Comparative double blind clinical trial of phenytoin and sodium valproate as anticonvulsant prophylaxis after craniotomy: efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects

A library of quantitative markers of seizure severity

OBJECTIVE

Understanding fluctuations in seizure severity within individuals is important for determining treatment outcomes and responses to therapy, as well as assessing novel treatments for epilepsy. Current methods for grading seizure severity rely on qualitative interpretations from patients and clinicians. Quantitative measures of seizure severity would complement existing approaches to electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, outcome monitoring, and seizure prediction. Therefore, we developed a library of quantitative EEG markers that assess the spread and intensity of abnormal electrical activity during and after seizures.

METHODS

We analyzed intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings of 1009 seizures from 63 patients. For each seizure, we computed 16 markers of seizure severity that capture the signal magnitude, spread, duration, and postictal suppression of seizures.

RESULTS

Quantitative EEG markers of seizure severity distinguished focal versus subclinical seizures across patients. In individual patients, 53% had a moderate to large difference (rank sumr > .3 ,p < .05 ) between focal and subclinical seizures in three or more markers. Circadian and longer term changes in severity were found for the majority of patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

We demonstrate the feasibility of using quantitative iEEG markers to measure seizure severity. Our quantitative markers distinguish between seizure types and are therefore sensitive to established qualitative differences in seizure severity. Our results also suggest that seizure severity is modulated over different timescales. We envisage that our proposed seizure severity library will be expanded and updated in collaboration with the epilepsy research community to include more measures and modalities.

Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for postcraniotomy seizures

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2018. The incidence of seizures following supratentorial craniotomy for non-traumatic pathology has been estimated to be between 15% to 20%; however, the risk of experiencing a seizure appears to vary from 3% to 92% over a five-year period. Postoperative seizures can precipitate the development of epilepsy; seizures are most likely to occur within the first month of cranial surgery. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) administered pre- or postoperatively to prevent seizures following cranial surgery has been investigated in a number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of AEDs when used prophylactically in people undergoing craniotomy and to examine which AEDs are most effective.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update we searched the following databases on 29 September 2019: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs of people with no history of epilepsy who were undergoing craniotomy for either therapeutic or diagnostic reasons. We included trials with adequate randomisation methods and concealment; these could either be blinded or unblinded parallel trials. We did not stipulate a minimum treatment period, and we included trials using active drugs or placebo as a control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors (JW, JG, YD) independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved any disagreements through discussion. Outcomes investigated included the number of participants experiencing seizures (early (occurring within first week following craniotomy), and late (occurring after first week following craniotomy)), the number of deaths and the number of people experiencing disability and adverse effects. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the trials, we did not combine data from the included trials in a meta-analysis; we presented the findings of the review in narrative format. Visual comparisons of outcomes are presented in forest plots.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (N = 1815), which were published between 1983 and 2015. Three trials compared a single AED (phenytoin) with placebo or no treatment. One, three-armed trial compared two AEDs (phenytoin, carbamazepine) with no treatment. A second three-armed trial compared phenytoin, phenobarbital with no treatment. Of these five trials comparing AEDs with placebo or no treatment, two trials reported a statistically significant advantage for AED treatment compared to controls for early seizure occurrence; all other comparisons showed no clear or statistically significant differences between AEDs and control treatment. None of the trials that were head-to-head comparisons of AEDs (phenytoin versus sodium valproate, phenytoin versus phenobarbital, levetiracetam versus phenytoin, zonisamide versus phenobarbital) reported any statistically significant differences between treatments for either early or late seizure occurrence. Only five trials reported incidences of death. One trial reported statistically significantly fewer deaths in the carbamazepine and no-treatment groups compared with the phenytoin group after 24 months of treatment, but not after six months of treatment. Incidences of adverse effects of treatment were poorly reported; however, three trials did show that significantly more adverse events occurred on phenytoin compared to valproate, placebo, or no treatment. No trials reported any results relating to functional outcomes such as disability. We considered the evidence to be of low certainty for all reported outcomes due to methodological issues and variability of comparisons made in the trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited, low-certainly evidence to suggest that AED treatment administered prophylactically is either effective or not effective in the prevention of postcraniotomy (early or late) seizures. The current evidence base is limited due to the different methodologies employed in the trials and inconsistencies in the reporting of outcomes including deaths and adverse events. Further evidence from good-quality, contemporary trials is required in order to assess the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic AED treatment compared to placebo or no treatment, or other AEDs in preventing postcraniotomy seizures in this select group of patients.

Seizures in meningioma

More than one-third of patients with meningiomas will experience seizures at some point in their disease. Despite this, meningioma-associated epilepsy remains significantly understudied, as most investigations focus on tumor progression, extent of resection, and survival. Due to the impact of epilepsy on the patient's quality of life, identifying predictors of preoperative seizures and postoperative seizure freedom is critical. In this chapter, we review previously reported rates and predictors of seizures in meningioma and discuss surgical and medical treatment options. Preoperative epilepsy occurs in approximately 30% of meningioma patients with peritumoral edema on neuroimaging being one of the most significant predictor of seizures. Other associated factors include age <18, male gender, the absence of headache, and non-skull base tumor location. Following tumor resection, approximately 70% of individuals with preoperative epilepsy achieve seizure freedom. Variables associated with persistent seizures include a history of preoperative epilepsy, peritumoral edema, skull base tumor location, tumor progression, and epileptiform discharges on postoperative electroencephalogram. In addition, after surgery, approximately 10% of meningioma patients without preoperative epilepsy experience new seizures. Variables associated with new postoperative seizures include tumor progression, prior radiation exposure, and gross total tumor resection. Both pre- and postoperative meningioma-related seizures are often responsive to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), although AED prophylaxis in the absence of seizures is not recommended. AED selection is based on current guidelines for treating focal seizures with additional considerations including efficacy in tumor-related epilepsy, toxicities, and potential drug-drug interactions. Continued investigation into medical and surgical strategies for preventing and alleviating epilepsy in meningioma is warranted.

Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data.

OBJECTIVE

To describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery.

METHODS

The MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Among 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05-0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001-0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48-0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.

Postcranioplasty seizures following decompressive craniectomy and seizure prophylaxis: a retrospective analysis at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

Cranioplasty is a relatively simple and less invasive intervention, but it is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. The incidence of, and the risk factors for, such seizures and the effect of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have not been well studied. The authors' aim was to evaluate the risk factors that predispose patients to postcranioplasty seizures and to examine the role of seizure prophylaxis in cranioplasty.

METHODS

The records of patients who had undergone cranioplasty at the authors' medical center between 2009 and 2014 with at last 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics, the occurrence of postoperative seizures, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 583 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, 247 had preexisting seizures or used AEDs before the cranioplasty and 336 had no seizures prior to cranioplasty. Of these 336 patients, 89 (26.5%) had new-onset seizures following cranioplasty. Prophylactic AEDs were administered to 56 patients for 1 week after cranioplasty. No early seizures occurred in these patients, and this finding was statistically significant (p = 0.012). Liver cirrhosis, intraoperative blood loss, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus were risk factors for postcranioplasty seizures in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. The prophylactic use of AEDs can reduce the occurrence of early seizures.

