Archaeal Host Cell Recognition and Viral Binding of HFTV1 to Its Haloferax Host

Host range and cell recognition of archaeal viruses

Archaea are members of a separate domain of life that have unique properties, such as the composition of their cell walls and the structure of their lipid bilayers. Consequently, archaeal viruses face different challenges to infect host cells in comparison with viruses of bacteria and eukaryotes. Despite their significant impact on shaping microbial communities, our understanding of infection processes of archaeal viruses remains limited. Several receptors used by archaeal viruses to infect cells have recently been identified. The interactions between viruses and receptors are one of the determinants of the host range of viruses. Here, we review the current literature on host ranges of archaeal viruses and factors that might impact the width of these host ranges.

Structure of the two-component S-layer of the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius

Surface layers (S-layers) are resilient two-dimensional protein lattices that encapsulate many bacteria and most archaea. In archaea, S-layers usually form the only structural component of the cell wall and thus act as the final frontier between the cell and its environment. Therefore, S-layers are crucial for supporting microbial life. Notwithstanding their importance, little is known about archaeal S-layers at the atomic level. Here, we combined single-particle cryo electron microscopy, cryo electron tomography, and Alphafold2 predictions to generate an atomic model of the two-component S-layer of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. The outer component of this S-layer (SlaA) is a flexible, highly glycosylated, and stable protein. Together with the inner and membrane-bound component (SlaB), they assemble into a porous and interwoven lattice. We hypothesise that jackknife-like conformational changes in SlaA play important roles in S-layer assembly.

Archaeal virus entry and egress

Archaeal viruses display a high degree of structural and genomic diversity. Few details are known about the mechanisms by which these viruses enter and exit their host cells. Research on archaeal viruses has lately made significant progress due to advances in genetic tools and imaging techniques, such as cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET). In recent years, a steady output of newly identified archaeal viral receptors and egress mechanisms has offered the first insight into how archaeal viruses interact with the archaeal cell envelope. As more details about archaeal viral entry and egress are unravelled, patterns are starting to emerge. This helps to better understand the interactions between viruses and the archaeal cell envelope and how these compare to infection strategies of viruses in other domains of life. Here, we provide an overview of recent developments in the field of archaeal viral entry and egress, shedding light onto the most elusive part of the virosphere.

Characterization of an archaeal virus-host system reveals massive genomic rearrangements in a laboratory strain

Halophilic archaea (haloarchaea) are known to exhibit multiple chromosomes, with one main chromosome and one or several smaller secondary chromosomes or megaplasmids. Halorubrum lacusprofundi, a model organism for studying cold adaptation, exhibits one secondary chromosome and one megaplasmid that include a large arsenal of virus defense mechanisms. We isolated a virus (Halorubrum tailed virus DL1, HRTV-DL1) infecting Hrr. lacusprofundi, and present an in-depth characterization of the virus and its interactions with Hrr. lacusprofundi. While studying virus-host interactions between Hrr. lacusprofundi and HRTV-DL1, we uncover that the strain in use (ACAM34_UNSW) lost the entire megaplasmid and about 38% of the secondary chromosome. The loss included the majority of virus defense mechanisms, making the strain sensitive to HRTV-DL1 infection, while the type strain (ACAM34_DSMZ) appears to prevent virus replication. Comparing infection of the type strain ACAM34_DSMZ with infection of the laboratory derived strain ACAM34_UNSW allowed us to identify host responses to virus infection that were only activated in ACAM34_UNSW upon the loss of virus defense mechanisms. We identify one of two S-layer proteins as primary receptor for HRTV-DL1 and conclude that the presence of two different S-layer proteins in one strain provides a strong advantage in the arms race with viruses. Additionally, we identify archaeal homologs to eukaryotic proteins potentially being involved in the defense against virus infection.

Influence of N-Glycosylation on Virus-Host Interactions in Halorubrum lacusprofundi

N-glycosylation is a post-translational modification of proteins that occurs across all three domains of life. In Archaea, N-glycosylation is crucial for cell stability and motility, but importantly also has significant implications for virus-host interactions. While some archaeal viruses present glycosylated proteins or interact with glycosylated host proteins, the direct influence of N-glycosylation on archaeal virus-host interactions remains to be elucidated. In this study, we generated an N-glycosylation-deficient mutant of Halorubrum lacusprofundi, a halophilic archaeon commonly used to study cold adaptation, and examined the impact of compromised N-glycosylation on the infection dynamics of two very diverse viruses. While compromised N-glycosylation had no influence on the life cycle of the head-tailed virus HRTV-DL1, we observed a significant effect on membrane-containing virus HFPV-1. Both intracellular genome numbers and extracellular virus particle numbers of HFPV-1 were increased in the mutant strain, which we attribute to instability of the surface-layer which builds the protein envelope of the cell. When testing the impact of compromised N-glycosylation on the life cycle of plasmid vesicles, specialized membrane vesicles that transfer a plasmid between host cells, we determined that plasmid vesicle stability is strongly dependent on the host glycosylation machinery. Our study thus provides important insight into the role of N-glycosylation in virus-host interactions in Archaea, while pointing to how this influence strongly differs amongst various viruses and virus-like elements.