Factors determining safety culture in hospitals: a scoping review

Fostering an aged care organizational culture that supports innovation

AIM

This study aimed to identify how aged care organizations can foster a culture that supports the implementation of innovation.

INTRODUCTION

The aged care sector must innovate to meet clients' evolving needs and increased regulatory requirements. Given the need to account for the values, beliefs, expectations, and assumptions held by a diverse range of stakeholders, implementing innovations within aged care can be exceptionally complex. Fostering a supportive organizational culture can facilitate the implementation of these critical innovations.

METHODS

Papers from a large scoping review that identified organizational culture as a barrier and/or enabler to implementing innovations in aged care were imported into NVivo. Data relating to how organizations fostered (or could foster) a culture that supported the implementation of innovations were then extracted, inductively coded, interpreted, and grouped into approaches.

RESULTS

Of the 193 papers from the original scoping review, 109 were included in this secondary analysis. From these 109 papers, we identified six key approaches: cultivating collaboration; valuing contributions; ensuring alignment between the organizational vision, culture, and innovation; demonstrating organizational commitment; developing and communicating the implementation plan; and accounting for stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study outlines effective approaches that can be used by aged care organizations to cultivate a culture that supports the implementation of innovations. However, these approaches should not be viewed in isolation; rather, they are interconnected and mutually reinforcing. Together, these insights offer practical guidance for aged care entities seeking to adapt and evolve through innovation implementation.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A264.

Challenges of safety culture in Surgical Center: mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the safety attitudes of health and support areas professionals working in Surgical Center.

METHOD

sequential explanatory mixed methods study. The quantitative stage covered 172 health and support professionals in eight Surgical Centers of a hospital complex. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Surgical Center was applied. In the subsequent qualitative stage, 16 professionals participated in the Focus Group. Photographic methods were used from the perspective of ecological and restorative thinking, and data analysis occurred in an integrated manner, through connection.

RESULTS

the general score, by group of Surgical Centers, based on the domains of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Surgical Center, reveals a favorable perception of the safety climate, with emphasis on the domains Stress Perception, Communication in the Surgical Environment, Safety Climate and Perception of Professional Performance. The overall analysis of the domain Communication and Collaboration between Teams appears positive and is corroborated by data from the qualitative stage, which highlights the importance of interaction and communication between healthcare teams as fundamental for daily work.

CONCLUSION

the perception of safety attitudes among health and support professionals was positive. The perception of the nursing team stands out as closer or more favorable to attitudes consistent with the safety culture.

The anatomy of safe surgical teams: an interview-based qualitative study among members of surgical teams at tertiary referral hospitals in Norway

BACKGROUND

In spite of the global implementation of surgical safety checklists to improve patient safety, patients undergoing surgical procedures remain vulnerable to a high risk of potentially preventable complications and adverse outcomes. The present study was designed to explore the surgical teams' perceptions of patient safety culture, capture their perceptions of the risk for adverse events, and identify themes of interest for quality improvement within the surgical department.

METHODS

This qualitative study had an explorative design with an abductive approach. Individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted between 10/01/23 and 11/05/23. The participants were members of surgical teams (n = 17), general and orthopedic surgeons (n = 5), anesthesiologists (n = 4), nurse anesthetists (n = 4) and operating room nurses (n = 4). Middle managers recruited purposively from general and orthopedic surgical teams in two tertiary hospitals in Norway, aiming for a maximum variation due to gender, age, and years within the specialty. The data material was analyzed following Braun and Clarke's method for reflexive thematic analysis to generate patterns of meaning and develop themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

The analysis process resulted in three themes describing the participants' perceptions of patient safety culture in the surgical context: (1) individual accountability as a safety net, (2) psychological safety as a catalyst for well-being and safe performance in the operating room, and (3) the importance of proactive structures and participation in organizational learning.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an empirical insight into the culture of patient safety in the surgical context. The study highlighted the importance of supporting the individuals' competence, building psychological safety in the surgical team, and creating structures and culture promoting a learning organization. Quality improvement projects, including interventions based on these results, may increase patient safety culture and reduce the frequency of adverse events in the surgical context.