Effectiveness of perioperative antiepileptic drug prophylaxis for early and late seizures following oncologic neurosurgery: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of perioperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis on short- and long-term seizure incidence among patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. It is the first meta-analysis to focus exclusively on perioperative AED prophylaxis among patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the System for Information on Gray Literature in Europe for records related to perioperative AED prophylaxis for patients with brain tumors. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Incidence rates for early seizures (within the first postoperative week) and total seizures were estimated based on data from randomized controlled trials. A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to analyze pooled relative risk (RR) of early seizures (within the first postoperative week) and total seizures associated with perioperative AED prophylaxis versus control.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 352 patients met the criteria of inclusion. The results demonstrated that perioperative AED prophylaxis for patients undergoing brain tumor surgery provides a statistically significant reduction in risk of early postoperative seizures compared with control (RR = 0.352, 95% confidence interval 0.130-0.949, p = 0.039). AED prophylaxis had no statistically significant effect on the total (combined short- and long-term) incidence of seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates for the first time that perioperative AED prophylaxis for brain tumor surgery provides a statistically significant reduction in early postoperative seizure risk.

A Novel Protocol to Reduce Early Seizures After Cranioplasty: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a relatively simple and straightforward intervention; however, it is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. Postcranioplasty seizures, especially early seizures, are common and associated with poor outcomes and longer hospital stays. Protocols for preventing and managing early seizures have not been well established.

METHODS

The medical records of 595 patients who underwent cranioplasty were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 259 had preexisting seizures and 336 had no seizures before cranioplasty. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were administered to patients who had no seizures before cranioplasty for 1 week, whereas an advanced AED regimen was administered to patients with preexisting seizures. Subsequently, clinical characteristics, occurrence of recurrent seizures, early seizures, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Our previous study showed positive results for prophylaxis in new-onset early seizures. In the patients with preexisting seizures, 46.7% of the patients (121/259) experienced recurrent seizures after cranioplasty and 17.4% of the patients (45/259) experienced early recurrent seizures within 1 week of their operation. In the group who received the advanced AEDs, early recurrent seizures were significantly reduced to 8.7% compared with the regular group (20.5%; P = 0.027). Younger age and preoperative hydrocephalus engendered a higher risk of recurrent seizures. The number of previous craniotomies was observed to have a trend of increasing early recurrent seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. Our management protocol for postcranioplasty seizures includes seizure prophylaxis and advanced use of AEDs, which can reduce the occurrence of early seizures.

Pharmacology of new and developing intravenous therapies for the management of seizures and epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are administered orally for chronic use. Parenteral formulations might be necessary when the oral route is not feasible (e.g. an impairment of consciousness, trauma, dysphagia, gastrointestinal illness) or for treatment of seizure emergencies. At present, few intravenous (IV) formulations are available on the market.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to summarize the pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications of IV medications that have been recently introduced to the armamentarium of epilepsy therapy or are currently being developed. Apart from AEDs, other compounds belonging to different pharmacological classes (e.g. diuretics, anesthetics), which have shown potential effectiveness in seizure control, are taken into consideration, and the pathophysiological premises supporting their use for epilepsy treatment are illustrated. The authors give particular focus to immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive agents, which have become the therapeutic cornerstones for immune-mediated epilepsies, despite regulatory obstacles.

EXPERT OPINION

In several circumstances, especially in the case of seizure-related emergencies, clinical practice seems not match literature-based evidence, and several IV AEDs are still used off-label. Strong evidence derived from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is needed to support the effectiveness and tolerability of any therapeutic approach, however common and "accepted' it may be, in order to guarantee patient safety and well-being.

Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for postcraniotomy seizures

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in Issue 3, 2015.The incidence of seizures following supratentorial craniotomy for non-traumatic pathology has been estimated to be between 15% to 20%; however, the risk of experiencing a seizure appears to vary from 3% to 92% over a five-year period. Postoperative seizures can precipitate the development of epilepsy; seizures are most likely to occur within the first month of cranial surgery. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) administered pre- or postoperatively to prevent seizures following cranial surgery has been investigated in a number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of AEDs when used prophylactically in people undergoing craniotomy and to examine which AEDs are most effective.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update we searched the following databases on 26 June 2017: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register, the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs of people with no history of epilepsy who were undergoing craniotomy for either therapeutic or diagnostic reasons. We included trials with adequate randomisation methods and concealment; these could either be blinded or unblinded parallel trials. We did not stipulate a minimum treatment period, and we included trials using active drugs or placebo as a control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors (JW, JG, YD) independently selected trials for inclusion and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessments. We resolved any disagreements through discussion. Outcomes investigated included the number of participants experiencing seizures (early (occurring within first week following craniotomy), and late (occurring after first week following craniotomy)), the number of deaths and the number of people experiencing disability and adverse effects. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the trials, we did not combine data from the included trials in a meta-analysis; we presented the findings of the review in narrative format. Visual comparisons of outcomes are presented in forest plots.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (N = 1815), which were published between 1983 and 2015. Three trials compared a single AED (phenytoin) with placebo or no treatment. One three-armed trial compared two AEDs (phenytoin, carbamazepine) with no treatment. A second three-armed trial compared phenytoin, phenobarbital with no treatment. Of these five trials comparing AEDs with placebo or no treatment, two trials reported a statistically significant advantage for AED treatment compared to controls for early seizure occurrence; all other comparisons showed no clear or statistically significant differences between AEDs and control treatment. None of the trials that were head-to-head comparisons of AEDs (phenytoin versus sodium valproate, phenytoin versus phenobarbital, levetiracetam versus phenytoin, zonisamide versus phenobarbital) reported any statistically significant differences between treatments for either early or late seizure occurrence.Incidences of death were reported in only five trials. One trial reported statistically significantly fewer deaths in the carbamazepine and no-treatment groups compared with the phenytoin group after 24 months of treatment, but not after six months of treatment. Incidences of adverse effects of treatment were poorly reported; however, three trials did show that significantly more adverse events occurred on phenytoin compared to valproate, placebo, or no treatment. No trials reported any results relating to functional outcomes such as disability.We considered the evidence to be of low quality for all reported outcomes due to methodological issues and variability of comparisons made in the trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited, low-quality evidence to suggest that AED treatment administered prophylactically is either effective or not effective in the prevention of postcraniotomy (early or late) seizures. The current evidence base is limited due to the different methodologies employed in the trials and inconsistencies in the reporting of outcomes including deaths and adverse events. Further evidence from good-quality, contemporary trials is required in order to assess the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic AED treatment compared to placebo or no treatment, or other AEDs in preventing postcraniotomy seizures in this select group of patients.

