Capsaicin-sensitive fibers are required for the anorexic action of systemic but not central bombesin

Gastrin-releasing peptide attenuates fear memory reconsolidation

BACKGROUND

Gastrin Releasing Peptide (GRP) may play a role in fear learning. The GRP Receptor is expressed in the basolateral amygdala and hippocampus, and central administration of GRP mediates fear learning. The effects of GRP on reconsolidation, however, have been minimally explored. Reconsolidation, the process by which formed memories are rendered labile following recall, provides a window of opportunity for pharmacological intervention. Although evidence suggests the window of opportunity to alter reactivated consolidation memory can be as long as 6 h, shorter intervals have not been extensively investigated.

METHOD

Male Sprague-Dawley rats received six 1.0 mA continuous footshocks. 24 h later, were re-exposed to the context (shock chamber). Immediately following memory retrieval rats received i.p. injection of GRP (10 nmol/kg), Flumazenil (1 mg/kg), GRP + Flumazenil (10 nmol/kg GRP with 1 mg/kg Flumazenil), or Vehicle. Other groups received GRP or Vehicle at 0, 10, 30, or 60 min post-reactivation. 24 h and 5 days later rats were assessed for fear expression upon re-exposure to the fearful stimulus.

RESULTS

GRP significantly attenuated the reconsolidation of learned fear when administered immediately (but not 10 min or longer) following recall. Some of the variability in the impact of treatments aimed at disrupting fear memories may be governed, in part, by the time-frame of the reconsolidation window. Our results indicate that the effect of immediate administration persisted for at least 5 days. Co-administration of benzodiazepine-receptor antagonist Flumazenil blocked this effect, suggesting the effect is mediated via a GABAergic mechanism.

Peripheral injection of bombesin induces c-Fos in NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons

As anorexigenic hormones bombesin and nucleobindin2 (NUCB2)/nesfatin-1 decrease food intake in rodents. Both hormones have been described in brain nuclei that play a role in the modulation of hunger and satiety, like the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). However, the direct interaction of the two hormones is unknown so far. The aim of study was to elucidate whether bombesin directly interacts with NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons in the PVN and NTS. Therefore, we injected bombesin intraperitoneally (ip) at two doses (26 and 32nmol/kg body weight) and assessed c-Fos activation in the PVN, arcuate nucleus (ARC) and NTS compared to vehicle treated rats (0.15M NaCl). We also performed co-localization studies with oxytocin or tyrosine hydroxylase. Bombesin at both doses increased the number of c-Fos positive neurons in the PVN (p<0.05) and NTS (p<0.05) compared to vehicle, while in the ARC no modulation was observed (p>0.05). In the PVN and NTS the number of c-Fos positive neurons colocalized with NUCB2/nesfatin-1 increased after bombesin injection compared to vehicle treatment (p<0.05). Moreover, an increase of activated NUCB2/nesfatin-1 immunoreactive neurons that co-expressed oxytocin in the PVN (p<0.05) or tyrosine hydroxylase in the NTS (p<0.05) was observed compared to vehicle. Our results show that peripherally injected bombesin activates NUCB2/nesfatin-1 neurons in the PVN and NTS giving rise to a possible interaction between bombesin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1 in the modulation of food intake.

Capsaicin treatment differentially affects feeding suppression by bombesin-like peptides

Peripheral administration of bombesin (BN) and the related mammalian peptides, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and neuromedin B (NMB), suppress food intake in rats. To examine whether all BN-like peptides utilize the same neural pathways to reduce feeding, rats were treated on postnatal day 2 with the injection vehicle or capsaicin, a neurotoxin that damages a subset of visceral afferent fibers. When rats reached adulthood, we compared the ability of a dose range of systemically administered BN, GRP18-27 and NMB to reduce intake of a 0.5 kcal/ml glucose solution in a short-term feeding test. Our results demonstrate that capsaicin treatment abolished or attenuated the suppression of glucose intake produced by BN and NMB but had no effect on the ability of GRP to reduce feeding. These results suggest that different neural substrates underlie the anorexic effects of peripherally administered BN-like peptides.

