What do we know about demand, use and outcomes in primary care out-of-hours services? A systematic scoping review of international literature

Task shifting from general practitioners to other health professionals in out-of-hours primary care - a systematic literature review on content and quality of task shifting

BACKGROUND

Task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to other health professionals could solve the increased workload, but an overview of the evidence is lacking for out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the content and quality of task shifting from GPs to other health professionals in clinic consultations and home visits in OOH-PC.

METHODS

Four database literature searches were performed on 13 December 2021, and updated in August 2023. We included articles that studied content (patient characteristics, reason for encounter) and/or quality (patient satisfaction, safety, efficiency) of task shifting in face-to-face contacts at OOH-PC. Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of included articles using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Data was extracted and results were synthesised in a narrative summary.

RESULTS

The search identified 1,829 articles, resulting in the final inclusion of seven articles conducted in the UK or the Netherlands. Studies compared GPs with other health professionals (mainly nurses). These other health professionals saw patients with less urgent health problems, younger patients, and patients with less complex health problems than GPs. Most studies concluded that other health professionals provided safe and vastly efficient care corresponding to the level of GPs but findings about productivity were inconclusive.

CONCLUSION

The level of safety and efficiency of care provided by other health professionals in OOH-PC seems like that of GPs, although they mainly see patients presenting with less urgent and less complex health problems.

Reducing patients' rate of frequent attendance through a training intervention for physicians

BACKGROUND

Frequent attendance is a common issue for primary care health centres. The phenomenon affects the quality of care, increases doctors' workloads and can lead to burnout.This study presents the results of an educational intervention for primary care physicians, aimed at helping them to decrease the prevalence rate of excessive attendance by patients at their centres.

METHODS

A training programme was carried out for 11 primary care doctors in Barcelona who had patient lists totalling 20,064 patients. The goal of the training was to provide the participating physicians with techniques to curb frequent attendance. Additionally, the programme sought to offer them strategies to prevent professional burnout and tools to better organize their everyday medical practice. The study used a quasi-experimental design for an evaluation of an educational intervention, featuring a pre-test assessment (before the training programme) and a post-test assessment (after the training programme), as well as comparison with a control group that did not undergo the training. The study assessed the effects of the programme on the rates of frequent attendance of patients served by the participating physicians. These rates were compared with those registered by the patients seen by the control group physicians over the same period.

RESULTS

Among the group of physicians who received the training, the mean prevalence of patients who qualified as frequent attenders decreased from 22% prior to the training programme to 8% after completion of the programme. In other words, 14% of patients (2,809) limited the frequency of their visits to primary care physicians after their physicians had completed the training programme. Meanwhile, the study recorded an average decrease of 3.1 visits per year by the patients of the physicians who had undergone the training. Statistically significant differences between this group and the control group were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The educational intervention proved effective at helping primary care physicians to decrease their patients' rates of frequent attendance. It also contributes to the impact research of continuing education on doctors and their patients. We need to increase primary care spending from the current 14% to the 25%, to address this problem, among others.

Effects of Telephone Consultation on Safety, Service Use, Patient Satisfaction, and Workload: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Objective: Telephone consultation (TC) is widely used for its easy access and convenience. This review aimed to assess the effects of TC including triage on safety, service use, patient satisfaction, and health professionals' workload to inform directions for future health service practice. Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses (Health & Medicine), ClinincalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform were searched on April 7, 2022. The included were randomized controlled trials that compared TC with standard (face-to-face [F2F]) management or that by another group of call advisers. Cochrane methods were used to select eligible studies, assess the risk of bias, estimate summary effect measure, and grade evidence certainty. Meta-analysis was performed on important outcomes with moderate- or high-quality evidence. Results: Eight studies were included involving 40,002 participants. TC could increase call resolution-proportion of callers' concerns being addressed by telephone advice alone (two studies; high certainty) and reduce F2F contacts with doctors for the first consultation (two studies, moderate certainty) compared with standard management or TC by doctors. None of included studies reported increases in adverse events, including all-cause mortality, acute and emergency department visit, and hospitalization. There was inadequate evidence regarding the effects of TC on patient satisfaction and length of consultation. Conclusion: The findings support the benefits of TC on improving call resolution and reducing F2F contacts with doctors on the day of first management for regular day service; and TC by nurses can provide better effects than that by doctors for out-of-hours service.