Seizure incidence in the acute postneurosurgical period diagnosed using continuous electroencephalography

OBJECTIVEDelay in diagnosis and subsequent treatment of nonconvulsive seizures can lead to worsened outcomes. The gold standard in detecting nonconvulsive seizures is continuous video-electroencephalography (cEEG). Compared to routine, 30-minute EEG, the use of cEEG increases the likelihood of capturing intermittent nonconvulsive seizures. Studies of critically ill patients in intensive care units demonstrate a particularly high rate of nonconvulsive seizures. Some of these studies included postneurosurgical patients, but often subanalyses of specific populations were not done. In particular, few studies have specifically evaluated postneurosurgical patients by using cEEG in the acute postoperative setting. Therefore, the incidence and predictors of acute postneurosurgical seizures are unclear.METHODSIn this study, the authors focused on patients who were admitted to the neurological critical care unit following neurosurgery and who underwent cEEG monitoring within 72 hours of surgery.RESULTSA total of 105 cEEG studies were performed in 102 patients. Twenty-nine patients demonstrated electrographic (subclinical) seizures, of whom 10 had clinical seizures clearly documented either before or during cEEG monitoring. Twenty-two patients had subclinical seizures only detected on cEEG, 19 of whom did not have clinical seizure activity at any point during hospitalization. Those with seizures were more likely to have had a history of epilepsy (p = 0.006). The EEG studies of patients with seizures were more likely to show lateralized periodic discharges (p = 0.012) and lateralized rhythmic delta activity (p = 0.012). The underlying neuropathological disorders most associated with seizure risk were lobar tumor on presentation (p = 0.048), subdural hematoma (SDH) requiring craniotomy for evacuation (p = 0.002), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (p = 0.026), and perioperative SAH (p = 0.019). In those undergoing craniotomy, the presence of SDH (p = 0.032), particularly if requiring evacuation (p = 0.003), increased the risk of seizures. In those without preoperative intracranial bleeding, perioperative SAH after craniotomy was associated with a higher incidence of seizures (p = 0.014). There was an additive effect on seizure incidence when perioperative SAH as well as concomitant intraparenchymal hemorrhage and/or stroke were present. The clinical examination of the patient, including the presence or absence of altered mental status and the presence or absence of repetitive movements, was not predictive of subclinical seizures.CONCLUSIONSIn postneurosurgical patients referred for cEEG monitoring, there is a high rate of both clinical and subclinical seizures in the early postoperative period. Seizures are particularly common in patients with SDH or lobar tumor and perioperative SAH. There was an additive effect on seizure incidence when more extensive brain injury was present. As expected, those with a history of epilepsy also demonstrated higher seizure rates. Further studies are needed to evaluate the time period of maximum seizure incidence after surgery, and the effects acute postneurosurgical seizures have on long-term outcomes.

The Influence of Perioperative Seizure Prophylaxis on Seizure Rate and Hospital Quality Metrics Following Glioma Resection

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently administered prophylactically to mitigate seizures following craniotomy for brain tumor resection. However, conflicting evidence exists regarding the efficacy of AEDs, and their influence on surgery-related outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of perioperative AEDs on postoperative seizure rate and hospital-reported quality metrics.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, incorporating all adult patients who underwent craniotomy for glioma resection at our institution between 1999 and 2014. Patients in 2 cohorts-those receiving and those not receiving prophylactic AEDs-were compared on the incidence of postoperative seizures and several hospital quality metrics including length of stay, discharge status, and use of hospital resources.

RESULTS

Among 342 patients with glioma undergoing cytoreductive surgery, 301 (88%) received AED prophylaxis and 41 (12%) did not. Seventeen patients (5.6%) in the prophylaxis group developed a seizure within 14 days of surgery, compared with 1 (2.4%) in the standard group (OR = 2.2, 95% CI [0.3-17.4]). Median hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay were similar between the cohorts. There was also no difference in the rate at which patients presented within 90 days postoperatively to the emergency department or required hospital readmission. In addition, the rate of hospital resource consumption, including electroencephalogram and computed tomography scan acquisition, and neurology consultation, was similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The administration of prophylactic AEDs following glioma surgery did not influence the rate of perioperative seizures, nor did it reduce healthcare resource consumption. The role of perioperative seizure prophylaxis should be closely reexamined, and reconsideration given to this commonplace practice.

A systematic review of perioperative seizure prophylaxis during brain tumor resection: the case for a multicenter randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The majority of neurosurgeons administer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prophylactically for supratentorial tumor resection without clear evidence to support this practice. The putative benefit of perioperative seizure prophylaxis must be weighed against the risks of adverse effects and drug interactions in patients without a history of seizures. Consequently, the authors conducted a systematic review of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the efficacy of perioperative seizure prophylaxis among patients without a history of seizures.

METHODS

Five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL/Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect) were searched for RCTs published before May 2017 and investigating perioperative seizure prophylaxis in brain tumor resection. Of the 496 unique research articles identified, 4 were selected for inclusion in this review.

RESULTS

This systematic review revealed a weighted average seizure rate of 10.65% for the control groups. There was no significant difference in seizure rates among the groups that received seizure prophylaxis and those that did not. Further, this expected incidence of new-onset postoperative seizures would require a total of 1258 patients to enroll in a RCT, as determined by a Farrington-Manning noninferiority test performed at the 0.05 level using a noninferiority difference of 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

According to a systematic review of major RCTs, the administration of prophylactic AEDs after brain tumor resection shows no significant reduction in the incidence of seizures compared with that in controls. A large multicenter randomized clinical trial would be required to assess whether perioperative seizure prophylaxis provides benefit for patients undergoing brain tumor resection.

A Systematic Appraisal of Neurosurgical Seizure Prophylaxis: Guidance for Critical Care Management

Clinical decisions are often made in the presence of some uncertainty. Health care should be based on a combination of scientific evidence, clinical experience, economics, patient value judgments, and preferences. Seizures are not uncommon following brain injury, surgical trauma, hemorrhage, altered brain metabolism, hypoxia, or ischemic events. The impact of seizures in the immediate aftermath of injury may be a prolonged intensive care stay or compounding of the primary injury. The aim of brain injury management is to limit the consequences of the secondary damage. The original intention of seizure prophylaxis was to limit the incidence of early-onset seizures. However, clinical trials have been equivocal on this point, and there is concern about the adverse effects of antiepileptic drug therapy. This review of the literature raises concerns regarding the arbitrary division of seizures into early onset (7 d) and late onset (8 d and beyond). In many cases it would appear that seizures present within 24 hours of the injury or after 7 days, which would be outside of the scope of current seizure prophylaxis guidance. There also does not appear to be a pathophysiological reason to divide brain injury-related seizures into these timeframes. Therefore, a solution to the conundrum is to reevaluate current practice. Prophylaxis could be offered to those receiving intensive care for the primary brain injury, where the impact of seizure would be detrimental to the management of the brain injury, or other clinical judgments where prophylaxis is prudent. Neurosurgical seizure management can then focus attention on which agent has the best adverse effect profile and the duration of therapy. The evidence seems to support levetiracetam as the most appropriate agent. Although previous reviews have identified an increase cost associated with the use of levetiracetam, current cost comparisons with phenytoin demonstrate a marginal price differential. The aim of this review is to assimilate the applicable literature regarding seizure prophylaxis. The final guidance is a forum upon which further clinical research could evaluate a new seizure prophylaxis paradigm.

