A syndrome of overgrowth and acromegaloidism with normal growth hormone secretion is associated with chromosome 11 pericentric inversion

The Importance of Acromegaloid Physical Features for Clinical Practice

Acromegaly and gigantism are hormonal disorders which develop as a consequence of chronic growth hormone hypersecretion. The prefix pseudo- is used to describe a certain clinical condition without a clearly proven characteristic of pathophysiological mechanism and basic biochemical features; pseudoacromegaly or acromegaloidism match the definition from above. In this case reports, we will try to provide a concise overview of diagnostic evaluation of acromegaloid physical appearance, while discussing two cases of patients who have similar clinical acromegaloid features as the first sign of the disease but have completely different etiologic backgrounds of their acromegalic appearance. The first case is of a 57-year-old male who presented with a marked acral growth and coarse facial features, but the diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis caused by multiple myeloma was confirmed just after biopsy of tongue and buccal mucosa. The second case is that of a 63-year-old male with an acromegaloid appearance caused by ectopic secretion of GH secreting lung carcinoma. The early diagnosis of ectopic acromegaly and pseudoacromegaly is still a challenging process. The key task is to confirm the GH axis abnormalities and establish the underlying disease, as a crucial step for faster treatment and need to avoid unnecessary therapeutic procedures to decreased mortality and improved quality of life.

Insulin resistance and pseudoacromegaly: A case report

Patients with acromegaly have soft tissue overgrowth that induced characteristic clinical presentation. A growth hormone-secreting adenoma of the anterior pituitary gland is the most common cause of acromegaly. Metabolic and somatic features of acromegaly caused by high serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and excess growth hormone (GH) production. we present a case of 'pseudoacromegaly' with an acromegaloid features, suppressed IGF-I levels and marked elevation of serum insulin. Endocrinologists should consider this diagnosis when assessing patients with clinical features of acromegaly and insulin resistance, in the absence of elevated levels of GH and IGF-I.

Pseudoacromegaly

Individuals with acromegaloid physical appearance or tall stature may be referred to endocrinologists to exclude growth hormone (GH) excess. While some of these subjects could be healthy individuals with normal variants of growth or physical traits, others will have acromegaly or pituitary gigantism, which are, in general, straightforward diagnoses upon assessment of the GH/IGF-1 axis. However, some patients with physical features resembling acromegaly - usually affecting the face and extremities -, or gigantism - accelerated growth/tall stature - will have no abnormalities in the GH axis. This scenario is termed pseudoacromegaly, and its correct diagnosis can be challenging due to the rarity and variability of these conditions, as well as due to significant overlap in their characteristics. In this review we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of pseudoacromegaly conditions, highlighting their similarities and differences with acromegaly and pituitary gigantism, to aid physicians with the diagnosis of patients with pseudoacromegaly.

Acromegaloid facial appearance: case report and literature review

Pseudoacromegaly is characterized by an acromegalic appearance without any abnormality of growth hormone function. It may be caused by several congenital and acquired conditions. One such condition is the acromegaloid facial appearance (AFA) syndrome. This condition has been described in approximately eight cases/families. It encompasses a spectrum of acromegaloid physical findings, normal growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor one (IGF-1) levels, and variable mode of inheritance. The most common physical findings are coarse facies, bulbous nose, and thickened lips. We present a case and a review of the literature on this illness. The patient is a 57-year-old woman who was referred to the endocrinology division for evaluation of suspected acromegaly. She had an acromegaloid appearance since birth as well as a terminal hypertrichosis. Her endocrine laboratory evaluation and chromosomal analyses were normal. AFA needs to be considered when evaluating any patient with pseudoacromegaly. Additional cases/families need to be identified in order to better understand the clinical spectrum, clinical implications, and mode of inheritance of AFA.

[Overgrowth with and without obesity: clinical and molecular principles]

Somatic overgrowth is a complex and heterogeneous pathology that is only partially understood, although developments in molecular biology have allowed the discovery of the aetiological basis of some of these conditions. The differential diagnosis of a patient with a possible variant of normality, a chromosomopathy, a dysmorphic syndrome, a metabolic or an endocrine disease is essential. The initial clinical evaluation should include a correct anamnesis and physical examination, as well as complementary laboratory and image analyses that will help to orient the diagnosis. This should include a full blood counts and complete biochemical analysis, determinations of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, free T4, TSH and homocystinuria, as well as a karyotype and an X-ray of the left hand and wrist. These results should be very beneficial in orienting the diagnosis. Additional molecular studies should be performed when a monogenic disease is suspected. Cardiological, ophthalmological, skeletal, psychological and psychiatric studies should be performed if the clinical information and previously mentioned complementary studies so indicate. In this review, the aetiological basis and the diagnostic-therapeutic principles in the most common causes of overgrowth, will be analysed.