Burden and patient characteristics associated with repeat consultation for unscheduled care within 30 days in primary care: a retrospective case control study with implications for aging and public health

Introduction

Repeated consultations in primary care represent a significant burden on healthcare services. Characterizing the patients who repeatedly attend ambulatory care would enhance our understanding of the healthcare needs of this population, with a view to providing appropriate services. The aim of this study was therefore to identify the factors associated with repeated consultation in unscheduled care. Our secondary aim was to explore the specific profile of patients aged >65 years.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study comparing re-consultation within 30 days at a primary care facility versus non-reconsulting patients, defined as those who did not reconsult within 30 days, among patients consulting over a period of 1 year (1 January to 31 December 2019). Data was collected for a random sample of 5,059 consultations. Patients and controls were matched for age ± 5 years, and sex.

Results

The main factors associated with repeat consultation were an initial consultation late at night (midnight to 6.00 am; OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.20-1.44), and psychological disorders as the main diagnosis (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.20-1.48). Conversely, consulting at the weekend was associated with a lower likelihood of repeat consultation (OR 0.82, 95% 0.85-0.91).

Conclusion

30-day reconsultations were significantly more frequent after late night consultation. This could be used as an indicator of the quality of care to assess performance of general practice teams with implications for improving overall health of an aging population.

Synergism of an Urgent Care Walk-in Clinic With an Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The overutilization of hospital emergency departments by low-urgency patients is seen as a growing problem in health-care delivery, and a variety of solutions are under discussion. We studied the change in utilization of a hospital emergency department (ED) by low-urgency patients after an urgent care walk-in clinic (WIC) was opened in the immediate vicinity.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center pre-post comparative study was carried out at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). The ED patient collective consisted of adult walk-in patients who presented to the ED between 4 pm and midnight. The "pre" period consisted of August and September 2019, and the "post" period was from November 2019 (after the opening of the WIC) to January 2020.

RESULTS

The study patients consisted of 4765 ED walk-in patients and 1201 WIC patients. 956 (80.5%) of the WIC patients had been referred onward to the WIC after initially presenting to the ED; from this group, 790 patients (82.6%) received definitive care in the WIC. The number of outpatients treated in the ED fell by 37.3% (95% confidence interval [30.9; 43.8]), from 851.5 to 536.7 per month. The most marked decreases were in the areas of dermatology (from 62.5 to 14.3 patients per month), neurology (45.5 to 25), ophthalmology (115 to 64.7), and trauma surgery (211 to 128.7). No decrease was seen in urology, psychiatry, or gynecology. For patients presenting without any referral document, the mean length of stay fell by a mean of 17.6 [7.4; 27.8] minutes from its "pre" value of 172.3 minutes. The rate of patients who left during treatment fell from 76.5 to 28.3 patients per month (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A GP-led urgent care walk-in clinic next door to an interdisciplinary hospital emergency department is a resource-saving treatment option for walk-in patients who present to the emergency department. Most of the patients referred from the ED to the WIC were able to receive definitive care there.

Walk-in clinic patient characteristics and utilization patterns in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Walk-in clinics are common in North America and are designed to provide acute episodic care without an appointment. We sought to describe a sample of walk-in clinic patients in Ontario, Canada, which is a setting with high levels of primary care attachment.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study using health administrative data from 2019. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics and health care utilization patterns of patients attending 1 of 72 walk-in clinics with those of the general Ontario population. We examined the subset of patients who were enrolled with a family physician and compared walk-in clinic visits to family physician visits.

RESULTS

Our study found that 562 781 patients made 1 148 151 visits to the included walk-in clinics. Most (70%) patients who attended a walk-in clinic had an enrolling family physician. Walk-in clinic patients were younger (mean age 36 yr v. 41 yr, standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.24), yet had greater health care utilization (moderate and high use group 74% v. 65%, SMD 0.20) than the general Ontario population. Among enrolled Ontarians, walk-in patients had more comorbidities (moderate and high count 50% v. 45%, SMD 0.10), lived farther from their enrolling physician (median 8 km v. 6 km, SMD 0.21) and saw their enrolling physician less in the previous year (any visit 67% v. 80%, SMD 0.30). Walk-in encounters happened more often after hours (16% v. 9%, SMD 0.20) and on weekends (18% v. 5%, SMD 0.45). Walk-in clinics were more often within 3 km of patients' homes than enrolling physicians' offices (0 to < 3 km: 32% v. 22%, SMD 0.21).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that proximity of walk-in clinics and after-hours access may be contributing to walk-in clinic use among patients enrolled with a family physician. These findings have implications for policy development to improve the integration of walk-in clinics and longitudinal primary care.

