Risk of enzyme allergy in the detergent industry

Microbial-based cleaning products as a potential risk to human health: A review

Microbial-based cleaning products (MBCPs) have been introduced, on the market, as an alternative to traditional chemical cleaning. In addition to traditional detergents, MBCPs can perform their cleaning function, digesting the smallest particles of dirt and mitigating odours generated by environmental bacterium metabolic processes. Nevertheless, several aspects remain to be clarified and assessed, requiring further studies and new regulations to ensure safety. The particular composition of MBCPs makes it difficult to include these products in a specific class, making the European legal context incomplete and unclear. Moreover, MBCPs effects on human health are poorly documented. Exposure risks can be obtained indirectly by studies conducted in both microorganisms exposure and their metabolic products, such as enzymes, especially in workers. A further limiting factor for the accurate human health risk assessment due to MBCPs use is an incomplete indication about the MBCPs compositions. Moreover, additional factors such as host microorganisms, frequency and space of use, subject health condition, and age can determine different illness scenarios. The findings from the broad range of studies we have reviewed in this paper confirm the necessity of integrative investigation and regulation to address the use of MBCPs.

3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)- benzoic acid: a new cause of sensitiser induced occupational asthma, rhinitis and urticaria

OBJECTIVES

3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-benzoic acid (BCMBA) has not previously been identified as a respiratory sensitiser. We detected two cases who presented respiratory and urticaria symptoms related to BCMBA and had positive skin prick tests to the agent. Subsequently, we conducted outbreak investigations at the BCMBA-producing factory and performed clinical examinations to confirm occupational diseases.

METHODS

The outbreak investigations included observations of work processes, assessment of exposure, a medical survey with a questionnaire and skin prick tests with 0.5% BCMBA water solution on 85 exposed workers and 9 unexposed workers. We used specific inhalation or nasal challenge and open skin application test to investigate BCMBA-related occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria.

RESULTS

We identified nine workers with respiratory and/or skin symptoms and positive skin prick tests to BCMBA in a chemical factory. A survey among chemical factory workers indicated a BCMBA-related sensitisation rate of 8% among all exposed workers; the rate was highest (25%) among production workers in the production hall. Sensitisation was detected only in workers with the estimated highest exposure levels. Six cases of occupational asthma, rhinitis and/or contact urticaria caused by BCMBA were confirmed with challenge tests. Asthma-provoking doses in specific inhalation challenges were very low (0.03% or 0.3% BCMBA in lactose).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a new low molecular weight agent causing occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria. A typical clinical picture of allergic diseases and positive skin prick tests suggest underlying IgE-mediated disease mechanisms. Stringent exposure control measures are needed in order to prevent BCMBA-related diseases.

Managing the Risk of Occupational Allergy in the Enzyme Detergent Industry

Enzyme proteins have potential to cause occupational allergy/asthma. Consequently, as users of enzymes in formulated products, detergents manufacturers have implemented a number of control measures to ensure that the hazard does not translate into health effects in the workforce. To that end, trade associations have developed best practice guidelines which emphasize occupational hygiene and medical monitoring as part of an effective risk management strategy. The need for businesses to recognize the utility of this guidance is reinforced by reports where factories which have failed to follow good industrial hygiene practices have given rise to incidences of occupational allergy. In this article, an overview is provided of how the industry guidelines are actually implemented in practice and what experience is to be derived therefrom. Both medical surveillance and air monitoring practices associated with the implementation of industry guidelines at approximately 100 manufacturing facilities are examined. The data show that by using the approaches described for the limitation of exposure, for the provision of good occupational hygiene and for the active monitoring of health, the respiratory allergenic risk associated with enzyme proteins can be successfully managed. This therefore represents an approach that could be recommended to other industries contemplating working with enzymes.

Allergic asthma caused by exposure to bacterial alpha-amylase Termamyl®

BACKGROUND

Airborne enzymes behave as potent respiratory allergens. Till date, allergic disorders caused by genetically engineered enzymes widely used in the industry, have not been reported.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We describe a worker employed in the detergent industry who developed asthma and rhinitis from IgE-mediated sensitization to the thermostable endo-alpha-amylase Termamyl® and to the protease Savinase®. This is the first report showing that Termamyl® elicits allergic respiratory disorders in humans.