The role of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs for seizure prophylaxis in meningioma surgery: A systematic review

Meningiomas are the commonest type of primary brain tumours. Whilst most patients are seizure-free prior to surgery, antiepileptic drugs are frequently administered to reduce the risk of developing post-operative seizures. However, evidence to support their efficacy in providing this outcome is sparse. To this end, we performed a systematic review to assess the impact of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs on post-operative epilepsy rates in seizure-naïve patients undergoing craniotomy for resection of meningiomas. The literature search was performed using PubMed for studies published between January 1990 and November 2016. The total number of patients in each study was extracted and divided into cohorts according to administration of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs. Clinical characteristics, study type and post-operative epilepsy rates were recorded. A total of 11 studies involving 1143 patients met the selection criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who developed post-operative epilepsy in the cohort that received prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (20 of 766; 2.6%) and the cohort that did not (10 of 377; 2.7%) (Chi-square test; P=0.96). A detailed meta-analysis could not be performed due to the insufficiency in data reported. Based on the results of this systematic review, the routine use of antiepileptic drugs for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naïve patients undergoing meningioma resection could not be substantiated. However, limitations of a systematic review should be considered on interpretation. High quality prospective randomised controlled trials are required to definitively answer this important clinical question.

Prophylactic Levetiracetam for Seizure Control After Cranioplasty: A Multicenter Prospective Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To study efficacy and safety of prophylactic levetiracetam (LEV) administration in adults undergoing cranioplasty.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled and randomly divided 200 adults undergoing cranioplasty into 2 groups: LEV (prophylactic LEV for 24 weeks) and control (no prophylactic antiepileptic drugs). Demographic and clinical characteristics; occurrence of postoperative seizure; changes in IQ, memory quotient, and activities of daily living scores; and postoperative side effects during hospital stay were analyzed at 2-, 24-, and 48-week follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between groups in both early-stage seizures in the initial 2 weeks and late-stage seizures in the 3-24 weeks after cranioplasty (P < 0.05). Postoperative seizures occurred in 17.0% in the control group and 4.1% in the LEV group 48 weeks after cranioplasty, which was found to be significant (P = 0.0020). Patients with abnormal preoperative or postoperative electroencephalography (EEG) with spikes or sharp waves presented with an increased number of postoperative seizures compared with patients with normal EEG readings at 48 weeks. Significant differences were found between patients with postoperative seizures and patients without postoperative seizures in regard to changes in IQ, memory quotient, activities of daily living, and patient satisfaction scores (P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in side effects between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative seizure is a common complication of cranioplasty, especially in patients with preoperative or postoperative abnormal EEG with spikes or sharp waves. Prophylactic LEV administration significantly reduced postcranioplasty seizures during LEV usage and had few side effects.

Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy

Clinical trials represent the best source of evidence on which to base treatment decisions. For such evidence to be utilized meaningfully, however, it is essential that results are interpreted correctly. This requires a good understanding of strengths and weaknesses of the adopted design, the clinical relevance of the outcome measures, and the many factors that could affect such outcomes. As a general rule, uncontrolled studies tend to provide misleading evidence as a result of the impact of confounders such as regression to the mean, patient‐related bias, and observer bias. On the other hand, although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are qualitatively superior, aspects of their execution may still decrease their validity. Bias and decreased validity in RCTs may occur by chance alone (for example, treatment groups may not necessarily be balanced for important variables despite randomization) or because of specific features of the trial design. In the case of industry‐driven studies, bias often influences the outcome in favor of the sponsor's product. Factors that need to be carefully scrutinized include (1) the purpose for which the trial is conducted; (2) potential bias due to unblinding or lack of blinding; (3) the appropriateness of the control group; (4) the power of the study in detecting clinically relevant differences; (5) the extent to which eligibility criteria could affect outcomes and be representative of routine clinical practice; (6) whether the treatments being compared are used optimally in terms of dosing, duration of treatment, and other variables; (7) the appropriateness of the statistical comparisons; (8) the clinical relevance of the outcome measures and whether all key outcome information is reported (for example, responder rates in completers); and (9) potential bias in the way results are presented and discussed. This article discusses each of these aspects and illustrates the discussion with examples taken from published antiepileptic drug trials.

Seizures in supratentorial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT Meningioma is the most common benign intracranial tumor, and patients with supratentorial meningioma frequently suffer from seizures. The rates and predictors of seizures in patients with meningioma have been significantly under-studied, even in comparison with other brain tumor types. Improved strategies for the prediction, treatment, and prevention of seizures in patients with meningioma is an important goal, because tumor-related epilepsy significantly impacts patient quality of life. METHODS The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed for manuscripts published between January 1980 and September 2014, examining rates of pre- and postoperative seizures in supratentorial meningioma, and evaluating potential predictors of seizures with separate meta-analyses. RESULTS The authors identified 39 observational case series for inclusion in the study, but no controlled trials. Preoperative seizures were observed in 29.2% of 4709 patients with supratentorial meningioma, and were significantly predicted by male sex (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.30-2.34); an absence of headache (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.25); peritumoral edema (OR 7.48, 95% CI 6.13-9.47); and non-skull base location (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.25). After surgery, seizure freedom was achieved in 69.3% of 703 patients with preoperative epilepsy, and was more than twice as likely in those without peritumoral edema, although an insufficient number of studies were available for formal meta-analysis of this association. Of 1085 individuals without preoperative epilepsy who underwent resection, new postoperative seizures were seen in 12.3% of patients. No difference in the rate of new postoperative seizures was observed with or without perioperative prophylactic anticonvulsants. CONCLUSIONS Seizures are common in supratentorial meningioma, particularly in tumors associated with brain edema, and seizure freedom is a critical treatment goal. Favorable seizure control can be achieved with resection, but evidence does not support routine use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients without seizures. Limitations associated with systematic review and meta-analysis should be considered when interpreting these results.

Epilepsy in glioma patients: mechanisms, management, and impact of anticonvulsant therapy

Seizures are a well-recognized symptom of primary brain tumors, and anticonvulsant use is common. This paper provides an overview of epilepsy and the use of anticonvulsants in glioma patients. Overall incidence and mechanisms of epileptogenesis are reviewed. Factors to consider with the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) including incidence during the disease trajectory and prophylaxis along with considerations in the selection of anticonvulsant use (ie, potential side effects, drug interactions, adverse effects, and impact on survival) are also reviewed. Finally, areas for future research and exploring the pathophysiology and use of AEDs in this population are also discussed.

Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for post-craniotomy seizures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of seizures following supratentorial craniotomy for non-traumatic pathology has been estimated to be between 15% to 20%; however, the risk of experiencing a seizure may vary from 3% to 92% over a five-year period. Postoperative seizures can precipitate the development of epilepsy; seizures are most likely to occur within the first month of cranial surgery. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) administered pre- or postoperatively to prevent seizures following cranial surgery has been investigated in a number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of AEDs when used prophylactically in people undergoing craniotomy and to examine which AEDs are most effective.

