Confirmation of deafness in infancy

Impact of Hearing Aids on Language Outcomes in Preschool Children With Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss

This study aimed to investigate the role of hearing aid (HA) usage in language outcomes among preschool children aged 3-5 years with mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The data were retrieved from a total of 52 children with MBHL and 30 children with normal hearing (NH). The association between demographical, audiological factors and language outcomes was examined. Analyses of variance were conducted to compare the language abilities of HA users, non-HA users, and their NH peers. Furthermore, regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of language outcomes. Aided better ear pure-tone average (BEPTA) was significantly correlated with language comprehension scores. Among children with MBHL, those who used HA outperformed the ones who did not use HA across all linguistic domains. The language skills of children with MBHL were comparable to those of their peers with NH. The degree of improvement in audibility in terms of aided BEPTA was a significant predictor of language comprehension. It is noteworthy that 50% of the parents expressed reluctance regarding HA use for their children with MBHL. The findings highlight the positive impact of HA usage on language development in this population. Professionals may therefore consider HAs as a viable treatment option for children with MBHL, especially when there is a potential risk of language delay due to hearing loss. It was observed that 25% of the children with MBHL had late-onset hearing loss. Consequently, the implementation of preschool screening or a listening performance checklist is recommended to facilitate early detection.

Audiological characteristics of children with congenital unilateral hearing loss: insights into Age of reliable behavioural audiogram acquisition and change of hearing loss

Objectives

The aims of this study were to report the audiological characteristics of children with congenital unilateral hearing loss (UHL), examine the age at which the first reliable behavioural audiograms can be obtained, and investigate hearing changes from diagnosis at birth to the first reliable behavioural audiogram.

Method

This study included a sample of 91 children who were diagnosed with UHL via newborn hearing screening and had reliable behavioural audiograms before 7 years of age. Information about diagnosis, audiological characteristics and etiology were extracted from clinical reports. Regression analysis was used to explore the potential reasons influencing the age at which first reliable behavioural audiograms were obtained. Correlation and ANOVA analyses were conducted to examine changes in hearing at octave frequencies between 0.5 and 4 kHz. The proportions of hearing loss change, as well as the clinical characteristics of children with and without progressive hearing loss, were described according to two adopted definitions: Definition 1: criterion (1): a decrease in 10 dB or greater at two or more adjacent frequencies between 0.5 and 4 kHz, or criterion (2): a decrease in 15 dB or greater at one octave frequency in the same frequency range. Definition 2: a change of ≥20 dB in the average of pure-tone thresholds at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz.

Results

The study revealed that 48 children (52.7% of the sample of 91 children) had their first reliable behavioural audiogram by 3 years of age. The mean age at the first reliable behavioural audiogram was 3.0 years (SD 1.4; IQR: 1.8, 4.1). We found a significant association between children's behaviour and the presence or absence of ongoing middle ear issues in relation to the delay in obtaining a reliable behavioural audiogram. When comparing the hearing thresholds at diagnosis with the first reliable behavioural audiogram across different frequencies, it was observed that the majority of children experienced deterioration rather than improvement in the initial impaired ear at each frequency. Notably, there were more instances of hearing changes (either deterioration or improvement), in the 500 Hz and 1,000 Hz frequency ranges compared to the 2,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz ranges. Seventy-eight percent (n = 71) of children had hearing deterioration between the diagnosis and the first behavioural audiogram at one or more frequencies between 0.5 and 4 kHz, with a high proportion of them (52 out of the 71, 73.2%) developing severe to profound hearing loss. When using the averaged three frequency thresholds (i.e., definition 2), only 26.4% of children (n = 24) in the sample were identified as having hearing deterioration. Applying definition 2 therefore underestimates the proportion of children that experienced hearing changes. The study also reported diverse characteristics of children with or without hearing deterioration.

Conclusion

The finding that 78% of children diagnosed with UHL at birth had a decrease in hearing loss between the hearing levels at first diagnosis and their first behavioural audiogram highlights the importance of monitoring hearing threshold levels after diagnosis, so that appropriate intervention can be implemented in a timely manner. For clinical management, deterioration of 15 dB at one or more frequencies that does not recover warrants action.

Mild matters: trial learnings and importance of community engagement in research for early identified bilateral mild hearing loss

Introduction

Early identification of mild hearing loss has resulted in early hearing amplification without adequate evidence of effectiveness. This paper describes learnings from a pilot trial, combined with a qualitative study, to highlight the importance of community engagement in designing research studies to determine whether early amplification benefits young children with bilateral mild hearing loss.

Methods

PART 1 of the study is a proof-of-concept non-blinded multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hearing device fitting vs. no fitting aimed to gather preliminary data and determine its acceptability/feasibility in children <2 years old with bilateral mild hearing loss.

Results

PART 2 is a qualitative study to understand the barriers/enablers to RCT participation. Of 40 potentially eligible families, nine (23%) declined, three were uncontactable (7%), 26 (65%) ineligible: of these, nine (35%) did not meet hearing threshold inclusion criteria, 11 (42%) were already fitted or had made decisions on fitting hearing device, two (7%) had conductive loss and four (16%) were ineligible for other reasons. Two of 11 (18%) eligible families were randomised. With the limited sample size, outcome measures were not compared between groups. Both participants completed the trial, reported the RCT to be acceptable, and neither changed group post-enrolment.

Discussion

Whilst recruitment uptake could potentially be increased by altering the eligibility criteria, better communication with and reimbursement of clinicians as recruiters, and improving awareness of the study amongst external stakeholders, the RCT methodology does not conform to family-centred practice, and potentially raises ethical concerns regarding potential adverse consequences of not offering early amplification. Parental perception of losing control over choice of management due to randomisation is not an easily modifiable factor. Alternative methodological approaches without randomisation are required to determine whether hearing amplification benefits infants with mild hearing loss.Clinical Trial Registration: identifier [ACTRN12618001608257].

Multidimensional Family-Centred Early Intervention in Children with Hearing Loss: A Conceptual Model

At least two per thousand newborns are affected by hearing loss, with up to 40% with an additional disability. Early identification by universal newborn hearing screening and early intervention services are available in many countries around the world, with limited data on their effectiveness and a lack of knowledge about specific intervention-related determinants of child and family outcomes. This concept paper aimed to better understand the mechanisms by which multi-dimensional family-centred early intervention influences child outcomes, through parent behaviour, targeted by intervention by a review of the literature, primarily in the field of childhood hearing loss, supplemented by research findings on physiological and atypical child development. We present a conceptual model of influences of multi-disciplinary family-centred early intervention on family coping/functioning and parent–child interaction, with effects on child psycho-social and cognitive outcomes. Social communication and language skills are postulated as mediators between parent–child interaction and non-verbal child outcomes. Multi-disciplinary networks of professionals trained in family-centred practice and the evaluation of existing services, with respect to best practice guidelines for family-centred early intervention, are recommended. There is a need for longitudinal epidemiological studies, including specific intervention measures, family behaviours and multidimensional child outcomes.

