SOS induction in a subpopulation of structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) mutant cells in Bacillus subtilis

Sending out an SOS - the bacterial DNA damage response

The term “SOS response” was first coined by Radman in 1974, in an intellectual effort to put together the data suggestive of a concerted gene expression program in cells undergoing DNA damage. A large amount of information about this cellular response has been collected over the following decades. In this review, we will focus on a few of the relevant aspects about the SOS response: its mechanism of control and the stressors which activate it, the diversity of regulated genes in different species, its role in mutagenesis and evolution including the development of antimicrobial resistance, and its relationship with mobile genetic elements.

Structure and kinase activity of bacterial cell cycle regulator CcrZ

CcrZ is a recently discovered cell cycle regulator that connects DNA replication initiation with cell division in pneumococci and may have a similar function in related bacteria. CcrZ is also annotated as a putative kinase, suggesting that CcrZ homologs could represent a novel family of bacterial kinase-dependent cell cycle regulators. Here, we investigate the CcrZ homolog in Bacillus subtilis and show that cells lacking ccrZ are sensitive to a broad range of DNA damage. We demonstrate that increased expression of ccrZ results in over-initiation of DNA replication. In addition, increased expression of CcrZ activates the DNA damage response. Using sensitivity to DNA damage as a proxy, we show that the negative regulator for replication initiation (yabA) and ccrZ function in the same pathway. We show that CcrZ interacts with replication initiation proteins DnaA and DnaB, further suggesting that CcrZ is important for replication timing. To understand how CcrZ functions, we solved the crystal structure bound to AMP-PNP to 2.6 Å resolution. The CcrZ structure most closely resembles choline kinases, consisting of a bilobal structure with a cleft between the two lobes for binding ATP and substrate. Inspection of the structure reveals a major restructuring of the substrate-binding site of CcrZ relative to the choline-binding pocket of choline kinases, consistent with our inability to detect activity with choline for this protein. Instead, CcrZ shows activity on D-ribose and 2-deoxy-D-ribose, indicating adaptation of the choline kinase fold in CcrZ to phosphorylate a novel substrate. We show that integrity of the kinase active site is required for ATPase activity in vitro and for function in vivo. This work provides structural, biochemical, and functional insight into a newly identified, and conserved group of bacterial kinases that regulate DNA replication initiation.

Hydroxyurea Induces a Stress Response That Alters DNA Replication and Nucleotide Metabolism in Bacillus subtilis

Hydroxyurea (HU) is classified as a ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitor and has been widely used to stall DNA replication by depleting deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pools. Recent evidence in Escherichia coli shows that HU readily forms breakdown products that damage DNA directly, indicating that toxicity is a result of secondary effects. Because HU is so widely used in the laboratory and as a clinical therapeutic, it is important to understand its biological effects. To determine how Bacillus subtilis responds to HU-induced stress, we performed saturating transposon insertion mutagenesis followed by deep sequencing (Tn-seq), transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis, and measurement of replication fork progression. Our data show that B. subtilis cells elongate, and replication fork progression is slowed, following HU challenge. The transcriptomic data show that B. subtilis cells initially mount a metabolic response likely caused by dNTP pool depletion before inducing the DNA damage response (SOS) after prolonged exposure. To compensate for reduced nucleotide pools, B. subtilis upregulates the purine and pyrimidine biosynthetic machinery and downregulates the enzymes producing ribose 5-phosphate. We show that overexpression of the RNR genes nrdEF suppresses the growth interference caused by HU, suggesting that RNR is an important target of HU in B. subtilis. Although genes involved in nucleotide and carbon metabolism showed considerable differential expression, we also find that genes of unknown function (y-genes) represent the largest class of differentially expressed genes. Deletion of individual y-genes caused moderate growth interference in the presence of HU, suggesting that cells have several ways of coping with HU-induced metabolic stress. IMPORTANCE Hydroxyurea (HU) has been widely used as a clinical therapeutic and an inhibitor of DNA replication. Some evidence suggests that HU inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, depleting dNTP pools, while other evidence shows that toxic HU breakdown products are responsible for growth inhibition and genotoxic stress. Here, we use multiple, complementary approaches to characterize the response of Bacillus subtilis to HU. B. subtilis responds by upregulating the expression of purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. We show that HU challenge reduced DNA replication and that overexpression of the ribonucleotide reductase operon suppressed growth interference by HU. Our results demonstrate that HU targets RNR and several other metabolic enzymes contributing to toxicity in bacteria.