New insights into the pathogenesis of Beckwith-Wiedemann and Silver-Russell syndromes: contribution of small copy number variations to 11p15 imprinting defects

The imprinted 11p15 region is organized in two domains, each of them under the control of its own imprinting control region (ICR1 for the IGF2/H19 domain and ICR2 for the KCNQ1OT1/CDKN1C domain). Disruption of 11p15 imprinting results in two fetal growth disorders with opposite phenotypes: the Beckwith-Wiedemann (BWS) and the Silver-Russell (SRS) syndromes. Various 11p15 genetic and epigenetic defects have been demonstrated in BWS and SRS. Among them, isolated DNA methylation defects account for approximately 60% of patients. To investigate whether cryptic copy number variations (CNVs) involving only part of one of the two imprinted domains account for 11p15 isolated DNA methylation defects, we designed a single nucleotide polymorphism array covering the whole 11p15 imprinted region and genotyped 185 SRS or BWS cases with loss or gain of DNA methylation at either ICR1 or ICR2. We describe herein novel small gain and loss CNVs in six BWS or SRS patients, including maternally inherited cis-duplications involving only part of one of the two imprinted domains. We also show that ICR2 deletions do not account for BWS with ICR2 loss of methylation and that uniparental isodisomy involving only one of the two imprinted domains is not a mechanism for SRS or BWS.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, etiology and management, a 10-year analysis of a single center

OBJECTIVE

To analyze congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) during a 10-year period at the University of Kiel, from 1995 through 2004, in order to develop a strategy to improve prenatal diagnosis, to be able to consider endoscopical treatment for selected cases and to assess the current postnatal treatment strategies.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the fetal medicine ultrasound department, from the birth registry, from the postmortem registry, from the neonatal intensive care unit, from pediatric surgery and from the genetic database. Data were subselected for chromosomes, genetic syndromes, for isolated CDH and for associated anomalies, the lung to head ratio and lung volumes were assessed. Data were analyzed respectively for gestation at diagnosis, the type of CDH, the perinatal management and the postnatal outcome.

RESULTS

There were 29 cases of CDH, in 10/29 (34%) the parents requested termination of pregnancy of which two had already died during pregnancy, 12/19 (63%) survived, which was defined as discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit, seven newborns 7/19 (37%) died in the hospital, 5 of these 5/7 (71%) were delivered in Kiel. A prenatal diagnosis was performed in 16/29 (55%), 1/16 (6%), 7/16 (43%) and 8/16 (50%) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester, respectively; in 10/29 (34%) diagnosis was performed postpartum, in 3/29 (10%) the diagnosis was performed at autopsy following termination of pregnancy. When the liver was in the abdomen, 9/10 (90%) of the children survived, compared to only 3/8 (43%) when the liver was located in the thorax. A lung to head ratio of 0.81 at 24 weeks resulted in death due to pulmonary hypoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival in CDH is around 50%, antenatal endoscopical therapy may only be considered, if the diagnosis is performed in the early second trimester, and selection criteria such as the lung to head ratio, associated defects and the chromosomal status can be applied.

Acromegaloidism with normal growth hormone secretion associated with X-tetrasomy

We reported a case of a 26-year-old female who was referred to our clinic with the diagnosis of possible acromegaly. She was born from a term pregnancy by forceps delivery. The patient was diagnosed as having hip luxation at one month and spoke her first word at 15 months. She had been diagnosed at the age of 9 years old as having perinatal encephalopathy with intellectual and motor affectation. Since this period of time she has undergone an insidious change in her appearance, mainly comprising progressive coarsening of the face. For this reason she was submitted to our clinic with presumed acromegaly. Dynamic tests of growth hormone secretion ruled out such a diagnosis. The Patient was considered as having "acromegaloidism", a term used for patients whom manifest clinical features of acromegaly but do not present a demonstrable growth hormone hypersecretion. Subsequently cytogenetic evaluation revealed an infrequent chromosome pattern: X-Tetrasomy. In the present article a differential diagnosis of acromegaloidism and the potential role of genes present on X-chromosome involved in human growth such as SHOX gene are discussed. Overdosification of SHOX gene might explain tall stature of girls with X-tetrasomy. Our observation suggested that X-tetrasomy should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acromegaloidism. Furthermore, this may lead to the identification of new genes in the X-chromosome that are important for growth of facial structures.