative patients. Among PCR-positive samples, the median C_T was lower in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples; however, C_T ranges overlapped. Among Clarity-positive samples, the quantitative toxin concentration was significantly higher in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples as determined by CCNA and Quik Chek Toxin A and B. Laboratory tests for CDI vary in sensitivity and specificity. The quantitative toxin concentration may offer value in guiding CDI diagnosis and treatment. The presence of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and previous hospitalizations may assist with CDI diagnosis, while other clinical parameters may not be consistently reliable.

The Role of Diagnostic Stewardship in Clostridioides difficile Testing: Challenges and Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accurate and timely diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is imperative to prevent C. difficile transmission and reduce morbidity and mortality due to CDI, but CDI laboratory diagnostics are complex. The purpose of this article is to review the role of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of CDI, and the role of diagnostic stewardship in optimization of C. difficile testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results from C. difficile diagnostic tests should be interpreted with an understanding of the strengths and limitations inherent in each testing approach. Use of highly sensitive molecular diagnostic tests without accounting for clinical signs and symptoms may lead to over-diagnosis of CDI and increased facility CDI rates. Current guidelines recommend a two-step, algorithmic approach for testing. Diagnostic stewardship interventions, such as education, order sets, order search menus, reflex orders, hard and soft stop alerts, electronic references, feedback and benchmarking, decision algorithms, and predictive analytics may help improve use of C. difficile laboratory tests and CDI diagnosis. The diagnostic stewardship approaches with the highest reported success rates include computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) interventions, face-to-face feedback, and real-time evaluations.

SUMMARY

CDI is a clinical diagnosis supported by laboratory findings. Together, clinical evaluation combined with diagnostic stewardship can optimize the accurate diagnosis of CDI.

South African Society of Clinical Microbiology Clostridioides difficile infection diagnosis, management and infection prevention and control guideline

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a problem in both developed and developing countries and is a common hospital-acquired infection. This guideline provides evidence-based practical recommendations for South Africa and other developing countries. The scope of the guideline includes CDI diagnostic approaches; adult, paediatric and special populations treatment options; and surveillance and infection prevention and control recommendations.