Completeness of reporting on prognostic factors for breast cancer: a regional survey

Variations in treatment and survival in breast cancer

To achieve optimum quality of care for women with breast cancer in the UK, uniformity of care in accordance with consensus guidelines is needed. This review highlights variations in provision of care for women with breast cancer, with particular emphasis on care received in the UK, examines differences in survival, and discusses the factors that may underlie these differences. Strong variation in treatment was identified, which appeared to affect survival significantly. These findings reinforce the need for women with breast cancer to be treated by dedicated specialists working within a multidisciplinary team to provide a high standard of care.

Errors in histopathology reporting: detection and avoidance

The histopathological diagnosis is the bedrock of modern oncology, and plays a major role in the treatment of many other types of disease. Errors in these reports can critically affect patient care and may become the subject of media concern. This article considers how audit in histopathology can provide information about errors and inconsistencies in the diagnosis of surgical specimens. The use of audit to generate information about the background level of errors in pathology reports is reviewed, along with findings about the nature of these errors and the types of specimens more commonly affected. Generic audit strategies that can be used to minimize the risk of errors in reports are discussed, together with the use of audit to evaluate diagnostic criteria and pathological scoring or grading systems. The role of audit in determining the informational content of reports is included, and there is consideration of the relationship between sample size and error rates. The limited extent to which audit can be used to assess the performance of individual pathologists is also covered.

Australia's breast surgery workload is changing: comparison of a metropolitan and a rural hospital

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a common disease in our community and its incidence is increasing. As a result of the improvements in community awareness and introduction of screening, patients are being diagnosed with earlier breast cancer and with a higher incidence of pre-invasive disease. Improvements in radiology, often coupled with minimally invasive diagnostic modalities, have lessened the requirement for open diagnostic biopsies and also reduced the number of operations for benign breast disease.

METHODS

An audit of the surgical workload at Prince of Wales/Prince Henry Hospitals and Tamworth Base Hospital was conducted to document and compare the above changes in the metropolitan and rural settings. This study was conducted between 1987 and 1996 to assess the effect of screening and improved technology over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

The study found that a high percentage of malignant lesions are being diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) with a corresponding reduction in open biopsy rate at the Prince of Wales Hospital. There is a smaller percentage of benign operations in both settings with a reduction of equal proportion. The reporting of the pathology specimens has markedly improved at both institutions. There has been a reduction in the number of patients having modified radical mastectomy and there has been a corresponding increase in breast conservation surgery especially at the Prince of Wales/Prince Henry Hospitals, although there was an unexpectedly high incidence of breast conservation surgery at Tamworth Base Hospital in 1987. In 1996 the rates of breast conservation surgery were the same in both hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There are minimal differences in the quality of surgical care being offered to patients at the Tamworth Base Hospital compared with the Prince of Wales Hospital and both institutions are within reach of the accepted best management practices available.