Spontaneous long-term course of persistent peripheral graft detachments after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

A Functional and Immunologic Point of View on Corneal Endothelial Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To systematically review and meta-analyze the immunologic aspects and outcomes of various endothelial keratoplasty (EK) techniques, specifically comparing Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), Ultra-Thin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK), and Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Main outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 at 6 months after keratoplasty, rejection rate one year after surgery, BSCVA at last follow up, and postoperative immunomodulating regimen. Results: A higher proportion of DMEK patients achieved a BSCVA of 20/20 after 6 months. UT-DSAEK and DMEK showed similar rejection rates with a lower risk of re-bubbling for UT-DSAEK (4% vs. 20%). Conclusions: DMEK showed faster visual recovery than UT-DSAEK but a similar rejection rate and long-term visual acuity. One-year postoperative slow tapering steroid regimen has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on rejection risk and visual outcomes.

Posterior stromal ripples increase risk of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachment worsening over time

PURPOSE

To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) features of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts associated with graft attachment worsening over time.

METHODS

Retrospective case series on patients who received uncomplicated DMEK surgery and for whom subsequent AS-OCT data were available for analysis. Patients' demographics and surgical details were collected. AS-OCT was analysed for graft detachment axial extension, presence of posterior stromal ripples, quadrant involvement (location and number), degree of detachment extension, peripheral roll, presence and amount of air in the anterior chamber (AC). Features associated with re-bubbling and graft detachment worsening over time were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.8 years (63% females) were included. AS-OCT was performed at 2.9 ± 2.4 days after surgery. AS-OCT factors associated with re-bubbling were posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.004) and detachment axial extension (p < 0.001). At first follow-up, of the 147 DMEK, 67 showed complete attachment and 80 partial detachment. In those cases of initially completely attached grafts, posterior stromal ripples were associated with the risk of subsequent graft detachment (p = 0.014) together with recipient age (p = 0.043), phaco-combined surgery (p = 0.018) and AS-OCT timing (p = 0.033); while, in the initially partially detached grafts, detachment worsening was associated with posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.025), detachment axial extension (p = 0.003), degrees of detachment involvement (p = 0.029), peripheral roll-in shape (p = 0.033) and presence of air in the AC (p = 0.032). Relative risk (RR) of graft detachment worsening in patients with moderate/severe posterior stromal ripples was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.09-2.81).

CONCLUSION

Posterior stromal ripples and detachment axial extension >1/3 of graft surface area were the main risk factors for detachment worsening over time, and patients showing these features should be monitored closely to identify the need for re-bubbling at an early stage, thus improving surgical outcomes.

Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study

AIMS

To identify risk factors for rebubbling, and early graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

In this prospective registry study, all consecutive DMEK procedures registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were assessed (n=752). Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression. The effect of rebubbling on endothelial cell density was analysed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

144 of 752 (19%) eyes underwent rebubbling. Rebubbling was successful in 101 eyes (70%). In eyes that underwent rebubbling, the graft failure rate was significantly higher than eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (30% vs 9%, respectively; OR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.72 to 6.73, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for rebubbling were surgical complication (OR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.33, p=0.012) and older recipient age (OR: 1.04 (per increase of 1 year), 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.003). Risk factors for developing graft failure within 3 months were transplant before 2016 (OR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.90, p<0.001), and surgical complication (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.04, p=0.004). Throughout the study period, rebubbling and early graft failure were inversely related. Eyes that underwent rebubbling showed significantly lower endothelial cell densities at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This Dutch registry study identified independent risk factors for DMEK graft detachment leading to rebubbling, namely recipient age and surgical complication, and early graft failure, namely transplantation before 2016 and surgical complication. Rebubbling was associated with significantly higher endothelial cell loss in the first year after surgery.

