1
|
Hattab S, Ma AH, Tariq Z, Vega Prado I, Drobish I, Lee R, Yee R. Rapid Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Approaches for Use in the Clinical Laboratory. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:786. [PMID: 39200086 PMCID: PMC11351821 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13080786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The rapid rise in increasingly resistant bacteria has become a major threat to public health. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial in guiding appropriate therapeutic decisions and infection prevention practices for patient care. However, conventional culture-based AST methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Therefore, rapid AST approaches exist to address the delayed gap in time to actionable results. There are two main types of rapid AST technologies- phenotypic and genotypic approaches. In this review, we provide a summary of all commercially available rapid AST platforms for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. We describe the technologies utilized, performance characteristics, acceptable specimen types, types of resistance detected, turnaround times, limitations, and clinical outcomes driven by these rapid tests. We also discuss crucial factors to consider for the implementation of rapid AST technologies in a clinical laboratory and what the future of rapid AST holds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siham Hattab
- Department of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (S.H.); (Z.T.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Adrienne H. Ma
- Department of Pharmacy, Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, CO 81647, USA;
| | - Zoon Tariq
- Department of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (S.H.); (Z.T.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Ilianne Vega Prado
- Department of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (S.H.); (Z.T.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Ian Drobish
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | - Rachel Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA;
| | - Rebecca Yee
- Department of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (S.H.); (Z.T.); (I.V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pottie I, Vázquez Fernández R, Van de Wiele T, Briers Y. Phage lysins for intestinal microbiome modulation: current challenges and enabling techniques. Gut Microbes 2024; 16:2387144. [PMID: 39106212 PMCID: PMC11305034 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2387144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The importance of the microbiota in the intestinal tract for human health has been increasingly recognized. In this perspective, microbiome modulation, a targeted alteration of the microbial composition, has gained interest. Phage lysins, peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes encoded by bacteriophages, are a promising new class of antibiotics currently under clinical development for treating bacterial infections. Due to their high specificity, lysins are considered microbiome-friendly. This review explores the opportunities and challenges of using lysins as microbiome modulators. First, the high specificity of endolysins, which can be further modulated using protein engineering or targeted delivery methods, is discussed. Next, obstacles and possible solutions to assess the microbiome-friendliness of lysins are considered. Finally, lysin delivery to the intestinal tract is discussed, including possible delivery methods such as particle-based and probiotic vehicles. Mapping the hurdles to developing lysins as microbiome modulators and identifying possible ways to overcome these hurdles can help in their development. In this way, the application of these innovative antimicrobial agents can be expanded, thereby taking full advantage of their characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Pottie
- Laboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Vázquez Fernández
- Laboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Tom Van de Wiele
- Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Yves Briers
- Laboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta A, Siddiqui F, Saxena B, Purwar S, Saigal S, Sharma JP, Kumar S. A prospective study evaluating the effect of a "Diagnostic Stewardship Care-Bundle" for automated blood culture diagnostics. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2023; 35:360-368. [PMID: 38035932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We prospectively implemented a diagnostic stewardship care-bundle checklist, 'Sepsis-48 DSB', with the aim of reducing intervening duration of key steps of automated blood culture diagnostics (aBCD). METHODS Sepsis-48 DSB was implemented for automated blood culture bottles (BCBs) received from adult intensive care units (AICUs) during the intervention period (P2; July 2020-June 2021) and intervening durations were compared with those during the retrospective, pre-intervention period (P1; March-June 2020). During both periods, provisional blood culture reports (pBCR) were issued wherein direct microbial identification (dID) was performed in BCBs with Gram-negatives by directly inoculating conventional biochemical tests and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (dAST) using EUCAST RAST method. The results were compared with the standard of care (SoC) method (i.e. full incubation followed by identification and AST by VITEKⓇ-2 Compact). RESULTS During P2, significant reductions in loading time (LT; median: 63.5 vs. 32 minutes, P < 0.001), time to dID+dAST performance (TTD; 186 vs. 115 minutes, P = 0.0018) and an increase in compliance to bundle targets (LT ≤45: 44% vs. 66%, P = 0.006 and TTD ≤120: 34% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.03) were observed. Using dID+dAST method, results were read 694 minutes earlier than SoC method. Of 176 pBCR, 165 (94%) were concordant with SoC in microbial identification of species. Categorical agreement for any drug-bug combination was 92.7% (1079/1164) and corresponding major, very major, and minor error rates were 8.8% (19/216), 4.9% (45/921), and 1.8% (21/1164), respectively. CONCLUSION The 'diagnostic stewardship care-bundle' strategy was successfully implemented with considerable diagnostic accuracy leading to significant reductions in duration of targeted steps of aBCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayush Gupta
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India.