Bombesin, but not amylin, blocks the orexigenic effect of peripheral ghrelin

The interaction between ghrelin and bombesin or amylin administered intraperitoneally on food intake and brain neuronal activity was assessed by Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in nonfasted rats. Ghrelin (13 microg/kg ip) increased food intake compared with the vehicle group when measured at 30 min (g/kg: 3.66 +/- 0.80 vs. 1.68 +/- 0.42, P < 0.0087). Bombesin (8 microg/kg) injected intraperitoneally with ghrelin (13 microg/kg) blocked the orexigenic effect of ghrelin (1.18 +/- 0.41 g/kg, P < 0.0002). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 microg/kg ip) exerted a dose-related nonsignificant reduction of food intake (g/kg: 1.08 +/- 0.44, P > 0.45 and 0.55 +/- 0.34, P > 0.16, respectively). By contrast, ghrelin-induced stimulation of food intake (g/kg: 3.96 +/- 0.56 g/kg vs. vehicle 0.82 +/- 0.59, P < 0.004) was not altered by amylin (1 and 5 microg/kg ip) (g/kg: 4.37 +/- 1.12, P > 0.69, and 3.01 +/- 0.78, respectively, P > 0.37). Ghrelin increased the number of FLI-positive neurons/section in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) compared with vehicle (median: 42 vs. 19, P < 0.008). Bombesin alone (4 and 8 microg/kg ip) did not induce FLI neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and coadministered with ghrelin did not alter ghrelin-induced FLI in the ARC. However, bombesin (8 microg/kg) with ghrelin significantly increased neuronal activity in the PVN approximately threefold compared with vehicle and approximately 1.5-fold compared with the ghrelin group. Bombesin (8 microg/kg) with ghrelin injected intraperitoneally induced Fos expression in 22.4 +/- 0.8% of CRF-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN. These results suggest that peripheral bombesin, unlike amylin, inhibits peripheral ghrelin induced food intake and enhances activation of CRF neurons in the PVN.

Bombesin-like peptides and associated receptors within the brain: distribution and behavioral implications

As we commemorate the 25th anniversary of the journal Peptides, it is timely to review the functional significance of the bombesin (BB)-like peptides and receptors in the CNS. Over two decades ago we published an article in the journal Peptides demonstrating that BB-like peptides are present in high densities in certain rat brain regions (such as the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus). Subsequently, one of the mammalian forms of BB, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) containing cell bodies were found in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus and nucleus of the solitary tract of the hindbrain. Another related peptide, namely neuromedin (NM)B, was detected in the olfactory bulb and dentate gyrus. BB and GRP bind with high affinity to BB(2) receptors, whereas NMB binds with high affinity to BB(1) receptors. The actions of BB or GRP are blocked by BB(2) receptor antagonists such as (Psi(13,14)-Leu(14))BB whereas PD168368 is a BB(1) receptor antagonist. Exogenous administration of BB into the rat brain causes hypothermia, hyperglycemia, grooming and satiety. BB-like peptides activate the sympathetic nervous system and appear to modulate stress, fear and anxiety responses. GRP and NMB modulate distinct biological processes through discrete brain regions or circuits, and globally these peptidergic systems may serve in an integrative or homeostatic function.

Effects of perivagal administration of capsaicin on post-surgical food intake

The vagus nerve has been related to the short-term control of food intake. This involvement has previously been explored by examining the food intake of animals after recovery from a vagotomy or immediately after the intervention, among other methods. In the present work, a study was conducted on the impact of the perivagal application of capsaicin (a specific neurotoxic treatment that destroys most of the vagal afferent pathways) on the intake of water and solid (experiment 1) or liquid (experiment 2) food presented after the surgery The results of experiment 1 showed that lesioned animals consume significantly larger amounts of food and water compared with controls at 6, 12, and 24 h (but not at 48 or 72 h) after the surgical intervention. Likewise, experiment 2 revealed a greater intake of liquid food by capsaicin-treated animals at the first post-surgical sessions. These data are discussed in terms of the role played by vagal afferent fibers in the control of short-term food intake.