Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

Newer Therapies in Rheumatology

Seven of the 11 newer medications recently or soon to be approved to treat rheumatologic diseases discussed in this article are biologic agents and reflect the current ability of science to target specific components of the immune system. The other agents are molecules that are directed against specific immune pathway targets as well. All have shown superiority to placebo and in some cases have been compared to currently accepted therapies. Safety issues are generally centered around infections due to the immune-interrupting nature of these therapies.

Efficacy of Olokizumab against Comorbid Depressive Disorder in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Preliminary Results of the Study

Interleukin (IL) 6 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of depression comorbid with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and IL-6 inhibitors used to treat patients with RA may have an antidepressant effect. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Russian iIL-6 olokizumab (OKZ) in reducing symptoms of depression in patients with moderate/high RA activity. To date, 49 RA patients have been included, of which 43 (87.7%) are women, with an average age of 47.8 ± 12.8 years; with a predominant high activity of RA according to DAS28 (CRP) indices (89.8%), SDAI (79.6%) and CDAI (75.5%) and inefficacy of stable 12-week therapy with сDMARDs. In all patients, a psychiatrist, in accordance with ICD-10, diagnosed depression (chronic or recurrent) of varying severity during a semi-structured interview. At week 0, all patients were randomized by the method of sequential numbers in a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1 to one of the three study groups: group 1-cDMARDs + OKZ 64 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (n = 18); group 2-cDMARDs + OKZ 64 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks + psychopharmacotherapy (PPT) (n = 26); group 3-cDMARDs + PPT (n = 5). The duration of the study is 24 weeks. The dynamics of depression severity was assessed on the PHQ-9, MADRS scales; anxiety, on HAM-A; experimental psychological projective techniques were also used. After 12 and 24 weeks of therapy, there was a significant decrease in the severity of depression and anxiety in all groups of patients. However, the difference between the final and initial values of all scales was statistically significantly greater (p <0.05) in the groups of patients receiving PPT: cDMARDs + OKZ + PPT (ΔPHQ-9 24-0 = -6.75 ± 3.91; ΔMADRS 24-0 = -22.5 ± 4.83; ΔHAM-A 24-0 = -14.6 ± 5.37) and cDMARDs + PPT (ΔPHQ-9 24-0 = -15.5 ± 3.53; ΔMADRS 24-0 = -25.0 ± 1.41; ΔHAM-A 24-0 = -18.5 ± 3.53), compared with the cDMARDs + OKZ group (ΔPHQ-9 24-0 = -4.00 ± 3.89; ΔMADRS 24-0 = -5.75 ± 8.29; ΔHAM-A 24-0 = -8.50 ± 8.21). According to a semi-structured interview with a psychiatrist and design experimental psychological techniques, the proportion of patients without depression after 24 weeks of therapy was significantly higher in the groups of patients receiving PPT: 90% in the group of cDMARDs + OKZ + PPT and 100%-cDMARDs + PPT, as opposed to 25% in the group of cDMARDs + OKZ. OKZ therapy contributed to the normalization of night sleep but did not lead to a decrease in the frequency and severity of cognitive disorders (CDs). OKZ has an antidepressant effect, leads to a decrease in the frequency of sleep disorders. However, a complete regression of depression symptoms when OKZ is prescribed without PPT is possible only in 25% of RA patients, mainly in the patients with mild depression. A combination of OKZ and PPT is optimal for the complete regression of depression and anxiety and a decrease in the frequency and severity of CDs.

Olokizumab plus methotrexate: safety and efficacy over 106 weeks of treatment

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using pooled data from three randomised clinical trials (RCT) followed by open-label extension (OLE) study.

METHODS

Cumulative data from three phase 3 core trials and their OLE were analysed. Safety variables assessed included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs of special interest and laboratory results. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 responses, Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) <3.2, CDAI remission and low disease activity (LDA), SDAI remission and LDA, HAQ-DI decrease of 0.22 unit and Boolean 2.0 remission.

