Effects of enalapril on myocardial noradrenaline overflow during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure

A meta-analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on functional capacity in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction

AIM

To determine by meta-analysis whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search 13 multi-centre double blind parallel group trials that evaluated the effect of ACE inhibitors vs. placebo on exercise duration were selected. Ninety-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class II-IV. The studies were combined using the Cochrane meta-analysis program (Review manager version 4.1). Analyses according to treatment period, exercise protocols and publication periods were performed. Treatment with ACE inhibitor over 4-12 weeks resulted in a beneficial effect on exercise duration (P=0.003 and P=0.0008 for 4- and 12-weeks treatment, respectively), but the magnitude of improvements did not exceed 30 s corresponding to only 5% compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the pronounced effect on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic LVSD, ACE inhibitors have improving effect on functional capacity measured as exercise tolerance time.

Adverse effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure and/or ventricular dysfunction : meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The evidence-based benefit/risk evaluation of therapeutic interventions in randomised clinical trials should include both the assessment of the benefits and of the adverse outcomes. There is ample evidence that ACE inhibitors improve the symptoms and prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF) and ventricular dysfunction. However, there is little systematic information on the tolerability and adverse effects associated with their use in these conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the adverse events related to ACE inhibitor use in the treatment of CHF and ventricular dysfunction.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Description of adverse events in reports of randomised clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in CHF or ventricular dysfunction was examined, and a meta-analysis was performed. Trials were included if they were placebo- or standard treatment-controlled, and if the treatment duration was at least 8 weeks. Relative risks and their 95% CIs were estimated with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Only 22 (43%) of 51 original reports contained information on the number of withdrawals and their causes. Missing information from the remaining 29 trials was obtained from the authors. The weighted mean duration of treatment was 100.2 weeks. After excluding administrative reasons, heart failure, myocardial infarction and hypertension, the withdrawal rates attributed to adverse events were 13.8% and 9.4% for the ACE inhibitor and control groups, respectively (RR = 1.54 [95% CI 1.30-1.83]; weighted difference = 3.1 per 100 treated patients [95% CI 1.8-4.4]). Cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, dizziness, hyperkalaemia, and impotence were all significantly more prevalent among patients treated with ACE inhibitors than among those in the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CHF or ventricular dysfunction enrolled in randomised clinical trials, treatment with an ACE inhibitor for an average of 2 years leads to an additional 3% of treatment withdrawals. In a significant proportion of the reports on these randomised clinical trials, information on adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal was inadequate. Proper evidence-based evaluation of the benefit/risk of therapeutic interventions needs a more systematic approach to reporting of adverse events experiences recorded in clinical trials.

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reduces plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and improves endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability and coronary microvascular function in patients with syndrome X

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition has been shown to improve clinical myocardial ischemia in patients with syndrome X (angina pectoris, positive treadmill exercise test, normal coronary angiograms, and no evidence of coronary spasm). This study was conducted to investigate the effects of long-term ACE inhibitors on endothelial nitric oxide (NO) metabolism and coronary microvascular function in patients with syndrome X. After a 2-week washout period, 20 patients with syndrome X were randomized to receive either enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, 5 mg twice daily (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) in a double-blind design for 8 weeks. Another 6 age- and gender-matched subjects with negative treadmill exercise tests were also studied as controls. Compared with control subjects, patients with syndrome X had significantly reduced coronary flow reserve, reduced plasma levels of nitrate and nitrite (NOx), and a reduced plasma L-arginine to asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) ratio (an index of systemic NO metabolism), as well as reduced endothelial function. These patients also had increased plasma levels of ADMA, which is an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthase and of von Willebrand factor, a marker of endothelial injury. Baseline characteristics including exercise performance and coronary flow reserve were similar between enalapril and placebo groups. After an 8-week treatment period, exercise duration (p = 0.001) and coronary flow reserve (p = 0.001) significantly improved with enalapril but not with placebo. Enalapril treatment, but not placebo, reduced plasma von Willebrand factor (p = 0.03) and ADMA levels (p = 0.01) and increased NOx levels (p = 0.01) and the ratio of L-arginine to ADMA (p <0.01). In patients with syndrome X, the plasma NOx level was positively and ADMA level inversely correlated with coronary flow reserve before and after the treatment. In conclusion, long-term ACE inhibitor treatment with enalapril improved coronary microvascular function as well as myocardial ischemia in patients with syndrome X. This may be related to the improvement of endothelial NO bioavailability with the reduction of plasma ADMA levels.