Language Outcomes in Deaf or Hard of Hearing Teenagers Who Are Spoken Language Users: Effects of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Early Confirmation

Objectives:

This study aimed to examine whether (a) exposure to universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and b) early confirmation of hearing loss were associated with benefits to expressive and receptive language outcomes in the teenage years for a cohort of spoken language users. It also aimed to determine whether either of these two variables was associated with benefits to relative language gain from middle childhood to adolescence within this cohort.

Design:

The participants were drawn from a prospective cohort study of a population sample of children with bilateral permanent childhood hearing loss, who varied in their exposure to UNHS and who had previously had their language skills assessed at 6–10 years. Sixty deaf or hard of hearing teenagers who were spoken language users and a comparison group of 38 teenagers with normal hearing completed standardized measures of their receptive and expressive language ability at 13–19 years.

Results:

Teenagers exposed to UNHS did not show significantly better expressive (adjusted mean difference, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.26 to 1.05; d = 0.32) or receptive (adjusted mean difference, 0.68; 95% CI, −0.56 to 1.93; d = 0.28) language skills than those who were not. Those who had their hearing loss confirmed by 9 months of age did not show significantly better expressive (adjusted mean difference, 0.43; 95% CI, −0.20 to 1.05; d = 0.35) or receptive (adjusted mean difference, 0.95; 95% CI, −0.22 to 2.11; d = 0.42) language skills than those who had it confirmed later. In all cases, effect sizes were of small size and in favor of those exposed to UNHS or confirmed by 9 months. Subgroup analysis indicated larger beneficial effects of early confirmation for those deaf or hard of hearing teenagers without cochlear implants (N = 48; 80% of the sample), and these benefits were significant in the case of receptive language outcomes (adjusted mean difference, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 2.71; d = 0.78). Exposure to UNHS did not account for significant unique variance in any of the three language scores at 13–19 years beyond that accounted for by existing language scores at 6–10 years. Early confirmation accounted for significant unique variance in the expressive language information score at 13–19 years after adjusting for the corresponding score at 6–10 years (R² change = 0.08, p = 0.03).

Conclusions:

This study found that while adolescent language scores were higher for deaf or hard of hearing teenagers exposed to UNHS and those who had their hearing loss confirmed by 9 months, these group differences were not significant within the whole sample. There was some evidence of a beneficial effect of early confirmation of hearing loss on relative expressive language gain from childhood to adolescence. Further examination of the effect of these variables on adolescent language outcomes in other cohorts would be valuable.

Normal neonatal hearing screening did not preclude sensorineural hearing loss in two-year-old very preterm infants

AIM

Very preterm infants are at risk of neonatal hearing loss. However, it is unknown whether infants with a normal neonatal hearing screening result risk sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) at a later age.

METHODS

This cohort study was conducted at the Erasmus Medical University Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 77 very preterm infants born between October 2005 and September 2008. All infants underwent auditory brainstem response audiometry during neonatal hearing screening and at two years of corrected age. The frequency of SNHL in infants with a normal neonatal hearing screening was analysed and the risk factors associated with newly diagnosed SNHL in these infants were examined.

RESULTS

We found that 3.9% (3/77) of the very preterm infants showed permanent hearing loss during their neonatal hearing screening. In addition, a relatively high prevalence of newly diagnosed SNHL (4.3%) was found in three of the 70 infants followed up at the age of two. The total prevalence rate of permanent hearing loss in the cohort was approximately 8%.

CONCLUSION

A normal outcome of neonatal hearing screening did not guarantee normal hearing at two years of age in this very preterm cohort and paediatricians should be alert to the possibility of late-onset SNHL.

The impact of universal newborn hearing screening on long-term literacy outcomes: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the benefits of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) seen at age 8 years persist through the second decade.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of a population sample of children with permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) followed up for 17 years since birth in periods with (or without) UNHS.

SETTING

Birth cohort of 100 000 in southern England.

PARTICIPANTS

114 teenagers aged 13-19 years, 76 with PCHI and 38 with normal hearing. All had previously their reading assessed aged 6-10 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Birth in periods with and without UNHS; confirmation of PCHI before and after age 9 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Reading comprehension ability. Regression modelling took account of severity of hearing loss, non-verbal ability, maternal education and main language.

RESULTS

Confirmation of PCHI by age 9 months was associated with significantly higher mean z-scores for reading comprehension (adjusted mean difference 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.97) although birth during periods with UNHS was not (adjusted mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.75 to 1.06). The gap between the reading comprehension z-scores of teenagers with early compared with late confirmed PCHI had widened at an adjusted mean rate of 0.06 per year (95% CI -0.02 to 0.13) during the 9.2-year mean interval since the previous assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit to reading comprehension of confirmation of PCHI by age 9 months increases during the teenage years. This strengthens the case for UNHS programmes that lead to early confirmation of permanent hearing loss.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN03307358.

The Influence of Hearing Aid Use on Outcomes of Children With Mild Hearing Loss

PURPOSE

This study examined the effects of consistent hearing aid (HA) use on outcomes in children with mild hearing loss (HL).

METHOD

Five- or 7-year-old children with mild HL were separated into 3 groups on the basis of patterns of daily HA use. Using analyses of variance, we compared outcomes between groups on speech and language tests and a speech perception in noise task. Regression models were used to investigate the influence of cumulative auditory experience (audibility, early intervention, HA use) on outcomes.

RESULTS

Full-time HA users demonstrated significantly higher scores on vocabulary and grammar measures compared with nonusers. There were no significant differences between the 3 groups on articulation or speech perception measures. After controlling for the variance in age at confirmation of HL, level of audibility, and enrollment in early intervention, only amount of daily HA use was a significant predictor of grammar and vocabulary.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results provide evidence that children's language development benefits from consistent HA use. Nonusers are at risk in areas such as vocabulary and grammar compared with other children with mild HL who wear HAs regularly. Service providers should work collaboratively to encourage consistent HA use.