RESULTS

A total of 2304 patients received OKZ in combination with MTX either once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks. Event rates per 100 patient-years in OKZ every 2 weeks and OKZ every 4 weeks, respectively, were 9.57 and 9.13 for SAEs; 2.95 and 2.34 for serious infections; 0.09 and 0.05 for gastrointestinal perforations; 0.58 and 0.83 for major adverse cardiovascular events; and 0.45 and 0.50 for malignancies. No increase in the rate of any AE was observed over 106 weeks of treatment. The evaluation of laboratory variables demonstrated the expected changes, like neutropenia, elevation of liver enzymes and blood lipids. Clinical response rates remained stable during the OLE.

CONCLUSION

The long-term safety and tolerability of OKZ in combination with MTX remained stable. The efficacy of OKZ was maintained through week 106. These findings support OKZ as a treatment option for patients with active RA.

Novel and potential future therapeutic options in systemic autoimmune diseases

Autoimmune inflammation is caused by the loss of tolerance to specific self-antigens and can result in organ-specific or systemic disorders. Systemic autoimmune diseases affect a significant portion of the population with an increasing rate of incidence, which means that is essential to have effective therapies to control these chronic disorders. Unfortunately, several patients with systemic autoimmune diseases do not respond at all or just partially respond to available conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and targeted therapies. However, during the past few years, some new medications have been approved and can be used in real-life clinical settings. Meanwhile, several new candidates appeared and can offer promising novel treatment options in the future. Here, we summarize the newly available medications and the most encouraging drug candidates in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's disease, systemic sclerosis, systemic vasculitis, and autoimmune myositis.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab administered intravenously to RA patients at 64 mg/kg every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2 or Q4W).

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 2609 patients met the inclusion criteria. Both olokizumab Q2 and Q4W treatments achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) compared with the placebo (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, 95% credible interval [CrI] 2.53-4.09; OR 3.05, 95% CrI 2.43-3.86). However, olokizumab Q2W was associated with the most favorable surface using the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ACR20 response rate. The ranking probability based on the SUCRA indicated that olokizumab Q2W had the highest probability of being considered the best treatment option for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by olokizumab Q4W, adalimumab, and placebo. The ACR50 and 70 response rates showed a similar distribution pattern to the ACR20 response rate, except that olokizumab Q4W had a higher-ranking probability than olokizumab Q2W for ACR50. The SUCRA rating likelihood of adverse events (AEs) and withdrawal due to AEs showed that a placebo was likely to be the best intervention.

CONCLUSION

Both olokizumab Q2 and Q4W were efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for active RA.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and olokizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the relative efficacy and safety of olokizumab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who were intolerant or responding inadequately to methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab in RA patients who were intolerant or responding inadequately to MTX.

RESULTS

Six RCTs comprising 4439 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tocilizumab, sarilumab, olokizumab, and adalimumab treatments achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate compared with placebo. However, tocilizumab was associated with the most favorable surface area using the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ACR20 response rate. The ranking probability based on the SUCRA indicated that tocilizumab treatment had the highest probability of providing the best ACR20 response rate, followed by sarilumab, olokizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W), olokizumab Q4W, adalimumab 40 mg, and placebo. The ACR50 and 70 response rates showed a distribution pattern similar to that of the ACR20 response rate. However, olokizumab Q4W had a higher ranking probability than olokizumab Q2W. The SUCRA rating showed that the placebo was the best intervention with the least adverse events (AEs) and withdrawal due to AEs, followed by interleukin‑6 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab, sarilumab, and olokizumab are more effective than adalimumab and have similar efficacy and safety in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.

Targeting IL-6 or IL-6 Receptor in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Have We Learned?