Experiences from occupational exposure limits set on aerosols containing allergenic proteins

Occupational exposure limits (OELs) together with determined airborne exposures are used in risk assessment based managements of occupational exposures to prevent occupational diseases. In most countries, OELs have only been set for few protein-containing aerosols causing IgE-mediated allergies. They comprise aerosols of flour dust, grain dust, wood dust, natural rubber latex, and the subtilisins, which are proteolytic enzymes. These aerosols show dose-dependent effects and levels have been established, where nearly all workers may be exposed without adverse health effects, which are required for setting OELs. Our aim is to analyse prerequisites for setting OELs for the allergenic protein-containing aerosols. Opposite to the key effect of toxicological reactions, two thresholds, one for the sensitization phase and one for elicitation of IgE-mediated symptoms in sensitized individuals, are used in the OEL settings. For example, this was the case for flour dust, where OELs were based on dust levels due to linearity between flour dust and its allergen levels. The critical effects for flour and grain dust OELs were different, which indicates that conclusion by analogy (read-across) must be scientifically well founded. Except for subtilisins, no OEL have been set for other industrial enzymes, where many of which are high volume chemicals. For several of these, OELs have been proposed in the scientific literature during the last two decades. It is apparent that the scientific methodology is available for setting OELs for proteins and protein-containing aerosols where the critical effect is IgE sensitization and IgE-mediated airway diseases.

Enzymes in cleaning products: an overview of toxicological properties and risk assessment/management

Enzymes used in cleaning products have an excellent safety profile, with little ability to cause adverse responses in humans. For acute toxicity, genotoxicity, sub-acute and repeated dose toxicity, enzymes are unremarkable. Reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity are also not endpoints of concern. Exceptions are the ability of some proteases to produce irritating effects at high concentrations and more importantly, the intrinsic potential of these bacterial/fungal proteins to act as respiratory sensitizers. It is a reasonable assumption that the majority of enzyme proteins possess this hazard. However, methods for characterising the respiratory sensitisation hazard of enzymes are lacking and the information required for risk assessment and risk management, although sufficient, remains limited. Previously, most data was generated in animal models and in in vitro immunoassays that assess immunological cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, by the establishment of strict limits on airborne exposure (based on a defined minimal effect limit of 60ng active enzyme protein/m(3)) and air and health monitoring, occupational safety can be assured. Similarly, by ensuring that airborne exposure is kept similarly low, coupled with knowledge of the fate of these enzymes on skin and fabrics, it has proven possible to establish a long history of safe consumer use of enzyme containing products.

Relevance of sensitization to occupational allergy and asthma in the detergent industry

There exists considerable historic experience of the relationship between exposure and both the induction of sensitization and the elicitation of respiratory symptoms from industrial enzymes of bacterial and fungal origin used in a wide variety of detergent products. The detergent industry in particular has substantial experience of how the control of exposure leads to limitation of sensitization with low risk of symptoms. However, the experience also shows that there are substantial gaps in knowledge, even when the potential occupational allergy problem is firmly under control, and also that the relationship between exposure and sensitization can be hard to establish. The latter aspect includes a poor appreciation of how peak exposures and low levels of exposure over time contribute to sensitization. Furthermore, while a minority of workers develop specific IgE, essentially none appear to have symptoms, a situation which appears to contradict the allergy dogma that, once sensitized, an individual will react to much lower levels of exposure. For enzymes, the expression of symptoms occurs at similar or higher levels than those that cause induction. In spite of some knowledge gaps, medical surveillance programs and constant air monitoring provide the tools for successful management of enzymes in the occupational setting. Ultimately, the knowledge gained from the occupational setting facilitates the completion of safety assessments for consumer exposure to detergent enzymes. Such assessments have been proven to be correct by the decades of safe use both occupationally and in consumer products.

Defining occupational and consumer exposure limits for enzyme protein respiratory allergens under REACH

A wide range of substances have been recognized as sensitizing, either to the skin and/or to the respiratory tract. Many of these are useful materials, so to ensure that they can be used safely it is necessary to characterize the hazards and establish appropriate exposure limits. Under new EU legislation (REACH), there is a requirement to define a derived no effect level (DNEL). Where a DNEL cannot be established, e.g. for sensitizing substances, then a derived minimal effect level (DMEL) is recommended. For the bacterial and fungal enzymes which are well recognized respiratory sensitizers and have widespread use industrially as well as in a range of consumer products, a DMEL can be established by thorough retrospective review of occupational and consumer experience. In particular, setting the validated employee medical surveillance data against exposure records generated over an extended period of time is vital in informing the occupational DMEL. This experience shows that a long established limit of 60 ng/m(3) for pure enzyme protein has been a successful starting point for the definition of occupational health limits for sensitization in the detergent industry. Application to this of adjustment factors has limited sensitization induction, avoided any meaningful risk of the elicitation of symptoms with known enzymes and provided an appropriate level of security for new enzymes whose potency has not been fully characterized. For example, in the detergent industry, this has led to general use of occupational exposure limits 3-10 times lower than the 60 ng/m(3) starting point. In contrast, consumer exposure limits vary because the types of exposure themselves cover a wide range. The highest levels shown to be safe in use, 15 ng/m(3), are associated with laundry trigger sprays, but very much lower levels (e.g. 0.01 ng/m(3)) are commonly associated with other types of safe exposure. Consumer limits typically will lie between these values and depend on the actual exposure associated with product use.