Unilateral deafness in children affects development of multi-modal modulation and default mode networks

Monaural auditory input due to congenital or acquired unilateral hearing loss (UHL) may have neurobiological effects on the developing brain. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated the effect of UHL on the development of functional brain networks used for cross-modal processing. Children ages 7-12 with moderate or greater unilateral hearing loss of sensorineural origin (UHL-SN; N = 21) and normal-hearing controls (N = 23) performed an fMRI-compatible adaptation of the Token Test involving listening to a sentence such as "touched the small green circle and the large blue square" and simultaneously viewing an arrow touching colored shapes on a video. Children with right or severe-to-profound UHL-SN displayed smaller activation in a region encompassing the right inferior temporal, middle temporal, and middle occipital gyrus (BA 19/37/39), evidencing differences due to monaural hearing in cross-modal modulation of the visual processing pathway. Children with UHL-SN displayed increased activation in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus, likely the result either of more effortful low-level processing of auditory stimuli or differences in cross-modal modulation of the auditory processing pathway. Additionally, children with UHL-SN displayed reduced deactivation of anterior and posterior regions of the default mode network. Results suggest that monaural hearing affects the development of brain networks related to cross-modal sensory processing and the regulation of the default network during processing of spoken language.

Maturação auditiva periférica: análise das amplitudes das emissões otoacústicas produto de distorção em neonatos pré-termo e a termo

Objetivo : Comparar neonatos prematuros e a termo quanto à presença e amplitude das Emissões Otoacústicas Produto de Distorção (EOAPD), bem como caracterizá-los em relação aos indicadores de risco para perda auditiva. Métodos : Estudo realizado por análise das EOAPD (frequências de 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 e 8000 Hz) e dos indicadores de risco para perda auditiva. Os neonatos foram agrupados segundo a idade gestacional. Os resultados foram analisados empregando-se testes ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis e Qui-quadrado (5%). Resultados : A amostra constituiu-se de 109 neonatos (218 orelhas), com distribuição homogênea quanto ao gênero e a classificação a termo/pré-termo. Foi observado alto risco para perda auditiva em 40,4% dos lactentes. Dos indicadores de risco para deficiência auditiva, os mais frequentes foram a permanência em incubadora e internação em UTI superiores a cinco dias. As EOAPD mostraram-se presentes em 209 orelhas (95,9%). A ausência de respostas às EOAPD foi significativamente mais recorrente nos grupos com menor idade gestacional. Verificou-se aumento das amplitudes das EOAPD de acordo com o aumento da idade gestacional, exceto para a frequência de 8000 Hz na orelha esquerda. Não foi observada diferença entre orelhas e gêneros quanto à presença e amplitude das EOAPD. Conclusão : Há diferença entre os grupos pré-termo e a termo, quanto à presença e amplitude das EOAPD: maior probabilidade de falha nos grupos com menor idade gestacional e aumento (não linear) das amplitudes, conforme a idade gestacional torna-se maior. Os achados sugerem o fenômeno de maturação do sistema auditivo periférico.

High frequency tympanometry in neonates with normal otoacoustic emissions: measurements and interpretations

Tympanometry is used in evaluating middle ear functional conditions. Before 6 months of age its results may be misleading. High-frequency studies aim to provide more valid procedures. In this study, 236 healthy newborns (127 male, 109 female; 73 % rural, 27 % urban) with age between 0 and 42 days (mean 27 days) no risk for hearing impairment; were analyzed for DPOAE. 209 babies who passed DPOAE were further analyzed for high-frequency tympanometry using Interacoustic AT235h tympanometer, which was possible for 399 ears. The success rate for HFT was 95.3 %. Descriptive statistics for six parameters TPP, Y 200, Y peak, Y tail, YpC-200 and Ypc-tail were analyzed and compared with previous studies. All the parameters except the Ypc-tail were in the range of previous studies.

Functional and structural changes throughout the auditory system following congenital and early-onset deafness: implications for hearing restoration

The absence of auditory input, particularly during development, causes widespread changes in the structure and function of the auditory system, extending from peripheral structures into auditory cortex. In humans, the consequences of these changes are far-reaching and often include detriments to language acquisition, and associated psychosocial issues. Much of what is currently known about the nature of deafness-related changes to auditory structures comes from studies of congenitally deaf or early-deafened animal models. Fortunately, the mammalian auditory system shows a high degree of preservation among species, allowing for generalization from these models to the human auditory system. This review begins with a comparison of common methods used to obtain deaf animal models, highlighting the specific advantages and anatomical consequences of each. Some consideration is also given to the effectiveness of methods used to measure hearing loss during and following deafening procedures. The structural and functional consequences of congenital and early-onset deafness have been examined across a variety of mammals. This review attempts to summarize these changes, which often involve alteration of hair cells and supporting cells in the cochleae, and anatomical and physiological changes that extend through subcortical structures and into cortex. The nature of these changes is discussed, and the impacts to neural processing are addressed. Finally, long-term changes in cortical structures are discussed, with a focus on the presence or absence of cross-modal plasticity. In addition to being of interest to our understanding of multisensory processing, these changes also have important implications for the use of assistive devices such as cochlear implants.

Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire with Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: psychometric properties of the Persian version

OBJECTIVES

Measuring parent satisfaction with neonatal hearing screening programs is one of the most important indicators for assessing the quality and effectiveness and a useful instrument to identify service shortfalls. The aims of this study were to translate and adapt Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire with Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs (PSQ-NHSPs) to Persian language, determine the validity and reliability of this translation, and determine the level of parent satisfaction with neonatal hearing screening programs in Iran.

METHODS

Translated Persian version of the original English PSQ-HNSPs was presented to 138 parents whose children had received hearing screening before discharge from hospital.

RESULTS

The majority of parents responded strongly agree or agree to all dimensions of the questionnaire: overall satisfaction (90.6%), personnel in charge of hearing test (60.1%), and appointment activities (58%). Good internal consistency reliability (a=0.89) and moderate test-retest reliability (r=0.61) of the Persian version of PSQ-NHSPs were indicated. Construct validity was demonstrated by a significant positive relationship between overall satisfaction and specific dimensions in the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of PSQ-NHSPs is a valid and reliable tool to assess the level of parent satisfaction with neonatal hearing screening programs.

Frequency of Hearing Impairment among Full-term Newborns in Yazd, Iran

OBJECTIVE

Permanent congenital hearing loss, a common congenital anomaly, may affect speech and language acquisition, academic achievement and social development. Current standards emphasize early recognition of congenital hearing loss. This study was conducted to find the prevalence of hearing impairment in term newborns in Yazd, Iran.

METHODS

This was a descriptive-analytic study conducted in Yazd on 7250 term newborns. Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) test was performed in all newborns during the first 24 hours after birth. Those who failed to respond at the first step were retested 15 days later. Those who failed to respond at the second step too, were tested by acoustic brainstem responses (ABR) test. Chi square test was used for data analysis.

FINDINGS

From 7250 newborns in the first step 598 (8.2%) and 682 (9.4%) ears (right and left, respectively) failed. In the second step 51 (0.7%) and 58 (0.8%) ears (right and left, respectively) failed. Consanguinity and route of delivery had significant effect on the frequency of hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

The overall frequency of congenital hearing loss in this study was found high.

