Accuracy of endoscopic staging and targeted biopsies for routine gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy evaluation study protocol of a prospective, cohort study: the estimate study

Can patients with mild non-neoplastic lesions diagnosed at baseline screening be safely exempt from surveillance: evidence from multicenter community-based cohorts

Surveillance recommendations for gastric cancer (GC) in current guidelines focused on advanced precancerous lesions and were based on precise diagnosis of severity/extent of baseline lesions. We aimed to develop a less endoscopy-related equipment-dependent risk-stratification tool, and assessed whether mild-precursor-lesion patients can be safely exempt from surveillance. In the multicenter community-based cohort, 75,051 participants receiving baseline endoscopy were enrolled during 2015-2017 and followed-up until 2021. Cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of GC for precancerous-conditions were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank tests. Mixed-effects Cox regression models were used to detect potential factors for progression towards GC. A risk score was calculated as counts of selected factors. An independent cohort, including 26,586 participants was used for external validation. During a median follow-up of 6.25 years, CIRs of GC were 0.302%, 0.436%, and 4.756% for normal group, non-neoplastic (atrophic gastritis/intestinal metaplasia) and neoplastic lesions (low-grade/high-grade dysplasia), respectively (Ptrend<0.001). Four predictors, including male, ⩾60 years, smoking, and limited vegetable consumption, were selected for risk-stratification. High-risk patients (⩾3 risk factors) with non-neoplastic lesions showed higher GC risks (adjusted HR=7.73, 95%CI: 4.29-13.92), and their four-year CIR reached the one-year CIR of neoplastic lesions. Further categorizing non-neoplastic lesions by histological grade, both patients with moderate-to-severe lesions (aHR=3.07, 95%CI: 1.67-5.64) and high-risk patients with mild lesions (aHR=7.29, 95%CI: 3.58-14.86) showed higher risks. Consistent trends were observed in validation cohort. High-risk mild-precursor-lesion patients should receive surveillance within 3-5 years after baseline screening. Our study provides evidence on supplementing current guideline recommendations.

Expression of Claudins in Preneoplastic Conditions of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review

Premalignant lesions of the gastrointestinal tract are a group of disorders which act as the harbinger of malignant tumors. They are the ground-zero of neoplastic transformation, and their identification and management offer patients the best opportunity of blocking the progress of cancer. However, diagnoses of some of these conditions are hard to make, and their clinical importance is difficult to assess. Recent reports indicated that several claudin proteins have altered expressions in many cancers, including esophageal, gastric, colon, liver, and pancreatic cancers. The early identification of the aberrant expression of these proteins could lead to the early diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tumors. Specifically, claudins -1, -2, -3, -4, and -18 are frequently overexpressed in gastrointestinal preneoplastic lesions. These altered expressions have shown clinical value in several tumors, providing diagnostic and prognostic information. In this article, we review the literature on the aberrant expression of claudins in preneoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Additionally, we summarize their diagnostic and prognostic implications.

A non-invasive combined strategy to improve the appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background and aim Increasing the appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) improves the quality of care while containing costs. The aim of this study was to improve the appropriateness of UGIE through a process involving evaluation of prescriptions and the use of a non-invasive alternative. Materials and methods A senior endoscopist evaluated the appropriateness of all outpatient referrals for UGIE and established the proper timing. Referrals were either accepted and programmed, canceled, or substituted by a non-invasive evaluation of gastric function, determining serum levels of gastrin-17 (G17), Pepsinogen I (PGI) and II (PGII), and antibodies against Helicobacter pylori. Results A total of 5102 requests for UGIE examinations were evaluated; 540 (10.4%) were inappropriate and had been prescribed for: gastroesophageal reflux disease (n=307), surveillance with erroneous timing (n=113), dyspepsia (n=66), other indications (n=20), and absence of written indication (n=34). Gastric function was evaluated in 282/540 patients; findings included normal values in 94 patients without proton-pump inhibitor therapy (PPI) and in 48 on PPI, active H pylori infection in 56, previous H pylori infection in 30, GERD in n=50, and atrophic gastritis in n=4. UGIE was performed in the latter 4 cases.  Within 2 years (range 1-22 months) of the initial refusal, 105/504 patients underwent UGIE, with normal endoscopic findings in 71/105 (67.5%), and with no cases of cancer. Conclusions This strategy, based on a strict control of prescriptions, is effective to increase the appropriateness while containing public health costs. The use of gastric function testing improves patient selection for UGIE endoscopy.

Markers of gastric intestinal metaplasia under digital chromoendoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) under digital chromoendoscopy presents various markers. The diagnostic yield of each marker has shown variable results. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the following markers: light blue crest (LBC), marginal turbid band (MTB), groove type (GT), white opaque substance (WOS). Discussion of their joint diagnosis, reliability, assessment of local GIM severity and influencing factors was also provided. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of science were searched. The Meta-DiSc and Stata software were used to analyze the data. Fourteen studies were included with a total of 3081 lesions. There were 12 studies for LBC, six for GT, four for MTB and one for WOS, respectively. The pooled results showed that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of LBC were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.81] and 0.95 (95% CI 0.94-0.96). The sensitivity of GT and MTB were 0.49 (95% CI 0.43-0.54) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.40-0.53), and the specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.95). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9532, 0.7791 and 0.9553 for LBC, GT and MTB, respectively. LBC resulted the most classic marker. Proper combined diagnosis can improve the diagnostic efficiency. Reliability of these markers was acceptable. These markers can help endoscopic to assess the severity of local GIM. Besides intestinal metaplasia, many factors can potentially interfere with the diagnosis.

Histological assessment of gastric pseudopyloric metaplasia: Intra- and inter-observer consistency

BACKGROUND

The histological spectrum of oxyntic mucosal atrophy (a major determinant of gastric cancer risk) includes pseudopyloric metaplasia (PPM), which histological assessment has been regarded as unreliable. PPM consistently expresses Trefoil-Factor 2 (TFF2), which is histochemically detecteble (TFF2-IHC).

AIMS

Intra- and inter-observer consistency in assessing PPM was examined using both hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and TFF2-IHC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four oxyntic biopsy samples obtained from autoimmune gastritis were considered. Two serial histological sections obtained from the paraffin-embedded tissue-samples were stained with H&E and TFF2-IHC. Three pathologists (Alpha, Beta, Gamma) independently scored PPM by both staining and the Intra- and inter-observer consistency (H&E versus TFF2-IHC) was calculated using k-statistics and/or Spearman's coefficient.

RESULTS

Based on H&E-stain versus TFF2-IHC, intra-observer consistency in PPM assessement was ranked as consistently "good" (k-values: Alpha=0.79; Beta=0.78; Gamma=0.75). Based on H&E, the overall PPM inter-observer consistency among the 3 observers was ranked as "good" (k=0.77) (the inter-observer consistency for pairs of observers was as follows: Alpha versus Beta k=0.88; Alpha versus Gamma k=0.87; Beta versus Gamma k=0.80). Based on TFF2-IHC, the overall PPM inter-observer agreement was ranked as "excellent" (k=0.91) (the inter-observer consistency for pairs of observers was as follows: Alpha versus Beta k=1; Alpha versus Gamma k=0.91; Beta versus Gamma k=0.91).

CONCLUSION

Relying on either H&E staining or TFF2-IHC, pathologists assess PPM consistently.