Transdermal nitroglycerin as an adjuvant to patient-controlled morphine analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Which Interventions Are Effective in Treating Sleep Disturbances After THA or TKA? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Poor sleep quality is a common complaint after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), and it is associated with reports of higher pain and worse functional outcomes. Several interventions have been investigated with the intent to reduce the incidence of postoperative sleep disturbance with varying effectiveness. An aggregate of the best available evidence, along with an evaluation of the quality of those studies, is needed to provide valuable perspective to physicians and to direct future research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: (1) What is the reported efficacy of the most commonly studied medications and nonpharmacologic approaches, and (2) what are their side effects and reported complications?

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keywords was performed utilizing Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases from database inception to 2023, with the last search occurring October 24, 2023, to identify studies that evaluated a sleep intervention on the effect of patient-reported sleep quality after THA or TKA. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials, comparative studies, and observational studies on adult patients who underwent primary TKA or THA for osteoarthritis and who completed validated sleep questionnaires to assess sleep quality postoperatively. We excluded studies on patients younger than 18 years, patients with sleep apnea, TKA or THA because of trauma or conditions other than osteoarthritis, revision TJA, studies in languages other than English, and studies from nonindexed journals or preprint servers. Two investigators independently screened 1535 studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Ultimately, 14 studies were included in this systematic review, including 12 randomized controlled trials and 2 prospective comparative studies. A total of 2469 participants were included, with a mean ± SD age of 65 ± 7 years and 38% men in control groups and 65 ± 7 years and 39% men in intervention groups. Sleep quality questionnaires utilized included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Self-Rating Scale of Sleep, 100-mm VAS - Sleep, Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale, Likert scales, and one institutionally designed questionnaire. Quality analysis was performed utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials, where higher scores of 13 indicated a more reliable study, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies, where higher scores of 9 indicated a more reliable study and scores < 5 represented a high risk of bias. Two of the randomized controlled trials scored a 12 of 13, and the remaining 10 met every criteria of the JBI checklist. Both comparative studies scored 5 of 9 possible points of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Melatonin and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib were found to provide a clinically important benefit to sleep quality within the first postoperative week after TJA. However, rofecoxib was withdrawn from the market globally in 2004 over concerns about increased risk of cardiovascular events. Another cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, remains available. No other intervention demonstrated a clinical benefit. Side effects of melatonin include dizziness, headache, paresthesia, and nausea, and it is contraindicated in patients with liver failure, autoimmune conditions, or who are receiving warfarin. Long-term adverse effects of rofecoxib include hypertension, edema, and congestive heart failure, and it is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency or who are receiving warfarin. Melatonin is considered safe in older patients, but more caution should be taken with rofecoxib.

CONCLUSION

Owing to limited evidence in support of most of the interventions we studied, none of these interventions can be recommended for routine use after TJA. Melatonin and rofecoxib may provide a benefit to sleep quality in some patients, but physicians need to understand the adverse effects and contraindications before recommending these interventions. Additionally, rofecoxib is no longer commercially available. Future investigation is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions with minimal side effect profiles for providers to be able to make an informed decision about interventions for sleep improvement after TJA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Nitroglycerin Plus Morphine on Iv Patient Controlled Analgesia for Abdominal Surgery: The Effect on Postoperative Pain

Background

Some studies have reported the effect of nitroglycerin on the reduction of pain after surgery.

Objectives

The primary goal of the current study was to evaluate the addition of nitroglycerin (as a nitric oxide donor) to morphine in patient-controlled analgesia. Besides, its effects on the reduction of pain and stability in hemodynamic indices after abdominal surgery are also investigated.

Methods

The current study was performed on 60 patients as candidates for abdominal surgery. Morphine (0.75 mg/mL) and nitroglycerin plus morphine (morphine 0.5 mg/mL + TNG 15 μg/mL) infusions were used for control and case groups, respectively, with the same induction of anesthesia. The severity of postoperative pain, hemodynamic indices of systolic blood pressure, diastolic pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and nausea were measured after surgery (immediately, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery).

Results

The pain score decreased for both groups almost similarly. The mean systolic blood pressure was highly reduced in both groups. However, the mean diastolic blood pressure in the control group was considerably lower than that of the case group. Besides, the respiratory rate in the case group dramatically diminished and approached the normal value.

Conclusions

Combined administration of nitroglycerin and morphine had no synergistic effects on reducing postoperative pain. However, it led to more stable hemodynamic indices and improved breathing, without any side effects.

The Effect of Nitroglycerine Infusion on Postoperative Pain in Lower Limb Surgery: A Clinical Double-Blind Study

Background

Acute postoperative pain causes severe discomfort in patients accompanied by hemodynamic and metabolic instability.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nitroglycerin addition on the infusion of intravenous analgesia pump in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery.