Dynamic characteristics of the middle ear in neonates

OBJECTIVE

Early diagnosis and treatment of hearing disorders in neonates is highly effective for realization of linguistic competence and intellectual development. To objectively and quickly evaluate the dynamic characteristics of the middle ear, a sweep frequency impedance (SFI) meter was developed, which allowed the diagnosis of middle-ear dysfunctions in adults and children. However, this SFI meter was not applicable to neonates since the size of the measurement probe was too large. In the present study, therefore, the SFI meter was improved, i.e., the diameter of the probe was reduced to that of the neonatal external ear canal. By using this newly designed SFI meter, SFI tests were performed in healthy neonates.

METHODS

A sound of the sweeping sinusoidal frequency between 0.1 kHz and 2.0 kHz in 0.02-kHz step intervals is presented to the ear canal by an SFI probe while the static pressure of the ear canal is kept constant. During this procedure, the sound pressure level (SPL) is measured. The measurements are performed at 50-daPa intervals of static pressure from 200 daPa to -200 daPa.

RESULTS

Measurements were conducted in 10 ears of 9 neonates. The SPL showed two variations at 0.26 ± 0.03 kHz and 1.13 ± 0.12 kHz. Since the SPL is known to show a variation at frequencies from 1.0 kHz to 1.6 kHz due to the resonance of the middle ear in adults and children with normal hearing, the second variation is probably related to such resonance in neonates. The measurement of gel models, which mimics the neonatal external ear canal, showed a variation in SPL at around 0.5 kHz. This implies that the source of the first variation may possibly be related to the resonance of the external ear canal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

SFI tests revealed that there were two variations in the SPL curve in neonates, one at 0.26 ± 0.03 kHz and the other at 1.13 ± 0.12 kHz, the former and the latter being possibly related to the resonance of the external ear canal wall and that of the middle ear, respectively. This result suggests that the dynamic characteristics of the middle ear in neonates are different from those in adults.

The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit

OBJECTIVE

To identify the outcomes of hearing screening using different protocols of both Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) tests in the same ear of the babies in a neonatal unit population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on babies who were admitted into a neonatal unit. By using a formula of single proportion and considering 20% drop out, the number of sample required was 114. The subjects were chosen by using a systematic random sampling. The infants selected were subjected to DPOAE followed by AABR tests screening at the same setting before discharge.

RESULTS

There were 73 newborns (61.6% male and 38.4% female) participated in this study with a total of 146 ears screened. Ototoxic medication was the most common risk factor followed by hyperbilirubinaemia and low birth weight. AABR had higher passing rate (82.9%) as compared to DPOAE (77.4%). The highest passing rate was achieved if the protocol of either passed DPOAE or AABR was used (90.4%). The rate was lower when auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) has been considered (82.9%). Hyperbilirubinaemia, prematurity, craniofacial malformation and ototoxic drugs seem to be the high risk factors for auditory neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

AABR has a higher passing rate as compared to DPOAE. However, the use of both instruments in the screening process especially in NICU will be useful to determine the infants with ANSD who may need different approach to management. Therefore, a protocol in which newborns are tested with AABR first and then followed by DPOAE on those who fail the AABR is recommended.

Mutation detection in GJB2 gene among Malays with non-syndromic hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

To identify the mutations in the GJB2 gene and to determine its association with non-syndromic hearing loss in Malays.

METHODS

A comparative cross sectional study was conducted on a group of children from the deaf schools and the normal schools. A total of 91 buccal cell samples of non-syndromic hearing loss and 91 normal hearing children were taken. Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify the coding region of GJB2 gene. The PCR product of GJB2 coding region was preceded with screening for mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) and mutations detected were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Twelve sequence variations including mutations and polymorphisms were found in 32 patients and 37 control subjects. The variations were G4D, V27I, E114G, T123N, V37I and R127H in both groups, W24X, R32H, 257_259 del CGC and M34L in patients only and I203T and V153I in control subjects only. There were no association between homozygous (P=0.368) or heterozygous (P=0.164) GJB2 gene and non-syndromic hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The types of GJB2 gene mutation were different and vary in Malay non-syndromic hearing loss as compared to the other races. Furthermore, the mutation did not associate with hearing loss in the population. Other related genes are believed to be involved and need to be sought in this group of patients.

Growth and neurosensory outcomes of preterm very low birth weight infants at 18 months of corrected age

OBJECTIVE

To determine the growth and neurosensory outcomes of infants with birth weight ≤ 1,500 g or gestation ≤ 32 wks at 18 months corrected age. This prospective cohort study was conducted at a Level III neonatal unit in India. The neonates with birth weight ≤ 1,500 g or gestation ≤ 32 wks were included in the study.

METHODS

The infants were followed up at 3,6,9,12 and 18 months corrected age. Weight, length and head circumference were plotted on WHO multisite growth reference study (MGRS) charts. Neurological examination was conducted by Amiel-Tison method, hearing was evaluated with brainstem auditory evoked responses, vision assessed with Teller acuity cards, and development assessed with Developmental Assessment Scales for Indian Infants II.

RESULTS

During the period from July 2006 through June 2007, there were 141 neonates born at gestation ≤ 32 wks or birth weight ≤ 1,500 g. Seven infants had major malformations, 30 died before discharge, 36 had residence > 20 km and parents of four had refused consent. The remaining 64 neonates were enrolled for follow up. The mean gestation and birth weight were 31(2.4) wks and 1208 (365) g respectively. There were 38 (59%) small for gestation infants. Fifty-five infants completed 18 months follow up for growth outcomes. Seventeen (30.9%; 95% CI 18.3% to 43.5%) infants were undernourished, 28(50.9%; 95% CI 37.3% to 64.6%) were stunted, 8(14.5%; 95% CI 0 to 24) were wasted and 14(25.4%; 95% CI 13.6% to 37.3%) had microcephaly. Infants with birth weight <1,000 g (n = 17) were significantly more affected. Ten (58.8%; p < 0.01) were undernourished, 13(76.5%; p < 0.01) were stunted and 10(58.8%; p < 0.01) had microcephaly. Complete formal neurological evaluation for development, hearing and vision was done in 31 infants. Six of these 31 (19.3%; 95% CI 4.6% to 34.1%) infants had one or more major disabilities. These included cerebral palsy (n = 3), developmental delay (development quotient <70, n = 3), and deafness (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Very low birth weight infants are at a high risk of neurosensory disability and growth failure. There is a need to create a nation-wide database of these infants for neurodevelopment and growth outcomes.

