Qualitative perspectives on the sustainability of sexual health continuous quality improvement in clinics serving remote Aboriginal communities in Australia

Producing knowledge together: a participatory approach to synthesising research across a large-scale collaboration in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health

BACKGROUND

Despite that stakeholder participation in evidence synthesis could result in more useful outcomes, there are few examples of processes that actively involve them in synthesis work. Techniques are needed that engage diverse stakeholders as equal partners in knowledge co-production. The aims of this paper are to describe an innovative participatory process of synthesising a large body of academic research products and compare the findings of the participatory process against two traditional approaches to synthesis: a rapid review and a structured review.

METHODS

First, a rapid synthesis of all research outputs (n = 86) was conducted by researchers with in-depth knowledge of the collaboration's research. Second, a team of researchers and service providers conducted a structured synthesis of seventy-eight peer-reviewed articles and reports generated by the collaboration. Fifty-five publications were brought forward for further synthesis in part three, a facilitated participatory synthesis. Finally, we explored the value added by the participatory method by comparing findings generated across the three synthesis approaches.

RESULTS

Twelve researchers and 11 service providers/policy partners-8 self-identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander-participated in two facilitated workshops (totalling 4 h). Workshop activities engaged participants in reviewing publication summaries, identifying key findings, and evoked review, discussion and refinement. The process explicitly linked experiential knowledge to citations of academic research, clearly connecting the two knowledge types. In comparing the findings generated across all three methods we found mostly consistencies; the few discrepancies did not contradict but gave deeper insights into statements created by the other methods. The participatory synthesis generated the most, detailed, and unique findings, and contextual insights about the relevance of the key messages for practice.

CONCLUSION

The participatory synthesis engaged stakeholders with diverse backgrounds and skillsets in synthesising a large body of evidence in a relatively short time. The participatory approach produced findings comparable to traditional synthesis methods while extending knowledge and identifying lessons most relevant for the participants who, ultimately, are the end users of the research. This process will interest other large-scale research collaborations seeking to engage stakeholders in evidence synthesis.

Exploring Whether the Electronic Optimization of Routine Health Assessments Can Increase Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections and Provider Acceptability at an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service: Mixed Methods Evaluation

BACKGROUND

In the context of a syphilis outbreak in neighboring states, a multifaceted systems change to increase testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among young Aboriginal people aged 15 to 29 years was implemented at an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS) in New South Wales, Australia. The components included electronic medical record prompts and automated pathology test sets to increase STI testing in annual routine health assessments, the credentialing of nurses and Aboriginal health practitioners to conduct STI tests independently, pathology request forms presigned by a physician, and improved data reporting.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether the systems change increased the integration of STI testing into routine health assessments by clinicians between April 2019 and March 2020, the inclusion of syphilis tests in STI testing, and STI testing uptake overall. We also explored the understandings of factors contributing to the acceptability and normalization of the systems change among staff.

METHODS

We used a mixed methods design to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of the systems change implemented in 2019. We calculated the annual proportion of health assessments that included tests for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, as well as an internal control (blood glucose level). We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of quarterly proportions 24 months before and 12 months after the systems change and in-depth semistructured interviews with ACCHS staff using normalization process theory.

RESULTS

Among 2461 patients, the annual proportion of health assessments that included any STI test increased from 16% (38/237) in the first year of the study period to 42.9% (94/219) after the implementation of the systems change. There was an immediate and large increase when the systems change occurred (coefficient=0.22; P=.003) with no decline for 12 months thereafter. The increase was greater for male individuals, with no change for the internal control. Qualitative data indicated that nurse- and Aboriginal health practitioner-led testing and presigned pathology forms proved more difficult to normalize than electronic prompts and shortcuts. The interviews identified that staff understood the modifications to have encouraged cultural change around the role of sexual health care in routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the first time that optimizing health assessments electronically is an effective and acceptable strategy to increase and sustain clinician integration and the completeness of STI testing among young Aboriginal people attending an ACCHS. Future strategies should focus on increasing the uptake of health assessments and promote whole-of-service engagement and accountability.

Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustainability: a systematic integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To identify barriers and facilitators associated with the sustainability of implemented and evaluated improvement programs in healthcare delivery systems.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

Six academic databases were searched to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between July 2011 and June 2022. Studies were included if they reported on healthcare program sustainability and explicitly identified barriers to, and facilitators of, sustainability.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic integrative review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Study quality was appraised using Hawker's Quality Assessment Tool.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