Predictive factors of graft detachment and rebubbling after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To identify risk and predictive factors associated with the need of rebubbling in the eye of patients who underwent a descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent DMEK were retrospectively analyzed. Data regarding comorbidities, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative treatments or complications were collected. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by optical coherence tomography before and the day after DMEK. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 333 DMEK, rebubbling was performed in 119 cases (36%). Preoperative subepithelial fibrosis and a history of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) were associated with significantly more graft detachment [OR of 3.55 (2.02-6.32; P < 0.001) and 5.89 (2.00-21.86; P = 0.003), respectively]. A decreased CCT the day after surgery reduced by 5.7-fold the risk of rebubbling (sensitivity/specificity of 0.42/0.93). Conversely, a 20% increase in the CCT the day after surgery increased by 4.5-fold the risk of rebubbling (sensitivity/specificity of 0.42/0.91).

CONCLUSION

Variation of the CCT could be used as a predictive factor of rebubbling after DMEK. Patients with a 20% increase of CCT the day after surgery are at higher risk of graft detachment. Conversely, a reduced CCT the day after the surgery is associated with a reduced risk of rebubbling. Subepithelial fibrosis and history of PK were also identified as risk factors for rebubbling. Those predictive factors may help develop a customized approach for patients undergoing DMEK surgery.

Corneal pachymetry by AS-OCT after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Corneal thickness (pachymetry) maps can be used to monitor restoration of corneal endothelial function, for example after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Automated delineation of the corneal interfaces in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) can be challenging for corneas that are irregularly shaped due to pathology, or as a consequence of surgery, leading to incorrect thickness measurements. In this research, deep learning is used to automatically delineate the corneal interfaces and measure corneal thickness with high accuracy in post-DMEK AS-OCT B-scans. Three different deep learning strategies were developed based on 960 B-scans from 50 patients. On an independent test set of 320 B-scans, corneal thickness could be measured with an error of 13.98 to 15.50 μm for the central 9 mm range, which is less than 3% of the average corneal thickness. The accurate thickness measurements were used to construct detailed pachymetry maps. Moreover, follow-up scans could be registered based on anatomical landmarks to obtain differential pachymetry maps. These maps may enable a more comprehensive understanding of the restoration of the endothelial function after DMEK, where thickness often varies throughout different regions of the cornea, and subsequently contribute to a standardized postoperative regime.

Impact of Re-bubbling after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty on Long-term Results

Purpose/Aim of the study: Graft detachment after DMEK can be treated easily with an additional air injection - re-bubbling. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of a re-bubbling on the postoperative outcome.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective, comparative, cohort study we included eyes from patients that underwent DMEK surgery. A graft detachment was diagnosed by slit-lamp examination and OCT scan. All eyes were divided into three groups: no re-bubbling, one re-bubbling, more than one re-bubbling. We analyzed the visual acuity, endothelial cell density and rate of graft failure.Results: In 163 of 463 eyes (35.2%) a re-bubbling was performed (119 eyes 1 re-bubbling, 44 eyes more than one re-bubbling). Visual acuity improved significantly in all groups. After controlling for donor age, reason for surgery, time of cultivation of the graft and preoperative visual acuity, no difference in the visual acuity was seen at any point of follow-up. All patients showed a significant reduction in endothelial cell density 1 month after DMEK. Controlling for donor age, reason for surgery, type of surgery (DMEK-only or DMEK combined with cataract surgery) and the time of cultivation of the graft, the difference in endothelial cell density at 1 month post-surgery between no re-bubbling and one re-bubbling was 157 cells/mm² (95% CI 2-310, p = .047) and between no re-bubbling and more than one re-bubbling 504 cells/mm² (95% CI 267 - 741, p < .001). The difference in endothelial cell density remained over the course of follow-up. Twenty patients (4.3%) developed a graft failure during postoperative follow-up. Controlling for donor age, reason for surgery and the time of cultivation of the graft, we did not find any difference in the risk of graft failure between re-bubbling categories.Conclusions: Re-bubbling increased the risk for an endothelial cell loss, but did not influence the postoperative visual acuity and the rate of graft failure.

The Cologne rebubbling study: a reappraisal of 624 rebubblings after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Background/Aims

To analyse graft detachments prior to rebubbling, the influence of rebubbling on the postoperative outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and the need for rebubbling on the contralateral eye.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, out of 1541 DMEKs, optical coherence tomography scans and clinical records of 499 eyes undergoing rebubbling after DMEK at the University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, were examined. Main Outcome measures were (a) number, localisation and size of graft detachments; (b) influence of rebubbling/s on postoperative outcome after 12 months; and (c) rebubbling risk of the contralateral eye after DMEK.

