Common drive to the upper airway muscle genioglossus during inspiratory loading

Mechanisms underlying the prolonged activation of the genioglossus following arousal from sleep

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Transient arousal from sleep has been shown to elicit a prolonged increase in genioglossus muscle activity that persists following the return to sleep and which may protect against subsequent airway collapse. We hypothesized that this increased genioglossal activity following return to sleep after an arousal is due to persistent firing of inspiratory-modulated motor units (MUs) that are recruited during the arousal.

METHODS

Thirty-four healthy participants were studied overnight while wearing a nasal mask with pneumotachograph to measure ventilation and with 4 intramuscular genioglossus EMG electrodes. During stable N2 and N3 sleep, auditory tones were played to induce brief (3-15s) AASM arousals. Ventilation and genioglossus MUs were quantified before the tone, during the arousal and for 10 breaths after the return to sleep.

RESULTS

A total of 1089 auditory tones were played and gave rise to 239 MUs recorded across arousal and the return to sleep in 20 participants (aged 23 ± 4.2 years and BMI 22.5 ± 2.2 kg/m2). Ventilation was elevated above baseline during arousal and the first post-arousal breath (p < .001). Genioglossal activity was elevated for five breaths following the return to sleep, due to increased firing rate and recruitment of inspiratory modulated MUs, as well as a small increase in tonic MU firing frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

The sustained increase in genioglossal activity that occurs on return to sleep after arousal is primarily a result of persistent activity of inspiratory-modulated MUs, with a slight contribution from tonic units. Harnessing genioglossal activation following arousal may potentially be useful for preventing obstructive respiratory events.

The influence of alcohol on genioglossus single motor units in men and women during wakefulness

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? How does alcohol intake, which worsens obstructive sleep apnoea, alter motor control of the genioglossus muscle, an upper airway dilator, in healthy awake human volunteers, and does alcohol alter genioglossus muscle afterdischarge? What is the main finding and its importance? Alcohol consumption had a very minor effect on the activity of the genioglossus in healthy young individuals studied during wakefulness and did not alter afterdischarge, leaving open the possibility that alcohol worsens obstructive sleep apnoea via other mechanisms.

ABSTRACT

Alcohol worsens obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This effect is thought to be due to alcohol's depressant effect on upper airway dilator muscles such as the genioglossus, but how alcohol reduces genioglossal activity is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alcohol consumption on genioglossus muscle single motor units (MUs). Sixteen healthy individuals were studied on two occasions (alcohol: breath alcohol concentration ∼0.07% and placebo). They were instrumented with a nasal mask, four intramuscular genioglossal EMG electrodes, and an ear oximeter. They were exposed to 8-12 hypoxia trials (45-60 s of 10% O2 followed by one breath of 100% O2 ) while awake. MUs were sorted according to their firing patterns and quantified during baseline, hypoxia and recovery. For the alcohol and placebo conditions, global muscle activity (mean ± SD peak inspiratory EMG = 119.3 ± 44.1 and 126.5 ± 51.9 μV, respectively, P = 0.53) and total number of MUs recorded at baseline (68 and 67, respectively) were similar. Likewise, the peak discharge frequency did not differ between conditions (21.2 ± 4.28 vs. 22.4 ± 4.08 Hz, P = 0.09). There was no difference between conditions in the number (101 vs. 88, respectively) and distribution of MU classes during hypoxia, and afterdischarge duration was also similar. In this study, alcohol had a very minor effect on genioglossal activity and afterdischarge in these otherwise healthy young individuals studied while awake. If similar effects are observed during sleep, it would suggest that the worsening of OSA following alcohol may be related to increased upper airway resistance/nasal congestion or arousal threshold changes.

Effect of Test Interface on Respiratory Muscle Activity and Pulmonary Function During Respiratory Testing in Healthy Adults

Purpose

The mouthpiece is the standard interface for spirometry tests. Although the use of a mouthpiece can be challenging for patients with orofacial weakness, maintaining a proper seal with a facemask can be an issue for healthy individuals during forceful efforts. We compared respiratory muscle activity and tests using a mouthpiece and facemask in healthy adults to investigate whether they can be used interchangeably.

Methods

In this observational study, subjects (n=12) completed forced vital capacity, maximal respiratory pressure, and peak cough flow with a mouthpiece and facemask. Root mean square values of the genioglossus, diaphragm, scalene, and sternocleidomastoid were compared between conditions.

Results

When switching from a mouthpiece to a facemask, significantly higher values were seen for peak cough flow (average bias= -54.36 L/min, p<0.05) and the difference seen with MEP and MIP were clinically significant (average bias: MEP=27.33, MIP=-5.2). Additionally, submental activity was significantly greater when MIP was conducted with a mouthpiece. No significant differences were seen in respiratory muscle activity during resting breathing or spirometry.

Conclusion

There are clinically significant differences with cough and MEP tests and neck muscles are activated differently based on interface. Considering the small sample size, our findings suggest a facemask may be used to complete some PFTs.