Effect of ACE-inhibitor ramiprilat and AT1-receptor antagonist candesartan on cardiac norepinephrine release: comparison between ischemic and nonischemic conditions

ACE-inhibitors and AT -receptor antagonists may exert part of their pharmacological actions by interference with angiotensin-and/or bradykinin-mediated prejunctional stimulation of cardiac norepinephrine release. As endogenous formation of angiotensin and bradykinin is increased in ischemia, we investigated the effects of the ACE-inhibitor ramiprilat and the AT -receptor antagonist candesartan on cardiac norepinephrine release in isolated perfused rat hearts, under nonischemic and stop-flow conditions. Exocytotic release of endogenous norepinephrine was induced by electrical field stimulation and measured by HPLC. Paired stimulations were applied in each heart to obtain an intraindividual comparison of the effect of the pharmacological agent on norepinephrine release with the release under baseline conditions. The ACE-inhibitor ramiprilat (0.1-10 nM) and the AT -receptor antagonist candesartan (1-100 nM) were studied during normal flow or in the fourth minute of stop-flow. Under nonischemic conditions, the ACE-inhibitor slightly reduced norepinephrine release at the highest concentration, while the AT -receptor antagonist did not influence norepinephrine release in normoxia. Conversely, both substances significantly increased norepinephrine release during ischemia. Augmentation of norepinephrine release in ischemia by ramiprilat and candesartan was blocked by the bradykinin B -receptor antagonist HOE 140 and, in case of candesartan, by the AT -receptor antagonist PD 123319. The ACE-inhibitor ramiprilat and AT -receptor antagonist candesartan enhance cardiac norepinephrine release selectively in ischemia by stimulating presynaptic bradykinin B -receptors. Regarding the AT -receptor antagonist, AT -receptor activation is also involved in bradykinin-mediated prejunctional stimulation.

Recent insight into therapy of congestive heart failure: focus on ACE inhibition and angiotensin-II antagonism

One possible intervention to interrupt the deleterious effects of the renin-angiotensin system is suppression of angiotensin II (Ang II) formation by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). However, ACE inhibition incompletely suppresses Ang II formation and also leads to accumulation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors are believed to promote the known deleterious effects of Ang II. Therefore, AT1 receptor antagonists have been recently introduced into therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although there are significant differences between the effects of AT1 receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors including the unopposed stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptors by AT1 receptor antagonists, the discussion of whether ACE inhibitors, AT1 receptor antagonists or the combination of both are superior in the pharmacotherapy of CHF is still largely theoretical. Accordingly, AT1 receptor antagonists are still investigational. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remain first line therapy in patients with CHF due to systolic dysfunction. However, in patients not able to tolerate ACE inhibitor induced side effects, in particular cough, AT1 receptor antagonism is a good alternative. In clinical practice, emphasis should be placed on increasing the utilization of ACE inhibitors, as more than 50% of patients with CHF do not receive ACE inhibitors. In addition, the majority of those on ACE inhibitors receive doses lower than the dosage used in the large clinical trials. Although not yet completely proved, it is likely that high doses of ACE inhibition are superior to low doses with respect to prognosis and symptoms.

Vasodilator therapy in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation: enalapril versus hydralazine therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study attempted to evaluate the long-term efficacy of enalapril versus hydralazine therapy on left ventricular volume, mass and function as well as on the renin-angiotensin system in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation.

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that early administration of a vasodilator drug might be able to reduce left ventricular dilation and mass expansion. Because the renin-angiotensin system may be activated in chronic aortic regurgitation, early enalapril therapy might be beneficial.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1993, 76 asymptomatic nonrheumatic patients with mild to severe chronic aortic regurgitation were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing enalapril with hydralazine. All patients underwent serial noninvasive studies. Seventy patients completed the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

At 1 year, patients receiving enalapril had a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes (124 +/- 15 vs. 108 +/- 17 ml/m2, p < 0.01; 50 +/- 12 vs. 40 +/- 14 ml/m2, p < 0.01, respectively) and mass index (131 +/- 16 vs. 113 +/- 19 g/m2, p < 0.01), whereas hydralazine therapy showed no significant changes. Both regimens not only had a significant reduction in left ventricular mean wall stress but also had a mild increase in exercise duration. Only enalapril therapy achieved a significant inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, in contrast to hydralazine therapy. Moreover, the multiple r2 value from the analysis for end-diastolic volume index using the two variables of age and treatment drugs was 72.1% (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both regimens decrease left ventricular mean wall stress. Enalapril therapy achieves significant left ventricular mass regression, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index reduction and renin-angiotensin system suppression. These findings suggest that early unloading enalapril therapy has the potential to favorably influence the natural history of chronic aortic regurgitation.