A team of reviewers screened eligible studies against the inclusion criteria and extracted the data independently using a purpose-designed Excel spreadsheet. Barriers and facilitators were extracted and mapped to the Integrated Sustainability Framework (ISF). Frequency counts of reported barriers/facilitators were performed across the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the 124 studies included in this review, almost half utilised qualitative designs (n = 52; 41.9%) and roughly one third were conducted in the USA (n = 43; 34.7%). Few studies (n = 29; 23.4%) reported on program sustainability beyond 5 years of program implementation and only 16 of them (55.2%) defined sustainability. Factors related to the ISF categories of inner setting (n = 99; 79.8%), process (n = 99; 79.8%) and intervention characteristics (n = 72; 58.1%) were most frequently reported. Leadership/support (n = 61; 49.2%), training/support/supervision (n = 54; 43.5%) and staffing/turnover (n = 50; 40.3%) were commonly identified barriers or facilitators of sustainability across included studies. Forty-six (37.1%) studies reported on the outer setting category: funding (n = 26; 56.5%), external leadership by stakeholders (n = 16; 34.8%), and socio-political context (n = 14; 30.4%). Eight studies (6.5%) reported on discontinued programs, with factors including funding and resourcing, poor fit, limited planning, and intervention complexity contributing to discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the importance of taking into consideration the inner setting, processes, intervention characteristics and outer setting factors when sustaining healthcare programs, and the need for long-term program evaluations. There is a need to apply consistent definitions and implementation frameworks across studies to strengthen evidence in this area.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/11/e018568 .

Clinicians' perspectives on why young Aboriginal people are not testing for sexually transmissible infections in Western Sydney

BACKGROUND

Incidence of sexually transmissible infections (STI) amongst young Aboriginal people in Australia are significantly higher compared to the wider population. Low levels of engagement with public sexual health services also exacerbates health inequity. This study sought to understand the access barriers facing Aboriginal People with local Sexual Health services from the perspective of local clinicians within Western Sydney.

METHODS

Six clinicians (six registered nurses, two medical practitioners) and two social workers, working in a Sexual Health service, were interviewed using a semi-structure questionnaire. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interview texts were analysed using NVIVO 12 and a thematic analysis undertaken.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis revealed three broad themes: personal, practical, and programmatic. Clinicians believed the involvement of Aboriginal people in service delivery would contribute to greater inclusion and more culturally competent services. Clinicians also considered that young Aboriginal people were unaware of the risks of untreated STIs, and that greater STI-related education regarding risk and prevention may reduce STI incidence and improve participation in services. Clinicians believed that culturally-competent STI education would be more effective if co-designed with the local Aboriginal community. Clinicians identified that Aboriginal young people were concerned about their privacy when accessing services, and that barriers could be reduced by greater community engagement in service delivery design and quality improvement initiatives.

CONCLUSION

The three themes identified in this study provide guidance for service providers about approaches that may enhance the access, participation, and cultural safety sexual health services for Aboriginal clients.

Barriers and enablers for young Aboriginal people in accessing public sexual health services: A mixed method systematic review

BACKGROUND

A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to address the research question, Do young Australian Aboriginal people barriers in accessing public sexual health services? Aboriginal people are disproportionally affected by significantly higher incidence rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs), compared to the rest of the Australian population. This problem is particularly acute for young people under 30 years of age who suffer from the consequences of STIs due to the number of sexual partners and challenges faced in accessing healthcare.

METHODS

The study inclusion criteria were: papers published between January 1999 and September 2019 inclusive; published in any language, discussed healthcare barriers and facilitators; included people under 30 years of age; contained research with one or more of the following terms; Aboriginal, Health, Access, Barriers and Sexual Health; was published or discussed Australia research. Articles were extracted from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Proquest Social Sciences, Open Grey and NLM Bookshelf. An initial search identified 770 articles; 23 duplicate articles were removed. 642 were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria following a title and abstract review of articles. 60 articles underwent full text review by two reviewers and 15 articles were included in analysis.

RESULTS

This review found that novel approaches to service delivery such as incorporating STI testing into other targeted initiatives, providing self-testing kits and achieving high levels of cultural competency were key facilitators to access. Whereas location of services, inconsistent service provision, shame and differing levels of knowledge about the effects of STIs were key barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified barriers and facilitators of access to sexual health services for Aboriginal young people. System level changes are needed to improve physical environments, service integration and consistent provision of culturally competent services. This review highlights the need for further research focussed on assessing the real-world pressures of young Aboriginal people and how healthcare providers can better offer a person-centred service.

Syphilis testing performance in Aboriginal primary health care: exploring impact of continuous quality improvement over time

Data from 110 primary healthcare clinics participating in two or more continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycles in preventive care, which included syphilis testing performance (STP) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged between 15 and 54 years, were used to examine whether the number of audit cycles including syphilis testing was associated over time with STP improvement at clinic level in this specific measure of public health importance. The number of cycles per clinic ranged from two to nine (mode 3). As shown by medical record audit at entry to CQI, only 42 (38%) clinics had tested or approached 50% or more of their eligible clients for syphilis in the prior 24 months. Using mixed effects logistic regression, it was found that the odds of a clinic's STP relative to its first cycle increased only modestly. Counterintuitively, clinics undertaking the most preventive health CQI cycles tended to have the lowest STP throughout. Participation in a general preventive care CQI tool was insufficient to achieve and sustain high rates of STP for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people required for public health benefit. Improving STP requires dedicated effort and greater understanding of barriers to effective CQI within and beyond clinic control.