Conjoint analyses of patients’ preferences for primary care: a systematic review

Background

While patients’ preferences in primary care have been examined in numerous conjoint analyses, there has been little systematic effort to synthesise the findings. This review aimed to identify, to organise and to assess the strength of evidence for the attributes and factors associated with preference heterogeneity in conjoint analyses for primary care outpatient visits.

Methods

We searched five bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Econlit and Scopus) from inception until 15 December 2021, complemented by hand-searching. We included conjoint analyses for primary care outpatient visits. Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion and assessed the quality of all included studies using the checklist by ISPOR Task Force for Conjoint Analysis. We categorized the attributes of primary care based on Primary Care Monitoring System framework and factors based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Services Use. We then assessed the strength of evidence and direction of preference for the attributes of primary care, and factors affecting preference heterogeneity based on study quality and consistency in findings.

Results

Of 35 included studies, most (82.4%) were performed in high-income countries. Each study examined 3–8 attributes, mainly identified through literature reviews (n = 25). Only six examined visits for chronic conditions, with the rest on acute or non-specific / other conditions. Process attributes were more commonly examined than structure or outcome attributes. The three most commonly examined attributes were waiting time for appointment, out-of-pocket costs and ability to choose the providers they see. We identified 24/58 attributes with strong or moderate evidence of association with primary care uptake (e.g., various waiting times, out-of-pocket costs) and 4/43 factors with strong evidence of affecting preference heterogeneity (e.g., age, gender).

Conclusions

We found 35 conjoint analyses examining 58 attributes of primary care and 43 factors that potentially affect the preference of these attributes. The attributes and factors, stratified into evidence levels based on study quality and consistency, can guide the design of research or policies to improve patients’ uptake of primary care. We recommend future conjoint analyses to specify the types of visits and to define their attributes clearly, to facilitate consistent understanding among respondents and the design of interventions targeting them.

Word Count: 346/350 words.

Trial registration

On Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m7ts9

From direct attendance to telephone triage in an emergency primary healthcare service: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

To describe how an intervention to limit direct attendance in an emergency primary healthcare service affected the contacts to the clinic and the level of care given, and which factors were associated with a change from direct attendance to telephone contact.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Seven Norwegian emergency primary healthcare services. The telephone triage operators are primarily registered nurses.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered patient contacts to the services during 2007-2019.

INTERVENTIONS

In 2013, one of the seven services made an intervention to limit direct attendances to the emergency primary healthcare clinic. Through an advertisement in a local newspaper, the public was encouraged to call in advance. Patients who still attended directly, were encouraged to call in advance next time.

MEASURES

We compared the proportions of direct attendance and telephone contact, and of consultation by a general practitioner and telephone consultation by an operator, before and after the intervention. We also compared the proportions of direct attendance regarding gender, age group, time of day and urgency level. Descriptive analyses and log binomial regression analyses were applied.

RESULTS

There were 1 105 019 contacts to the seven services during the study period. The average proportion of direct attendance decreased from 68.7% (95% CI 68.4% to 68.9%) to 23.4% (95% CI 23.2% to 23.6%) in the service that carried out the intervention. Telephone consultation by an operator increased from 11.7% (95% CI 11.5% to 11.8%) to 29.2% (95% CI 28.9% to 29.5%) and medical consultation by a general practitioner decreased from 78.3% (95% CI 78.1% to 78.5%) to 57.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 57.3%). The youngest and the oldest age group and women had the largest decrease in direct attendance, by -81%, -74% and -71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intervention influenced how the public contacted the service. Information campaigns on how to contact healthcare services should be implemented on a regular basis.

Development of an observer-reported outcome measure to capture the signs and impact of fever distress symptoms in infants and young children

PURPOSE

This qualitative study aimed to construct an observer-reported outcome measure (ObsRO) to evaluate fever distress in young children.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify fever-related concepts. Clinical experts were interviewed for feedback on these concepts. Parents of young children were interviewed to identify behaviours the child exhibited during a recent fever episode. Fever sign and behaviour concepts endorsed by ≥ 20% parents were used to create items for the draft ObsRO. Parents of young children who recently had fever completed the ObsRO and gave feedback during two successive rounds of cognitive interviews.