Response of plasma neuropeptide Y and noradrenaline to dynamic exercise and ramipril treatment in patients with congestive heart failure

Forty-two patients with congestive heart failure were studied in order to clarify whether the plasma level of neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity (NPY-LI) rises in parallel with plasma noradrenaline (NA) during physical exercise in congestive heart failure (CHF). All patients were studied in a randomized placebo-controlled trial with the ACE-inhibitor ramipril during 12 weeks to determine whether ACE-inhibition alters the response of plasma NPY-LI to exercise. The patients were treated with diuretics and had stable congestive heart failure (NYHA classes II-III). Plasma NPY-LI was 50 +/- 5 pmol l-1 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) at rest and 60 +/- 6 pmol l-1 at the end of exercise at baseline (P < 0.01). The corresponding values for plasma NA were 2.8 +/- 0.2 nmol l-1 and 15.3 +/- 1.2 nmol l-1 (P < 0.001). Before ACE-inhibition, there was a correlation between high NPY-LI and NA values after exercise. After treatment with ramipril or placebo for 12 weeks, there was no difference in plasma NPY-LI and NA at rest or after exercise between the two treatment groups. The maximal exercise time was unchanged. It is concluded that plasma NPY-LI and NA were elevated at rest in CHF. The additional rise of plasma NPY-LI and NA after exercise was attenuated in CHF compared to healthy individuals. ACE-inhibition with ramipril did not alter plasma NPY-LI or NA at rest or after exercise compared to placebo.

Chronotropic response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation: relation to functional state

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relation between functional capacity and heart rate response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation.

SUBJECTS

73 consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relation between functional capacity, measured as peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2; ml/min/kg), and heart rate at all stages of exercise in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Peak VO2 showed no correlation with resting heart rate, but it showed a negative correlation with heart rate during the first stage of exercise (r = -0.94, p < 0.01). Indeed, heart rate during the early stages of exercise (stages 1-5) was higher in patients with a peak VO2 less than or equal to 20 ml/mm/kg than in those with a peak VO2 greater than 20 ml/min/kg (heart rate 140 v 125 beats/min, p < 0.05). At maximal exercise, however, peak VO2 was positively correlated with heart rate (r = 2.15, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with atrial fibrillation and impaired functional capacity heart rate at low levels of exercise is augmented but maximal heart rate attenuated compared with patients with preserved functional capacity. Excessive heart rate responses to minor exercise may have deleterious effects on left ventricular function and thereby further limit functional capacity.

ACE-inhibitors in coronary artery disease?

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors are established in the treatment of arterial hypertension and heart failure. In recent years ACE-inhibitors have also been used in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), since from experimental data an antiischemic action of these agents is suggested. Antiischemic effects of ACE-inhibitors may be exerted through a reduction of myocardial oxygen demand, by a reduction of angiotensin-mediated coronary vasoconstriction, by an interaction with bradykinin and the prostaglandin system, by a modulation of endothelial control of vascular tone, and by an interaction with the sympathetic nervous system. However, clinical findings on potential beneficial effects of ACE-inhibitors in patients with CAD are inconsistent and controversial. While in hypertensive patients with CAD ACE-inhibitors generally seem to attenuate myocardial ischemia at rest and during exercise, a significant fraction of about 30% of normotensive patients with CAD does not benefit or even deteriorates. Lowering of coronary perfusion pressure and alteration of transmural blood flow distribution may be responsible for this. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) or congestive heart failure (CONSENSUS, SOLVD) ACE-inhibitors have been proven to prevent progressive deterioration in left ventricular function and to reduce mortality. In patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction (SAVE), long-term administration of captropril was associated with an improvement in survival and reduced morbidity and mortality due to major cardiovascular events. Therefore, from a prognostic viewpoint patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction or congestive heart failure should be treated with ACE-inhibitors, although the clinical use of ACE-inhibitors in patients with ongoing angina pectoris may be limited by an aggravation of angina, presumably due to critically lowering coronary perfusion pressure. Finally, ACE-inhibitors failed to prevent restenosis after successful PTCA. In conclusion, from a prognostic viewpoint patients with CAD and congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction should be treated with ACE-inhibitors. In hypertensive patients ACE-inhibitors generally seem to attenuate myocardial ischemia. In normotensive patients with CAD and angina pectoris but without left ventricular dysfunction ACE-inhibitors cannot generally be recommended at present, unless the patients, which may have benefit from ACE-inhibitor treatment can be better defined.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors versus digoxin for the treatment of congestive heart failure

