Viering DH, Vermeltfoort L, Bindels RJ, Deinum J, de Baaij JH. Electrolyte Disorders in Mitochondrial Cytopathies: A Systematic Review.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2023;
34:1875-1888. [PMID:
37678265 PMCID:
PMC10631606 DOI:
10.1681/asn.0000000000000224]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Several recent studies identified mitochondrial mutations in patients with Gitelman or Fanconi syndrome. Mitochondrial cytopathies are generally not considered in the diagnostic workup of patients with electrolyte disorders. In this systematic review, we investigated the presence of electrolyte disorders in patients with mitochondrial cytopathies to determine the relevance of mitochondrial mutation screening in this population. Our analysis demonstrates that electrolyte disorders are commonly reported in mitochondrial cytopathies, often as presenting symptoms. Consequently, more clinical attention should be raised for mitochondrial disease as cause for disturbances in electrolyte homeostasis. Further prospective cohort studies are required to determine the exact prevalence of electrolyte disorders in mitochondrial cytopathies.
BACKGROUND
Electrolyte reabsorption in the kidney has a high energy demand. Proximal and distal tubular epithelial cells have a high mitochondrial density for energy release. Recently, electrolyte disorders have been reported as the primary presentation of some mitochondrial cytopathies. However, the prevalence and the pathophysiology of electrolyte disturbances in mitochondrial disease are unknown. Therefore, we systematically investigated electrolyte disorders in patients with mitochondrial cytopathies.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar for articles on genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease in patients for whom at least one electrolyte is reported. Patients with a known second genetic anomaly were excluded. We evaluated 214 case series and reports (362 patients) as well as nine observational studies. Joanna Briggs Institute criteria were used to evaluate the quality of included studies.
RESULTS
Of 362 reported patients, 289 had an electrolyte disorder, with it being the presenting or main symptom in 38 patients. The average number of different electrolyte abnormalities per patient ranged from 2.4 to 1.0, depending on genotype. Patients with mitochondrial DNA structural variants seemed most affected. Reported pathophysiologic mechanisms included renal tubulopathies and hormonal, gastrointestinal, and iatrogenic causes.
CONCLUSIONS
Mitochondrial diseases should be considered in the evaluation of unexplained electrolyte disorders. Furthermore, clinicians should be aware of electrolyte abnormalities in patients with mitochondrial disease.
Collapse