RnhP is a plasmid-borne RNase HI that contributes to genome maintenance in the ancestral strain Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610

RNA-DNA hybrids form throughout the chromosome during normal growth and under stress conditions. When left unresolved, RNA-DNA hybrids can slow replication fork progression, cause DNA breaks, and increase mutagenesis. To remove hybrids, all organisms use ribonuclease H (RNase H) to specifically degrade the RNA portion. Here we show that, in addition to chromosomally encoded RNase HII and RNase HIII, Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 encodes a previously uncharacterized RNase HI protein, RnhP, on the endogenous plasmid pBS32. Like other RNase HI enzymes, RnhP incises Okazaki fragments, ribopatches, and a complementary RNA-DNA hybrid. We show that while chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is required for pBS32 hyper-replication, RnhP compensates for the loss of RNase HIII activity on the chromosome. Consequently, loss of RnhP and RNase HIII impairs bacterial growth. We show that the decreased growth rate can be explained by laggard replication fork progression near the terminus region of the right replichore, resulting in SOS induction and inhibition of cell division. We conclude that all three functional RNase H enzymes are present in B. subtilis NCIB 3610 and that the plasmid-encoded RNase HI contributes to chromosome stability, while the chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is important for chromosome stability and plasmid hyper-replication.

Beyond the bulk: disclosing the life of single microbial cells

Microbial single cell analysis has led to discoveries that are beyond what can be resolved with population-based studies. It provides a pristine view of the mechanisms that organize cellular physiology, unbiased by population heterogeneity or uncontrollable environmental impacts. A holistic description of cellular functions at the single cell level requires analytical concepts beyond the miniaturization of existing technologies, defined but uncontrolled by the biological system itself. This review provides an overview of the latest advances in single cell technologies and demonstrates their potential. Opportunities and limitations of single cell microbiology are discussed using selected application-related examples.

Structural maintenance of chromosome complex in bacteria

In all organisms, from eukaryotes to prokaryotes, the chromosome is highly compacted and organized. Chromosome condensation is essential in all cells and ranges from 1,000- to more than 10,000-fold between bacterial and eukaryotic cells. Replication and transcription occur in parallel with chromosome segregation in bacteria. Structural maintenance of chromosome proteins play a key role in chromosome compaction and segregation, their coordination with the cell cycle, and in various other chromosome dynamics, including DNA repair. In spite of their essential nature in almost all organisms, their function at a molecular level is only slowly beginning to emerge.

Hydroxyurea induces hydroxyl radical-mediated cell death in Escherichia coli

Hydroxyurea (HU) specifically inhibits class I ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), depleting dNTP pools and leading to replication fork arrest. Although HU inhibition of RNR is well recognized, the mechanism by which it leads to cell death remains unknown. To investigate the mechanism of HU-induced cell death, we used a systems-level approach to determine the genomic and physiological responses of E. coli to HU treatment. Our results suggest a model by which HU treatment rapidly induces a set of protective responses to manage genomic instability. Continued HU stress activates iron uptake and toxins MazF and RelE, whose activity causes the synthesis of incompletely translated proteins and stimulation of envelope stress responses. These effects alter the properties of one of the cell's terminal cytochrome oxidases, causing an increase in superoxide production. The increased superoxide production, together with the increased iron uptake, fuels the formation of hydroxyl radicals that contribute to HU-induced cell death.

Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity

In many bacteria, there is a genome-wide bias towards co-orientation of replication and transcription, with essential and/or highly-expressed genes further enriched co-directionally. We previously found that reversing this bias in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis slows replication elongation, and we proposed that this effect contributes to the evolutionary pressure selecting the transcription-replication co-orientation bias. This selection might have been based purely on selection for speedy replication; alternatively, the slowed replication might actually represent an average of individual replication-disruption events, each of which is counter-selected independently because genome integrity is selected. To differentiate these possibilities and define the precise forces driving this aspect of genome organization, we generated new strains with inversions either over ∼1/4 of the chromosome or at ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons. Applying mathematical analysis to genomic microarray snapshots, we found that replication rates vary dramatically within the inverted genome. Replication is moderately impeded throughout the inverted region, which results in a small but significant competitive disadvantage in minimal medium. Importantly, replication is strongly obstructed at inverted rRNA loci in rich medium. This obstruction results in disruption of DNA replication, activation of DNA damage responses, loss of genome integrity, and cell death. Our results strongly suggest that preservation of genome integrity drives the evolution of co-orientation of replication and transcription, a conserved feature of genome organization.

An important feature of genome organization is that transcription and replication are selectively co-oriented. This feature helps to avoid conflicts between head-on replication and transcription. The precise consequences of the conflict and how it affects genome organization remain to be understood. We previously found that reversing the transcription bias slows replication in the Bacillus subtilis genome. Here we engineered new inversions to avoid changes in other aspects of genome organization. We found that the reversed transcription bias is sufficient to decrease replication speed, and it results in lowered fitness of the inversion strains and a competitive disadvantage relative to wild-type cells in minimal medium. Further, by analyzing genomic copy-number snapshots to obtain replication speed as a function of genome position, we found that inversion of the strongly-transcribed rRNA genes obstructs replication during growth in rich medium. This confers a strong growth disadvantage to cells in rich medium, turns on DNA damage responses, and leads to cell death in a subpopulation of cells, while the surviving cells are more sensitive to genotoxic agents. Our results strongly support the hypothesis that evolution has favored co-orientation of transcription with replication, mainly to avoid these effects.