SEARCH METHODS

Searches were run for the original review in January 2012. We performed subsequent searches in September 2012 and up to 04 August 2014. We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs of people with no history of epilepsy who were undergoing craniotomy for either therapeutic or diagnostic reasons. Trials with adequate randomisation methods and concealment were included; these could either be blinded or unblinded parallel trials. We did not stipulate a minimum treatment period, and we included trials using active drugs or placebo as a control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (JP and JG) independently selected trials for inclusion and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessments. We resolved any disagreements through discussion. Outcomes investigated included the number of patients experiencing seizures (early - occurring within first week following craniotomy, and late - occurring after first week following craniotomy), the number of deaths and the number of people experiencing disability and adverse effects. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the trials, we did not combine data from the included trials in a meta-analysis; we presented the findings of the review in narrative format.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs (N = 1602), which were published between 1983 and 2013. Three trials compared a single AED (phenytoin) with a placebo or no treatment. One three-arm trial compared two AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin) with no treatment. A second three-arm trial compared phenytoin, phenobarbital and no treatment. Three other trials were head-to-head trials of AEDs (phenytoin vs. valproate; zonisamide vs. phenobarbital) and levetiracetam vs. phenytoin. Of the five trials comparing AEDs with controls, only one trial reported a significant difference between AED treatment and controls for early seizure occurrence. All other comparisons were non-significant. Of the head-to-head trials, none reported statistically significant differences between treatments for either early or late seizures. One head-to-head trial showed an increase in the number of deaths following one AED treatment compared to another AED treatment. Incidences of adverse effects of treatment were poorly reported, and the most trials reported no significant differences between treatment groups. However data on adverse events were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence to suggest that AED treatment administered prophylactically is effective or not effective in preventing post-craniotomy seizures. The current evidence base is limited due to the differing methodologies employed in the trials and inconsistencies in reporting of outcomes. Further evidence from good-quality, contemporary trials is required in order to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic AED treatment compared to control groups or other AEDs in preventing post-craniotomy seizures properly.

Anticonvulsant prophylaxis for brain tumor surgery: determining the current best available evidence

Patients who undergo craniotomy for brain tumor resection are prone to experiencing seizures, which can have debilitating medical, neurological, and psychosocial effects. A controversial issue in neurosurgery is the common practice of administering perioperative anticonvulsant prophylaxis to these patients despite a paucity of supporting data in the literature. The foreseeable benefits of this strategy must be balanced against potential adverse effects and interactions with critical medications such as chemotherapeutic agents and corticosteroids. Multiple disparate metaanalyses have been published on this topic but have not been applied into clinical practice, and, instead, personal preference frequently determines practice patterns in this area of management. Therefore, to select the current best available evidence to guide clinical decision making, the literature was evaluated to identify meta-analyses that investigated the efficacy and/or safety of anticonvulsant prophylaxis in this patient population. Six meta-analyses published between 1996 and 2011 were included in the present study. The Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses and Oxman-Guyatt methodological quality assessment tools were used to score these meta-analyses, and the Jadad decision algorithm was applied to determine the highest-quality meta-analysis. According to this analysis, 2 metaanalyses were deemed to be the current best available evidence, both of which conclude that prophylactic treatment does not improve seizure control in these patients. Therefore, this management strategy should not be routinely used.

Levetiracetam seizure prophylaxis in craniotomy patients at high risk for postoperative seizures

Background:

The risk of developing immediate postoperative seizures in patients undergoing supratentorial brain tumor surgery without anti-epileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis is 15-20%. Patients who present with pre-operative seizures and patients with supratentorial meningioma or supratentorial low grade gliomas are at significantly higher risk. There is little data on the efficacy of levetiracetam as a prophylactic AED in the immediate postoperative period (within 7 days of surgery) in these patients.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 165 adult patients classified as higher risk for postoperative seizures who underwent brain tumor resection at Duke University Hospital between time May 2010 and December 2011. All patients had received levetiracetam monotherapy in doses of 1000-3000 mg/day in the immediate postoperative period.

Results:

We identified 165 patients with following tumor locations: Frontal 83 (50.3%), Temporal 37 (22.4%), Parietal 30 (18.2%), Occipital 2 (1.2%) and 13 (7.8%) with single lesions involving more than one lobe. Histology revealed: Glioma 98 (59.4%), Meningioma 57 (34.5%) and Brain Metastases 6 (3.6%). Preoperatively, 88/165 (53.3%) patients had presented with seizures. 12/165 patients (7.3%) developed clinical seizures (generalized 10, partial 2) in the immediate post-operative period. Other than somnolence in 7 patients (4.2%), no major side-effects were noted.

Conclusions:

The incidence of seizures was significantly lower in patients treated with levetiracetam (7.3%) when compared with the expected (15-20%) rate without AED prophylaxis based on the previous literature. Levetiracetam appears effective and safe for seizure prevention in patients undergoing brain tumor resection and who are at significantly higher risk of developing post-operative seizures. These findings warrant confirmation in a prospective randomized trial.

Requirement for cardiac telemetry during intravenous phenytoin infusion: guideline fact or guideline fiction?

Guidelines recommend the use of cardiac telemetry when phenytoin is administered intravenously. Clinical areas where telemetry is available may not always be the most suitable place to monitor and treat these sick patients. We sought to clarify the evidence regarding the need for cardiac telemetry during intravenous infusion of phenytoin.

Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for post-craniotomy seizures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of seizures following supratentorial craniotomy for non-traumatic pathology has been estimated to be 15% to 20%; however, the risk of experiencing a seizure may vary from 3% to 92% over a five-year period. Postoperative seizures can precipitate the development of epilepsy; seizures are most likely to occur within the first month of cranial surgery. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) administered pre- or postoperatively to prevent seizures following cranial surgery has been investigated in a number of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of AEDs when used prophylactically in people undergoing craniotomy and to examine which AEDs are most effective.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (September 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library Issue 9, 2012), and MEDLINE (1946 to September 2012). No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of people with no history of epilepsy who were undergoing craniotomy for either therapeutic or diagnostic reasons were included. Trials with adequate randomisation methods and concealment were included; these could either be blinded or unblinded parallel trials. No minimum treatment period was stipulated, trials using active drugs or placebo as a control group were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (JP and JG) independently selected trials for inclusion and carried out data extraction and risk of bias assessments. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. Outcomes investigated included the number of patients experiencing seizures (early - occurring within first week following craniotomy and late - occurring after first week following craniotomy), the number of deaths and the number of people experiencing disability and adverse effects. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the trials, data from the trials were not combined in a meta-analysis; the findings of the review are presented in narrative format.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (N = 1398) were eligible for inclusion within the review with publication dates ranging between 1983 and 1999. Two trials compared a single AED (phenytoin) with a placebo. One three-arm trial compared two AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin) with no treatment. A second three-arm trial compared phenytoin, phenobarbital and no treatment. Two other trials were head-to-head trials of AEDs (phenytoin vs. valproate and zonisamide vs. phenobarbital). Of the four trials comparing AEDs with controls only one trial reported a significant difference between AED treatment and controls for early seizure occurrence. All other comparisons were non-significant. Of the head-to-head trials, none reported statistically significant differences between treatments for either early or late seizures. One head-to-head trial showed an increase in the number of deaths following one AED treatment compared to another AED treatment. Incidences of adverse effects of treatment were poorly reported, no significant differences between treatment groups were found due to the limited number of reported occurrences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence to suggest that AED treatment administered prophylactically is effective or not effective in preventing post-craniotomy seizures. The current evidence base is limited due to the differing methodologies employed in the trials and inconsistencies in reporting of outcomes. Further evidence from good-quality, contemporary trials is required in order to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic AED treatment compared to control groups or other AEDs in preventing post-craniotomy seizures properly.