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and digoxin may be used in the management of heart failure. Digoxin increases myocardial contractility in vitro, and has a modest but durable beneficial effect in congestive heart failure due to impaired left ventricular systolic function. ACE inhibitors have clear beneficial effects in all grades of heart failure and, in addition, modify the natural history and reduce mortality. Comparative studies in mild to moderate heart failure reveal a tendency towards greater benefits and tolerability of ACE inhibitors over digoxin. ACE inhibition is indicated, in conjunction with diuretic therapy, for all grades of heart failure. Digoxin is best reserved for patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular response, and for those whose heart failure is not controlled with an ACE inhibitor plus a diuretic. In patients with heart failure following myocardial infarction, digoxin is of modest benefit. Digoxin should be administered slowly and carefully to avoid acute vasoconstriction and toxicity. Provisional data suggest ACE inhibitors are also beneficial in these patients. However, the results of clinical trials presently in progress are required to clarify their role following myocardial infarction.

The clinical pharmacology of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in chronic heart failure

ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) have now been shown to improve symptoms and survival in patients with mild, moderate and severe chronic heart failure. Their mechanism of action is thought to be a combination of RAAS suppression and augmentation of bradykinin and prostaglandins. Although ACE inhibitors improve hemodynamics post myocardial infarction, we do not yet have consistent data on their effects on symptoms or survival in these particular patients. One other potential benefit is their effects on reperfusion injury and free radicals. As yet only minor differences have been found to exist between different ACEIs but increasing attention is now being focussed in this direction.

Exercise hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism during long-term beta-adrenergic blockade in severe heart failure

Hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism at rest and during exercise were investigated in 21 patients with heart failure. The patients were evaluated before and after long-term treatment (14 +/- 7 months) with the beta-adrenergic blocking agent metoprolol. Clinical improvement with increased functional capacity occurred during treatment. Maximal work load increased by 25% (104 to 130 W; p less than 0.001). Hemodynamic data showed an increased cardiac index (3.8 to 4.6 liters/min per m2; p less than 0.02) during exercise. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased at rest (20 to 13 mm Hg; p less than 0.01) and during exercise (32 to 28 mm Hg; p = NS). Stroke volume index (30 to 39 g.m/m2; p less than 0.006) and stroke work index (28 to 46 g.m/m2; p less than 0.006) increased during exercise and long-term metoprolol treatment. The arterial norepinephrine concentration decreased at rest (3.72 to 2.19 nmol/liter; p less than 0.02) but not during exercise (13.2 to 11.1 nmol/liter; p = NS). The arterial-coronary sinus norepinephrine difference suggested a decrease in myocardial spillover during metoprolol treatment (-0.28 to -0.13 nmol/liter; p = NS at rest and -1.13 to -0.27 nmol/liter; p less than 0.05 during exercise). Coronary sinus blood flow was unchanged during treatment. Four patients produced myocardial lactate before the study, but none produced lactate after beta-blockade (p less than 0.05). There was no obvious improvement in a subgroup of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In summary, there were signs of increased myocardial work load without higher metabolic costs after treatment with metoprolol.

Effect of captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with angina pectoris and heart failure

The effects of captopril and placebo were compared in 18 patients with chronic heart failure and angina pectoris with use of a double-blind crossover trial design. Symptoms were assessed by patient treatment preference, visual analogue scores and nitroglycerin consumption. Exercise performance was assessed using two different treadmill protocols of different work intensity with simultaneous measurement of oxygen consumption and by supine bicycle exercise and simultaneous radionuclide ventriculography. Arrhythmias were assessed by 48 h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Patients generally preferred placebo to captopril, and this appeared to be due to an increase in symptoms of angina with captopril. Treadmill exercise time on a high intensity protocol was shorter with captopril than with placebo; on a low intensity protocol, angina became a more frequent limiting symptom even though overall exercise performance was not changed. The heart rate-blood pressure product was reduced, but largely because of a reduction in blood pressure rather than in heart rate. During supine bicycle exercise, no differences in symptoms, exercise performance, ejection fraction or changes in blood pressure were noted and ventricular arrhythmias were reduced. Captopril does not appear to be clinically useful in alleviating angina pectoris in patients with heart failure, and this effect may be related to a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure. Nonetheless, desirable metabolic effects, a reduction in arrhythmias and potential effects on survival require further study of captopril in patients with both angina and heart failure.