The use of different pathways in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has led to a significant decrease in the number of treatment-resistant patients. In this context, interleukin (IL)-6 inhibition has filled an important gap in rheumatoid arthritis treatment with its effectiveness and safety in both monotherapy and combinations. The process of IL-6 inhibition initiated with IL-6 receptor blockers has prompted questions regarding the potential impact and safety of different inhibitions of this pathway, such as the direct blockade of IL-6. Following the termination of the development of sirukumab because of mortality data in early studies, the investigation of olokizumab, which targets a different region of the IL-6 cytokine, has renewed the hope in this area and the safety concerns have been largely alleviated by the open-label extension data. In addition, the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and sarilumab have led to a rapid investigation of biosimilars and new potent IL-6 receptor blockers. A comprehensive understanding of mechanisms of this pathway with further long-term clinical data and basic research may provide a decisive impact on selecting the appropriate mechanism as the first choice in personalized treatments.

Text Mining and Drug Discovery Analysis: A Comprehensive Approach to Investigate Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis

Purpose: Osteoporosis (OP) and diabetes are prevalent diseases in orthopedic and endocrinology departments, with OP potentially arising as a complication of diabetes. However, the mechanism underlying diabetes-induced osteoporosis (DOP) remains enigmatic, and drug discovery in this domain is restricted, hindering research into the DOP's etiology and treatment. With the ultimate goal of preventing OP in diabetic patients, the objective of this study is to mine the genes and pathways linked to DOP using bioinformatics and databases. Method: The present study employed text mining as the initial approach to retrieve genes commonly associated with diabetes and OP. Subsequently, functional annotation was conducted to investigate the roles and functionalities. In order to explore the interactions between proteins relevant to DOP, we constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Furthermore, to obtain key genes and candidate drugs for DOP treatment, we conducted drug-gene interaction (DGI) analysis, complemented by a thorough examination of transcriptional factors (TFs)-miRNA co-regulation. Results: The results through text mining revealed 110 genes that are commonly associated with both diabetes and OP. Subsequent enrichment analysis narrowed down the list to 95 symbols that were involved in PPI analysis. After DGI analysis, we identified 7 genes targeted by 11 drugs, which represent candidates for treating DOP. Conclusion: This study unveils ANDECALIXIMAB, SILTUXIMAB, OLOKIZUMAB, SECUKINUMAB, and IXEKIZUMAB as promising potential drugs for DOP treatment, demonstrating the significance of utilizing text mining and pathway analysis to investigate disease mechanisms and explore existing therapeutic options.

The efficacy and safety of olokizumab for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis

Olokizumab (OKZ) is a novel IL-6 inhibitor that directly targets IL-6 rather than its receptor. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OKZ for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the optimal treatment regimen. A systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed until August 31, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022358082. Five RCTs with 2277 patients were included. OKZ significantly improved the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) 20 (RR: 1.97 with 95% CI [1.49, 2.58], P = 0.00001), ACR50 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), ACR70 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), disease activity score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) (RR: 3.91 with 95% CI [2.65, 5.79], P = 0.00001), clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (RR: 2.80 with 95% CI [1.43, 5.48], P = 0.003), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.38, - 0.18], P = 0.00001) after 12 weeks, compared to placebo. However, OKZ was also associated with a higher incidence of any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 1.15 with 95% CI [1.06, 1.25], P = 0.0005) and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 1.86 with 95% CI [1.05, 3.29], P = 0.03). OKZ is effective and with acceptable safety profile when administrated with methotrexate in patients with RA not adequately controlled by tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; however, more large-scale RCTs are still required to investigate the optimal dosing, long-term effects, and comparative efficacy versus established biological DMARDs. Key Points • OKZ is effective especially with methotrexate in RA patients.