Methods

This study was a double-blind clinical trial conducted on 75 patients with lower limb fracture. Patients were randomly assigned to receive three regimens for postoperative pain control via intravenous analgesia pump, including group A (fentanyl 10mc/kg + 10 mL distilled water), B (fentanyl 10 mc/kg + nitroglycerin 500 mc), and C (fentanyl 10 mc/kg + nitroglycerin 1000 mc). The patients at the beginning of recovery and prior to putting the pain pump at the time of 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, were assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS) to measure pain and Ramsay scale to measure sedation.

Results

The results showed that weight, height, and gender distribution were not significantly different in the three groups. The HR, MAP, and VAS mean scores showed a significant difference for intragroup and intergroup differences in the three groups at many times.

Conclusions

Low dose nitroglycerine, as an adjuvant drug, can be added to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump in patients undergoing surgery for better analgesic purposes in patients without underlining disease.

Nitrates for the prevention of cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Cardiac complications are not uncommon in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, especially in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or at high risk of CAD. Perioperative cardiac complications can lead to mortality and morbidity, as well as higher costs for patient care. Nitrates, which are among the most commonly used cardiovascular drugs, perform the function of decreasing cardiac preload while improving cardiac blood perfusion. Sometimes, nitrates are administered to patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery to reduce the incidence of cardiac complications, especially for patients with CAD. However, their effects on patients' relevant outcomes remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES

• To assess effects of nitrates as compared with other interventions or placebo in reducing cardiac risk (such as death caused by cardiac factors, angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure and cardiac arrhythmia) in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.• To identify the influence of different routes and dosages of nitrates on patient outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Chinese BioMedical Database until June 2014. We also searched relevant conference abstracts of important anaesthesiology or cardiology scientific meetings, the database of ongoing trials and Google Scholar.We reran the search in January 2016. We added three potential new studies of interest to the list of 'Studies awaiting classification' and will incorporate them into our formal review findings for the review update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nitrates versus no treatment, placebo or other pharmacological interventions in participants (15 years of age and older) undergoing non-cardiac surgery under any type of anaesthesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane. Two review authors selected trials, extracted data from included studies and assessed risk of bias. We resolved differences by discussion and, when necessary, sought help and suggestions from a third review author. We used a random-effects model for data analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (8244 participants analysed). Investigators reported 12 different comparisons of three different nitrates (nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate and nicorandil) versus no treatment, placebo or other pharmacological interventions. All participants were older than 15 years of age. More than half of the trials used general anaesthesia. Surgical procedures in most trials were at low to moderate risk for perioperative cardiac complications. Only two comparisons including three studies reported the primary outcome - all-cause mortality up to 30 days post operation. Researchers reported other morbidity outcomes and adverse events in a variable and heterogeneous way, resulting in limited available data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. We determined that the overall methodological quality of included studies was fair to low, in accordance with risk of bias in most domains.In summary, we found no difference in the primary outcome - all-cause mortality up to 30 days post operation - when nitroglycerin was compared with no treatment (one study, 60 participants, 0/30 vs 1/30; (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 7.87, very low-quality evidence based on GRADE criteria) or with placebo (two studies, 89 participants, 1/45 vs 0/44; RR 2.81, 95% CI 0.12 to 63.83, very low-quality evidence). Regarding our secondary outcomes, we noted no statistically significant differences in angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrest in any comparisons. In comparisons versus nitroglycerin, although more events of cardiac ischaemia were observed in participants receiving no treatment or placebo, we found no statistically significant differences in any comparisons, except the comparison of nicorandil versus placebo. One study revealed a potential dose-dependent protective effect of nicorandil for cardiac ischaemia.Adverse events were reported in a heterogeneous way among the comparisons. In general, more participants treated with nitrates had hypotension, tachycardia and headache, but investigators reported no statistically significant differences between groups in any comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that nitroglycerin or isosorbide dinitrate is not associated with improvement in mortality and cardiac complications among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Limited evidence suggests that nicorandil may reduce the risk of cardiac ischaemia in participants undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Additional studies are needed to consolidate the evidence.However, the data included in many of the analyses in this review are sparse - that is, adequate data are few - resulting in very low power to detect differences between nitrates and comparators. Thus, a more objective conclusion would state that available evidence is insufficient to show whether nitrates are associated with improvement in mortality and cardiac complications among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Over the past decade, no high-quality studies have focused on association of cardiac mortality and morbidity with use of nitrates during non-cardiac surgery. This review underlines the need for well-designed trials in this field.