[Antiepileptic prophylaxis for elective neurosurgery]

In tumoral surgery, the risk factors for perioperative epilepsy can be roughly grouped into two categories: those related to the preoperative patient's conditions (type and location of the tumors, their impact on the surrounding brain…) and those specifically related to surgery (cerebral edema, parenchymal hematoma, surgical approach, complete or incomplete resection...). The first category is supposed to be responsible for preoperative and late postoperative epilepsy, while the second would be more related to the risk of epilepsy in the first postoperative week (or may be even in the first 48hours). It is well accepted (but not always respected) by the neuro-oncologists that there is no indication for preventive antiepileptic drugs (AED) in a patient with a brain tumor that has never presented seizure. However, every seizure crisis must be treated medically. Neurosurgical procedure (which is also a key factor for controlling epilepsy when it occurs. The AED should then be maintained as appropriate. In the absence of preoperative treatment, it has never been shown that prophylactic AED significantly decreases the incidence of postoperative seizures, early or late. Yet, the opposite has not been shown neither, and many groups use AED despite the risk of side effects and an uncertain risk-benefit ratio. Currently, postoperative epilepsy is much less frequent than it was 20 or 30years ago, and the risk of AED side effects also decreases with the latest generation of molecules (such as levetiracetam). So, AED risks and benefits tend to diminish in parallel, but their relationship is still to be assessed. In practice, a modern attitude would restrict prophylactic AED use to the higher risk patients (preoperative epilepsy, temporal astrocytoma, the extent of edema and mass effect...). A drug of last generation should be used, starting one week before surgery. The duration of the treatment should be limited to one week postoperatively in the absence of seizure.

Surgical treatment of symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformations in eloquent brain regions

BACKGROUND

Despite the increased risk of hemorrhage and deteriorating neurological function of once-bled cerebral cavernous malformations (CM), the management of eloquently located CMs remains controversial.

METHODS

All eloquently located CMs (n = 45) surgically treated between 03/2006 and 04/2011 in our department were consecutively evaluated. Eloquence was characterized according to Spetzler and Martin's definition. The following locations were approached: brainstem, n = 16; sensorimotor, n = 8; visual pathway, n = 7; cerebellum (deep nuclei and peduncles), n = 7; basal ganglia, n = 4, and language, n = 3. Follow-up data was available for 41 patients (91 %) with a median interval of 14 months. Outcomes were evaluated according to the Glasgow outcome and the modified Rankin scale.

RESULTS

Immediately after surgery, 47 % (n = 21) had a new deficit. At follow-up, 80 % (n = 36) recovered to at least preoperative status or were better than before surgery, 9 % (n = 4) exhibited a slight, and 7 % (n = 3) had a moderate neurological impairment. Only two cases (4 %) with a new permanent severe deficit were observed, both related to dorsal brainstem surgery. The outcome after the surgery of otherwise located brainstem CMs was as beneficial as that for non-brainstem CMs. Patients with initially poor neurological performance fared worse than oligosymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high postoperative transient morbidity, the majority improved profoundly during follow-ups. Compared with natural history, surgical treatment should be considered for all eloquent symptomatic CMs. Dorsal brainstem location and poor preoperative neurological status are associated with an increased postoperative morbidity.

Tolerability, safety, and side effects of levetiracetam versus phenytoin in intravenous and total prophylactic regimen among craniotomy patients: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Practical choice in parenteral antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) remains limited despite formulation of newer intravenous agents and requirements of special patient groups. This study aims to compare the tolerability, safety, and side effect profiles of levetiracetam (LEV) against the standard agent phenytoin (PHT) when given intravenously and in total regimen for seizure prophylaxis in a neurosurgical setting.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, single-center study with appropriate blinding comprised evaluation pertaining to intravenous use 3 days following craniotomy and at discharge, and to total intravenous-plus-oral AED regimen at 90 days. Primary tolerability end points were discontinuation because of side effect and first side effect. Safety combined end point was major side effect or seizure. Seizure occurrence and side effect profiles were compared as secondary outcomes.

KEY FINDINGS

Of 81 patients randomized, 74 (36 LEV, 38 PHT) received parenteral AEDs. No significant difference attributable to intravenous use was found between LEV and PHT in discontinuation because of side effect (LEV 1/36, PHT 2/38, p = 1.00) or number of patients with side effect (LEV 1/36, PHT 4/38, p = 0.36). No significant difference was found between LEV and PHT total intravenous-plus-oral regimen in discontinuation because of side effect (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-2.92, p = 0.72) or number of patients with side effect (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.77-2.98, p = 0.22). More patients assigned PHT reached the undesirable clinical end point for safety of major side effect or seizure (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.70, p = 0.002). Seizures occurred only in patients assigned PHT (n = 6, p = 0.01). Although not significant, trends were observed for major side effect in more patients assigned PHT (p = 0.08) and mild side effect in more assigned LEV (p = 0.09).

SIGNIFICANCE

Both LEV and PHT are well-tolerated perioperatively in parenteral preparation, and in total intravenous-plus-oral prophylactic regimen. Comparative safety and differing side effect profile of intravenous LEV supports use as an alternative to intravenous PHT.

Prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy in patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection: a systematic analysis of efficacy

Object

Meningiomas are one of the more common intracranial neoplasms. The risk of seizures and secondary aspiration, brain edema, and brain injury often leads practitioners to administer prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) perioperatively. The efficacy of this practice remains controversial, however, with prior investigations reaching conflicting results and recent studies focusing on AED side effects. The authors performed a systematic analysis of outcomes following supratentorial meningioma resection with and without prophylactic AED administration in the hope of clarifying the role of AEDs in the perioperative care of patients with these lesions.

Methods

A MEDLINE search of the literature (1979–2010) was performed. Comparisons were made for patient and tumor characteristics as well as success of repair, morbidity, and seizure outcome. Statistical analyses of categorical variables were undertaken using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

Nineteen studies, involving 698 patients, were included. There were no significant differences in the extent of resection, perioperative mortality, or recurrence between the AED and no-AED cohorts. Likewise, there were no significant differences in the incidence of early or late seizures between the cohorts.

Conclusions

The results of this systematic analysis supports the conclusion that the prophylactic administration of anticonvulsants during resection of supratentorial meningiomas provides no benefit in the prevention of either early or late postoperative seizures. Despite their traditional role in this patient population, the routine use of AEDs should be carefully reconsidered.

Prophylactic antibiotics and anticonvulsants in neurosurgery

The prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent infection and the prophylactic administration of anticonvulsants to prevent first seizure episodes are common practice in neurosurgery. If prophylactic medication therapy is not indicated, the patient not only incurs the discomfort and the inconvenience resulting from drug treatment but is also unnecessarily exposed to adverse drug reactions, and incurs extra costs. The main situations in which prophylactic anticonvulsants and antibiotics are used are described and those situations we found controversial in the literature and lack further investigation are identified: anticonvulsants for preventing seizures in patients with chronic subdural hematomas, antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures in those suffering from brain tumors, antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures, and antibiotic prophylaxis for the surgical introduction of intracranial ventricular shunts.In the following we present systematic reviews of the literature in accordance with the standard protocol of The Cochrane Collaboration to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of these prophylactic medications in the situations mentioned. Our goal was to efficiently integrate valid information and provide a basis for rational decision-making.