Comprehensive overview of microRNA function in rheumatoid arthritis

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a class of endogenous single-stranded short noncoding RNAs, have emerged as vital epigenetic regulators of both pathological and physiological processes in animals. They direct fundamental cellular pathways and processes by fine-tuning the expression of multiple genes at the posttranscriptional level. Growing evidence suggests that miRNAs are implicated in the onset and development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA is a chronic inflammatory disease that mainly affects synovial joints. This common autoimmune disorder is characterized by a complex and multifaceted pathogenesis, and its morbidity, disability and mortality rates remain consistently high. More in-depth insights into the underlying mechanisms of RA are required to address unmet clinical needs and optimize treatment. Herein, we comprehensively review the deregulated miRNAs and impaired cellular functions in RA to shed light on several aspects of RA pathogenesis, with a focus on excessive inflammation, synovial hyperplasia and progressive joint damage. This review also provides promising targets for innovative therapies of RA. In addition, we discuss the regulatory roles and clinical potential of extracellular miRNAs in RA, highlighting their prospective applications as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers.

Personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: Combining biomarkers and patient preferences to guide therapeutic decisions

The last few decades have seen major therapeutic advancements in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapeutics. New disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have continued to emerge, creating more choices for people. However, no therapeutic works for all patients. Each has its own inherent benefits, risks, costs, dosing, and monitoring considerations. In parallel, there has been a focus on personalized medicine initiatives that tailor therapeutic decisions to patients based on their unique characteristics or biomarkers. Personalized effect estimates require an understanding of a patient's baseline probability of response to treatment and data on the comparative effectiveness of the available treatments. However, even if accurate risk prediction models are available, trade-offs often still need to be made between treatments. In this paper, we review the history of RA therapeutics and progress that has been made toward personalized risk predictive models for DMARDs, outlining where knowledge gaps still exist. We further review why patient preferences play a key role in a holistic view of personalized medicine and how this links with shared decision-making. We argue that a "preference misdiagnosis" may be equally important as a medical misdiagnosis but is often overlooked.

Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022.

RESULTS

Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission.

CONCLUSION

The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA.

Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic(s) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention in RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments yet without, or limited, registry data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine observational studies addressed the safety of DMARDs. Two studies (unclear risk of bias (RoB)) showed an increased risk of serious infections with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Herpes zoster infections occurred more with JAKi than csDMARDs (adjusted HR (aHR): 3.66) and bDMARDs (aHR: 1.9-2.3) (four studies, two low RoB). The risk of malignancies was similar across bDMARDs (five studies) and with tofacitinib compared with bDMARDs (one study, low RoB). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar with bDMARDs and tofacitinib (two studies, one low RoB). Thirty studies reported safety from RCTs, with one, designed to evaluate safety, showing that malignancies (HR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.04 to 2.09)) and MACE (HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)) occurred numerically more frequently with tofacitinib (5 mg and 10 mg doses combined) than with TNFi in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg than with TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of bDMARDs was further demonstrated. Whether the difference in incidence of malignancies, MACE and VTE between tofacitinib and TNFi applies to other JAKi needs further evaluation.

Olokizumab's Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

In the development of rheumatoid arthritis, the cytokine interleukin-6 plays a role. An interleukin-6 cytokine-specific monoclonal antibody called olokizumab directly targets this cytokine. OKZ effectiveness and safety are being evaluated through this meta-analysis.

METHOD

I looked up every published randomized controlled study on Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed. I conducted the study using both the Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance approaches. I evaluated bias in the included studies using the risk of bias tool 2.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, five trials totalling 2227 participants, were examined. In contrast to the placebo group, the olokizumab group had a significantly higher incidence of American College of Rheumatology 20; RR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.69, 1.99], P < 0.00001. Regarding Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index improvement, olokizumab significantly outperformed the placebo group; MD = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.32, -0.24], P < 0.00001. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was significantly higher in the olokizumab group than in the placebo group; RR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.04, 1.17], P = 0.0006. Furthermore, the incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the olokizumab group and the placebo group; RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.60, 1.20], P = 0.35.

CONCLUSION

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, olokizumab combined methotrexate is well tolerated and more effective than placebo plus methotrexate.