Screening for delayed-onset hearing loss in preschool children who previously passed the newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence of delayed-onset hearing loss in preschool children who previously passed newborn hearing screening in Shanghai, China.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and September 2010, 21,427 preschool children were enrolled from five areas of Shanghai, who had passed newborn hearing screening. Children were screened for delayed-onset hearing loss with pediatric audiometers. Children with positive results in initial and re-screening tests were assessed audiologically and for risk indicators according to the Year 2007 Statement of the American Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH).

RESULTS

During the study period, 445 children (2.08%) were referred for audiologic assessment; 16 (0.75/1000, 95% CI 0.38-1.12) had permanent delayed-onset hearing loss. Of these, five (0.23/1000) had bilateral moderate hearing loss; seven (0.33/1000) had mild bilateral hearing loss; and four (0.19/1000) had unilateral moderate or mild hearing loss. JCIH risk indicators were established for six children (6/16, 37.5%), including parental concern regarding speech and language developmental delay, neonatal intensive care unit with assisted ventilation or hyperbilirubinemia, recurrent otitis media with effusion, craniofacial malformation, and family history (n=1 for each). The remaining ten (62.5%) had no related risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of preschool children have undiagnosed delayed-onset hearing loss. Hearing screening in preschool is recommended for an early detection.

Universal neonatal audiological screening: experience of the University Hospital of Pisa

The early identification of pre-lingual deafness is necessary to minimize the consequences of hearing impairment on the future communication skills of a baby. According to the most recent international guidelines the deafness diagnosis must occur before the age of three months and the prosthetic-rehabilitative treatment with a traditional hearing aid should start within the first six months. When a Cochlear implant becomes necessary, the treatment should start between the age of 12 months and 18 months. The only way to diagnose the problem early is the implementation of universal neonatal audiological screening programs. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) is the most adequate test because it's accurate, economic and of simple execution. Automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) is necessary to identify patients with auditory neuropathy but it is also important to reduce the number of false-positives.The 20-30% of infant hearing impairment is represented by progressive or late-onset hearing loss (HL) so it's also necessary to establish an audiological follow up program, especially in infants at risk.From November 2005 all neonates born in the University hospital of Pisa undergo newborn hearing screening. From 2008 the screening program follows the guidelines for the execution of the audiological screening in Tuscany which have been formulated by our group according to the 2007 JCIH Position Statement and adaptated to our regional reality by a multidisciplinary effort. From November 2005 to April 2009 8113 neonates born in the Neonatal Unit of Santa Chiara Hospital (Pisa) have undergone newborn hearing screening. 7621 neonates (93.9%) without risk factors executed only the TEOAE test. 492 (6.1%) neonates had audiological risk factors and thus underwent TEOAE and AABR. 84 patients (1,04%) failed both TEOAE and AABR tests. 78 of them underwent further investigations. 44 patients resulted false positives (the 0,54% of the screened newborns). 34 neonates (4,2 ‰) had a final diagnosis of hearing impairment. 8 patients (0.99 ‰) had unilateral hearing loss (HL). 26 patients (3,2 ‰) had bilateral hearing impairment.In our screening program the percentage of false-positives was quite low (0.54%) while the incidence of bilateral HL (3.2 ‰) is a little higher than that found in literature reports. In most of our patients premature birth or neonatal suffering represent the main cause of HL.

Anxiety of the mothers with referred baby during Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the anxiety among mothers whom their babies have failed test results in the first stage of Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on mothers whom their baby have positive test results in the first stage of Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program. Face to face interview was conducted to obtain data on sociodemographic profiles, knowledge about hearing loss and past medical history. Symptoms experienced by the mothers due to positive hearing test results and level of anxiety were measured by using the Malay translation Beck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire. These mothers were then given an appointment to come for the second screening six weeks after the first screening. The same questionnaire was given to them before the start of the second screening. SPSS version 11.5 was used for data entry and analysis. Wilcoxon signed Rank Test was used to compare the level of anxiety between the first and second screening.

RESULTS

From a total of 78 mothers who were participated during the first screening, 50 of them have completed the study at the second screening (response rate=64%). Fifty-two percent of them knew about the hearing screening before hand. Ninety-six percent of the mothers became alert about their child response towards sounds after they knew that their child had failed the first hearing screening. During the first screening, 74% of the mothers felt mild anxiety which was decreased to 68% before the mothers undergone the second screening. Moderate anxiety was felt by 10% of the mothers during both the first and second screening. There were 8% of the mothers having severe anxiety during the first screening but have reduced to half (4%) before the mothers undergone the second screening. The anxiety level was significantly less before the second screening with the median score of 5 (IQR: 13.0) compared to after the first screening (8, IQR=14.25); p=0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

There are considerable portion of the mothers of false-positive test result during Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program experienced unacceptable anxiety. This group of mothers needs to be identified and given a necessary help.

Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II)

Previously presented results of the newborn hearing screening in Hamburg and the perspectives are subsequently discussed. Minimum standards referring a participation of 95% of the neonates and a fail rate of less than 4% hearing-impaired children at the primary screening are fulfilled in Hamburg. Systematic screening of newborn hearing by an interdisciplinary approach provides early identification and intervention for children with permanent unilateral and bilateral hearing loss. But a newborn hearing screening on a voluntary basis alone cannot be maintained in the long run. Further, an anonymous data collection is not sufficient in regard to an uninterrupted tracking of conspicuous and unscreened neonates. A lost-to-follow-up rate of 31.3% at primary screening in Hamburg is much too high and emphasizes the need for a public health approach to a population-based newborn hearing screening with an elaborate and name-based tracking system. The legislation and implementation of a nationwide newborn hearing screening program in Germany and the association of German newborn hearing screening centers are highlighting long efforts of hearing professionals. But the implementation of a newborn hearing screening only makes sense if there exists an efficient tracking system. Sad to say, we are still a long way from the implementation of such a tracking system.

Neonatal hearing screening model: An Italian regional experience

OBJECTIVE

To produce a model for routine centralized hearing screening including all aspects of the screening, from diagnosis to psychological counseling and early rehabilitation.

METHODS

A prospective observational study on a geographically defined pediatric population (Liguria region, northwestern Italy) and data collection in a data bank. The model proposed was created for the audiological screening of all newborns of the Liguria region. The model includes four phases: (1) preliminary identification of contractual, administrative, legal aspects; (2) screening for identification of congenital hearing impairment; (3) therapy and rehabilitation of identified subjects and genetic analysis; (4) epidemiology, data management, and workload management. To test the feasibility of the model proposed and to establish the workload required according to the resources available in the regional health plan, we performed a pilot study on all infants born in four of the 13 regional birth centers of Liguria region from 1 April 2001 to 30 September 2001.