Genioglossus motor unit activity in supine and upright postures in obstructive sleep apnea

This study investigated whether a change in posture affected the activity of the upper-airway dilator muscle genioglossus in participants with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). During wakefulness, a monopolar needle electrode was used to record single motor unit activity in genioglossus in supine and upright positions to alter the gravitational load that causes narrowing of the upper airway. Activity from 472 motor units was recorded during quiet breathing in 17 males, nine of whom had OSA. The mean number of motor units for each participant was 11.8 (SD 3.4) in the upright and 16.0 (SD 4.2) in the supine posture. For respiratory-modulated motor units, there were no significant differences in discharge frequencies between healthy controls and participants with OSA. Within each breath, genioglossus activity increased through the recruitment of phasic motor units and an increase in firing rate, with an overall increase of ~6 Hz (50%) across both postures and participant groups. However, the supine posture did not lead to compensatory increases in the peak discharge frequencies of inspiratory and expiratory motor units, despite the increase in gravitational load on the upper airway. Posture also had no significant effect on the discharge frequency of motor units that showed no respiratory modulation during quiet breathing. We postulate that, in wakefulness, any increase in genioglossus activity to compensate for the gravitational effects on the upper airway is achieved primarily through the recruitment of additional motor units in both healthy controls and participants with OSA.

Analysis of the myoelectric characteristics of genioglossus in REM sleep and its improvement by CPAP treatment in OSA patients

OBJECTIVES

To reveal the characteristics of genioglossus (GG) activation in moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep compared with non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and to determine whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) could improve GG activation in OSA patients during sleep.

METHODS

All subjects underwent polysomnography (PSG) with synchronous GG electromyography (GGEMG) recording with intra-oral surface electrodes at baseline on the first night. Only those subjects diagnosed with moderate and severe OSA were included and were manually titrated with CPAP to achieve a therapeutic pressure (Pt) with GGEMG recording on the second night.

RESULTS

Nine OSA patients and six normal controls were analyzed in this study. The tonic GGEMG was higher in OSA patients during wakefulness (p = 0.003) and NREM sleep (p = 0.015), but it was not higher in REM sleep (p = 0.862). The average phasic activity of OSA patients was significantly higher in all stages, including wakefulness (p = 0.007), NREM sleep (p = 0.005), and REM sleep (p = 0.021). The peak phasic GGEMG was not different in wakefulness compared with normal controls (p = 0.240), but it was higher in OSA patients in NREM sleep (p = 0.001) and REM sleep (p = 0.021), and it was significantly reduced by using CPAP during sleep (NREM sleep: p = 0.027; REM sleep: p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that GG activation during NREM and REM sleep is associated with component differences. The tonic component of GGEMG exhibited less of a compensatory increase compared with the phasic component in REM sleep, suggesting that it may be one of the pathological mechanisms of UA collapsibility in REM sleep. In addition, treatment with CPAP can normalize GGEMG activity and mostly reduced the peak phasic GGEMG during sleep.

Muscles of Breathing: Development, Function, and Patterns of Activation

This review is a comprehensive description of all muscles that assist lung inflation or deflation in any way. The developmental origin, anatomical orientation, mechanical action, innervation, and pattern of activation are described for each respiratory muscle fulfilling this broad definition. In addition, the circumstances in which each muscle is called upon to assist ventilation are discussed. The number of "respiratory" muscles is large, and the coordination of respiratory muscles with "nonrespiratory" muscles and in nonrespiratory activities is complex-commensurate with the diversity of activities that humans pursue, including sleep (8.27). The capacity for speech and adoption of the bipedal posture in human evolution has resulted in patterns of respiratory muscle activation that differ significantly from most other animals. A disproportionate number of respiratory muscles affect the nose, mouth, pharynx, and larynx, reflecting the vital importance of coordinated muscle activity to control upper airway patency during both wakefulness and sleep. The upright posture has freed the hands from locomotor functions, but the evolutionary history and ontogeny of forelimb muscles pervades the patterns of activation and the forces generated by these muscles during breathing. The distinction between respiratory and nonrespiratory muscles is artificial, as many "nonrespiratory" muscles can augment breathing under conditions of high ventilator demand. Understanding the ontogeny, innervation, activation patterns, and functions of respiratory muscles is clinically useful, particularly in sleep medicine. Detailed explorations of how the nervous system controls the multiple muscles required for successful completion of respiratory behaviors will continue to be a fruitful area of investigation. © 2019 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 9:1025-1080, 2019.

Contribution from motor unit firing adaptations and muscle coactivation during fatigue

The control of motor unit firing behavior during fatigue is still debated in the literature. Most studies agree that the central nervous system increases the excitation to the motoneuron pool to compensate for decreased force contributions of individual motor units and sustain muscle force output during fatigue. However, some studies claim that motor units may decrease their firing rates despite increased excitation, contradicting the direct relationship between firing rates and excitation that governs the voluntary control of motor units. To investigate whether the control of motor units in fact changes with fatigue, we measured motor unit firing behavior during repeated contractions of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle while concurrently monitoring the activation of surrounding muscles, including the flexor carpi radialis, extensor carpi radialis, and pronator teres. Across all subjects, we observed an overall increase in FDI activation and motor unit firing rates by the end of the fatigue task. However, in some subjects we observed increases in FDI activation and motor unit firing rates only during the initial phase of the fatigue task, followed by subsequent decreases during the late phase of the fatigue task while the coactivation of surrounding muscles increased. These findings indicate that the strategy for sustaining force output may occasionally change, leading to increases in the relative activation of surrounding muscles while the excitation to the fatiguing muscle decreases. Importantly, irrespective of changes in the strategy for sustaining force output, the control properties regulating motor unit firing behavior remain unchanged during fatigue. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work addresses sources of debate surrounding the manner in which motor unit firing behavior is controlled during fatigue. We found that decreases in the motor unit firing rates of the fatiguing muscle may occasionally be observed when the contribution of coactive muscles increases. Despite changes in the strategy employed to sustain the force output, the underlying control properties regulating motor unit firing behavior remain unchanged during muscle fatigue.