CHARACTERISTICS OF OLOKIZUMAB PHARMACOKINETICS IN PATIENTS WITH NOVEL CORONAVIRUS INFECTION COVID-19

The aim of the article is to study pharmacokinetic characteristics of intravenous olokizumab in patients with moderate COVID-19 to relieve a hyperinflammation syndrome.

Materials and methods. The pharmacokinetic study was conducted as a part of a phase III clinical study (RESET, NCT05187793) on the efficacy and safety of a new olokizumab regimen (intravenous, at the doses of 128 mg or 256 mg) in COVID-19 patients. Plasma concentrations of olokizumab were determined by the enzyme immunoassay. The population analysis was performed using a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a linear two compartment.

Results. The pharmacokinetic analysis included the data from 8 moderate COVID-19 patients who had been administrated with olokizumab intravenously at the dose of 128 mg. According to the analysis results in this population, there was an increase in the drug clearance, compared with the data obtained in healthy volunteers and the patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 0.435, 0.178 and 0.147 l/day, respectively. The parameters analysis within the framework of a population pharmacokinetic model showed that the main factors for the increased olokizumab clearance are a high body mass index. In addition, the presence of COVID-19 itself is an independent factor in increasing the drug clearance.

Conclusion. After the intravenous olokizumab administration, an increase in the drug clearance is observed in moderate COVID-19 patients against the background of the disease course. The main contribution to the increased clearance is made by the characteristics of the population of COVID-19 patients associated with the risk of a severe disease and inflammation. When administered intravenously at the dose of 128 mg, a therapeutically significant olokizumab level was maintained throughout the acute disease phase for 28 days.

The prospects of interleukin-6 inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis: Olokizumab (novel monoclonal antibodies to IL-6)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) manifested with progressive destruction of joints, systemic inflammation of visceral organs and a wide range of co-morbidities associated with chronic inflammation. Among the cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA and certain other IMRDs, the role of interleukin (IL) 6 is of special interest. The introduction of mAbs tocilizumab (TCZ) and later sarilumab (SAR), both blocking the receptor of this cytokine, into clinical practice was an important achievement in the treatment of IIRDs at the beginning of the 21st century. As a novel approach in the treatment of RA, the humanized mAb against IL-6 olokizumab (OKZ) is in development by the Russian company R-PHARM under the license agreement with UCB Pharma. The review examines new data on efficacy and safety of OKZ in RA and the prospects of its use in rheumatology

Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ), a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 (IL-6) cytokine, versus placebo (PBO) in patients with prior inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IRs).

Methods

In this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, the patients were randomised in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w), OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks (q4w) or PBO plus methotrexate. At week 16, the patients on PBO were randomised to receive either OKZ regime. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP))<3.2 at week 12 was the major secondary efficacy endpoint. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed.

Results

In 368 patients randomised, ACR20 response rates were 60.9% in OKZ q2w, 59.6% in OKZ q4w and 40.6% in PBO (p<0.01 for both comparisons). Achievement of DAS28 (CRP) <3.2 was significantly different, favouring the OKZ arms. Improvements in efficacy and patient-reported outcomes were maintained throughout 24 weeks and were noted after week 16 in patients who switched from PBO.

Dose-related treatment-emergent serious adverse events were 7% in OKZ q2w, 3.2% in OKZ q4w and none in the PBO group.

Conclusions

Direct inhibition of IL-6 with OKZ resulted in significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis compared with PBO in TNF-IR patients with a similar safety profile as observed for monoclonal antibodies to the IL-6 receptor.

Trial registration number

NCT02760433.