RESULTS

Twenty-five parents participated in the concept elicitation. Mean child age was 2.7 years (range: 0.6-5.8 years). Fever sign and behaviour concepts endorsed by ≥ 20% participants were high temperature (80%), skin hot to touch (32%), skin redness/flushing (32%), reduced appetite/drink (96%), needy/clingy/irritable (48-92%), less active/interactive (68-84%) and lethargic (64-88%). Eighteen items, four in the Fever Signs Module and 14 in the Fever Behaviours Module, were developed for the draft ObsRO. Chosen recall period was 24 h. Thirty participants (Round 1: n = 17; Round 2: n = 13), participated in cognitive interviews. Mean child age was 2.4 years (range 0.3-5.8). Round 1 feedback resulted in two Fever Signs items being combined. Three Fever Behaviour items were deleted, six revised and four unchanged. No changes were made following Round 2 feedback. Most participants understood all aspects of the ObsRO and found it user-friendly.

CONCLUSION

The ObsRO will undergo further development in validation studies testing measurement properties of each item.

Pre- and post-home visit behaviors after using after-hours house call (AHHC) medical services: a questionnaire-based survey in Tokyo, Japan

Background

After-hours house call (AHHC) medical services have been implemented in Japan to reduce ambulance use, as well as overcrowding at the emergency department (ED). Examining the pre-and post-home visit behaviors of those using AHHC medical services will provide insights into the usefulness of these services and help develop strategies to reduce ED visits and ambulance use further.

Methods

This questionnaire-based study used data from anonymized medical records and internet-based questionnaires completed by patients who used AHHC medical services in Tokyo, Japan, between January 1 and December 31, 2019. The questionnaire comprised two questions: (1) What action would the patient have taken in the absence of AHHC services and (2) what action was taken within 3 days following the use of the AHHC services. In addition, following home consultations, AHHC doctors classified the patient’s illness severity as mild (treatable with over-the-counter medications), moderate (requires hospital or clinic visit), or severe (requires ambulance transportation).

Results

Of the 15,787 patients who used AHHC medical services during the study period, 2128 completed the questionnaire (13.5% response rate). Individuals aged ≤15 years and 16–64 years were the most common users of AHHC services (≤15 years, 71.4%; 16–64 years, 26.8%). Before using the AHHC service, 46.4% of the total respondents reported that they would have visited an ED had AHHC services not been available (≤15 years, 47.8%; 16–64 years, 42.8%; ≥65 years, 43.6%). The proportion of patients originally planning to call an ambulance was higher among those in the older age groups (≤15 years, 1.1%; 16–64 years, 6.0%; ≥65 years, 20.5%). After using the AHHC services, most patients (68.1%) did not visit a hospital within 3 days; however, the proportion of patients who visited an ED and called an ambulance within 3 days increased with the severity of illness.

Conclusions

Increasing AHHC medical services awareness among older adults and patients assessed as having severe illnesses regularly availing of AHHC services may help reduce ED visits and ambulance use.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00545-w.

Use of Primary Care Data in Research and Pharmacovigilance: Eight Scenarios Where Prescription Data are Absent

The use of primary care databases has been integral in pharmacoepidemiological studies and pharmacovigilance. Primary care databases derive from electronic health records and offer a comprehensive description of aggregate patient data, from demography to medication history, and good sample sizes. Studies using these databases improve our understanding of prescribing characteristics and associated risk factors to facilitate better patient care, but there are limitations. We describe eight key scenarios where study data outcomes can be affected by absent prescriptions in UK primary care databases: (1) out-of-hours, urgent care and acute care prescriptions; (2) specialist-only prescriptions; (3) alternative community prescribing, such as pharmacy, family planning clinic or sexual health clinic medication prescriptions; (4) newly licensed medication prescriptions; (5) medications that do not require prescriptions; (6) hospital inpatient and outpatient prescriptions; (7) handwritten prescriptions; and (8) private pharmacy and private doctor prescriptions. The significance of each scenario is dependent on the type of medication under investigation, nature of the study and expected outcome measures. We recommend that all researchers using primary care databases be aware of the potential for missing prescribing data and be sensitive to how this can vary substantially between items, drug classes, patient groups and over time. Close liaison with practising primary care clinicians in the UK is often essential to ensure awareness of nuances in clinical practice.