Results

Mean number of detachment areas was 2.02±0.9. Mean lateral diameter of all detachments was 4534.76±1920.83 μm. Mean axial diameter was 382.53±282.02 μm. Detachments were equally distributed over all regions of the cornea. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity ( BSCVA) after 12 months was 0.197±0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, endothelial cell density (ECD) was 1575.21±397.71 cells/mm2and mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was 566.37±68.11 μm. BSCVA, CCT, ECD or endothelial cell loss of all rebubbled patients were not influenced by the number of rebubblings or the time between DMEK and rebubbling. Of the rebubbled patients, which received a DMEK subsequently on the other eye, 193 (58.8%) also received a rebubbling, which was significantly higher, when compared to the overall rebubbling rate of 32.3% (p=0.000).

Conclusions

The overall number of rebubblings has no influence on the postoperative outcome after DMEK, if a rebubbling becomes necessary. Patients who received a rebubbling on one eye have an elevated risk for a rebubbling on the fellow eye.

Postoperative pain following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): a prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative pain following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Seventy-one patients completed perioperatively (day before surgery, day of surgery, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd day after surgery) four different questionnaires (a hospital internal protocol, QUIPS, PainDETECT®, and SF36) regarding their pain and other clinical parameters such as constipation, tiredness, vertigo, sleep disorders, concentration disorders, nausea, and emesis. All standardised questionnaires were evaluated to quantify average pain intensity as well as maximum pain intensity (NRS, 0 [no pain] to 10 [maximal pain], respectively). Analgesic treatment and intraocular pressure (IOP) during the perioperative stay were documented.

RESULTS

Mean average pain intensity was 0.70 ± 1.64 before surgery, 1.97 ± 2.05 on the day of surgery, 1.39 ± 1.68 on day 1, 0.87 ± 1.36 on day 2, and 0.81 ± 1.24 on day 3 after surgery. Maximum pain intensity was 0.65 ± 1.81 before surgery, 3.35 ± 2.98 on the day of surgery, 2.68 ± 2.99 on day 1, 1.49 ± 2.15 on day 2, and 1.26 ± 2.02 on day 3 after surgery. During the first three postoperative days, over 90% of the patients stated no or well tolerable pain. Eighty-three percent had postoperatively no need for analgesics at all. On the first two postoperative days, maximum IOP correlated significantly with reported increased maximum pain intensity (p = 0.043 and p = 0.029, respectively). All patients had very little problems with constipation, tiredness, vertigo, sleep disorder, concentration disorders, nausea, and emesis.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is associated with low postoperative pain intensity. Strong pain increase may indicate IOP elevation and should be further investigated and treated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00013995).

[10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has increased in popularity since its introduction over 10 years ago. This article presents a summary of the experiences of the past years collected at the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Cologne.

METHODS

A literature review of DMEK studies primarily from the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Cologne, Germany was carried out. Own experiences in the fields of donor selection and graft preparation, DMEK surgery, complication management and postoperative treatment are summarized.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of DMEK experience has been gained and ongoing improvements have occurred ranging from donor-recipient allocation to postoperative follow-up. These led to a better reproducibility of the intervention for the surgeon, to a better postoperative result and to a reduction of the complication rate.

DISCUSSION

The DMEK represents a safe and individualized procedure for endothelial transplantation for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Continuing development of the method leads to optimization and safer results.

Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation

In the past decade, novel lamellar keratoplasty techniques such as Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) for anterior keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)/Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for posterior keratoplasty have been developed. DALK eliminates the possibility of endothelial allograft rejection, which is the main reason for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Compared to PK, the risk of endothelial graft rejection is significantly reduced after DSAEK/DMEK. Thus, with modern lamellar techniques, the clinical problem of endothelial graft rejection seems to be nearly solved in the low-risk situation. However, even with lamellar grafts there are epithelial, subepithelial and stromal immune reactions in DALK and endothelial immune reactions in DSAEK/DMEK, and not all keratoplasties can be performed in a lamellar fashion. Therefore, endothelial graft rejection in PK is still highly relevant, especially in the "high-risk" setting, where the cornea's (lymph)angiogenic and immune privilege is lost due to severe inflammation and pathological neovascularization. For these eyes, currently available treatment options are still unsatisfactory. In this review, we will describe currently used keratoplasty techniques, namely PK, DALK, DSAEK, and DMEK. We will summarize their indications, provide surgical descriptions, and comment on their complications and outcomes. Furthermore, we will give an overview on corneal transplant immunology. A specific focus will be placed on endothelial graft rejection and we will report on its incidence, clinical presentation, and current/future treatment and prevention options. Finally, we will speculate how the field of keratoplasty and prevention of corneal allograft rejection will develop in the future.

Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors for early graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

Participants: A total of 173 donor corneas and 173 eyes of the patients following DMEK or DMEK in combination with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were included.

INTERVENTION

Pre-stripped DMEK grafts were transplanted using pull-through technique. At the end of surgery, the anterior chamber was filled with air, which was removed 3 hours later only if pupillary block was suspected. Rebubbling was performed in all cases with graft detachment, independently of its extension, as documented by means of anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The donor characteristics were collected from the eye bank database and matched with the recipient database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Donor and recipient characteristics affecting graft detachment using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The combination of DMEK with cataract removal and IOL implantation (odds ratio [OR] = 5.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-13.86, P < .002) and air fill of ≤75% of anterior chamber height at 2-3 hours postoperatively (OR = 2.66, 95% CI 1.12-6.34, P = .027) were found to be independent risk factors for postoperative graft detachment.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract removal at the time of DMEK is a risk factor for early graft detachment and therefore sequential surgery may be preferred over combined surgery in an attempt at minimizing rebubbling. Air level in the anterior chamber should be monitored and maintained above 75% in the early hours following surgery.

Graft detachment and rebubbling rate in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a selective replacement of dysfunctional endothelium with healthy donor Descemet membrane and endothelium. Although the donor preparation and surgical methods still remain a challenge, DMEK is gaining popularity in terms of early rehabilitation and visual outcomes. New and improved donor preparation techniques like prestripped DMEK tissues are being taken up rapidly because of less manipulation that is required in the surgical theatre. Donor graft delivery in the recipient eye has also been improved because of new products like prestripped and preloaded membranes. As DMEK is at its budding stage, only early outcomes have been known so far. Early graft detachment, rebubbling rates, and primary failures are still being studied in DMEK. As there are different techniques that are currently used for preparation and injection of the graft, it becomes difficult to judge the results based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Graft detachment and rebubbling rates have been a huge challenge both during the surgery and also while reporting postoperative data. We highlight the importance of defining graft detachment and rebubbling rates and their surgical relevance, which may also have an impact on graft preparation and insertion techniques.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) compared with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to find studies that compared DSAEK and DMEK outcomes. Efficacy parameters were the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE). Safety parameters were postoperative endothelial cell loss (ECL), air injection (rebubbling), graft failure, graft rejection, and high intraocular pressure (IOP). Results from last visit were pooled for the analyses because the follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months.

RESULTS

A total of 7 trials including 433 eyes were selected for this meta-analysis. BCVA was reported in all 7 studies, ECL% and rebubbling rate were reported in 6, and the remaining outcomes were reported in only 3 or 2 studies. Postoperative logMAR BCVA was significantly better for DMEK than that for DSAEK (P < 0.00001). More patients achieved the postoperative BCVA ≥ 20/25 and 20/20 in DMEK group than that in DSAEK (P > 0.001), whereas the proportion of patients whose postoperative BCVA ≥ 20/40 and the amount of SE did not differ statistically (P = 0.32 and P = 0.50, respectively). The DSAEK group has a significantly lower frequency of rebubbling than the DMEK group (P < 0.0001). The postoperative ECL%, graft failure, graft rejection, and high IOP were comparable between the 2 groups (all P values >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that DMEK provided better visual outcomes with similar safety when compared to DSAEK. Given the limited sample size, further investigations are needed to validate these findings.

