rHuEPO hyporesponsiveness and related high dosages are associated with hyperviscosity in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Low-dose erythropoietin treatment is not associated with clinical benefits in severely anaemic Jehovah's Witnesses: a plea for a change

BACKGROUND

Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusion have high mortality. Erythropoietin (EPO) has been used as an alternative to blood transfusion. The optimal dosing of EPO in anaemic Jehovah's Witnesses is unknown. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of treatment with a low dose (<600 IU/kg/week) of epoietin beta (EPO-β).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational study, retrospectively considering a 10-year period during which 3,529 adult Jehovah's Witnesses with a total of 10,786 hospital admissions were identified from databases of four major public hospitals in New Zealand. Patients with severe symptomatic anaemia (haemoglobin <80 g/L) who were unable to tolerate physical activity were included in the study. Patients treated without EPO were assigned to the conventional therapy group and those treated with EPO to the EPO treatment group.

RESULTS

Ninety-one Jehovah's Witnesses met the eligibility criteria. Propensity score matching yielded a total of 57 patients. Patients treated with conventional therapy and those treated with EPO had similar durations of severe anaemia (average difference 6.25 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.77-16.27 days; p=0.221). The mortality rate among Jehovah's Witnesses treated with conventional therapy was 4.68 per year (95% CI: 2.23-9.82), while that in those treated with EPO was 2.77 per year (95% CI: 0.89-8.60). Treatment with EPO was associated with a mortality ratio of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.1-2.6; p=0.236). Both groups of patients had similar in-hospital survival (p=0.703).

DISCUSSION

Treatment with low-dose EPO-β was not associated with either shorter duration of severe anaemia or a reduction in mortality.

Hyperviscosity in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

The resistance of blood to flow is called plasma viscosity. Increased blood viscosity has been described in patients with coronary and peripheral arterial disease. In this study, we evaluated the influence of clinical and laboratory findings on plasma viscosity in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Eighty-one kidney transplant recipients (37.8 ± 11.3 years old, 50.38 ± 16.8 months post-transplantation period, 27 female) with normal graft functions were enrolled. The biochemical and clinical parameters in the 1st year after transplantation were retrospectively recorded, and graft function was evaluated by means of the yearly decline in eGFR. Plasma viscosity was measured and searched for the association with cross-sectionally analyzed cardiovascular parameters including body composition analyses, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data, and pulse-wave velocity.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median value of serum viscosity. Patients with high viscosity had higher serum low-density lipoprotein (P = .042) and C-reactive protein (P = .046) levels than lower viscosity group. In ABPM, daytime (P = .047) and office systolic (P = .046) blood pressure levels and left ventricular mass index (LVMI; P = .012) were significantly higher in patients with hyperviscosity. Patients with high viscosity had higher hip circumference (P = .038) and fat mass (P = .048). Estimated glomerular filtration rate decline was significantly higher in high-viscosity patients than in patients with low viscosity levels (12.9% vs 17.2%; P = .001) at 2 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the hyperviscous state of the renal transplant recipients may arise from the inflammatory state, hypertension, and increased fat mass and increased LVMI. Hyperviscosity is also closely related to renal allograft dysfunction.