RESULTS

Out of the 3268 newborns enrolled during the 6-month pilot study, 3238 (99.1%) were screened with otoacoustic emissions (OAE), while screening was refused in 30 newborns (0.9%). OAE resulted in a 'pass' for 3180 newborns (98.2%) and a 'refer' in 58 (1.8%). The standard auditory brainstem response (ABR) test was performed in 156 newborns, 58 of them as a result of the 'refer' at the second OAE and 98 others at audiological risk. Results were positive or uncertain at first ABR in 45 patients. Workload was calculated on the basis of the data obtained in the pilot study to allocate financial and organizational resources.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the pilot study allowed project planning. We think that the screening model proposed is an example of how a regional organization can deliver improved quality care through a rationalization and optimization process.

Choice of probe tone and classification of trace patterns in tympanometry undertaken in early infancy

Tympanometry using 226 Hz, 678 Hz, and 1000 Hz probe tones was undertaken on two groups of babies, age 2 to 21 weeks. A group of 104 babies with normal ABR thresholds or TEOAEs were compared with a second group of 107 babies who had evidence of temporary conductive hearing loss based on the findings of a test battery, which included air and bone conduction ABR. The tympanograms were classified by Method 1, a simple visual classification system, and Method 2, adapted from a system described by Marchant et al (1986). The majority of tympanograms recorded in both groups using the 226 Hz probe tone were 'normal' Type A, with no significant difference in middle ear pressure or static admittance. However, both classification methods demonstrated significant differences between the two groups using the higher frequency probe tones, with Method 2 being the preferred system of classification. Tympanometry using 226 Hz is invalid below 21 weeks and 1000 Hz is the frequency of choice.

Hearing loss in children with very low birth weight: current review of epidemiology and pathophysiology

An association between birth weight <1500 g (very low birth weight (VLBW)) and hearing loss has been long recognised. As universal hearing screening programmes have become widely implemented and the survival rate of VLBW babies in modern intensive care units has increased, we have gained a substantially better understanding of the nature of this problem. However, many gaps in our knowledge base exist. This review describes recent data on hearing loss in the VLBW population and explains the current level of understanding about the physiological basis underlying the auditory deficits in these patients. Although VLBW alone may not have a severe impact on hearing, it is commonly associated with multiple other risk factors that can alter hearing in a synergistic fashion. Therefore, the risk of hearing loss is substantially higher than in the general newborn population. Also, it is important to perform a more comprehensive audiometric evaluation than standard otoacoustic emission screening for infants who are in the neonatal intensive care unit in order not to miss hearing loss due to retrocochlear pathology. Furthermore, children with VLBW are also at increased risk of experiencing progressive or delayed-onset hearing loss, and thus should continue to have serial hearing evaluations after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit.

Screening for gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malays with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss, using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and type of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss.

METHODS

A total of 33 Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss were screened for mutations in the Cx26 coding region. Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from buccal swab samples and subjected to polymerase chain reaction. Slow-reannealing was performed, followed by screening using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Eight of the samples (24.2 per cent) showed heterozygous peaks, and further sequencing of these samples revealed four patients (50.0 per cent) with the W24X mutation, two (25.0 per cent) with the V37I mutation and another two (25.0 per cent) with the G4D mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of buccal swab samples by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography is noninvasive and suitable for rapid and reliable screening of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss have different kinds of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations which are rarely found in other populations.

Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss

More than 90% of newborns in the United States are now being screened for hearing loss. A large fraction of cases of unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss are not currently identified through newborn hearing screening. This is of concern because a preponderance of research has demonstrated that unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss can lead to developmental delays and educational problems for some children. To help address this probable underidentification of unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss among infants and children, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early Hearing Detection and Intervention program and the Marion Downs Hearing Center convened a workshop in Breckenridge, Colorado, in July 2005. During this workshop, several issues related to screening and diagnosing unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss were identified, as well as recommendations for future research in this area. Issues identified included the lack of standardized definitions for permanent unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss; the use of screening protocols that are primarily designed to identify bilateral and unilateral hearing losses of a moderate degree or greater (eg, above 40 dB); calibration of screening equipment; availability of facilities that can provide the full range of audiologic, diagnostic, and management services to this pediatric population; and an overall lack of awareness by many professionals and families about the potential effect of unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss. Suggestions for future research, such as identifying ways to improve the identification of cases of unilateral hearing loss and mild bilateral hearing loss, were also discussed.

Tone-evoked ABR in full-term and preterm neonates with normal hearing

This study was designed to investigate the feasibility of applying tone-ABRs in the nursery and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and to provide normative tone-ABR data from neonates. Normative tone-ABR latency data were determined. The study obtained intensity series of tone-ABRs from thirty preterm neonates and twenty full-term neonates who had confirmed normal peripheral auditory function after passing both an OAE and ABR screening examination. ABRs were collected in response to 500, 1500, and 4000 Hz tone bursts at 70, 50, 30, and 20 dB nHL. Mean wave V latencies were compared between groups, ears, and by gender. Responses to tone bursts of 20 and 30 dB nHL were detected in 97% and 100% of all ears respectively, in addition to responses to the higher-intensity stimuli. Preterm neonates' ABRs showed significantly longer latencies than those of the full-term infants. Tone-ABR evaluation was found to be both feasible and reliable as a measure of auditory function in neonates.

Neurophysiologic evaluation of brain function in extremely premature newborn infants

In extremely preterm infants, neonatal brain injury and interruption of the normal maturation of the brain result in functional impairments that appear to manifest in later life. The roots of these impairments may be evaluated in the newborn infant using neurophysiologic techniques, such as evoked potentials and event-related potentials. This paper will review the use of neurophysiologic techniques as a marker of maturational processes in the preterm and newborn brain and as a method of monitoring the development of sensory and cognitive function in preterm infants, focusing on auditory perception, discrimination, and memory. The effects of risk conditions will be reviewed.

Ligurian experience on neonatal hearing screening: clinical and epidemiological aspects

AIM

Early identification and rehabilitation of newborns with congenital hearing impairment (HI) by Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS).

METHODS

The neonatal population was divided into two groups: babies with No Audiological Risk (NAR), and babies With Audiological Risk (WAR). NAR neonates underwent OAE testing, and in case of a doubtful (Refer) result, ABR testing was carried out. All WAR newborns underwent ABR testing within the third month of life.

RESULTS

Between February 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004, UNHS was carried out on 32 502 newborns at the 13 regional birth centres, representing 98.7% of the whole regional neonatal population. The prevalence of HI in the population we tested was estimated at about 1 per thousand, while Bilateral Hearing Impairment (BHI) was estimated at 0.65 per thousand. A 3.7% prevalence of HI and a 2.8% prevalence of BHI was observed among the WAR population. Median age at the end of the diagnostic procedures was 6.7 months in the WAR population and 6.9 months in the NAR population.