The Bacillus subtilis SftA (YtpS) and SpoIIIE DNA translocases play distinct roles in growing cells to ensure faithful chromosome partitioning

In several bacterial species, the faithful completion of chromosome partitioning is known to be promoted by a conserved family of DNA translocases that includes Escherichia coli FtsK and Bacillus subtilis SpoIIIE. FtsK localizes at nascent division sites during every cell cycle and stimulates chromosome decatenation and the resolution of chromosome dimers formed by recA-dependent homologous recombination. In contrast, SpoIIIE localizes at sites where cells have divided and trapped chromosomal DNA in the membrane, which happens during spore development and under some conditions when DNA replication is perturbed. SpoIIIE completes chromosome segregation post-septationally by translocating trapped DNA across the membrane. Unlike E. coli, B. subtilis contains a second uncharacterized FtsK/SpoIIIE-like protein, SftA (formerly YtpS). We report that SftA plays a role similar to FtsK during each cell cycle but cannot substitute for SpoIIIE in rescuing trapped chromosomes. SftA colocalizes with FtsZ at nascent division sites but not with SpoIIIE at sites of chromosome trapping. SftA mutants divide over unsegregated chromosomes more frequently than wild-type unless recA is inactivated, suggesting that SftA, like FtsK, stimulates chromosome dimer resolution. Having two FtsK/SpoIIIE paralogues is not conserved among endospore-forming bacteria, but is highly conserved within several groups of soil- and plant-associated bacteria.

Comparison of responses to double-strand breaks between Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis reveals different requirements for SOS induction

DNA double-strand breaks are particularly deleterious lesions that can lead to genomic instability and cell death. We investigated the SOS response to double-strand breaks in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. In E. coli, double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation resulted in SOS induction in virtually every cell. E. coli strains incapable of SOS induction were sensitive to ionizing radiation. In striking contrast, we found that in B. subtilis both ionizing radiation and a site-specific double-strand break causes induction of prophage PBSX and SOS gene expression in only a small subpopulation of cells. These results show that double-strand breaks provoke global SOS induction in E. coli but not in B. subtilis. Remarkably, RecA-GFP focus formation was nearly identical following ionizing radiation challenge in both E. coli and B. subtilis, demonstrating that formation of RecA-GFP foci occurs in response to double-strand breaks but does not require or result in SOS induction in B. subtilis. Furthermore, we found that B. subtilis cells incapable of inducing SOS had near wild-type levels of survival in response to ionizing radiation. Moreover, B. subtilis RecN contributes to maintaining low levels of SOS induction during double-strand break repair. Thus, we found that the contribution of SOS induction to double-strand break repair differs substantially between E. coli and B. subtilis.

Beta clamp directs localization of mismatch repair in Bacillus subtilis

MutS homologs function in several cellular pathways including mismatch repair (MMR), the process by which mismatches introduced during DNA replication are corrected. We demonstrate that the C terminus of Bacillus subtilis MutS is necessary for an interaction with beta clamp. This interaction is required for MutS-GFP focus formation in response to mismatches. Reciprocally, we show that a mutant of the beta clamp causes elevated mutation frequencies and is reduced for MutS-GFP focus formation. MutS mutants defective for interaction with beta clamp failed to support the next step of MMR, MutL-GFP focus formation. We conclude that the interaction between MutS and beta is the major molecular interaction facilitating focus formation and that beta clamp aids in the stabilization of MutS at a mismatch in vivo. The striking ability of the MutS C terminus to direct focus formation at replisomes by itself, suggests that it is mismatch recognition that licenses MutS's interaction with beta clamp.

The SOS Regulatory Network

All organisms possess a diverse set of genetic programs that are used to alter cellular physiology in response to environmental cues. The gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, mounts what is known as the "SOS response" following DNA damage, replication fork arrest, and a myriad of other environmental stresses. For over 50 years, E. coli has served as the paradigm for our understanding of the transcriptional, and physiological changes that occur following DNA damage (400). In this chapter, we summarize the current view of the SOS response and discuss how this genetic circuit is regulated. In addition to examining the E. coli SOS response, we also include a discussion of the SOS regulatory networks in other bacteria to provide a broader perspective on how prokaryotes respond to DNA damage.

The Bacillus subtilis sigma(M) regulon and its contribution to cell envelope stress responses

The Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma(M) factor is activated by cell envelope stress elicited by antibiotics, and by acid, heat, ethanol and superoxide stresses. Here, we have used several complementary approaches to identify genes controlled by sigma(M). In many cases, expression is only partially dependent on sigma(M) because of both overlapping promoter recognition with other ECF sigma factors and the presence of additional promoter elements. Genes regulated by sigma(M) have a characteristic pattern of induction in response to cell envelope-acting antibiotics as evidenced by hierarchical clustering analysis. sigma(M) also contributes to the expression of the Spx transcription factor and thereby indirectly regulates genes of the Spx regulon. Cell envelope stress responses also include regulons controlled by sigma(W), sigma(B) and several two-component regulatory systems (e.g. LiaRS, YycFG, BceRS). Activation of the sigma(M) regulon increases expression of proteins functioning in transcriptional control, cell wall synthesis and shape determination, cell division, DNA damage monitoring, recombinational repair and detoxification.