| | - Farha Siddiqui
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Bhoomika Saxena
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Shashank Purwar
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Saurabh Saigal
- Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Jai Prakash Sharma
- Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turbett SE, Banach DB, Bard JD, Gandhi RG, Letourneau AR, Azar MM. Rapid antimicrobial resistance detection methods for bloodstream infection in solid organ transplantation: Proposed clinical guidance, unmet needs, and future directions. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14113. [PMID: 37594214 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in antimicrobial resistance detection have spurred the development of multiple assays that can accurately detect the presence of bacterial resistance from positive blood cultures, resulting in faster institution of effective antimicrobial therapy. Despite these advances, there are limited data regarding the use of these assays in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and there is little guidance on how to select, implement, and interpret them in clinical practice. We describe a practical approach to the implementation and interpretation of these assays in SOT recipients using the best available data and expert opinion. These findings were part of a consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation held on December 7, 2021 and represent the collaboration between experts in transplant infectious diseases, pharmacy, antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship, and clinical microbiology. Areas of unmet need and recommendations for future investigation are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Turbett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David B Banach
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jennifer Dien Bard
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ronak G Gandhi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alyssa R Letourneau
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marwan M Azar
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gupta A, Siddiqui F, Saxena B, Purwar S, Saigal S, Sharma JP, Kumar S. A prospective study evaluating the effect of a 'Diagnostic Stewardship Care-Bundle' for automated blood culture diagnostics. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2023; 34:119-126. [PMID: 37437843 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We prospectively implemented a diagnostic stewardship care-bundle checklist, 'Sepsis-48 DSB', with the aim of reducing intervening duration of key steps of automated blood culture diagnostics (aBCD). METHODS Sepsis-48 DSB was implemented for automated blood culture bottles (BCBs) received from adult intensive care units (AICUs) during the intervention period (P2; July 2020-June 2021) and intervening durations were compared with those during the retrospective, pre-intervention period (P1; March-June 2020). During both periods, provisional blood culture reports (pBCR) were issued wherein direct microbial identification (dID) was performed in BCBs with Gram-negatives by directly inoculating conventional biochemical tests and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (dAST) using EUCAST RAST method. The results were compared with the standard of care (SoC) method (i.e. full incubation followed by identification and AST by VITEKⓇ-2 Compact). RESULTS During P2, significant reductions in loading time (LT) [median: 63.5 vs. 32 minutes, P < 0.001], time to dID+dAST performance (TTD) [186 vs. 115 minutes, P = 0.0018] and an increase in compliance to bundle targets [LT ≤45: 44% vs. 66%, P = 0.006 and TTD ≤120: 34% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.03] were observed. Using dID+dAST method, results were read 694 minutes earlier than SoC method. Of 176 pBCR, 165 (94%) were concordant with SoC in microbial identification of species. Categorical agreement for any drug-bug combination was 92.7% (1079/1164) and corresponding major, very major, and minor error rates were 8.8% (19/216), 4.9% (45/921), and 1.8% (21/1164), respectively. CONCLUSION The 'diagnostic stewardship care-bundle' strategy was successfully implemented with considerable diagnostic accuracy leading to significant reductions in duration of targeted steps of aBCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayush Gupta
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India.
