Referral pathways for patients with TIA avoiding hospital admission: a scoping review

Care settings of transient ischemic attack in the United States: A cohort study from the TriNetX health research network

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and hospitalization rates after a transient ischemic attack (TIA)-like presentation vary widely in clinical practice. This study aimed to examine variations in care settings at initial TIA diagnosis in the United States.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed an adult cohort with a first TIA principal diagnosis between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, from TriNetX Diamond Network. Care settings at TIA diagnosis were defined as hospital care (including inpatient services and observation unit care without admission) and outpatient care (including any outpatient or emergency department visits). We estimated the distribution of care settings at TIA diagnosis and examined the associations of the hospital care setting with baseline age, sex, race, ethnicity, region, and stroke history.

RESULTS

Among the 554,315 included patients, 38.8% received hospital care at their initial TIA diagnosis. A higher percentage of hospital care was observed in the age group of 50-64 years (40.3%), Black (46.0%), Hispanic (41.2%), South (40.9%), and Midwest (43.0%) Regions, and with a history of stroke (39.6%). Multivariable logistic regression consistently showed patients who were aged 50-64 years (Odds Ratio=1.09, 95% CI: [1.07, 1.11]), Black (1.28, [1.24, 1.32]), Hispanic (1.13, [1.09, 1.18]), from South (1.20, [1.18, 1.22]) and Midwest Region (1.33, [1.30, 1.35]), and had a history of stroke (1.02, [1.00, 1.04]) to more likely receive hospital care.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are TIA care disparities based on demographics, most patients with initial TIA received acute care in outpatient settings. It is imperative to ensure primary providers can risk-stratify TIA patients and provide rapid and proper management.

Fits, faints, falls and funny turns: cost and capacity savings in Queensland from the accelerated transient attack pathway initiative (ATAP)

BACKGROUND

falls, seizures, syncope and transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) are common presentations to emergency departments sharing overlapping clinical features and diagnostic uncertainties. These transient attacks can be markers of serious adverse outcomes and are associated with high admission rates. We evaluated the effects of an integrated suite of pathways for transient attacks designed to improve adherence to best practices and reduce costs through fewer admissions.

METHODS

a suite of clinician-designed pathways based on initial presenting diagnosis was developed to support ambulant care in a large hospital in Queensland, Australia. We performed a set of regression analyses to identify the differences in total cost and length of stay (LOS) before and after implementation. We conducted a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the cost savings of the freed capacity in the patient cohort.

RESULTS

pathway implementation was associated with reduced admitted LOS and costs. Falls patients admitted LOS declined by 32.5%, and admission costs by 19.5%. Syncope, seizure, and TIA patients admitted LOS declined by 22% with no change in admitted costs. Despite a small increase in 90-day representations, total emergency department LOS was unchanged. Emergency department costs were similar between falls and non-falls patients. The Monte Carlo analysis showed that the most likely outcome was a cost savings in freed capacity of $71 per patient episode.

CONCLUSION

the ATAP suite of pathways was associated with reduction in LOS, release of capacity and reduction in costs. Further study is needed to evaluate mechanisms and clinical outcomes in this vulnerable population.

ED Referral Dramatically Reduces Delays of Initial Evaluation in a French TIA Clinic

Background: The risk of recurrent brain infarction (BI) is high within the first hours after a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Emergent, specialized, and tailored patient management in a TIA program reduces the risk of recurrent BI after TIA by 80%. New antithrombotic strategies have been successfully tested within 12 h after TIA onset. We aim to investigate the factors associated with a delay of more than 12 h from TIA onset to evaluation in our TIA clinic.

Methods: In consecutive patients evaluated in our TIA clinic from 01/2012 to 11/2013, we prospectively collected delays from onset to arrival, baseline characteristics, discharge diagnosis and recurrent BI at 1 week. Referring pathways were dichotomized between office-based physicians (OBP) and emergency departments (ED). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results: 354 patients were evaluated. Mean (+/– SD) age was 61 years (+/−18). Median (IQR) ABCD2 score was 3 (2–4). Median (IQR) delay from onset to evaluation was 8 h (4–48). Overall, 185 (52%) were referred by OBP vs. 169 (48%) by ED. Evaluation was initiated within 12 h among 201 (57%) patients. After logistic regression, OBP referral was by comparison with ED the only independent factor associated with an evaluation delay >12 h (OR 5.7, 95% CI: 3.5–9.3, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that preliminary assessment by OBP may increase the delay to initiate the emergent evaluation of TIA patients. Promoting direct admission to TIA clinics through ED may be an efficient alternative for high risk TIAs.