[Influence of 20 % sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) on human corneal endothelial cells : An in vitro study]

BACKGROUND

In posterior lamellar keratoplasties, such as Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) an air bubble is left inside the anterior chamber to promote graft attachment during the early postoperative period. In the case of insufficient graft adhesion a renewed intracameral air injection is often necessary. The use of sulfur hexafluoride diluted with air (SF6 20 %) as an alternative to pure air may further enhance graft attachment and reduce the rebubbling rate. The effect of SF6 20 % on corneal endothelium is currently unclear and was therefore examined in vitro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this study 12 human corneoscleral discs were mounted in artificial anterior chambers, the systems were continuously filled with culture medium and the anterior chambers with air (n = 5) or SF6 20 % (n = 7) as tamponade. After 6 days of storage in the incubator endothelial cell density, toxicity on endothelial cells and corneal thickness were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in endothelial cell loss (p = 1.000), endothelial cell count (p = 0.648), toxicity on endothelial cells (p = 0.048) and central corneal thickness (p = 0.905) between the two groups after 1 week. The level of significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05 and adjusted to p ≤ 0.0056 according to the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.

CONCLUSION

The use of SF6 20 % as tamponade in the anterior chamber for posterior lamellar keratoplasty can be proposed as a safe alternative to pure air filling related to endothelial cell loss. Increased toxic effects on the corneal endothelium by SF6 20 % were not detected in this study; however, further prospective clinical trials are needed to examine the long-term effects in humans.

Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate Descemet graft (DG) detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in relation to DG position.

METHODS

A total of 175 consecutive pseudophakic eyes that underwent DMEK (175 eyes for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy) from September 2009 through February 2014 at the Tübingen Eye Hospital DG position were studied retrospectively by surgical video at the end of an operation. A group of 45 eyes showed a decentration of the DG with a stromal gap of ≥1.5 mm over at least 3 clock hours between the descematorhexis edge and the DG. DG detachment was documented at a mean follow-up of 13.9 ± 3.7 months after surgery. DG detachment was defined as a detachment of 20 % or more of the DG surface area. Various donor characteristics and patient characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the group of eyes with central well-positioned DG differed significantly from those of eyes with decentered DG. The preoperative BCVA in the central well-positioned DG group was 0.63 ± 0.40 logMAR, and in the decentered DG group 0.91 ± 0.51 logMAR (P < 0.001). The postoperative BCVA in the group of eyes with central well-positioned DG was 0.12 ± 0.11 logMAR, and in the group with decentered DG 0.23 ± 0.29 logMAR (P < 0.001). Endothelial cell density and patient characteristics such as age, gender, and intraocular pressure did not differ significantly between the two groups. The group of eyes with central well-positioned DG showed DG detachment in 12 %; the group with decentered DG findings had DG detachment in 87 % (P < 0.001) at the 12 month follow up.

CONCLUSION

The present findings demonstrate the importance of central well-positioned DG and the relation of disease severity. Central well-positioned DG may reduce the incidence of DG detachment. Overlapping of the donor DG and the host Descemet membrane seems to be responsible for DG detachment. One possible way to enhance graft adhesion could be a larger descematorhexis, which avoids an overlapping. The second possible way could be not waiting too long for surgery to reduce disease severity.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) allows for selective replacement of damaged endothelial cells, using only donor Descemet's membrane with endothelium. However, early adoption by corneal surgeons has been limited (illustrated by graft registry reports: 0.7% all corneal transplants in the USA; 0.4% in Australia for 2011) due to challenges in donor preparation and surgical technique. Recently, innovative donor preparation techniques may improve availability of pre-stripped DMEK donors from eye banks. The refinement of donor insertion and manipulation techniques has also improved outcomes and reduced graft detachment rates-still, the most common postoperative complication following DMEK. Randomised studies are needed to compare clinical practices and surgeon preferences, such as intraoperative use of long-acting gas, early versus late intervention of graft detachments and postoperative steroid management. A review of current literature reveals that most publications to date are reports from similar study cohorts by surgeons who pioneered and advocate this technique. Thus, more long-term clinical studies in other tertiary centres are required in order to confirm if the purported advantages of DMEK such as improved visual outcomes and reduced graft rejection are replicable among most corneal surgeons.