| | - Farha Siddiqui
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Bhoomika Saxena
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Shashank Purwar
- Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Saurabh Saigal
- Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Jai Prakash Sharma
- Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, (AIIMS), Bhopal, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zeng M, Xia J, Zong Z, Shi Y, Ni Y, Hu F, Chen Y, Zhuo C, Hu B, Lv X, Li J, Liu Z, Zhang J, Yang W, Yang F, Yang Q, Zhou H, Li X, Wang J, Li Y, Ren J, Chen B, Chen D, Wu A, Guan X, Qu J, Wu D, Huang X, Qiu H, Xu Y, Yu Y, Wang M. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, IMMUNOLOGY, AND INFECTION = WEI MIAN YU GAN RAN ZA ZHI 2023; 56:653-671. [PMID: 36868960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
The dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) is a global public health issue. CRGNB isolates are usually extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant, resulting in limited antimicrobial treatment options and high mortality. A multidisciplinary guideline development group covering clinical infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, clinical pharmacology, infection control, and guideline methodology experts jointly developed the present clinical practice guidelines based on best available scientific evidence to address the clinical issues regarding laboratory testing, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention of CRGNB infections. This guideline focuses on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Sixteen clinical questions were proposed from the perspective of current clinical practice and translated into research questions using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) format to collect and synthesize relevant evidence to inform corresponding recommendations. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, benefit and risk profile of corresponding interventions and formulate recommendations or suggestions. Evidence extracted from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered preferentially for treatment-related clinical questions. Observational studies, non-controlled studies, and expert opinions were considered as supplementary evidence in the absence of RCTs. The strength of recommendations was classified as strong or conditional (weak). The evidence informing recommendations derives from studies worldwide, while the implementation suggestions combined the Chinese experience. The target audience of this guideline is clinician and related professionals involved in management of infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Zeng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jun Xia
- The Nottingham Ningbo GRADE Centre, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China; Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zhiyong Zong
- Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi Shi
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Yuxing Ni
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Fupin Hu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Yijian Chen
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Chao Zhuo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Bijie Hu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaoju Lv
- Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jiabin Li
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui 230022, China
| | - Zhengyin Liu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Wenjie Yang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Qiwen Yang
- Department and State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Zhou
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410015, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Pharmaceutical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
| | - Yimin Li
- Department of Critical Care Medicine,State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Jian'an Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
| | - Baiyi Chen
- Divison of Infectious Diseases, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Dechang Chen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Xiangdong Guan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Jieming Qu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China
| | - Depei Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Xiaojun Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Haibo Qiu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yingchun Xu
- Department and State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Yunsong Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.
| | - Minggui Wang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, And Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of People's Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pettengill MA. Clinical Microbiology in 2021: My Favorite Studies about Everything Except My Least Favorite Virus. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY NEWSLETTER 2022; 44:73-80. [PMID: 35529099 PMCID: PMC9053308 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Pettengill
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11040427. [PMID: 35453179 PMCID: PMC9024665 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11040427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major threat to public health globally. Accurate and rapid detection of resistance to antimicrobial drugs, and subsequent appropriate antimicrobial treatment, combined with antimicrobial stewardship, are essential for controlling the emergence and spread of AMR. This article reviews common antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and relevant issues concerning the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Although accurate, classic technologies used in clinical microbiology to profile antimicrobial susceptibility are time-consuming and relatively expensive. As a result, physicians often prescribe empirical antimicrobial therapies and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Although recently developed AST systems have shown advantages over traditional methods in terms of testing speed and the potential for providing a deeper insight into resistance mechanisms, extensive validation is required to translate these methodologies to clinical practice. With a continuous increase in antimicrobial resistance, additional efforts are needed to develop innovative, rapid, accurate, and portable diagnostic tools for AST. The wide implementation of novel devices would enable the identification of the optimal treatment approaches and the surveillance of antibiotic resistance in health, agriculture, and the environment, allowing monitoring and better tackling the emergence of AMR.
Collapse
|