Perioperative levetiracetam for prevention of seizures in supratentorial brain tumor surgery

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as perioperative seizure prophylaxis in supratentorial brain tumor patients were retrospectively studied. Between February 2007 and April 2009 in a single institution, 78 patients with primary or secondary supratentorial brain tumors [40 female, 38 male; mean age 57 years, from 27 to 89 years; gliomas in 42 patients (53.8%), brain metastases in 17 (21.8%), meningiomas in 16 (20.5%), 1 primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma patient, and 2 patients with radiation necrosis] received between 1,000 mg and 3,000 mg LEV perioperatively. Preoperatively, 30 patients had experienced seizures (38.5%), most commonly glioma patients (47.6%), but also meningioma patients (31.3%) or patients with brain metastases (23.5%). No more seizures occurred in patients receiving 1-3 g LEV preoperatively. Within the first week postoperatively, a single seizure occurred in two patients (2.6%). At the end of the follow-up period (mean 10.5 months, range 0-31 months), 71 of the 78 patients (91%) were seizure free and 21 (26%) patients were not taking antiepileptic drugs. We observed side-effects in five patients (6.4%), including non-tumor-associated progressive somnolence in three patients (1.5 g, 1.5 g, and 2 g LEV daily) and reactive psychosis in two patients (1 and 1.5 g LEV daily), regressing after dose reduction. Perioperative LEV in supratentorial brain tumor patients was well tolerated. Compared with the literature, it resulted in low (2.6%) [corrected] seizure frequency in the early postoperative period. Additionally, its advantage of lacking cytochrome P450 enzyme induction allowed early initiation of effective postoperative chemotherapy in malignant glioma patients.

Antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures in people with brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Seizures can present at any time before or after diagnosis of a brain tumor. The risk of seizures varies by tumor type and its location in the brain. For a long time we believed that preventing seizures with antiepileptic drugs (seizure prophylaxis) was effective and necessary, but the supporting evidence was little and mixed. Such evidence was the basis for previous reviews to conclude that seizure prophylaxis was ineffective in people with brain tumors.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effectiveness of seizure prophylaxis in people with brain tumors, and to estimate the adverse event rates in the identified clinical trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search strategy that included free-text and MeSH terms in LILACS, EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, and The Cochrane Library (1966 to 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Controlled clinical trials with random allocation, blinded or unblinded, and placebo or observation in the control groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We screened the articles, extracted the data, and rated the validity of each trial to assess the risk of bias. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of a first seizure. The secondary outcome was adverse events. We pooled the aggregate data for each outcome into a random-effects model meta-analysis using the relative risk (RR). For adverse events, we also included the number needed to harm (NNH) using the absolute risk increase to compute the NNH.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no difference between the treatment interventions and the control groups in preventing a first seizure in participants with brain tumors. The risk of an adverse event was higher for those on antiepileptic drugs than for participants not on antiepileptic drugs (NNH 3; RR 6.10, 95% CI 1.10 to 34.63; P = 0.046).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence is neutral, neither for nor against seizure prophylaxis, in people with brain tumors. These conclusions apply only for the antiepileptic drugs phenytoin, phenobarbital, and divalproex sodium. The decision to start an antiepileptic drug for seizure prophylaxis is ultimately guided by assessment of individual risk factors and careful discussion with patients.

Supportive management of patients with brain tumors

Management issues for patients with brain tumors include peritumoral edema, symptomatic seizures, venous thromboembolism, headache, pain, fatigue and neuropsychological complaints. Vasogenic edema is typically ameliorated with the lowest dose possible of corticosteroid. Seizures are managed with attention to additional or complicated side effects of antiepileptic drugs and their interactions with chemotherapy, and primary prevention with antiepileptic medications is not recommended. Appropriate treatments for headache, pain, fatigue and neuropsychological complaints are important, but are not yet well standardized. Above all, patients' personal goals regarding their priorities at the end of life have the most importance.

THREE-DAY PHENYTOIN PROPHYLAXIS IS ADEQUATE AFTER SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE

OBJECTIVE

Phenytoin (PHT) is widely administered after subarachnoid hemorrhage, often for several weeks or months. In addition to known side effects, PHT use has been correlated with cognitive disability and poor outcome. To reduce the rate of PHT complications, we converted from a multi-week prophylactic regimen to a 3-day course of treatment. This study evaluates the changes in seizure rates and adverse events.

METHODS

From July 1998 to June 2002, 453 patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage were treated. In the first 9 months, 79 patients were administered PHT until discharged from the hospital, unless a drug reaction occurred first. In the last 39 months, PHT was discontinued 3 days after admission (370 patients), unless there was a history of epilepsy (four patients). This study represents a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, with follow-up periods of 3 to 12 months after discharge.

RESULTS

The 3-day PHT regimen produced a statistically significant reduction (P= 0.002) in the rate of PHT complications. In the first period, seven (8.8%) out of 79 patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction, compared with two (0.5%) out of 370 patients in the second period. The percentage of patients having seizures, both short- and long-term, did not change significantly. In the first period, the seizure rate during hospitalization was 1.3%; in the second period, it was 1.9% (P= 0.603). At an average follow-up period of 6.7 months, three (5.7%) out of 53 survivors in the first period experienced a seizure (including those who had a seizure during hospitalization). In the second period, 12 (4.6%) out of 261 survivors experienced a seizure at an average follow-up period of 5.4 months (P= 0.573).

CONCLUSION

A 3-day regimen of PHT prophylaxis is adequate to prevent seizures in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Drug reactions are significantly reduced, but seizure rates do not change. Short-term PHT administration may be a superior treatment paradigm.

Prevention of early postoperative seizures in patients with primary brain tumors: preliminary experience with oxcarbazepine

Early postoperative seizures are defined as those that appear within the first week after surgery and are a well-known and feared complication in patients with supratentorial brain tumors. Few studies have investigated the value of pharmacological prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative seizures in these patients and their outcome has not been consistent. Furthermore, the efficacy of the new generation of antiepileptic agents in the prophylaxis of perioperative seizures has not been assessed so far. We analyzed the data related to 150 patients harboring supratentorial brain gliomas with the aim to assess the efficacy of oxcarbazepine in preventing the occurrence or the recurrence of early postoperative seizures and its tolerability when it is rapidly titrated. Only four patients (2.7%) experienced seizures within the first week after surgery. Patients did not report disturbances during the titration phase. Regarding adverse events in the first week, six patients (4%) showed minor skin rash. Persistent symptomatic hyponatremia never occurred. Our data showed that oxcarbazepine can be a good alternative to traditional antiepileptic agents in the prevention of perioperative seizures being efficacy, ease of use (rapid titration in 3 days, not requiring close plasma concentration monitoring) and good tolerability (no major side effects during titration and during the first postoperative week) the key factors. Moreover, oxcarbazepine can be a valid choice when long-term therapy is required because of the low interaction with other drugs and the low hematological side effects.