[Occupational rhinitis]

INTRODUCTION

Rhinitis is one of the most common occupational diseases. It is often neglected by those affected because it causes little disability. It is poorly understood by doctors who have insufficient experience of occupational diseases and their causes. However it is often the first manifestation of a respiratory disorder that may cause physical complications and socio-economic disability.

BACKGROUND

Numerous diverse agents are potential causes of rhinitis. The diagnosis of occupational rhinitis should be considered when sneezing, rhinorrhoea or nasal obstruction are associated with work. The causal agent can be identified by ta-king a careful history. When the mechanism of the disease is immunologic the suspected antigen can be confirmed by skin testing, specific IgE or nasal provocation. The respiratory disorder of which rhinitis is the first manifestation may progress to asthma if the exposure continues. The prevention of occupational rhinitis depends on the reduction of exposure to allergens and/or irritants. When it has developed removal of the causative agent is essential to prevent progression to asthma.

Sensitization to Empynase(pronase B) in exposed hospital personnel and identification of the Empynase allergen

BACKGROUND

Empynase is a proteolytic enzyme that is widely used as an anti-inflammatory drug in Korea. We evaluated the prevalence of sensitization to Empynase in association with respiratory allergy symptoms in exposed hospital personnel, and identified the IgE-binding components in the Empynase extract, using sera with high levels of specific IgE antibodies.

METHODS

A total of 154 hospital personnel (135 nurses and 19 pharmacists) who worked in a university hospital and 123 unexposed healthy control subjects were enrolled. A questionnaire was administered that addressed demographics, job category, history of atopic diseases, diverse symptoms including nasal and lower respiratory symptoms, and the association of symptoms with work. Skin prick tests (SPTs) to common aeroallergens and Empynase extract were performed. Empynase-specific IgE antibody was detected by ELISA, and ELISA inhibition tests were conducted. IgE-binding components were identified by SDS-PAGE and IgE immunoblotting.

RESULTS

Forty-two subjects (27.3%) complained of work-related respiratory symptoms (WRRS). Five nurses (3.7%) and one pharmacist (5.3%) had work-related asthma symptoms, and 34 nurses (25.2%) and six pharmacists (31.6%) had work-related rhinitis symptoms. The prevalence of sensitization to Empynase on SPTs was 20.1%, and tended to be higher in pharmacists (31.6%) than in nurses (18.5%). It was estimated that 3.9-8.4% of hospital personnel had WRRS attributable to Empynase. The duration of exposure was longer in positive SPT responders than in negative responders (51.9+/-27.5 vs. 39.2+/-27.3 months, respectively; P<0.05), and the prevalence of Empynase-positive SPTs was significantly higher in subjects with asthma than in those without asthma (57.1% vs. 18.4%, respectively; P<0.05). The levels of Empynase-specific IgE antibodies were significantly higher in pharmacists (76.1+/-83.4 OD units) and nurses (56.3+/-103.0 OD units) than in normal controls (39.8+/-12.7 OD units; P<0.05). Seven subjects (two pharmacists and five nurses) had high serum levels of Empynase-specific IgE antibodies; six of these subjects had WRRS. ELISA inhibition tests were performed with the sera of these six subjects, revealing significant inhibition only with the addition of Empynase. Four strongly staining protein bands (sizes: 36, 33, 16, and 10 kDa) from Empynase extract were observed to bind to the IgE antibodies of sensitized subjects. Conclusion Exposure to Empynase powder may cause rhinitis and asthma in hospital personnel, and the pathogenic mechanism appears to be IgE mediated.

HLA-DQ8 is a predisposing molecule for detergent enzyme subtilisin BPN'-induced hypersensitivity

Several million individuals are exposed to agents in the workplace associated with atopy and asthma. Detergent enzymes have been implicated in occupationally induced hypersensitivity. However, the genetic susceptibility and T cell responses to detergent enzymes are undefined. We generated and used HLA-DQ6, -DQ8, -DR2, -DR3, and -DR4 transgenic mice to examine the immune and inflammatory components involved in the response to the detergent enzyme subtilisin BPN'. Based on in vitro and in vivo studies, for the first time, we present evidence that DQ8 is a strong susceptibility marker for BPN'-induced hypersensitivity. Only DQ8 mice showed consistent T cell responses to five immunodominant regions of BPN' comprising peptides #14 to 16, 36-37, 42-43, 62-63, and 80-81. The DQ8 mice also developed allergic eosinophilic inflammatory reactions in the airways following intranasal instillations of this enzyme. The DQ8 mice also responded to BPN' with a significant IgG1 and IgE production. We propose that the HLA Class II tg mice are useful for understanding allergenic responses to enzymes in humans, screening of allergenic and immunogenic properties of detergent enzymes, and for the development of modified enzymes to maintain efficient detergent qualities without allergic properties.