Experiences of out-of-hours task-shifting from GPs: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Background

The current GP workforce is insufficient to manage rising demand in patient care within out-of-hours (OOH) primary care services. To meet this challenge, non-medical practitioners (NMPs) are employed to fulfil tasks traditionally carried out by GPs. It is important to learn from experiences of task-shifting in this setting to inform optimal delivery of care.

Aim

To synthesise qualitative evidence of experiences of task-shifting in the OOH primary care setting.

Design & setting

Systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis.

Method

Electronic searches were conducted across CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PsychINFO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, and OpenGrey for qualitative studies of urgent or OOH primary care services, utilising task-shifting or role delegation. Included articles were quality appraised and key findings collated through thematic synthesis.

Results

A total of 2497 studies were screened, of which six met the inclusion criteria. These included interviews with 15 advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs), three physician assistants (PAs), two paramedics, and a focus group of 22 GPs, and focus groups with 33 nurses. Key findings highlight the importance of clearly defining and communicating the scope of practice of NMPs, and of building their confidence by appropriate training, support, and mentoring.

Conclusion

While NMPs may have the potential to make a substantial contribution to OOH primary care services, there has been very little research on experiences of task-shifting. Evidence to date highlights the need for further training specific to OOH services. Mentorship and support to manage the sometimes challenging cases presenting to OOH could enable more effective OOH services and better patient care.

Patient satisfaction and loyalty in Japanese primary care: a cross-sectional study

Background

This study aimed to explore associations between various elements of primary care, patient satisfaction, and loyalty.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used a modified version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT), which was adapted for Japan. We distributed the PCAT questionnaire to patients aged 20 years or older at five rural primary care centres in Japan. We confirmed the validity and reliability of the measure for our study. Next, we examined which elements of primary care were related to patient satisfaction and loyalty using Spearman’s correlation and structural equation modelling.

Results

Of 220 eligible patients, 206 participated in this study. We developed nine component scales: first contact (regular access), first contact (urgent access), longitudinality, coordination, comprehensiveness (variety of care), comprehensiveness (risk prevention), comprehensiveness (health promotion), family-centeredness, and community orientation. Longitudinality and first contact (urgent access) were related with patient satisfaction. Longitudinality, first contact (regular access), and family-centeredness were related to patient loyalty. In the structural equation modelling analysis, two variables were significantly related to loyalty, namely a combined variable including longitudinality and first contact (regular access), along with family-centeredness.

Conclusions

While a patient satisfaction model could not be distilled from the data, longitudinality, first contact (urgent access), and family-centeredness were identified as important elements for the cultivation of patient loyalty. This implies that primary care providers need to develop a deep understanding of patients’ contexts and concerns and pay attention to their level of access to cultivate greater patient loyalty.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06276-9.

Antibiotic prescribing in UK out-of-hours primary care services: a realist-informed scoping review of training and guidelines for healthcare professionals

Background

Antibiotic overuse has contributed to antimicrobial resistance, which is a global public health problem. In the UK, despite the fall in rates of antibiotic prescription since 2013, prescribing levels remain high in comparison with other European countries. Prescribing in out-of-hours (OOH) care provides unique challenges for prudent prescribing, for which professionals may not be prepared.

Aim

To explore the guidance available to professionals on prescribing antibiotics for common infections in OOH primary care within the UK, with a focus on training resources, guidelines, and clinical recommendations.

Design & setting

A realist-informed scoping review of peer-reviewed articles and grey literature.

Method

The review focused on antibiotic prescribing OOH (for example, clinical guidelines and training videos). General prescribing guidance was searched whenever OOH-focused resources were unavailable. Electronic databases and websites of national agencies and professional societies were searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Findings were organised according to realist review components, that is, mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes.

Results

In total, 46 clinical guidelines and eight training resources were identified. Clinical guidelines targeted adults and children, and included recommendations on prescription strategy, spectrum of the antibiotic prescribed, communication with patients, treatment duration, and decision-making processes. No clinical guidelines or training resources focusing specifically on OOH were found.

Conclusion

The results highlight a lack of knowledge about whether existing resources address the challenges faced by OOH antibiotic prescribers. Further research is needed to explore the training needs of OOH health professionals, and whether further OOH-focused resources need to be developed given the rates of antibiotic prescribing in this setting.