Olokizumab versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

The cytokine interleukin-6 is involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Olokizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 cytokine directly, is being tested for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

In a 24-week, phase 3, multicenter, placebo- and active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:2:2:1 ratio) patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate to receive subcutaneous olokizumab at a dose of 64 mg every 2 or 4 weeks, adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks), or placebo; all patients continued methotrexate therapy. The primary end point was an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response (≥20% fewer tender and swollen joints and ≥20% improvement in three of five other domains) at week 12, with each olokizumab dose tested for superiority to placebo. We also tested the noninferiority of each olokizumab dose to adalimumab with respect to the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response (noninferiority margin, -12 percentage points in the lower boundary of the 97.5% confidence interval for the difference between groups).

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients were assigned to receive olokizumab every 2 weeks, 479 to receive olokizumab every 4 weeks, 462 to receive adalimumab, and 243 to receive placebo. An ACR20 response at week 12 occurred in 44.4% of the patients receiving placebo, in 70.3% receiving olokizumab every 2 weeks (difference vs. placebo, 25.9 percentage points; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 17.1 to 34.1), in 71.4% receiving olokizumab every 4 weeks (difference vs. placebo, 27.0 percentage points; 97.5% CI, 18.3 to 35.2), and in 66.9% receiving adalimumab (difference vs. placebo, 22.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.8 to 29.8) (P<0.001 for the superiority of each olokizumab dose to placebo). Both olokizumab doses were noninferior to adalimumab with respect to the percentage of patients with an ACR20 response at week 12 (difference, 3.4 percentage points [97.5% CI, -3.5 to 10.2] with olokizumab every 2 weeks and 4.5 percentage points [97.5% CI, -2.2 to 11.2] with olokizumab every 4 weeks). Adverse events, most commonly infections, occurred in approximately 70% of the patients who received olokizumab. Antibodies against olokizumab were detected in 3.8% of the patients receiving the drug every 2 weeks and in 5.1% of those receiving it every 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving maintenance methotrexate, olokizumab was superior to placebo and noninferior to adalimumab in producing an ACR20 response at 12 weeks. Larger and longer trials are required to determine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. (Supported by R-Pharm; CREDO2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02760407.).

Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Olokizumab Treatment in Russian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease and its treatment is an urgent problem of rheumatology. Olokizumab (OKZ) is a new humanized monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6 and is one of the few promising drugs for RA therapy. One-hundred-and-twenty-five DNA samples from Russian patients with RA, treated with olokizumab, were genotyped with an NGS panel containing 60 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the whole coding sequences of IL6, IL6R, TNFRSF1A, CTLA4, IL10, IL23R, and PADI4; and by RT-PCR for HLA-DRB1 and HLA-B. Associations of polymorphic variants with olokizumab efficacy according to the scores ACR20, ACR50, and DAS28-CRP were determined. We analyzed the obtained data by using logistic regression, ROC curves, and multivariate ANOVA. A high predictive value of the response to olokizumab therapy at 24 weeks was found for the combination of HLA-DRB1*04 and HLA-B*27 alleles with SNPs located in non-HLA genes (IL1B, IL17A, PADI4, DHODH, GLCCI1, IL23R, and TNFAIP3), and clinical characteristics (age, RA duration, and intensity) according to ACR20. Thus, the comprehensive assessment of polymorphic variants of HLA and non-HLA genes considering population characteristics in combination with clinical parameters allows for the elaboration of an RA prognostic panel.

The IL6-like Cytokine Family: Role and Biomarker Potential in Breast Cancer

IL6-like cytokines are a family of regulators with a complex, pleiotropic role in both the healthy organism, where they regulate immunity and homeostasis, and in different diseases, including cancer. Here we summarise how these cytokines exert their effect through the shared signal transducer IL6ST (gp130) and we review the extensive evidence on the role that different members of this family play in breast cancer. Additionally, we discuss how the different cytokines, their related receptors and downstream effectors, as well as specific polymorphisms in these molecules, can serve as predictive or prognostic biomarkers with the potential for clinical application in breast cancer. Lastly, we also discuss how our increasing understanding of this complex signalling axis presents promising opportunities for the development or repurposing of therapeutic strategies against cancer and, specifically, breast neoplasms.