CONCLUSIONS

Our project is based on two levels of testing, which resulted in a 0.28% false-positive rate with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Our screening is the first Italian experience that has been extended to a whole region and the results prove that regional neonatal hearing screening is feasible.

Health status and health-related quality of life preference-based outcomes of children who are aged 7 to 9 years and have bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the health status and health-related quality of life preference-based outcomes of children with diagnosed bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment and a comparison group of English-speaking children with normal hearing.

METHODS

We studied 120 children who were aged 7 to 9 years and had bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment of moderate or greater severity, identified from a cohort of 156,733 children who were born in 8 districts of southern England, and 63 English-speaking children with normal hearing and the same place of birth and age at assessment. Principal caregivers were interviewed by using the Health Utilities Index Mark III questionnaire for proxy-assessed usual health status assessment. Levels of function within each of the 8 attributes of the Health Utilities Index Mark III (cognition, vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, and pain) were recorded.

RESULTS

Bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment is associated with significantly increased proportions of suboptimal levels of function and significantly lower single-attribute utility scores in 6 of the 8 attributes of the Health Utilities Index Mark III: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, and cognition. Compared with the children with normal hearing, the mean multiattribute utility score for the children with hearing impairment was significantly lower for both the whole group and the moderate, severe, and profound severity subgroups. The differences in the distributions of the multiattribute utility scores between the children with hearing impairment as a group and the children with normal hearing and between each of the severity subgroups and the children with normal hearing all were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides rigorous evidence of an association between bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment and diminished health status and health-related quality of life preference-based outcomes during midchildhood.

Language ability in children with permanent hearing impairment: the influence of early management and family participation

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to examine the relationships between management after confirmation, family participation, and speech and language outcomes in the same group of children with permanent childhood hearing impairment.

METHODS

Speech, oral language, and nonverbal abilities, expressed as z scores and adjusted in a regression model, and Family Participation Rating Scale scores were assessed at a mean age of 7.9 years for 120 children with bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment from a 1992-1997 United Kingdom birth cohort. Ages at institution of management and hearing aid fitting were obtained retrospectively from case notes.

RESULTS

Compared with children managed later (> 9 months), those managed early (< or = 9 months) had higher adjusted mean z scores for both receptive and expressive language, relative to nonverbal ability, but not for speech. Compared with children aided later, a smaller group of more-impaired children aided early did not have significantly higher scores for these outcomes. Family Participation Rating Scale scores showed significant positive correlations with language and speech intelligibility scores only for those with confirmation after 9 months and were highest for those with late confirmed, severe/profound, permanent childhood hearing impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Early management of permanent childhood hearing impairment results in improved language. Family participation is also an important factor in cases that are confirmed late, especially for children with severe or profound permanent childhood hearing impairment.

Initial Audiologic Assessment of Infants Referred From Well Baby, Special Care, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Nurseries

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-hr initial audiologic assessment appointment for infants referred from area universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programs to a clinical audiology department in an urban hospital.

Method

A prospective auditory brainstem response (ABR)-based protocol, including clicks, frequency-specific tone bursts, and bone-conducted stimuli, was administered by 10 audiologists to 375 infants. Depending on the ABR findings, additional test options included distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), high-frequency tympanometry, and/or otologic examination.

Results

In 88% of the 2-hr test sessions, at least 4 ABR threshold estimates were obtained (i.e., bilateral clicks and either a 500- or 1000-Hz tone burst and a 4000-Hz frequency tone burst for the better ear). The incidence of hearing loss was significantly different across nursery levels: 18% for Level I (well baby), 29% for Level II (special care), and 52% for Level III (neonatal intensive care unit). Hearing loss type was defined at the initial assessment for 35 of the 51 infants with bilateral hearing loss based on bone-conduction ABR, latency measures, DPOAEs, high-frequency tympanometry, and/or otologic examination.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that a 2-hr test appointment is appropriate for all nursery levels to diagnose severity and type of hearing loss in the majority of infants referred from UNHS. Examination by an otolaryngologist within 24–48 hr further defines the hearing loss and facilitates treatment plans.

Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment

BACKGROUND

Children with bilateral permanent hearing impairment often have impaired language and speech abilities. However, the effects of universal newborn screening for permanent bilateral childhood hearing impairment and the effects of confirmation of hearing impairment by nine months of age on subsequent verbal abilities are uncertain.

METHODS

We studied 120 children with bilateral permanent hearing impairment identified from a large birth cohort in southern England, at a mean of 7.9 years of age. Of the 120 children, 61 were born during periods with universal newborn screening and 57 had hearing impairment that was confirmed by nine months of age. The primary outcomes were language as compared with nonverbal ability and speech expressed as z scores (the number of standard deviations by which the score differed from the mean score among 63 age-matched children with normal hearing), adjusted for the severity of the hearing impairment and for maternal education.

RESULTS

Confirmation of hearing impairment by nine months of age was associated with higher adjusted mean z scores for language as compared with nonverbal ability (adjusted mean difference for receptive language, 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 1.33; and adjusted mean difference for expressive language, 0.70; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.13 to 1.26). Birth during periods with universal newborn screening was also associated with higher adjusted z scores for receptive language as compared with nonverbal ability (adjusted mean difference, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.07 to 1.13), although the z scores for expressive language as compared with nonverbal ability were not significantly higher. Speech scores did not differ significantly between those who were exposed to newborn screening or early confirmation and those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection of childhood hearing impairment was associated with higher scores for language but not for speech in midchildhood.

Neonatal screening for hearing impairment--The Oman experience

BACKGROUND

Oman introduced universal hearing screening at a national level in 2002 after piloting it in limited regions. Authors present their experiences.

METHODS

The screening had three phases. In Phase I, trained health staff of the delivery suits screened newborns by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) test. In Phase II, otologists examined ears and repeated hearing tests after 6 weeks. Those who failed the repeat test were referred to a tertiary unit for the Phase III. Audiometrists tested their hearing by an Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR). The rates of hearing disabled, false positive, yield and cost of screening were estimated.

RESULTS

The coverage of Phase I was 66.6% (21,387/32,125) and it had significant regional variation. Two thousand two hundred and eighty-seven (10.7%) newborns were suspected with hearing impairment. We detected 262 (1.2%) children with hearing impairment. In Phase II, 55 (0.26%) neonates failed the test. In Phase III, 36 neonates were tested with ABR. Eleven were lost to follow up and eight children were advised to undergo further investigations. Ten children were found normal and 26 had hearing impairment. Six neonates had sensory-neuronal hearing loss, 17 children had otitis media with effusion and three children had atresia of the middle ear. The yield of hearing screening was 1.2/1000. The cost of screening was US$7.1/newborn.