Pharmacological characterization of antiepileptic drugs and experimental analgesics on low magnesium-induced hyperexcitability in rat hippocampal slices

Perfusion of acute hippocampal slices with stimulatory buffers has long been known to induce rhythmic, large amplitude, synchronized spontaneous neuronal bursting in areas CA1 and CA3. The characteristics of this model of neuronal hyperexcitability were investigated in this study, particularly with respect to the activity of antiepileptic drugs and compounds representing novel mechanisms of analgesic action. Toward that end, low Mg(2+)/high K(+)-induced spontaneous activity was quantified by a virtual instrument designed for the digitization and analysis of bursting activity. Uninterrupted streams of extracellular field potentials were digitized and analyzed in 10-s sweeps, yielding four quantified parameters of neuronal hyperexcitability. Following characterization of the temporal stability of low Mg(2+)/high K(+)-induced hyperexcitability, compounds representing a diversity of functional mechanisms were tested for their effectiveness in reversing this activity. Of the four antiepileptic drugs tested in this model, only phenytoin proved ineffective, while valproate, gabapentin and carbamazepine varied in their potencies, with only the latter drug proving to be completely efficacious. In addition, three investigational compounds having analgesic potential were examined: ZD-7288, a blocker of HCN channels; EAA-090, an NMDA antagonist; and WAY-132983, a muscarinic agonist. Each of these compounds showed strong efficacy by completely blocking spontaneous bursting activity, along with potency greater than that of the antiepileptic drugs. These data indicate that pharmacological agents with varying mechanisms of action are able to block low Mg(2+)/high K(+)-induced hyperexcitability, and thus this model may represent a useful tool for identifying novel agents and mechanisms involved in epilepsy and neuropathic pain.

Measurement and prediction of subjective fatigue following traumatic brain injury

Numerous outcome studies have found fatigue to be a common problem following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study examined the magnitude, causes and impact of fatigue following TBI using three subjective fatigue scales, and investigated its relationship with demographic and injury-related factors, and mood. Forty-nine controls and 49 TBI participants (36.2% with GCS score of 13-15, 29.8% with GCS score of 9-12, and 34% with GCS score of 3-8) were seen at a mean of approximately 8 months post injury. All participants completed three subjective fatigue measures, including the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue (VAS-F) and Causes of Fatigue Questionnaire (COF). TBI participants reported a significantly greater impact of fatigue on their lifestyle on the FSS relative to controls, and reported activities requiring physical and mental effort as more frequent causes of fatigue on the COF. There were, however, no significant group differences on subscales of the VAS-F. Greater time since injury and higher education levels were associated with higher fatigue levels, independent of the effects of mood. Injury severity and age were not found to be significant predictors of subjective fatigue severity in TBI participants.

Add-on phenytoin fails to prevent early seizures after surgery for supratentorial brain tumors: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

To determine the potential effectiveness of phenytoin (PHT) in preventing early postoperative seizures in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors.

METHODS

Two hundred patients requiring elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors were randomized to two groups of equal size, with a prospective, open-label, controlled design. One group received PHT (18 mg/kg as an intravenous intraoperative load, followed by additional daily doses aimed at maintaining serum PHT concentrations within the 10- to 20-aeg/ml range) for 7 consecutive days. In the other group, PHT was not administered. More than 90% of patients in both groups continued to take preexisting anticonvulsant medication (AEDs) with carbamazepine or phenobarbital throughout the study. The primary efficacy end point was the number of patients remaining free from seizures during the 7-day period after the operation.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients allocated to PHT, 13 experienced seizures during the 7-day observation period, compared with 11 of 100 patients in the placebo group (p > 0.05). Most seizures occurred in the first day after surgery in both groups. There were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing more than one seizure, but there was a trend for generalized seizures to be more common in PHT-treated patients than in controls (11 vs. five patients, respectively). Status epilepticus occurred in one patient in the PHT group and in two patients in the control group. Of the 13 PHT-treated seizure patients, 11 had serum PHT concentrations within the target range, and only two had concentrations below range on the days their seizures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PHT, given at dosages producing serum concentrations within the target range, failed to prevent early postoperative seizures in patients treated with concomitant AEDs. Prophylactic administration of PHT cannot be recommended in these patients.

Antiepileptogenic agents: how close are we?

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition, affecting about 4% of individuals over their lifetime. Epilepsy can be idiopathic, secondary to an underlying genetic abnormality or unknown causes, or acquired. Known potential causes account for about one third of epilepsy. Control of epilepsy has primarily focused on suppressing seizure activity after epilepsy has developed. An intriguing possibility is to control acquired epilepsy by preventing epileptogenesis, the process by which the brain becomes epileptic. Many laboratory models simulate human epilepsy as well as provide a system for studying epileptogenesis. The kindling model involves repeated application of subconvulsive electrical stimulation to the brain, leading to spontaneous seizures. Other models include the cortical or systemic injection of various chemicals. These models suggest that many antiepileptic drugs, from phenobarbital and valproate (valproic acid) to levetiracetam and tiagabine, have antiepileptogenic potential. Some promising other possibilities include N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) antagonists as well as the neurotrophins and their receptors. Phenobarbital, phenytoin, valproate, carbamazepine and, to a very limited extent, diazepam have been evaluated in clinical trials to test whether they actually prevent epileptogenesis in humans. Results have been very disappointing. Meta-analyses of 12 different drug-condition combinations show none with significantly lower unprovoked seizure rates among those receiving the active drug. In 4 of the 12, the observed rate was actually slightly higher among treated individuals. None of the newer drugs have been evaluated in antiepileptogenesis trials. Until some drugs demonstrate a clear antiepileptogenic effect in clinical trials, the best course to reduce the incidence of epilepsy is primary prevention of the risk-increasing events--for example, wearing helmets, using seat belts, or decreasing the risk of stroke by reducing smoking.

Seizures in the adult intensive care unit

Seizures are a common occurrence in the intensive care unit (ICU). The presentation of seizures is usually as focal or generalized motor convulsions, but other seizure types may occur. Etiologies of the seizures are typically secondary either to primary neurologic pathology or a consequence of critical illness and clinical management. Particularly important as precipitants of seizures are hypoxia/ischemia, drug toxicity, and metabolic abnormalities. It is important to properly diagnose the seizure type and its cause to ensure appropriate therapy. Most seizures occur singly, and recurrence is usually prevented with initiation of anticonvulsant therapy. However, status epilepticus may develop, which requires emergent treatment before irreversible brain injury occurs. Treatment with anticonvulsants is not without untoward risks, however, and primary toxicities of these agents is reviewed. After traumatic head injury, brain surgery, or cerebrovascular accidents, many patients are at risk for seizures. Current data on the benefits of prophylactic therapy for such patients is also reviewed.

[Epileptogenic drugs in anesthesia]

Most anaesthetics and analgesics have both pro- and anticonvulsant activity. The data in the literature should be analysed with respect to the patient population, the recording of epileptic activity and the method of EEG analysis. Among inhaled anaesthetics, isoflurane has strong anticonvulsant properties. In some circumstances, sevoflurane may induce an epileptic activity. With the exception of ketamine and etomidate, all intravenous hypnotics may be used for anesthesia of the epileptic patient. Midazolam is a potent anticonvulsant. Among narcotics, fentanyl and alfentanil may induce clinical or electroencephalographic seizures. Considering the large number of patients treated with these agents without any neurological adverse effect, the clinical relevance of these data is unclear. Neuromuscular blocking agents do not possess pro- or anticonvulsant properties.