Prevalence and risk factors of work related asthma by industry among United States workers: data from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (1988-94)

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of work related asthma and work related wheezing in United States workers. To identify high risk industries that could be targeted for future intervention. To determine the population attributable risk of work related asthma and work related wheezing.

METHODS

The third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-1994 (NHANES III) was analyzed to determine the prevalence of work related asthma and wheezing and to identify initially defined industries at risk among United States workers aged 20 and older. Separate logistic models were developed with work related asthma and work related wheezing as outcomes. Work related asthma was defined as affirmative response to questions on self reported physician diagnosed asthma and work related symptoms of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma. Work related wheezing was defined as affirmative response to questions on self reported wheezing or whistling in the chest in the previous 12 months and work related symptoms of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and atopy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of work related asthma was 3.70% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.88 to 4.52) and the prevalence of work related wheezing was 11.46% (95% CI 9.87 to 13.05). The main industries identified at risk of work related asthma and wheeze included the entertainment industry; agriculture, forestry, and fishing; construction; electrical machinery; repair services; and lodging places. The population attributable risk for work related asthma was 36.5% and work related wheezing was 28.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide impetus for further research and actions by public health professionals which prioritise occupational asthma on the public health agenda. Future intervention strategies need to be developed for effective control and prevention of asthma in the workplace.

Skin as a route of exposure to protein allergens

Protein contact with skin is associated with a number of clinical conditions, including protein contact dermatitis and immunologic contact urticaria. This article reviews the clinical and other selected evidence that proteinaceous materials penetrate skin. It is concluded that whilst penetration of intact proteins through normal skin is extremely low and without consequence, any damage to the skin barrier may allow penetration. As a result, risk assessment for contact of protein with skin must take into account potential barrier impairment and thus the possibility of both the induction and the elicitation of allergic skin reactions.

Occupational asthma and allergy in the detergent industry: new developments

This review highlights the latest developments in the control of enzyme-induced occupational asthma and allergy (rhinitis and conjunctivitis) in the detergent industry. The industry has developed guidelines for the safe handling of enzymes in order to reduce the risk of occupational allergy and asthma. Those manufacturing facilities that follow all of the guidelines enjoy very low or no cases of asthma and allergy among workers exposed to enzymes. The key to the success of the management of enzyme-induced allergy and asthma is prospective surveillance for the development of enzyme-specific IgE antibody before the onset of allergic symptoms. This allows for continuing interventions to reduce exposures, so as to minimize or eliminate those associated with symptoms. Workers with IgE to enzymes can still continue to work in the industry symptom-free for their entire career. This indicates that exposures needed to induce sensitization are different and probably lower than exposures needed to elicit enzyme allergic symptoms. The experience of the detergent enzyme industry in controlling occupational allergens can be applied to other industries. The detergent enzyme story can be viewed as a model for the control of type 1 protein allergens in the workplace.

Occupational allergens

Occupational agents are important in a significant number of respiratory diseases. More than 250 occupational substances have been reported to cause occupational asthma. Occupational allergens are the subset of agents causing occupational diseases through an IgE-mediated mechanism. These allergens may be classified as being of either high or low molecular weight. The more common occupational allergens and the industries at increased risk of exposing workers to these agents are discussed.

Sensitisation to enzymes in the animal feed industry

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of enzyme sensitisation in the animal feed industry.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was conducted in four animal feed factories, where several enzymes had been used in powder form for 7-9 years. Before this study, enzymes in liquid form had started to be used. Sensitisation to enzymes was examined by skin prick and radioallergosorbent (RAST) tests. Altogether 218 workers were tested; 140 people in various tasks in manufacturing, where exposure to various organic dusts and to enzymes was possible, and 78 non-exposed office workers. The workers were interviewed for work related respiratory and skin symptoms. Total dust concentrations were measured by a gravimetric method. The concentrations of protease and alpha-amylase were measured with catalytic methods and that of xylanase with an immunological method.

RESULTS

Ten workers (7%) were sensitised to enzymes in the exposed group of 140, whereas none were sensitised in the non-exposed group. Six of the sensitised people had respiratory symptoms at work: two of them especially in connection with exposure to enzymes. Enzyme concentrations in the air varied greatly: xylanase from less than 0.8 ng/m(3) up to 16 ng/m(3), alpha-amylase from less than 20 ng/m(3) up to 200 ng/m(3), and protease from less than 0.4 ng/m(3)up to 2900 ng/m(3). On average, highest xylanase and alpha-amylase concentrations were found in the various manufacturing sites, whereas the highest protease concentrations were found in areas of high total dust.

CONCLUSIONS

Industrial enzymes may cause allergies in the animal feed industry. There is a need to assess exposure to enzymes at various phases of production, and to minimise exposures.