CONCLUSION

Universal hearing screening in Oman was useful but had teething problems. Proper planning, advocacy to the health staff and parents, commitment of the staff and care of the equipment are important. Such screening should be complimented with a defaulter retrieval and rehabilitation facilities for the hearing disabled.

The economic costs of congenital bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to estimate the economic costs of bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) in the preceding year of life for children aged 7 to 9 years.

METHODS

A cost analysis was conducted by using a birth cohort of children born between 1992 and 1997 in 8 districts of Southern England, of which half had been born into populations exposed to universal newborn screening (UNS). Unit costs were applied to estimates of health, social, and broader resource use made by 120 hearing-impaired children and 63 children in a normally hearing comparison group. Associations between societal costs per child and severity of hearing impairment, language ability score, exposure to UNS, and age of confirmation were analyzed, including adjustment for potential confounders in a linear regression model.

RESULTS

The mean societal cost in the preceding year of life at 7 to 9 years of age was 14092.5 pound sterling for children with PCHI, compared with 4206.8 pound sterling for the normally hearing children, a cost difference of 9885.7 pound sterling. After adjusting for severity and other potential confounders in a linear regression model, mean societal costs among children with PCHI were reduced by 2553 pound sterling for each unit increase in the z score for receptive language. Using similar regression models, exposure to a program of UNS was associated with a smaller cost reduction of 2213.2 pound sterling, whereas costs were similar between children whose PCHI was confirmed at <9 or >9 months. CONCLUSIONS. The study provides rigorous evidence of the annual health, social, and broader societal cost of bilateral PCHI in the preceding year of life at 7 to 9 years of age and shows that it is related to its severity and has an inverse relationship with language abilities after adjustment for severity.

Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis

Background

Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and treatment. At present, no model exists which explicitly quantifies the effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) versus other programme alternatives in terms of early diagnosis. It has yet to be considered whether early diagnosis (within the first few months) of hearing impairment is of importance with regard to the further development of the child compared with effects resulting from a later diagnosis. The objective was to systematically compare two screening strategies for the early detection of new-born hearing disorders, UNHS and risk factor screening, with no systematic screening regarding their influence on early diagnosis.

Methods

Design: Clinical effectiveness analysis using a Markov Model.

Data Sources: Systematic literature review, empirical data survey, and expert opinion. Target Population: All newborn babies.

Time scale: 6, 12 and 120 months.

Perspective: Health care system.

Compared Strategies: UNHS, Risk factor screening (RS), no systematic screening (NS). Outcome Measures: Quality weighted detected child months (QCM).

Results

UNHS detected 644 QCM up until the age of 6 months (72,2%). RS detected 393 child months (44,1%) and no systematic screening 152 child months (17,0%). UNHS detected 74,3% and 86,7% weighted child months at 12 and 120 months, RS 48,4% and 73,3%, NS 23,7% and 60,6%. At the age of 6 months UNHS identified approximately 75% of all children born with hearing impairment, RS 50% and NS 25%. At the time of screening UNHS marked 10% of screened healthy children for further testing (false positives), RS 2%. UNHS demonstrated higher effectiveness even under a wide range of relevant parameters. The model was insensitive to test parameters within the assumed range but results varied along the prevalence of hearing impairment.

Conclusion

We have shown that UNHS is able to detect hearing impairment at an earlier age and more accurately than selective RS. Further research should be carried out to establish the effects of hearing loss on the quality of life of an individual, its influence on school performance and career achievement and the differences made by early fitting of a hearing aid on these factors.

Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice

Recent technological advances have made feasible universal newborn hearing screening and therefore early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Over the past three years, new information has been published on whether early intervention is beneficial, the possibility of harm arising from newborn screening, and its cost. Dramatic progress has been made in the large scale implementation of universal screening in many parts of the western world.

Qualitative analysis of parents' experience with early detection of hearing loss

AIMS

To determine key themes from parents' comments on paths to diagnosis and intervention for their children with hearing loss, following introduction of at-risk neonatal hearing screening and modification of distraction test screening for infants not at-risk.

METHODS

Parents of children born in 1993 in Victoria, Australia, who were eligible for screening via the Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program and who were subsequently diagnosed with a permanent congenital hearing loss and fitted with hearing aids prior to the year 2000 were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire shortly after aid fitting. Two researchers independently analysed parent comments using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Parents of 82 children (61%) replied to the questionnaire. Themes analysis revealed a generally positive response to neonatal ABR screening, with a mixed response to the distraction test; powerful emotions experienced by parents at diagnosis including denial and shock; frustration arising from delays in diagnosis, and communication difficulties with providers. Special difficulties testing children with other medical and developmental problems, confusion about tympanostomy tube insertion, and difficulty with wearing hearing aids were also reported. Some children had experienced problems in the school setting. Experience of post-diagnostic services was generally positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents need greater support both during the testing of screen failures and at the time of diagnosis. Providers need more training in how to communicate findings to parents, particularly at times when parents are experiencing strong emotions. Parents need more strategies to enable hearing aid wearing in very young children. Some children with additional medical, developmental, and behavioural problems need specialised approaches to testing.

Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of newborn hearing disorders is 1-3 per 1,000. Crucial for later outcome are correct diagnosis and effective treatment as soon as possible. With BERA and TEOAE low-risk techniques for early detection are available. Universal screening is recommended but not realised in most European health care systems. Aim of the study was to examine the scientific evidence of newborn hearing screening and a comparison of medical outcome and costs of different programmes, differentiated by type of strategy (risk screening, universal screening, no systematical screening).

METHODS

In an interdisciplinary health technology assessment project all studies on newborn hearing screening detected in a standardized comprehensive literature search were identified and data on medical outcome, costs, and cost-effectiveness extracted. A Markov model was designed to calculate cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

Economic data were extracted from 20 relevant publications out of 39 publications found. In the model total costs for screening of 100,000 newborns with a time horizon of ten years were calculated: 2.0 Mio.euro for universal screening (U), 1.0 Mio.euro for risk screening (R), and 0.6 Mio.euro for no screening (N). The costs per child detected: 13,395 euro (U) respectively 6,715 euro (R), and 4,125 euro (N). At 6 months of life the following percentages of cases are detected: U 72%, R 43%, N 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

A remarkable small number of economic publications mainly of low methodological quality was found. In our own model we found reasonable cost-effectiveness ratios also for universal screening. Considering the outcome advantages of higher numbers of detected cases a universal newborn hearing screening is recommended.